TacticalFox88
Banned
I don't believe that there's a single potential Republican in 2016 that can take on Hillary.
I seriously hope Bill convinces her to run. The GOP would be roflstomped so hard.
I don't believe that there's a single potential Republican in 2016 that can take on Hillary.
Yeah, because they have such a wonderful legacy that even modern day repulicans hold high.
I think you'll find republicans rather nostalgic for the Bush years after 8 years of Obama
this right here as a "latino" I'd be hard pressed to vote for him. I'm sure he will get the cuban vote but as far as the rest of "latinos" I doubt it. His stance on the dream act and immigration won't help. I actually find his immigration stance pretty funny. I wonder if he would be in favor of doing something about the wet foot dry foot policy or if he's just interested in the southern borderRubio it too token. Non-Cuban Latinos won't follow him
How's Jeb in regards to social issues? Is it even possible to have a true conservative who doesn't hate people of different backgrounds, sexual identity, race, etc? Hell, I'd consider voting for someone like that.
American Crossroads, the Rove-affiliated super PAC, had been billed as sort of shadow Republican Party, one that could operate outside the messy party structure and avoid its inevitable internecine fights. But instead, despite having raised $300 million this cycle, not only was American Crossroads unable to rescue Romney, but every single Senate candidate it got behind went down to defeat as well.
The donor community is not just annoyed, they are really really pissed off, said one Romney aide with close ties to the Republican Partys big-money people in New York. Most of the money Rove pried from these donors, this strategist said, went so that Crossroads could produce television ads slamming Barack Obama, instead of into the kind of get-out-the-vote effort that the Democrats focused on.
So much of Karls problem, and the problem with the other super PACs, is that they were all media, said Ed Rollins, who helped engineer Ronald Reagans landslide in 1984. Its easy to go and ask donors for a big donation when you show them a pretty commercial, rather than say I am going to organize these precincts and show them a bunch of voter rolls. There is no question we need to build infrastructure.
Worse, Republicans say, is that super PACs that did try to invest in the ground game found that Rove had already vacuumed up the top donors, who now had nothing left to contribute.
I don't believe that there's a single potential Republican in 2016 that can take on Hillary.
this right here as a "latino" I'd be hard pressed to vote for him. I'm sure he will get the cuban vote but as far as the rest of "latinos" I doubt it.
So ORCA really was a beached whale. Did they not know how to stress test this shit weeks before so they don't run into this kind of problem?Interesting story about the latest Romney campaign clusterfuck to come to light - massive computer failure:
http://politi.co/TxyCCw
This strikes me as a "Obama isn't a real black man" thing. We know how that worked.
Sounds remarkably similar to his older brother.He's generally moderate. Abortion only in case of rape, incest, etc. He's against gay marriage but had a rather poignant statement earlier this year where he said we need to hold all families, whether gay or straight, up as models for society if they're taking care of their children.
But the main thing is that he's completely for immigration reform and the dream act. He is by far the biggest supporter on the Republican side of anything dealing with Hispanic issues. He truly does get them to put it bluntly, and that's why Hispanics in Florida love him.
just because he's "latino" doesn't mean squat or ensure he's going to get there/our vote in droves. Theres quite a difference in "latino" cultures around the US and outside of cubans he hasn't won anyone over. His immigration and dream act stance reflect that.This strikes me as a "Obama isn't a real black man" thing. We know how that worked.
Rubio is pro immigration and pro dream act.
Santorum doesn't have an ice cube's chance in hell
He's generally moderate. Abortion only in case of rape, incest, etc. He's against gay marriage but had a rather poignant statement earlier this year where he said we need to hold all families, whether gay or straight, up as models for society if they're taking care of their children.
But the main thing is that he's completely for immigration reform and the dream act. He is by far the biggest supporter on the Republican side of anything dealing with Hispanic issues. He truly does get them to put it bluntly, and that's why Hispanics in Florida love him.
I wonder if there will be less of a hard swing to the right during the 2016 Primaries. Conservative pundits are advocating a lot of doubling down on their values, but I could see the politicians themselves being more savvy.
Don't underestimate Jeb Bush. People who are discounting him just because of the bad taste of Dubya are underestimating just how good of a politician Jeb is.
All I'll say.
As a Florida resident, I can second this.
He's generally moderate. Abortion only in case of rape, incest, etc. He's against gay marriage but had a rather poignant statement earlier this year where he said we need to hold all families, whether gay or straight, up as models for society if they're taking care of their children.
But the main thing is that he's completely for immigration reform and the dream act. He is by far the biggest supporter on the Republican side of anything dealing with Hispanic issues. He truly does get them to put it bluntly, and that's why Hispanics in Florida love him.
If Hilary ran I honestly expect a similar turn out for her compared to Obama. I'd imagine minorities and women especially supporting her. GOP would simply lose their shit collectively. I can only imagine all the dog whistling that will go on at Fox/GOP representatives in general.
I would guess most of the GOP would rather not take the tea party line, but they know they control the party so will toe the line to stay in power. anything else right now would be political suscide.I wonder if there will be less of a hard swing to the right during the 2016 Primaries. Conservative pundits are advocating a lot of doubling down on their values, but I could see the politicians themselves being more savvy.
If they do, they might as well kiss the Latino vote goodbye forever.So I know Immigration issues are a hot topic recently, atleast on the web. How possible is the Dream Act to pass within the next 4 years? Will the house republicans shoot it down?
I preferred Hilary to Obama in the primaries before 2008 and was pretty surprised by how many Democrats just didn't like her. Do you really think that has changed enough?
I preferred Hilary to Obama in the primaries before 2008 and was pretty surprised by how many Democrats just didn't like her. Do you really think that has changed enough?
I love it how Republicans are only liberal on social issues that directly affect them. Rubio with DREAM, Cheney with gay marriage. These selfish fucks.Rubio is pro immigration and pro dream act.
Santorum doesn't have an ice cube's chance in hell
+ A woman
+ A great public servant with a long career
+ Generally considered to have an excellent work ethic and productive drive, even among career politicians
+ Some policy gravitas
+ Bill Clinton
New: + An excellent secretary of state
New: + Barack Obama's endorsement--I'm reasonably confident that, barring Joe Biden also seeking the presidency, Barack would endorse her in the primaries.
- Not a transformative candidate (might not apply in 2016 if there are no other wildcards)
- Age; not a factor for the timing of 2016-2020, but not over the moon at the prospect of her age by the end of the second term
- DLC Democrat, although I get the feeling she's drifted left over the last 4 years
- I think what's perceived to be a bit of a harsh personal manner--and some of this may be bleed from the gender issue where borderline sexism is coming through
- Hangovers of any Democrats who felt frustrated with the end of the Clinton administration (will not apply in 2016, since Bill has been largely rehabilitated and time has dulled a lot of what would have been leftover pain)
Bad news for chlorophyll...guise, the leaves on my trees have started to turn brown and fall off the trees. I think they are dieing. Is this the 1000 years of darkness I was warned about? halp plz
+ A woman
+ A great public servant with a long career
+ Generally considered to have an excellent work ethic and productive drive, even among career politicians
+ Some policy gravitas
+ Bill Clinton
New: + An excellent secretary of state
New: + Barack Obama's endorsement--I'm reasonably confident that, barring Joe Biden also seeking the presidency, Barack would endorse her in the primaries.
- Not a transformative candidate (might not apply in 2016 if there are no other wildcards)
- Age; not a factor for the timing of 2016-2020, but not over the moon at the prospect of her age by the end of the second term
- DLC Democrat, although I get the feeling she's drifted left over the last 4 years
- I think what's perceived to be a bit of a harsh personal manner--and some of this may be bleed from the gender issue where borderline sexism is coming through
- Hangovers of any Democrats who felt frustrated with the end of the Clinton administration (will not apply in 2016, since Bill has been largely rehabilitated and time has dulled a lot of what would have been leftover pain)
I would guess most of the GOP would rather not take the tea party line, but they know they control the party so will toe the line to stay in power. anything else right now would be political suscide.
2016 has to be Hillary. Biden will fuck it up royally. Hillary is smart as hell and will court even more of the women vote to counteract the small amount of the black vote lost after Obama. A black man followed by a woman, please.
Isn't it SOP for a sitting president not to endorse anyone during the primary? Lest they undermine a different candidate in the general.
I love it how Republicans are only liberal on social issues that directly affect them. Rubio with DREAM, Cheney with gay marriage. These selfish fucks.
I love it how Republicans are only liberal on social issues that directly affect them. Rubio with DREAM, Cheney with gay marriage. These selfish fucks.
His daughter is.Wait, Cheney is gay?!
Wait, Cheney is gay?!
2016 has to be Hillary. Biden will fuck it up royally. Hillary is smart as hell and will court even more of the women vote to counteract the small amount of the black vote lost after Obama. A black man followed by a woman, please.
As someone who sides slightly Republican sometimes(voted McCain) i'd vote for her over any other candidate and would have even taken her over McCain in 08.I preferred Hilary to Obama in the primaries before 2008 and was pretty surprised by how many Democrats just didn't like her. Do you really think that has changed enough?
+ A woman
+ A great public servant with a long career
+ Generally considered to have an excellent work ethic and productive drive, even among career politicians
+ Some policy gravitas
+ Bill Clinton
New: + An excellent secretary of state
New: + Barack Obama's endorsement--I'm reasonably confident that, barring Joe Biden also seeking the presidency, Barack would endorse her in the primaries.
- Not a transformative candidate (might not apply in 2016 if there are no other wildcards)
- Age; not a factor for the timing of 2016-2020, but not over the moon at the prospect of her age by the end of the second term
- DLC Democrat, although I get the feeling she's drifted left over the last 4 years
- I think what's perceived to be a bit of a harsh personal manner--and some of this may be bleed from the gender issue where borderline sexism is coming through
- Hangovers of any Democrats who felt frustrated with the end of the Clinton administration (will not apply in 2016, since Bill has been largely rehabilitated and time has dulled a lot of what would have been leftover pain)
The fact they ultimately viciously turned against each other could plausibly be a reason it's not very common to endorse a candidate now that I think about it. Though I can imagine most politicians don't have Teddy Roosevelt's temperament and would probably have been cooler about disagreements on how to do things.- Roosevelt was the main driver of Taft running at all, I can't recall when or if he formally endorsed, but again he was the one that got Taft to run and I know he made public statements to the effect that he supported Taft.
The fact they ultimately viciously turned against each other could plausibly be a reason it's not very common to endorse a candidate now that I think about it.