ReadingRambo
Member
A citizen has every right to take as much time before the election as they need to decide. Just because things are black and white for you doesn't mean they are for everyone.
Oh ok. Thanks wasn't sure.
A citizen has every right to take as much time before the election as they need to decide. Just because things are black and white for you doesn't mean they are for everyone.
CNN still pimping out the undecideds for clicks. If you don't have a clue at this point just fucking stay home.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/05/politics/undecided-voters-decisions/index.html?hpt=hp_c2
You're not the only one seeing a lot of them. I've read that the Romney campaign has been sitting on a lot of cash for a long time, presumably to unleash this last-minute torrent of advertising. But given the level of campaign ads already saturating the airwaves for every representative, sheriff and dog-catcher, I think that's a poor strategic decision.Wow just saw 5 pro-Romney SuperPAC ads in the past 4 minutes on ABC (live in PA)
So I'm following coverage mostly from the UK and I'm surprised how the media here are saying it's a close one...
I don't know how any sane American could vote for the Republican party...:shrug:
Yeah, I think most people make up their minds on the candidates far in advance, and will focus more on local issues closer to the election. Depending on what there is the vote for, California is a storm of ballots.You're not the only one seeing a lot of them. I've read that the Romney campaign has been sitting on a lot of cash for a long time, presumably to unleash this last-minute torrent of advertising. But given the level of campaign ads already saturating the airwaves for every representative, sheriff and dog-catcher, I think that's a poor strategic decision.
Not all Americans are sane.So I'm following coverage mostly from the UK and I'm surprised how the media here are saying it's a close one...
I don't know how any sane American could vote for the Republican party...:shrug:
So I'm following coverage mostly from the UK and I'm surprised how the media here are saying it's a close one...
I don't know how any sane American could vote for the Republican party...:shrug:
Not all Americans are sane.
I have the next two days off. Enough to get smashed, wake up late for results and then have a day to recover physically (or mentally depending on the winner)Tomorrow should be fun. I should get smashed.
35-40% of the country would vote for a dead corpse over Obama.
Its make sense that when you're in recovery from life-saving surgery you just pull all the tubes out and hobble back to the scene of the accident.It makes sense that with the economy being in the gutter that people would look for alternatives.
Yeah, I think most people make up their minds on the candidates far in advance, and will focus more on local issues closer to the election. Depending on what there is the vote for, California is a storm of ballots.
No one in the media fell for the Romney internals "leak" right? Well outside of Fox News I assume.
The coverage has actually been quite funny...I don't know if it's intentional but when they interview people from Republican rallies...they seem to get some hilarious responses. Like global warming deniers...Obama not being Christian...and Obamacare crippling the economy...
California will turn out 80% to vote down a tax increase to pay for a social program they voted in two years earlier but at the same time vote largely for Democrats.
It's cute how you make sure to trace the financial crisis far back enough to where you can blame Clinton for it.I don't care who you vote for as long as you vote. My opinion is that Mitt has a chance and has a plan to turn this trainwreck around that has been on course for the past 12 years. My conviction is that my son Jonah grows up in a better America than I grew up, not worse. Where words matter and promises mean something. A place where freedom isn't threatened but encouraged. A place where overwhelming debt and a government that finances our future at the cost of our livelihood isn't politicized but is taken on with aggressiveness. The bottom line: We have been leaderless for the past 4 years....and it is time we have real leadership in this country again.
--------
Be fun to see what people say.
what's this business about overseas Military not getting to vote?
After participating in both the '04 and '08 elections here (not to mention the mid-terms), this should probably be in the OP to help ease the freakouts a little.
REMEMBER: Rural district (majority Republican) results always seem to get tallied first. Urban districts (majority Democrat) usually don't start getting their results in until after their polls are closed. A LOT OF BATTLEGROUND STATES WILL TREND RED EARLY ON. RELAX.
It's cute how you make sure to trace the financial crisis far back enough to where you can blame Clinton for it.
Tomorrow should be fun. I should get smashed.
So I'm following coverage mostly from the UK and I'm surprised how the media here are saying it's a close one...
I don't know how any sane American could vote for the Republican party...:shrug:
Obama's polling place is in Chicago, he already voted there.Heh, mine:
Ho Fucking Co Career & Tech
1311 Corder Rd
Warner Robins GA 31088
Barack Obama's
The Fucking School Without Walls
2130 G ST NW
Washington DC 20037
You have the right idea, Mulder. Time for some super hard cider and 13% beer to get this party started! Too bad I finished my growlers already
So nervous :S /shudder
Obama's polling place is in Chcago, he already voted there.
I was thinking about getting a 30 pack of PBR for myself because I'm poor. That's like under $20 right?
nyt said:Wisconsin is a deeply polarized state (see, Walker, Scott). But that is fitting — the state helped give rise to both the Republican Party in 1854 and the progressive movement, through former Wisconsin Gov. Robert La Follette Sr., who was born one year later in 1855. A century or so ago, when the progressive movement and the Republican Party were close cousins, Wisconsin was a reliably red state. (It voted for the Democrat in the presidential race just twice between 1856 and 1928.) Now that these are viewed as incompatible philosophies, their sharp edges manifest themselves in different ways throughout the state.
tnr said:While Obama’s ’08 improvement in states like North Carolina and Virginia received considerable attention, Obama actually improved over Kerry’s performance in Wisconsin by 14 points, a similar margin to the two red-to-blue states.
But Obama’s gains in states like Nevada, Virginia, New Mexico, and North Carolina were primarily due to changes in the composition of the electorate and improvement among college educated whites and minorities. In Wisconsin, Obama made huge gains among white voters without a college degree—it was an impressive performance in an “old coalition” state.
Here’s a different way to look at it: there might be more Bush-Obama voters in Wisconsin than any other battleground state, with the possible exception of Colorado—where many of Obama’s converts were well-educated, social moderates outside of Denver (May it also be observed that Denver is second on the list of most saturated markets).
I don't think anyone here in the UK wants Romney to win. Obama's healthcare policies would be seen as right-wing nuttery over here, Romney's would be off the scale.
Hahahaha
I don't care who you vote for as long as you vote. My opinion is that Mitt has a chance and has a plan to turn this trainwreck around that has been on course for the past 12 years. My conviction is that my son Jonah grows up in a better America than I grew up, not worse. Where words matter and promises mean something. A place where freedom isn't threatened but encouraged. A place where overwhelming debt and a government that finances our future at the cost of our livelihood isn't politicized but is taken on with aggressiveness. The bottom line: We have been leaderless for the past 4 years....and it is time we have real leadership in this country again.
--------
Be fun to see what people say.
You're not the only one seeing a lot of them. I've read that the Romney campaign has been sitting on a lot of cash for a long time, presumably to unleash this last-minute torrent of advertising. But given the level of campaign ads already saturating the airwaves for every representative, sheriff and dog-catcher, I think that's a poor strategic decision.
This is exactly what Rove's team did for Bush in 2000 to great effect in the swing states.Yeah, I think most people make up their minds on the candidates far in advance, and will focus more on local issues closer to the election. Depending on what there is the vote for, California is a storm of ballots.
I don't care who you vote for as long as you vote. My opinion is that Mitt has a chance and has a plan to turn this trainwreck around that has been on course for the past 12 years. My conviction is that my son Jonah grows up in a better America than I grew up, not worse. Where words matter and promises mean something. A place where freedom isn't threatened but encouraged. A place where overwhelming debt and a government that finances our future at the cost of our livelihood isn't politicized but is taken on with aggressiveness. The bottom line: We have been leaderless for the past 4 years....and it is time we have real leadership in this country again.
--------
Be fun to see what people say.
Has GAF come to a consensus yet what to put the blame on should Romney win? Voter suppression? Malicious software updates? Racism? Fox News? American is stupid? I'll need to know for tomorrow night so keep me posted, thanks!
Has GAF come to a consensus yet what to put the blame on should Romney win? Voter suppression? Malicious software updates? Racism? Fox News? American is stupid? I'll need to know for tomorrow night so keep me posted, thanks!