polyh3dron
Banned
I'm hoping Romney ends up with 47% of the popular vote. That'd be great.
nyt said:North Carolina had been reliably Republican for more than two decades. Even Bill Clinton, a Southerner who managed to carry other Southern states, fell short in North Carolina. But over the past few decades, the state’s economy has become much more diversified, remaking the state’s political landscape.
Longtime economic engines in the state, like tobacco, textiles and furniture, have been fading, while newer sectors — like banking, biotechnology, pharmaceuticals and telecommunications — have been growing. New kinds of jobs have attracted new kinds of voters, and North Carolina is younger, more diverse and better educated than it used to be.
But Mr. Obama’s 2008 victory in North Carolina came early. Favorable political conditions nationally and a substantial surge in turnout pulled the state into the Democratic column ahead of schedule. North Carolina, while more competitive than it used to be, is still to the right of the national tipping point, and Mitt Romney has had a slim lead in most surveys of the state conducted this year.
tnr said:How could Obama lose 7 points nationally, yet remain close in a state that he won by just 14,000 votes in a historic election? The answer lies in the resilience of Obama’s diverse coalition and the changing composition of North Carolina’s electorate.
For the most part, Obama’s biggest losses have come from predominantly white states where Obama won plenty of moderate, former Bush voters—like Wisconsin, Montana, and Indiana. North Carolina is relatively insulated from Obama’s losses, since most of Obama's gains came from young voters, college educated whites, and African Americans, three groups where Obama's support has remained relatively resilient. Indeed, nearly half of Obama’s ’08 voters in North Carolina were non-white—more than any other battleground state. From this perspective, North Carolina has not moved toward the Democrats, but the rest of the country, where white working class voters play a more central role in the Democratic coalition, has just moved away from Obama at a faster pace. But even if Obama’s support is resilient, it’s not completely impervious to the huge national swing in Romney’s direction. Obama won by just 14,000 votes in 2008, so Romney could win the state if he could peel off even a few of Obama’s supporters.
States choose the way they apportion their own Electoral College votes. Winner Take All increases each state's importance the most. Those voices are heard, they're just not having much effect (which considering the size of the electorate, isn't surprising whoever you vote for.) And it's not inherently a bad thing that campaigns focus on swing states. For one, those states change over time. Last cycle IN and MO were swing states, NV not so much. Also, fewer states to focus on means cheaper elections.The way the electoral college is set up, with the majority vote-getter in each state receiving all the votes, is the thing that doesn't make sense to me. With this system, you could have 49.9% of a state's population voting for a candidate, and that candidate receiving the equivalent of zero votes. Those voices aren't getting heard, and it leads to the current situation where candidates just focus on swing states.
We need an |OT| Republican Voter Fraud
This shit is getting ridiculous.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=498500
HEADSPoliGaf, let's decide who wins Florida. 538 is basically showing a 50 / 50 chance. Everyone flip a coin. Heads = Obama. Tails = Romney.
I got heads... Obama!
Florida is a lost cause, Rick Scott is making sure of it. Romney will snag Florida causing Tuesday night to be a long night to find out the full results
Do it and do it now
I try google and
hahahaha google
Florida is a lost cause, Rick Scott is making sure of it. Romney will snag Florida causing Tuesday night to be a long night to find out the full results
Florida seems as unlikely to go for Obama for the same reasons Ohio seems likely to go for him: Those states' polls have painted a very consistent picture over the last month.
States choose the way they apportion their own Electoral College votes. Winner Take All increases each state's importance the most.
Q: Has there been a poll which shows Romney in the lead in Ohio?
A: No.
Flick Ohio back to blue and it's 281-257 to Obama, which demonstrates how big of a pickle Romney is in. And bluntly, outside of outright treason I can't see Romney winning Ohio.
Does it? Don't you think romney would have spent more than zero time in new york if it mattered that there are several million republicans living upstate?
I'm tired of ohio and florida deciding elections
Florida seems as unlikely to go for Obama for the same reasons Ohio seems likely to go for him: Those states' polls have painted a very consistent picture over the last month.
Does it? Don't you think romney would have spent more than zero time in new york if it mattered that there are several million republicans living upstate?
I'm tired of ohio and florida deciding elections
Gaf prepare me for disappoint, what are the chances Romney wins? I mean I don't like him, but, I don't think it's all doom and gloom, but, he wouldn't be a very good president.
I'm hoping Romney ends up with 47% of the popular vote. That'd be great.
Gaf prepare me for disappoint, what are the chances Romney wins? I mean I don't like him, but, I don't think it's all doom and gloom, but, he wouldn't be a very good president.
Please, PLEASE do not call it a lost cause. I thought it was a lost cause a month ago; at present it feels like it's going to be as close as any state in the election. We are working incredibly hard and sometimes it feels like the election is Democracy vs. Rick Scott rather than Obama v. Romney, but there is not yet a clear victor in either battle.Florida is a lost cause, Rick Scott is making sure of it. Romney will snag Florida causing Tuesday night to be a long night to find out the full results
drudge is going nuts:
GALLUP: R 50% O 49%
ABCWASHPOST: O 50% R 47%
RASMUSSEN: R 49% O 48%
FUCK RICK SCOTT
Isn't Rick Scott the guy who became governor of Florida after being caught in a massive multi-million dollar Medicare fraud? America, what a country.
Isn't Rick Scott the guy who became governor of Florida after being caught in a massive multi-million dollar Medicare fraud? America, what a country.
Yes, the largest single case of medicare fraud in the history of this country.
Florida gonna Florida. I can say that because I live here. I think Obama has a chance but Rick Scott is doing a successful job making sure Romney wins the state.
Yes, the largest single case of medicare fraud in the history of this country.
Florida gonna Florida. I can say that because I live here. I think Obama has a chance but Rick Scott is doing a successful job making sure Romney wins the state.
nyt said:The Republican Party has good reason to hold its national convention in Tampa, Fla. The Tampa area is the most competitive section of the most competitive region in one of the most competitive states in the nation — the perfect place to seek a glimmer of extra advantage in a closely-fought presidential contest.
In many ways, the Tampa area was the weakest link in the regional coalition that Barack Obama built to win Florida in 2008. The Tampa-St. Petersburg media market is home to a quarter of Florida’s registered Republicans, and Mr. Obama carried Hillsborough and Pinellas Counties — home to Tampa and St. Petersburg — by a smaller margin than Florida’s other major population centers. If Mitt Romney wants to win the state, it represents the most attractive target.
And winning Florida is a must for Mr. Romney. Based on the simulations that the FiveThirtyEight forecast model ran on Tuesday, Mr. Romney has only a 0.3 percent chance of winning the election if he loses the state.
tnr said:Paradoxically, Obama’s resilience in Florida is partially related to his weakness there four years ago. In other states like Wisconsin, Iowa, Virginia, and Ohio, Romney will make gains by running up the score in white, rural areas where Obama outperformed Kerry by a wide margin. But McCain already ran up the score among Florida's rural voters in 2008. The Florida Panhandle and northern Florida was Obama’s weakest region of any battleground state, as he performed far worse than Kerry among these culturally southern, predominantly white, rural voters. One particularly pronounced example was Liberty County, a tiny county in the Panhandle where Obama lost by 44 points compared to Kerry’s 29-point defeat in 2004. Given that Liberty County is 18 percent black, McCain must have made extraordinary gains among the county's white voters. Romney will still make gains in these areas, but it's hard to envision the ten-plus point gains that Romney could plausibly see in southwestern Virginia or across Wisconsin and Iowa.
Of course, Romney doesn't need 10-plus point gains in a state that Obama only carried by 2.8 points and Florida has plenty of other swing regions and swing voters where Romney can and will make additional improvements. Many of these are concentrated along the vaunted I-4 corridor, and particularly in the Tampa/St. Petersburg metropolitan area. Romney will also need outsized gains in southwest Florida and Miami Dade County, where Romney could potentially reverse Obama's gains among Cuban voters. But Romney will find it more difficult to reverse Obama's improvement over Kerry's performance in Jacksonville and Orlando-Kissimmee, where strong black turnout and a growing and heavily Democratic Puerto Rican population have resulted in durable changes.
What's going on? I can't seem to find out
what the flying pig fuck!If I remember right he tried to shut down early voting in Miami-dade yesterday by saying they were out of ballots. After tons of people showed up and started yelling he found the ballots.
what the flying pig fuck!
I didn't say that. What I said is that WTA gives the most "bang for the buck" to a candidate winning a state. If a state split their EC votes proportional to its popular vote, there's not much bang for the buck since most states would be close to a 50-50 split. Split on Congressional districts, and you'd just see swing districts instead of states.Does it? Don't you think romney would have spent more than zero time in new york if it mattered that there are several million republicans living upstate?
2008, 1996, 1992, 1988, 1984, 1980 say, "Hi."I'm tired of ohio and florida deciding elections
It wouldn't be states (or cities as that one YouTube video claims,) it would be regions. The Atlantic coast, Southern California, the northern Pacific coast, probably the Chicago/St Louis corridor, and a couple of hot spots in Texas would get the focus.But if we move to a popular vote wouldn't it just mean that California, New York, and Texas decide elections? I do wonder if the democrats would have a big advantage with a popular vote scenario since their support is clustered in the cities moreso, and so GOTV efforts would be massively productive for them.
Wow pidge, are you doing every state?
Hurricane Sandy is actually a great example of one of the strengths of the electoral college system. Its basically a certainty that the aftermath of the hurricane is going to cause some kind of depression in turnout in the effected states (could be a little, could be significant) but as long as we assume that those who are turning out are a "representative sample" of its entire population the state's contribution to the national election remains identical.
Basically the good thing about the system is that it ties weight to population (via congressional membership), not turnout.
only swing states. the rest dont matter
Agreed.Hurricane Sandy is actually a great example of one of the strengths of the electoral college system. Its basically a certainty that the aftermath of the hurricane is going to cause some kind of depression in turnout in the effected states (could be a little, could be significant) but as long as we assume that those who are turning out are a "representative sample" of its entire population the state's contribution to the national election remains identical.
Basically the good thing about the system is that it ties weight to population (via congressional membership), not turnout.
FLORIDA