It's astonishing how many non-book readers don't care about the Wall or the Night's Watch. The producers really dropped the ball in expressing just how important that storyline is.
Having Grenn and Pyp die would be like Tolkien killing off Merry and Pippin. It just aint right although I can see why the show producers did it. So instead of Jon just being stupid and sending them away, he just won't have as many friends left at Castle Black before he gets murked.
The Wall arc is about to get a ton of new characters. The show is faced with the reality of paying actors, so it really doesn't make much sense to keep certain characters, especially if the script won't even have much room for them to have speaking lines. Better to give them heroic deaths in this battle, in my opinion.
Plus, they need to start giving more screen and facetime for Bowen Marsh, who I assume they'll recast.
Thenns are not the cannibals in the books.Huh? Thenn are a thing in the books too.
Uh, because there's no indication of that? We know Olenna wasn't fond of Targaryens anyway. She was engaged to one but went on to seduce Luthor Tyrell ("he couldn't walk for days", apparently).Why did it take me so long to realize the woman Aemon was in love with was Olenna Tyrell?
Uh, because there's no indication of that? We know Olenna wasn't fond of Targaryens anyway. She was engaged to one but went on to seduce Luthor Tyrell ("he couldn't walk for days", apparently).![]()
That's what makes it ironic. He can still picture her face, and she didn't even like him.
Its the best finale weve ever done, bar none, Thrones showrunners David Benioff and Dan Weiss said in a statement. The performances from our cast, the direction from Alex Graves, the VFX work, the new [music] cues from Ramin Djawadiall of it came together in perhaps the finest hour weve produced. Were immensely proud of The Children. And a little intimidated by the episode, because now we have to get back to the business of season five and figure out a way to top it.
COTF should be CGIOutstanding Prosthetic Make-up: The Children
COTF should be CGI
But a nice slit throat could be prosthetic![]()
I agree with Stannis. Look!A Storm of Swords said:Stannis ground his teeth. It is not my wish to tamper with your rights and traditions. As to royal guidance, Janos, if you mean that I ought to tell your brothers to choose you, have the courage to say so.
That took Lord Janos aback. He smiled uncertainly and began to sweat, but Bowen Marsh beside him said, Who better to command the black cloaks than a man who once commanded the gold, sire?
Any of you, I would think. Even the cook.
I think the show watchers are really missing something cool by not having that mystery be laid out in the first season, as it was the first book.
Forgive my ignorance, but what does "tracking shot" means?
I hope this comment isn't against the rules about doing detective work on the no-books thread, it's more just an observation on something I think the show really dropped the ball.
They're talking about the meaning of "The Song of Ice and Fire", what it means, and even talking about Aemon as a Targaryan in Westeros. I think it's a big let down that the show has totally ignored the mystery of Jon's parentage. I think the show watchers are really missing something cool by not having that mystery be laid out in the first season, as it was the first book.
Yeah you really only need to hear about Lyanna like twice before it's obvious "who is Jon's mom" is less interesting than "who is Jon's dad".
Not really. Once you figure out the mother, there's only one reasonable candidate for the father.
I agree with Stannis. Look!
![]()
That cook is goddamn badass.![]()
Yeah you really only need to hear about Lyanna like twice before it's obvious "who is Jon's mom" is less interesting than "who is Jon's dad".
I always do wonder though: did Ned have a wartime lover? Some scullery babe? Dayne after all?
That nod...
![]()
Stannis' nod is going to be upstaged by a kid.
Daario?
The cook is apparently Three-Finger Hobb (but with all his fingers still intact on the show). Sam mentions him once. lol
changes up the reason for people trying to vote him for LC (to get him out of the kitchen).
I kind of figured it was to get him out because he's a horrible cook or something disgusting.
Maybe they're scared of him. Rightly so, it seems.
I have mixed feelings about The Wall. The showrunners clearly wanted their Helm's Deep episode, and who can blame them for that? As a standalone work, it's spectacular. They nailed it hard. (Almost to the point that it sticks out as a calculated television event.) As part of this fourth season and the ASOIAF series as a whole... well, the only reason it's not a total waste of time is the entertainment factor of an episode-spanning battle, well executed.
Where does the show stand now, though? Almost exactly where it did at the end of episode 8. That would be fine if we hadn't spent the full hour with the most poorly adapted characters and storylines, or if, at the very least, Stannis had showed up to move the timeline forward in the North. But we have, and he didn't, and now the finale has relatively little time to resolve a heap of key events in many locations. And that's before we even consider any setup for the next season. Lady S., anyone?
So basically I'm expecting The Children either to be too scattered or to condense some major events more than I'm comfortable with. And yet somehow I'm still optimistic, lol.
The Others have been a bit of a cliched evil force so far, but I don't see how it's really a problem or any kind of snoozefest. Like with a lot of cliches that GRRM likes to use in unconventional ways or kind of turn on their heads, having this "army of darkness" on the move has brought a lot of great moments & awesome drama to the storylines. In the end, it hasn't been as much about fighting this cliched army of darkness, but the kind of humane drama and larger storylines that it has created, just like Dany's dragons are used in a multitude of interesting ways instead of them being an automatic key to victory or an awesome power without any negatives or downsides. The few times they've been seen have established them as a threat worth being scared of and that threat of the Others, in turn, has put the Wildlings on the move which gets us the whole Jon beyond the wall story arc, Jon amongst the wildlings story arc, Ygritte, the superb Battle on the Wall, Stannis at the Wall and all that ensues, Jon deciding to take the wildlings in (which was a great move from him) and the horrors that are happening by the end of ADWD to those who decided to not come south of the Wall.That and mostly because the framing of them has continued to be just "forced of darkness" and that's a total snoozefest. Maybe they will be revealed to be not just boring apocalyptic force of evil like many in here believe, but for now that are just boring fantasy bad guys, and what drew me to the series was all the politicking and complexity, not that stuff.
I think my final opinion of this episode will probably hinge on how well the Wall stuff is handled next season. "Waste of time" might be a bit of an exaggeration if it leads to good things.There is a lot of truth in this. But I think this episode was actually good for the development of the characters at the wall. And It was important to establish the importance of that plotline for the next season and beyond. I wish they had handled it better in the past, but I wouldn't call this episode a waste of time at all.
It would make for a great final WTF moment to get people hyped for Season 5.I cannot wait for next week and the Stoneheart reveal to finally end the speculation. It's just GOT to be in there, it's the ray of grim, horrible hope after all the terrible things that have happened. It needs to stay in. No skipping Brienne ahead, no cutting Stoneheart. They've been pretty faithful to some of the more outlandish elements of the series (anyone remember Mel birthing a shadow demon??), this feels like a crucial element that they'd be foolish to cut as the final bit of the season.