• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

United States Election: Nov 6, 2012 |OT| - Barack Obama Re-elected

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jack_AG

Banned
Not sure if this is the time or place, but the last election has got me thinking about who will be running in 2016.

I've got a few candidates in mind for the Democratic Party, mostly women, so I'll just jot down a few.


Kirsten Gillibrand
I think she's off to a good start and her time in this next session of the senate will be a crucial opportunity for her to gain experience and prove her worth. From what I've seen of her on TV and in interviews, she's personable and firm in her beliefs. Potential setbacks are her youth, the fact that she'd be the first female president (not necessarily bad, I think America is ready for a woman as president), her relatively liberal stance, and her lack of experience. I'll be keeping my eye on her.

Elizabeth Warren
Wow is her star on the rise. She's got a great chance to pave the way for her candidacy. She's smart, appears to be tough on shady business, and really popular. I'm worried about her age, though she'll be 67 in 2016. Still need to see a bit more of her in action.

Julio Castro
Well, I don't think he'll be ready by 2016, but I'd like to see more of him in the future. To be honest, I'm not as familiar with potential hispanic candidates - but he's got vitality and a good smile. He's extremely popular and I can see him hitting the House or the Senate in the next few years. I think the next democratic candidate will be latino or female.

Hillary C.
Sorry guys, I don't think Hillary is going to make it to the Oval Office. She's going to be too old in 2016. I don't think she should leave government completely, but I think she missed her chance. It's too bad, she probably would have made a decent president.



Again, to be honest, I'm not very familiar with many of the Republican faces, but I'm think they'll need to go with a non-white, relatively moderate candidate. I don't think the party will put up a female candidate. We may see more center-right candidates. I'm struggling to think of someone I'd actually consider voting for. Maybe someone like Olympia Snowe or Jim Leache. Then again, I don't know what direction they're going to go.

Mike Huckabee
I'm not sure how appealing he is as a candidate, but he looks like the checklist of an ideal, hard-right republican. His pass on the 2012 bid may mean he's testing the waters for 2016. I don't think this is the direction the country should move in, but if Obama's next 4 years are a disaster, it's possible the country could shift more in this direction. His views on homosexuality and evolution are pretty big hurdles.

Gary Johnson
AN interesting mix of views, he supports same-sex marriage, separation of church / state, drug decriminalization, is pro-choice, and is against censorship and regulation of the internet. Actually, the more I read about this guy the better he looks. Hmm...

Ryan
I don't think he made a strong enough impression during this campaign to make him a viable choice in the next election. When people see his name, they're going to think "Romney"→"loss". Unfortunately, he's finished. I don't know much about him, but it really bugs me he lied about his race time. Damn, dood, just come clean!! The man can't tell the truth about how fast he ran a marathon and he wants to be Vice-President?

Hmm, I'm drawing a blank here - anyone else want to add to the list?
I'm all for Gary Johnson. Straight shooter and a Libertarian. While I am a Libertarian I would still vote for the best candidate and not my party affiliation - so if its him vs someone better - I vote better - but Gary is a good dude so he's on the up in my book.
 

KuroNeeko

Member
I think Jeb Bush will be pressured to run on the GOP side. I also get the feeling they see Marco Rubio as their next big thing. Before Sandy, I would of guaranteed Chris Christie would run, but they seem to hate his guts now.

I think that's a pretty good call with Marco Rubio. He'll appeal to Latinos, especially south Florida, and he's young. I can't find anything on what he's done since he's been in office though.

As for Jeb, I grew up with him as Governor of Florida and the whole 2000 election thing (along with Terry Schiavo), really left a bad taste in my mouth. I think I've had enough of the Bushs and I don't think he really contributes as a candidate. Then again, if GW can serve two terms, Jeb is a definite possibility.

Joe Biden will run for Democrat

Bobby Jindal and Chris Christie will run for GOP.

Joe Biden - I hope not. He's good as a VP, but I can't see him as being neutral enough to be a good president.

Bobby Jindal - First I've heard of him, will check him out.
Chris Christie - I don't know, he's facing a lot of backlash at the moment. I guess he has 4 years to define himself.

I dont see Warren running at all. She's smart enough to realize she has no chance. I wouldnt mind seeing Amy Klobuchar run. She is super popular in Minnesota, and while not super liberal (that makes her electable), ill always vote for her sicne i think she does a good job

Yeah, I agree with you about Warren. She's coming into the game a bit late. I think she'd be a much better asset for the democrats in the Senate. She's just so popular right now.

Amy Klobuchar - Never heard of her. Will check her out.

I'm all for Gary Johnson. Straight shooter and a Libertarian. While I am a Libertarian I would still vote for the best candidate and not my party affiliation - so if its him vs someone better - I vote better - but Gary is a good dude so he's on the up in my book.

You know, I never really looked into him or the Libertarian party. Just from what I've read on wiki he seems like a pretty level-headed guy. I will look into him a bit more.
 

Terribleness

Neo Member
His Fox News shit is crazy. They are saying Obama took the low road and ran a dirty negative campaign and slandered Mitt. And Obama should be ashamed of how he won.

Wow. From the people who call Obama a Muslim socialist, non America.

Lol


i wanted to enjoy n laugh at all this. theres plenty to enjoy (the tears, GOP members admitting they have a TP problem).

however, seeing SO many members of the Right doubling down gets me tight.. specially watching fox news.. WTH is wrong with them. some of these people have to be somewhat educated. They see the other news, they have teams. Media Consultants, producers, lawyers, etc.. which means they're spewing this crap on purpose. they can't be so dense.. i try to find the humor but it mostly angers and annoys me lol..
 

Marvie_3

Banned
I dont see Warren running at all. She's smart enough to realize she has no chance. I wouldnt mind seeing Amy Klobuchar run. She is super popular in Minnesota, and while not super liberal (that makes her electable), ill always vote for her sicne i think she does a good job
Klobuchar is awesome.

Joe Biden will run for Democrat

Bobby Jindal and Chris Christie will run for GOP.

Bobby Jindal is still around?
 

Klocker

Member
O Reilly asked Bob Beckel why married women voted for Romney and single women voted for Obama.

That's a very broad question. There are multiple variables as to why single and married women vote the way they vote. Just a few socioeconomic examples:


shit. most married Republican women vote exactly the way their husbands tell them too ... younger progressive women make their own choices. Shocking!
 

APF

Member
Almost every single Obama (and same with Romney) ad was about demonizing the other guy. The my point of view here, Obama just did a better job of trashing the other guy than Romney did, and the issues were only a footnote. I'd say 80-90% of the ads were negative, and that's just looking at the official ads, not the interest group ads.

Obama's team did a pitch-perfect job of taking anti-Romney threads that were already in the public consciousness through previous runs + the primaries and hammering those messages home with no real opposition. I think there's definitely some strong residual, "president Hope-and-Change isn't supposed to do that" going on, from folks who clearly forget the 04 D primaries.
 

KuroNeeko

Member
I'm all for Gary Johnson. Straight shooter and a Libertarian. While I am a Libertarian I would still vote for the best candidate and not my party affiliation - so if its him vs someone better - I vote better - but Gary is a good dude so he's on the up in my book.

Ah man, I don't know. He's good on civil liberties and I applaud his determination to balance the budget, but man, he's hardcore when it comes to taxes. I don't think I agree with his willingness to allow states to bankrupt themselves or cut social programs like Social Security and Medicare. Will keep looking into him though.
 

Kusagari

Member
If the Republicans want to win Hispanics they'll nominate Jeb Bush.

He's the only one who has a chance at stealing a large number of them, and yes that includes Rubio. I'm just not sure how the rest of the country reacts to another Bush running.

Jeb is far more liberal and outspoken on immigration reform than Rubio is or ever has been by the way.
 
Almost every single Obama (and same with Romney) ad was about demonizing the other guy. The my point of view here, Obama just did a better job of trashing the other guy than Romney did, and the issues were only a footnote. I'd say 80-90% of the ads were negative, and that's just looking at the official ads, not the interest group ads.


Hmm, not sure about that. Obama had quite a few actual positions. Romney had zero, except for being anti-abortion-rights.

D: It is a moral imperative for people to have access to health care. If they have a pre-existing condition that shouldn't mean they are just out of luck. Preventative care will actually save us money by reducing emergency room dependence and unnecessarily advanced conditions, and we will be in a stronger bargaining position to lower prices.

R: I'm going to eliminate Obamacare. I agree with Obamacare. Those with pre-existing conditions should be covered. I cover them. I don't cover them.

D: Tax rates are too low on the most wealthy. They need to be raised to Bill Clinton era levels. Historically, we can see such tax rates are correlated with an improved economy. Right now the most wealthy are sitting on their money because the middle class is gutted and the middle class is what drives growth. Spending cuts are also needed, but certain cuts like education would be counterproductive because they are investments in the future.

R: I will lower taxes for everyone. I will not lower taxes for the most wealthy. I will lower taxes for the middle class. The most wealthy will pay the same percentage of total taxes. That means I will lower their taxes. But I won't. I will refuse even a 10 to 1 ratio of spending cuts to revenue increases. I will cut loopholes but I won't tell you which ones. I like money, and you will like money will be better.

D: Government should stay out of a woman's body. That is her private space. Women have the right to equal pay.

R: Women can be let off work early to go make dinner. But if they don't submit to an extremely invasive and permanent physical change at our insistence, we'll have to lock them up.
 

VanWinkle

Member
most married Republican women vote exactly the way their husbands tell them too ... younger progressive women make their own choices. Shocking!

Do you have facts to back that up? Seems like a pretty big accusation, where husbands that are Republican tell their wives what to do and women who are Republican are simply sheep.
 
If the Republicans want to win Hispanics they'll nominate Jeb Bush.

He's the only one who has a chance at stealing a large number of them, and yes that includes Rubio. I'm just not sure how the rest of the country reacts to another Bush running.

Jeb is far more liberal and outspoken on immigration reform than Rubio is or ever has been by the way.

The Bush name is poison, bro. Yea, he's the only smart one of the bunch, but it doesn't matter.
 

Kusagari

Member
The Bush name is poison, bro. Yea, he's the only smart one of the bunch, but it doesn't matter.

I don't think he'd win the election, but I do think he could make a decent dent in Hispanic support that could carry over afterward if the party continued following his lead.

I wouldn't expect them to do that, though, since they would probably take his loss as proof there's no winning in going that way.
 

VALIS

Member
I think the Dem ticket in 2016 will be Cuomo/Warren. This is also said with the full realization that predictions of tickets 4 years in advance are usually wildly off the mark and mine probably will be as well.
 

Korey

Member
7Kpjv.jpg
 

Amir0x

Banned
That map is really inaccurate, Korey. Civil War didn't start in 1846, so it's not a Civil War map. California was part of Mexico until a later date. The Nebraska Territory was created in 1854. Utah territory didn't exist until 1850.

Sorry dude :p
 

Rokam

Member
That map is really inaccurate, Korey. Civil War didn't start in 1846, so it's not a Civil War map. California was part of Mexico until a later date. The Nebraska Territory was created in 1854. Utah territory didn't exist until 1850.

Sorry dude :p

That and Kansas voted to be a free state. Which makes all the people around here with Confederate flags even more sad.
 

Balphon

Member
That map is really inaccurate, Korey. Civil War didn't start in 1846, so it's not a Civil War map. California was part of Mexico until a later date. The Nebraska Territory was created in 1854. Utah territory didn't exist until 1850.

Sorry dude :p

Yes, but the chief inaccuracy is that it should say 1856.
 
That and Kansas voted to be a free state. Which makes all the people around here with Confederate flags even more sad.
West Virginia broke off from Virginia because of the Civil War and yet I found more confederate flags there per capita than any othe state I've been too.
 
What would happened.... if God won presidency by write-in?

That's not how this works.

You can't just have a president just because you write it in.

Plus.

God doesn't really deal with us if he exists at all. Or are you suggesting that God would come down and campaign?

I can't just write it 'rock' and a rock will become president.

Political cartoonist tears:

alNKA.gif

LAT72.jpg

jhEvW.jpg

4JfmM.jpg

ljJJT.jpg

sIdIk.jpg

(this is the guy who did that police officers shooting chimp cartoon a couple years ago; he was CONVINCED Romney was going to sweep it)
DILoa.jpg

wZ0m5.gif

J6g1h.jpg

h4Bhd.jpg

O9nqw.jpg

jpZcD.jpg

48qZY.jpg

How are those even considered funny?
 

Ploid 3.0

Member
I live on that black belt in Mississippi near the MS river. Blue baby!

Also I wish Texas was made into two states. It's so big.
 

Jack_AG

Banned
Ah man, I don't know. He's good on civil liberties and I applaud his determination to balance the budget, but man, he's hardcore when it comes to taxes. I don't think I agree with his willingness to allow states to bankrupt themselves or cut social programs like Social Security and Medicare. Will keep looking into him though.
Aye. He needs to iron out a few wrinkle for sure - I really can't see that flying with everyone but he's on the right track with a majority of issues. He would still bring a breath of much needed fresh air if he tries to run Rep again. I see him as someone who would be rather easy to compromise with - I will be keeping tabs on him for the future. Rounding out a few of those jagged edges and he'd be a good candidate.
 

DrForester

Kills Photobucket
Someone asked for this last night after I mentione dit on the news, but here's an official source on Colorado Governor Hickenlooper's comments about the Marijuana amendment. Worth noting that he was publicly against it.

http://blogs.westword.com/latestword/2012/11/john_hickenlooper_amendment_64_cheetos_goldfish.php

The voters have spoken and we have to respect their will. This will be a complicated process, but we intend to follow through. That said, federal law still says marijuana is an illegal drug so don't break out the Cheetos or gold fish too quickly.
 

Mario

Sidhe / PikPok
This ongoing suggestion that Obama has now divided the country whereas Romney would not have is laughable given by definition winning the election means he has support of more of the people than the losing opponent.

Though math and logic have not been factored into many Republican talking points over the last few years, so of course unsurprising.
 
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
I hope someone links the clip of Maddow that everyone's talking about when it eventually gets uploaded to somewhere.
 

Zzoram

Member
I think the Dem ticket in 2016 will be Cuomo/Warren. This is also said with the full realization that predictions of tickets 4 years in advance are usually wildly off the mark and mine probably will be as well.

I would love for Warren to be on the ticket and win, but it seems so hopeless for her to get nominated or win in the USA as it is.
 

mattiewheels

And then the LORD David Bowie saith to his Son, Jonny Depp: 'Go, and spread my image amongst the cosmos. For every living thing is in anguish and only the LIGHT shall give them reprieve.'
If I see a repetitive theme in people's criticism, it's that the welfare slugs are always looking for more and Obama's the guy to give it to them.

Help me out, didn't these people get the same benefit from Bush's government? Or did Obama drastically expand welfare benefits or something?
 

linsivvi

Member
His success was built on a deck of cards. A trick deck. Once everyone knows the trick, his illusion is over.

Right. Science is a trick. Maths is a trick. Everything modern science created are illusions.

A man tells you that 2+2=4 and a bunch of stupid conservative pundits laughed at the man and now that he's been proven right it's just a card trick? Way to discredit logic and reason.

Disgusting.
 
If I see a repetitive theme in people's criticism, it's that the welfare slugs are always looking for more and Obama's the guy to give it to them.

Help me out, didn't these people get the same benefit from Bush's government? Or did Obama drastically expand welfare benefits or something?

There are more people on welfare due to the recession, and I think Obama expanded unemployment benefits somewhat, but it's mostly BS to play into the "Obamacare is making us a socialist nation" meme.

It's also a convenient scapegoat they can use to avoid admitting that their platform is the problem.
 

Klocker

Member
There are more people on welfare due to the recession, and I think Obama expanded unemployment benefits somewhat, but it's mostly BS to play into the "Obamacare is making us a socialist nation" meme.

It's also a convenient scapegoat they can use to avoid admitting that their platform is the problem.

yep.

god forbid he help people who lost their jobs because of Bush's disaster of a crony administration helping to ruin the economy
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom