I can point out that I find your hypothetical unrealistic without impugning anyone, and the way I respond to a hypothetical voter is different than the way I'd engage with a real voter.
Those forum members who have stated their intentions to vote third party are imaginary? These kinds of opinions exist.
Even if Obama is manifestly worst than Bush in every way on the drug war issue, and I don't cede that to you at all, even if he's manifestly worse, the question is how the policy enacted by another presidency might be different. Maybe it'd be better. Maybe it'd be worse.
Not in
every way. But definitely worse than Bush on marijuana.
http://blog.norml.org/2012/07/12/fe...t-most-prominent-medical-cannabis-dispensary/
Many of Californias most prominent and well-respected medical cannabis dispensaries and related facilities including Oaksterdam University, Berkeley Patients Group, and Harborside Health Center (HHC) flourished under the George W. Bush administration. But theyll be lucky to survive President Barack Obamas first term.
Maybe it'd be better, maybe it'd be worse. It's only maybe. Some people like to judge based on "maybe". Some people like to judge based on results.
You seem to be using "There's no difference between the candidates" as a proxy for "Obama has disappointed many people and has insufficiently improved on some problems we had with Bush". The two do not mean the same thing. It's possible that Mitt Romney is the better choice than Barack Obama for our hypothetical. It's also possible that Gary Johnson is the best candidate for our hypothetical, but even in that assumption, it's not an argument that Barack Obama and Mitt Romney are exactly the same.
You keep saying that my argument is "Obama and Romney are exactly the same". That's not my argument.
These are the points I were making, in no particular order:
The mindset behind single issue voting is the same kind of thinking that can lead to a third party vote.
Everyone has their own personal reasons for voting the way they do, and it's their right to do so.
Yes, most people realize the implications of their decision, and don't need others "reminding" them of how horrible they are.
Voting your conscience in a non-swing state isn't gonna make a lick of difference anyway.
Yes, "Obama has disappointed many people and has insufficiently improved on some problems we had with Bush", but that was just one example of what could push a particular voter to vote for a third party, nobody, or even Romney. It's basically what Adams described as a "firing offense".