• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

*UNMARKED SPOILERS ALL BOOKS* Game of Thrones |OT| - Season 4 - Sundays on HBO

Status
Not open for further replies.
If they submitted an Emmy nomination for the last episode in the "Outstanding Prosthetic Make-up" category, doesn't that all but confirm Stoneheart? I doubt they would consider the episode for just the wights or Leaf.
 

Speevy

Banned
At the beginning, I couldn't really put together that Renly was Robert's brother. The two look nothing alike. Robert looked so much older.
 

Speevy

Banned
If they submitted an Emmy nomination for the last episode in the "Outstanding Prosthetic Make-up" category, doesn't that all but confirm Stoneheart? I doubt they would consider the episode for just the wights or Leaf.

It would be much easier to kill all the Freys with a drone strike over The Twins.
 

Valhelm

contribute something
If they submitted an Emmy nomination for the last episode in the "Outstanding Prosthetic Make-up" category, doesn't that all but confirm Stoneheart? I doubt they would consider the episode for just the wights or Leaf.

If the Children aren't CGI, they'd probably use more intensive makeup than Stoneheart. They're essentially deer with human bodyshape.

Leaf_TheMico.jpg


ASOIAF wiki says that "The children were smaller than men with nut-brown skin, dappled like a deer's with paler spots. They had large ears that could hear things that no man could hear. They usually had large eyes, great golden cat's eyes, that could see down passages where a boy's eyes saw only blackness. They have vertical, slit-like pupils."
 
If the Children aren't CGI, they'd probably use more intensive makeup than Stoneheart. They're essentially deer with human bodyshape.

Leaf_TheMico.jpg


ASOIAF wiki says that "The children were smaller than men with nut-brown skin, dappled like a deer's with paler spots. They had large ears that could hear things that no man could hear. They usually had large eyes, great golden cat's eyes, that could see down passages where a boy's eyes saw only blackness. They have vertical, slit-like pupils."

Just let me believe :(
 

Famassu

Member
There is no way that is all happening in ep 10. It felt like 30 minutes had gone by just reading all the events that would happen.
Yeah, that's maybe a bit of my point. It would have to be extremely rushed and take way too much time from the episode to make it happen with any kind of decent pacing. Though, I guess they could really, REALLY rush it. 2-3 minute talk between Mance & Jon, commotion outside and they both run outside -> show wildlings being slaughtered for 2-3 minutes, ending with Stannis! Stannis! Stannis! -> cut away to someone else's storyline -> return to Jon's: 2 minute talk between Stannis & Jon outside -> cut to someone else's storyline -> Jon celebrating with his friends, 7 minutes from celebration to talks about a new Lord Commander to Jon being picked as the new Lord Commander. BAM, Stannis at the wall & Jon becoming the Lord Commander in 15 minutes.

:p
 
ADWD question: why do some people think Ramsay didn't write the pink letter?

I think it's because he demands for Reek's return. But last we saw, Theon was with Stannis' army, so if Ramsey won the battle like he said, he wouldn't have to ask for Reek back.

I think. It's been awhile since I've read it.
 

RatskyWatsky

Hunky Nostradamus
If the Children aren't CGI, they'd probably use more intensive makeup than Stoneheart. They're essentially deer with human bodyshape.

I bet they won't look like that on the show though. They made the giants look like large people instead of hairy sasquatch beasts, after all.
 
If the Children aren't CGI, they'd probably use more intensive makeup than Stoneheart. They're essentially deer with human bodyshape.

I really doubt they'll make the children of the forest look that alien/ animal like. If you watch some of the Blu Ray histories, they show children of the forest in there (albeit in concept sort of sketches) and they basically look like regular people in sort of primitive or native american looking dress.
 

Valhelm

contribute something
I really doubt they'll make the children of the forest look that alien/ animal like. If you watch some of the Blu Ray histories, they show children of the forest in there (albeit in concept sort of sketches) and they basically look like regular people in sort of primitive or native american looking dress.

Aw, that's lame.

I just realized that we might be seeing Charles Dance's lion this Sunday. I'm not sure if I'm ready for that.
 
No Stoneheart or a delayed introduction could certainly work with Season 5 Dorne leaks
Jaime going to Dorne, as he's not needed in the Riverlands, at least right right away.
 

CassSept

Member
If the Children aren't CGI, they'd probably use more intensive makeup than Stoneheart. They're essentially deer with human bodyshape.

http://awoiaf.westeros.org/images/9/9e/Leaf_TheMico.jpg[IMG]

ASOIAF wiki says that "[I]The children were smaller than men with nut-brown skin, dappled like a deer's with paler spots. They had large ears that could hear things that no man could hear. They usually had large eyes, great golden cat's eyes, that could see down passages where a boy's eyes saw only blackness. They have vertical, slit-like pupils.[/I]"[/QUOTE]

That's a really weird and stylized fanart though. I'd guess they'd be more like smaller humans with a bit bark-ish skin, probably wearing some sort of tribali-ish accessories.

Like their depiction in DVD extras, rather than that fanart.

[img]http://awoiaf.westeros.org/index.php/File:Children_of_the_Forest_greenseers.jpg
 

Madridy

Member
Why people still think that Stoneheart won't be in S4?

The reveal shouldn't take more than 2 minutes at the end of the episode.

Also Didn't Lena tease a heart made of stones in her Instagram few weeks ago?
 

Joe

Member
i don't know how anyone who only watches the show knows what's going on. i listened to the books and 100% need the show AND a wiki to to really understand everything.
 

Fuzzy

I would bang a hot farmer!
i don't know how anyone who only watches the show knows what's going on. i listened to the books and 100% need the show AND a wiki to to really understand everything.
I've found from a couple of people I know that have listened to the books that they miss a lot of what happened. It's probably because it's easier to zone out and not pay attention the entire time compared to reading them yourself.
 

F!ReW!Re

Member
i don't know how anyone who only watches the show knows what's going on. i listened to the books and 100% need the show AND a wiki to to really understand everything.

Come on, you really don't need the books or the wiki to understand where the wall is and that the Wildlings are trying to cross it from North to South (except the Tormund/Thenn band of raiders that crossed with Jon Snow)
I'll agree that some of the more obscure concepts and theories will be hard for show watchers to grasp (R+L=J is something barely touched upon / hinted at for example)
The mixup about WW, wights, the others and "zombies" is also something I can understand to be confusing for show viewers.

Although I also had to read a wiki after reading the books to grasp stuff like the Alchemist = Jaqen H'ghar and other such concepts.
And I'll also admit to speed reading through some of the boring stuff in the books (Dany's Mereen chapters and the whole Dorne crap in AFFC and ADWD), only to read through them again more slowly + wiki assistance after finishing ADWD. (I actually appreciate the Dany mereen chapters now, especially after reading that blogpost (was posted here a couple of weeks/months ago) detailing all of the intrigue going on in Mereen)

*edit;*
Found the link about Dany's time in Mereen;
http://meereeneseblot.wordpress.com...reenese-knot-part-i-who-poisoned-the-locusts/
 

CassSept

Member
I've found from a couple of people I know that have listened to the books that they miss a lot of what happened. It's probably because it's easier to zone out and not pay attention the entire time compared to reading them yourself.

Yeah the multitude of names are probably missable when heard, especially at scenes like Ramsay's wedding reception.
 

Joe

Member
what really hurt was me was the voice talent in the books. books 1-3 were amazing, like award winning amazing. but after the long time between books 3 and 4 his voice (and overall health) changed a lot and the voices were subpar. it got really hard to follow on book 4 and 5.
 
what really hurt was me was the voice talent in the books. books 1-3 were amazing, like award winning amazing. but after the long time between books 3 and 4 his voice (and overall health) changed a lot and the voices were subpar. it got really hard to follow on book 4 and 5.

Yeah, it was jarring for Dany's voice to go from proper to pauper.
 
It just hit me again that Stannis had Renly killed, his own brother. I sometimes fall into the camp that Stannis would be a good and fair king but killing your own brother? How can anyone support him?
 
It just hit me again that Stannis had Renly killed, his own brother. I sometimes fall into the camp that Stannis would be a good and fair king but killing your own brother? How can anyone support him?

Well do consider the stakes at hand and the fact that Stannis warned him not to take up arms. Stannis had claim to the throne, not Renly.

Yeah it's still pretty shitty but that is the guy Stannis is. He had the claim, Renly fought it, Stannis basically disowned him as a brother.

Renly would have been a shit king anyways.
 

Iksenpets

Banned
It just hit me again that Stannis had Renly killed, his own brother. I sometimes fall into the camp that Stannis would be a good and fair king but killing your own brother? How can anyone support him?

His brother was kind of in open rebellion against him, and would have killed him in battle the next day if Stannis hadn't struck first. Not saying he didn't take the less honorable path and that it wasn't a questionable move, but I don't think it's a black and white thing either.

Also in the book it always seemed like it was much more Melisandre acting on her own, and that Stannis is kind of in denial that he had any involvement at all.
 
It just hit me again that Stannis had Renly killed, his own brother. I sometimes fall into the camp that Stannis would be a good and fair king but killing your own brother? How can anyone support him?

He also basically abandoned Robert to die. He knew about the incest and ran away to dragonstone rather than do anything productive with the knowledge. Well until he was rightful King, then that knowledge was conveniently useful to him.

Renly would have been a shit king anyways.
He probably would have been a pretty decent king. I'd take Renly over almost every other candidate for the throne in the series, including Stannis who would have driven the realm apart and to war with his rigidity.
 

Enosh

Member
!!!!! HERE BE SPOILERS !!!!! !!!!! HERE BE SPOILERS !!!!! !!!!! HERE BE SPOILERS !!!!! !!!!! HERE BE SPOILERS !!!!!

He also basically abandoned Robert to die. He knew about the incest and ran away to dragonstone rather than do anything productive with the knowledge. Well until he was rightful King, then that knowledge was conveniently useful to him.
yes because doing something worked out so well for Ned
plus Aryn just died (iirc he ran after his death no?) in what was obviously a assassination, there is no way he would have known it was littlefinger dicking around instead of the Lannisters trying to take out people who know too much

and does anyone honestly think Robert would listen to him and believe the story?
 

Moff

Member
I believe stannis will be redeemed to a certain degree. as others have pointed it, melisandre insited ok taking shireen to the wall, I'm pretty sure she wants to sacrifice her, which is the moment stannis will finally step out of her shadow. and at the same time, will give melisandre reason to doubt him and look for azor ahai elsewhere.
 
!!!!! HERE BE SPOILERS !!!!! !!!!! HERE BE SPOILERS !!!!! !!!!! HERE BE SPOILERS !!!!! !!!!! HERE BE SPOILERS !!!!!


yes because doing something worked out so well for Ned
plus Aryn just died (iirc he ran after his death no?) in what was obviously a assassination, there is no way he would have known it was littlefinger dicking around instead of the Lannisters trying to take out people who know too much

and does anyone honestly think Robert would listen to him and believe the story?

He never even attempted to do anything. It was a pretty cowardly act.
 

Forkball

Member
WiC put up their tweet list for the last episode.

@CCozzetto: We are 2 minutes in and Jon’s hair is the clear star of this episode

@theSamwellTarly: Oh shit Aemon is Jon Snow’s dad. A + L = J amirite?

@feellikepdiddy: SAM AND GILLY SITTING IN A TREE, LOVE IS THE DEATH OF DUTY #RuinANurseryRhyme

@7373tinkerbell: I hope they can hold them off until dawn when gandolf comes

@theSamwellTarly: Someone call Legolas to kill that elephant thing damn.

@AngryGoTFan: AN ARROW GOING THAT SPEED WOULD FLY THROUGH A MAN NOT IMPALE HIM #NOONEUNDERSTAAANDS

@WiCThoros: #HoldTheGate

@Handsome_Jake_: Somewhere a feminist is writing an article about how Olly nodding his head after killing Ygritte was sexist.

@ThrilledGoTFan: THE CLIMB IS ALL THERE IS

@HarleyHorcrux: WHAT THE FUCK IS SHOW EVEN DOING WHY GRENN WHY PYP FUCK THIS IM FUCKING DONE
 

Reyne

Member
He also basically abandoned Robert to die. He knew about the incest and ran away to dragonstone rather than do anything productive with the knowledge. Well until he was rightful King, then that knowledge was conveniently useful to him.

Meh, what could he have done then, realistically? Accusing the queen of incest would have been political suicide, so to speak. Robert and Stannis weren't exactly on speaking terms so I doubt Robert would have taken kindly to Stannis accusing his lady queen of incest and adultery ( even if he cares but little about his wife and children ). And since the evidence amounts to 'bastards looks like the father, true-born children does not' it would have taken someone very close to Robert to convince him of that, like Ned or Jon Arryn, but both made the mistake of not telling him first.

Even long before that, Robert had decided that Stannis shouldn't have Storms End and the handship. It was one slight after another. So Stannis may have decided to leave Robert to his fate, but then Robert never did right by Stannis either. Perhaps if Stannis had been the Lord of Storms End and the Hand of the King, he would have had the necessary power and influence to save Robert from Cersei's treachery, but as it stands, he wasn't in the position to do it. His best card was, it seems to me, to bid his time on Dragonstone, or share Roberts fate in the grave.

He probably would have been a pretty decent king. I'd take Renly over almost every other candidate for the throne in the series, including Stannis who would have driven the realm apart and to war with his rigidity.

Stannis is not really as rigid as people make him out to be. He'll pardon lords were he can, or else give the lordship to more worthy people, like Davos. While some would call him iron, that'll break before he bends, he has so far shown himself to be very adaptive no matter where he is, even willingly to take the counsel of low-born and bastards, were most high-born lords, in their true rigidity, would refuse to even look at them, let alone follow their advice.

Anyway, I am hyped for the next episode.
Stannis! Stannis! STANNIS!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom