I think they spent all their northerners casting budget on the water gardens.
Changed all of her plans? What plans? The only plan we know of is wait here till Stannis shows up. Cogman doesn't make any sense just like this plotline.I was the one who first posted that quote to laugh at it last week. link Cogman might have just worded it really horribly. He made an update to that article a few days later.
"UPDATE: Bryan Cogman tweeted the following: Hi all. Not going to comment further but I do want to clarify something from the @EW interview that was conducted on set a few months ago: The choice I was referring to was Sansas choice to marry Ramsay and walk into that room. She feels marrying him is a vital step in reclaiming her homeland. Not trying to change anyones opinion of the scene (negative or otherwise) but that it what I was Ok, LAST last word. In NO WAY NO WAY was that comment an attempt to blame the victim. If it seemed that way Im deeply sorry. "
It's still worded badly. He seems to be saying she made the choice just to marry Ramsay, not the choice to be raped. He should have flat out said that.
But we have to be fair. Even if we didn't like that scene is episode 5, the show is clearly saying it was a rape with a serious effect on Sansa. They aren't handling it like she chose to be assaulted. A lot of us were thinking they might just have her blow it off. Like Jaime/Cersei last year. I give them credit for not doing that and handling the aftermath right. I was worried with that Cogman quote.
In a way, since Sansa got married willingly and walked to the bedroom willingly but yet was still raped and it changed all of her plans and broke her willpower, you could actually say it's making a serious statement against marital rape.
Changed all of her plans? What plans? The only plan we know of is wait here till Stannis shows up. Cogman doesn't make any sense just like this plotline.
Honestly, I think Theon will come around imo. Sansa will try to kill Ramsay and he stops her. He starts to torture her and Theon can't take it anymore and kills Ramsay with a Sword or something. If someone is to kill Ramsay; it should be Theon imo. He took his manhood.
Changed all of her plans? What plans? The only plan we know of is wait here till Stannis shows up. Cogman doesn't make any sense just like this plotline.
Nah, Sansa will go full Jeyne Pool. She already had bruises, the dogs are next.
LOL! Speevy for Christ's sake the thread won't hold until next week if you keep posting so damn much.
Wow Unbowed, Unbent, Unbroken really brought down peoples' opinion of the show.
88% for The Gift on RT.
88% bad? Dang! TV show review scores make video game review scores actually look biting in comparison!
When Tommen was yelling about being king he sounded almost exactly like Joffrey. Eerie stuff.
Victarian and Euron got merged.And then they say "BROTHER!" and you realize Daario was Victarian the whole time.
When Tommen was yelling about being king he sounded almost exactly like Joffrey. Eerie stuff.
Eh, Rotten Tomatoes is pretty shit for television I have to say.88% bad? Dang! TV show review scores make video game review scores actually look biting in comparison!
Wow Unbowed, Unbent, Unbroken really brought down peoples' opinion of the show.
88% for The Gift on RT.
One thing I don't get. If it was a royal decree that allowed the Faith Militant to cone back can't another decree outlaw them? It seems so simple but why isn't this an option?
I read the books. I get the plot. I just wondered why, on a practical level, the king didn't just order them disbanded. It's explained to us that they existed in the past until a king outlawed them. Why not do that again?I believe George R.R. Martin was trying to say that putting religion in charge of a government is dangerous. In medieval times, people were tortured and executed for speaking out against the church or for suspicion of heresy.
They've set up a pretty implausible set of circumstances, but the faith militant does take over King's Landing in the books.
I read the books. I get the plot. I just wondered why, on a practical level, the king didn't just order them disbanded. It's explained to us that they existed in the past until a king outlawed them. Why not do that again?
I don't know, even show only viewers I've spoken to have said this is the worst season of the show. Not surprising to see ratings and viewership down.Many absolutely loathe the Dorne storyline and what they did to Sansa has been inexcusable. People don't want to watch a fan favorite be a punching bag again. It especially pisses them off hearing that it doesn't happen in the books. Can't wait to see the reactions if the season ends with Jon being stabbed.
Sansa is apparently locked in her room and raped every night but that old hag can't take a clue? Light the candle yourself why don't you? Isnt she her maid?Brienne's story in the show pisses me off.
So, she's pretty much just sitting in a room, staring at a broken tower, and waiting for a candle to be lit? The fuck she thinks is going on with Sansa? Does she actually believe Sansa is enjoying her honeymoon to Ramsay? And what happens when a candle is lit? Do her and Pod just single-handedly take all of Winterfell's new residents on?If there is a plan in place to save Sansa once a candle is lit, why not just do it now? It's not like the North is getting any warmer...
Lol, again, thank you? for the background. I really just wanted to know if there was some clause that stopped the king from issuing a decree disbanding the Faith Militant that I was missing. I understand the plot of the show and the books. Here, we have a young man who is watching his family, including his hot wife, be taken by these people and he seems to have no clue how to get rid of them. If the former king (whoever that was) disbanded them simply with an order, and Cercei brought them back with a simple order, why can't Tommen, legally, get rid of them with a pen stroke? Or, was there more than just an order of the king that disbanded them in the past?Tommen is an ineffectual king who believes that the people must love him, else he will be seen as a terrible king like his brother was. They yell "bastard" in the streets when he passes and he takes this to heart.
He believes that his mother has put good, god-fearing and law-abiding people in charge of King's Landing. He is a young man who is not aware of why such a thing would be ill-advised.
Cersei has an insular view of every situation and cannot counsel anyone on the bigger picture. She just destroys what's in front of her.
The only way to stop the faith is to kill its members, and Tommen is unwilling to do that, so they remain in power. To simply take their power would not suffice. They would take up arms, and more than likely the common people would rise up against Tommen.
from the wiki:Lol, again, thank you? for the background. I really just wanted to know if there was some clause that stopped the king from issuing a decree disbanding the Faith Militant that I was missing. I understand the plot of the show and the books. Here, we have a young man who is watching his family, including his hot wife, be taken by these people and he seems to have no clue how to get rid of them. If the former king (whoever that was) disbanded them simply with an order, and Cercei brought them back with a simple order, why can't Tommen, legally, get rid of them with a pen stroke? Or, was there more than just an order of the king that disbanded them in the past?
He can't just arm them and then tell them to disband peacefully. In the books the crown owes the Faith an enormous debt which they agree to waive and also crown Tommen in return for the right to have their own military. Which I imagine was more like the Templars not the beggar knife wielders of the show.When Aegon the Conqueror, invaded Westeros, he adopted the Seven and gained support of the High Septon, who proclaimed that the Faith Militant would not offer resistance to the Targaryen invasion. A sept called the Sept of Remembrance was built on Rhaenys's Hill was constructed during the reign pf Aegon the Conquerer.
The Faith's support for the Targaryens changed upon Aegon's death and the passing of the Iron Throne to his son Aenys I Targaryen and later Maegor I Targaryen. The Faith withdrew their allegiance and the Militant orders supported those lords who opposed the Targaryens.
The resulting civil war raged through the reigns of Aenys I and Maegor the Cruel and into the start of the reign of Jaehaerys I. Maegor's brutal repression of the Faith caused tens of thousands of deaths. Eventually, Jaehaerys offered peace to the Faith and House Targaryen's unwavering defense and support in return for the militant orders disbanding to which they agreed. Jaehaerys I appointed Septon Barth the Hand of the King and had forty years of peace and prosperity.
I doubt the show would focus on that, it didn't even have time for Faith militant's proper set up.The Tyrells are well loved in the book and there is outrage/protests after Margaerys arrest. I like the idea but I'm not sure how well the Faith could turn the people of Kings Landing against her and the Tyrells. Quite a threat though.
Thank you.from the wiki:
He can't just arm them and then tell them to disband peacefully. In the books the crown owes the Faith an enormous debt which they agree to waive and also crown Tommen in return for the right to have their own military. Which I imagine was more like the Templars not the beggar knife wielders of the show.
the high sparrow is delusional if he thinks he represents "the many". the tyrell threat is very real.
Can they be blamed when they are imprisoning the people's beloved Magaery and Loras? The food came with Margaery, what do they expect.To be fair, the Tyrells have worked really hard to keep up a good image in King's Landing. I doubt they'd want to get rid of it by withholding food, and you can be sure the High Sparrow would let everyone know who's the cause.
Definitely. Hardly matters anyway.I doubt the show would focus on that, it didn't even have time for Faith militant's proper set up.
the high sparrow is delusional if he thinks he represents "the many". the tyrell threat is very real.
It's pretty cool when two characters who've never met do (Tyrion & Dany). Are we roughly up to where they are in the books with them now? Not that it in any way matters of course. I fully expect Season Six to be its own thing.
Sansa was kind of a dick, calling Jon a bastard, saying he was jealous of Joffrey. She even wondered if Arya wasn't found somewhere and not really her sister. She doesn't really seem to be close to any of her siblings, though we only see her interact with Arya.
Basically she was a dumb girl who chose her 'friends' over her family and payed for it.