• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

*UNMARKED SPOILERS ALL BOOKS* Game of Thrones |OT| - Season 5 - Sundays on HBO

Status
Not open for further replies.
She was pretty much the only person that openly said that all the warring and fighting was stupid and a waste of life. Given that the WWs about to fuck up a depleted Westeros I'd say she was pretty smart in that regard.
 

Damerman

Member
I don't understand what is so far fetched about this idea it's pretty clear from the books that each Stark child is being groomed to have very specific and clear talents so that together they'll represent a larger powerful force capable of influencing events and providing a large contribution come end game.

Arya= Assassin.
Bran= Wizard.
Jon= Warrior/Battle Commander.
Sansa= Political Player.
Rickon= ...Shaggydog.

They're basically a classic D&D party group.
regardless of whether this is a joke post or not, i agree with all my heart.(lol at Rickon)

also, count me as one of the rabid sansa fans. though arya is my number one when all starks are accounted for.
 
This is just speculation, but I wonder if we're eventually going to find out that there was actually good reason for Mad King Aerys's actions. GRRM likes to subvert the way that history has previously been presented; he's already done that a bit with the part where Jaime assassinated Aerys, but I'd love to find out that on some level Aerys was correct to want to burn KL, or else that he was being driven deliberately mad (maybe by Bloodraven).
 
Yeah, in regards to Robb's war councils, she was a pretty good advisor.
She took Tyrion Lannister in the belief that he attempted to have her son murdered (and this was bolstered by the misinformation Littlefinger gave her) - it was the emotions of a mother that overcome her there. And she only let him go because he earned his freedom according to the law.

As for Jaime, it was an irrational mistake, but an understandable one. That was when Tyrion as acting Hand arranged for the exchange between Jaime and the Stark girls; and of course unbeknownst to Catelyn, they didn't really have Arya.
 

Lothar

Banned
That would certainly be a boring twist. Sansa turns to Roose, hoping he'll sympathize over this information. He just laughs at her.

"Yeah, he does that."

That would be an awesome twist to mindfuck the audience.

Here's the line.
"Ramsay will kill them all, of course. That’s for the best. I will not live long enough to see new sons to manhood, and boy lords are the bane of any House. Walda will grieve to see them die, though.”

I can hear Michael McElhatton saying it.
 

XAL

Member
As for Jaime, it was an irrational mistake, but an understandable one. That was when Tyrion as acting Hand arranged for the exchange between Jaime and the Stark girls; and of course unbeknownst to Catelyn, they didn't really have Arya.

Having the Heir to House Lannister and possibly most skilled swordsman in Westeros... even if Tyrion had Arya it's not a worth trade.
 
This is just speculation, but I wonder if we're eventually going to find out that there was actually good reason for Mad King Aerys's actions. GRRM likes to subvert the way that history has previously been presented; he's already done that a bit with the part where Jaime assassinated Aerys, but I'd love to find out that on some level Aerys was correct to want to burn KL, or else that he was being driven deliberately mad (maybe by Bloodraven).

Actually, there's been some very hard implications that Aerys has had good reasons to be suspicious, but he was exaggerating that and became paranoid to the point of doing irrational shit.
During his reign, as it started to become apparent that he was no longer fit to rule, 2 factions started emerging, one led by Rhaegar, and one by Jon Arryn. It's even very likely that those two factions originally had coinciding goals (i.e. deposing Aerys; I don't think Jon Arryn's initial plan was to have Robert Baratheon take the throne, and Rhaegar just wanted to dethrone Aerys and succeed him).

During her visit of the crypts, Lady Dustin mentioned that Rickard Stark had "Southron ambitions". This all involved various characters that were involved during the War of the Ninepenny Kings (Rickard Stark, Hoster Tully, Jon Arryn, Steffon Baratheon and to a lesser extent, Tywin Lannister). If you look at various family trees, you will see that great lords usually marry within their own regions, mostly to bind their vassals tighter to their reign, and not have them rebel. However, the more recent marriage pacts all were across the borders.
The initial marriage pacts should've looked like this: Catelyn Tully marries Brandon Stark, Lysa Tully marries Jamie Lannister, Lyanna Stark marries Robert Baratheon, and Jon Arryn fosters Robert and Ned Stark at the Eyrie (fostering is about as strong as a marriage pact). Also noteworthy is that Elia Martell originally was supposed to marry a Hightower (who in turn were married to the Tyrells; Mace's wife is a Hightower), and there were plans by Joanna Lannister to marry Oberyn to Cersei, so the Reach and Dorne also seem to have been part of the original marriage lineup. But thanks to Tywin rejecting the Martells (due to Joanna's death) and the Martells rejecting the Hightowers, the Southern realms dropped out.

And then more stuff happened. Aerys rejected Tywin's proposal to wed Cersei and Rhaegar and instead married him to Elia, and named Jaime to the Kingsguard. That led the Lannisters to drop out of the proposed alliances. Then Aerys burnt Rickard and Brandon Stark, which forced Jon Arryn to marry Ned instead of Brandon to Catelyn Tully, and himself to Lysa Tully in order to get the Riverlands' support. Then the tourney at Harrenhal happened, Rhaegar kidnapped Lyanna cause of prophecy, and that was the opportunity the Stark-Baratheon-Arryn(-Tully) alliance was waiting for to rebel.

Obviously as shit hit the fan, Tywin loved the opportunity to get his own revenge for Aerys rejecting Cersei and making Jaime a Kingsguard by sacking King's Landing and having the woman he scorned Cersei over brutally murdered.
 

foxtrot3d

Banned
She kidnapped the son of the most powerful man in Westeros, and let him go. Then she had another of their sons and let him go too. That's pretty bad.

I never liked Catelyn but while she wasn't stupid she, like Ned Stark to an extent, acted too much on impulse and emotion. She just up and kidnaps Tyrion based on incomplete information completely oblivious to the consequences. She then release Jaimie based on her emotional impulses to save her children, again oblivious to the consequences.


regardless of whether this is a joke post or not, i agree with all my heart.(lol at Rickon)

also, count me as one of the rabid sansa fans. though arya is my number one when all starks are accounted for.

Not a joke pose, I think the books pretty much support my observations.

This is just speculation, but I wonder if we're eventually going to find out that there was actually good reason for Mad King Aerys's actions. GRRM likes to subvert the way that history has previously been presented; he's already done that a bit with the part where Jaime assassinated Aerys, but I'd love to find out that on some level Aerys was correct to want to burn KL, or else that he was being driven deliberately mad (maybe by Bloodraven).

Nah, I mean he was right to be paranoid but he was crazy. As Red Arremer points out it does seem that there was a very real conspiracy against Aerys, this is even further supported by "The World of Ice and Fire" book but Aerys was indeed pretty mad. I also think that it can pretty much be considered a fact that the Tourney of Harrenhall was a cover by Rhaegar to meet with a majority of the Lord's to plot against his father. Unfortunately, Varys, that sneaky fuck, ruined that plot.
 
Yeah, Rhaegar was plotting his own thing, but I haven't invested a lot of research into him, myself. But Aerys still was mad enough to have his own son and just about all great lords of Westeros plot his removal from the throne.
Robert really only took the Iron Throne by coincidence because of Rhaegar taking Lyanna, Jon Arryn's plan was just to depose of Aerys.

And since we only know Robert's perspective, it's also questionable whether Lyanna was actually kidnapped or not. It seems a lot more likely Rhaegar had her consent when he took her, as evidenced by Ned not having nearly as much of a strong reaction.

But Aerys putting wildfire all over King's Landing to burn the city to the ground? That was only him being crazy.
 

foxtrot3d

Banned
Yeah, Rhaegar was plotting his own thing, but I haven't invested a lot of research into him, myself. But Aerys still was mad enough to have his own son and just about all great lords of Westeros plot his removal from the throne.
Robert really only took the Iron Throne by coincidence because of Rhaegar taking Lyanna, Jon Arryn's plan was just to depose of Aerys.

And since we only know Robert's perspective, it's also questionable whether Lyanna was actually kidnapped or not. It seems a lot more likely Rhaegar had her consent when he took her, as evidenced by Ned not having nearly as much of a strong reaction.

But Aerys putting wildfire all over King's Landing to burn the city to the ground? That was only him being crazy.

I don't think anyone here believes she was kidnapped against her will. I think most of us believe that she and Rhaegar went off together in secret and got married on the Isle of Faces, afterwards he probably sent her Dorne to keep her safe.
 
To the guy above with the different roles of the Stark kids I think Rikon may end up leading the wildlings since he's quite wild
himself and I am not even joking lol
 
"Wildlings" may be sort of a useless term in the future, especially given that the Wall's gonna come down at some point (I'm thinking it'll happen at the end of TWOW).
 

foxtrot3d

Banned
To the guy above with the different roles of the Stark kids I think Rikon may end up leading the wildlings since he's quite wield himself and I am not even joking lol

The thing about Rickon is that he's too young to influence any events by himself unless we get a significant time skip. His importance is his use by others as a Stark and thus an heir to Winterfell, but he's not important in his own right like the rest of the Starks who are (or very well soon) will be able to play a part in the larger "Game."

"Wildlings" may be sort of a useless term in the future, especially given that the Wall's gonna come down at some point (I'm thinking it'll happen at the end of TWOW).

Yeah, I think Melisandre is right when she thought to her self they are "a dead people" but don't realize it.
 

duckroll

Member
This is just speculation, but I wonder if we're eventually going to find out that there was actually good reason for Mad King Aerys's actions. GRRM likes to subvert the way that history has previously been presented; he's already done that a bit with the part where Jaime assassinated Aerys, but I'd love to find out that on some level Aerys was correct to want to burn KL, or else that he was being driven deliberately mad (maybe by Bloodraven).

I don't think there's much more to it rather than what's on face value. Not everything has to have an "other side" to it. Sometimes it is just what it is. Generations of inbreeding and only having -one- mad king in the family is kinda surprising as it is. He was probably just you know... mentally ill.
 

foxtrot3d

Banned
I don't think there's much more to it rather than what's on face value. Not everything has to have an "other side" to it. Sometimes it is just what it is. Generations of inbreeding and only having -one- mad king in the family is kinda surprising as it is. He was probably just you know... mentally ill.

Ha, no like half of the Targ Kings were mad.
 

Gila

Member
xFRMzPh.jpg
 
The thing about Rickon is that he's too young to influence any events by himself unless we get a significant time skip. His importance is his use by others as a Stark and thus an heir to Winterfell, but he's not important in his own right like the rest of the Starks who are (or very well soon) will be able to play a part in the larger "Game."
Makes me curious if the original time jump plans being axed changed George's plan for Rickon.
 

Jarmel

Banned
Episode 8 was so good. So good.

The Night's King just cold staring Jon and saying "Let's Go!" was so awesome of a moment.

Season 6 is going to be amazing.
 

bengraven

Member
I was reading this "toilet facts" book called The Bloody History of Britain. It covers mainly the wars and kings and conquests with some occasional facts thrown in and lots and lots of dad humor.

You can definitely see where George got his influences. Half of the British kings were mad...hell, 90% of them were either assholes or insane. And the shit they did to each other makes Jaime throwing Bran out the window look like Jaime inviting Bran over to play Xbox. Seriously, George was too kind to his people.

Makes me curious if the original time jump plans being axed changed George's plan for Rickon.

I think the five year plan is why Rickon is so young. He would be the same age as Arya in the beginning when the books were done. It would be a parallel.

What is even more surprising is that the actor has like, a fairly normal, even high-ish voice.
Dude must get super hoarse every day he's on set.

Oh that motherfucker! I've been wanting a hot redhead all my life, but they all refused to be with me because THEY on the other hand, HATED fellow redheads and didn't want us to make ugly pale red haired kids.
 

foxtrot3d

Banned
Not really

Well, it depends on how we define "mad."

Maegor the Cruel. I don't think I really need to elaborate on him dude was named "the Cruel" after all and loved killing people.

Baelor I, the Blessed
. A religious nut who among his many memorable deeds locked his sisters away to protect himself from the evils of temptation and eventually died by fasting too much, or was may have been poisoned by his councilors for being completely nuts.

Aegon IV, the Unworthy.
Suspected of poisoning his father King Viserys II, his reign was filled with nothing more than his pursuit of carnal pleasure as he "did not count a night complete until he had spent himself in a woman." Thus leading to his many, many mistresses whom he disposed of in various manners when he was finished with them.

King Aerys I. A dude obsessed with ancient prophecy who was said to prefer taking a book to bed than his wife.

King Aerys II, the Mad.


And of course we're not even counting the various Princes and Princesses who we know exhibited forms of madness. Aerion Brightflame consumed wildfire believing he'd turn into a dragon. Prince Daeron became know as "the Drunken" because it was the only way he could cope with the constant visions he had. Prince Rhaegal was said to be crazy, running naked through the halls of the Red Keep.

The rest of the Kings were either sickly or ranged from competent to good rulers.
 
I was reading this "toilet facts" book called The Bloody History of Britain. It covers mainly the wars and kings and conquests with some occasional facts thrown in and lots and lots of dad humor.

You can definitely see where George got his influences. Half of the British kings were mad...hell, 90% of them were either assholes or insane. And the shit they did to each other makes Jaime throwing Bran out the window look like Jaime inviting Bran over to play Xbox. Seriously, George was too kind to his people.

The power struggle between the Lancasters and Yorks in the 14th & 15th century was really interesting. I actually saw a little video about that part of English history (which also likens some of the characters to GoT ones) the other day.
 

bengraven

Member
The power struggle between the Lancasters and Yorks in the 14th & 15th century was really interesting. I actually saw a little video about that part of English history (which also likens some of the characters to GoT ones) the other day.

I need to watch that. I know zip about British history except for the parts we're involved with or that were in major novels. If Charles Dickens, Susanna Clarke, Mel Gibson, or Naomi Novik didn't talk about it, I have no clue. :p
 

Amir0x

Banned
Well, it depends on how we define "mad."

Maegor the Cruel. I don't think I really need to elaborate on him dude was named "the Cruel" after all and loved killing people.

Baelor I, the Blessed
. A religious nut who among his many memorable deeds locked his sisters away to protect himself from the evils of temptation and eventually died by fasting too much, or was may have been poisoned by his councilors for being completely nuts.

Aegon IV, the Unworthy.
Suspected of poisoning his father King Viserys II, his reign was filled with nothing more than his pursuit of carnal pleasure as he "did not count a night complete until he had spent himself in a woman." Thus leading to his many, many mistresses whom he disposed of in various manners when he was finished with them.

King Aerys I. A dude obsessed with ancient prophecy who was said to prefer taking a book to bed than his wife.

King Aerys II, the Mad.


And of course we're not even counting the various Princes and Princesses who we know exhibited forms of madness. Aerion Brightflame consumed wildfire believing he'd turn into a dragon. Prince Daeron became know as "the Drunken" because it was the only way he could cope with the constant visions he had. Prince Rhaegal was said to be crazy, running naked through the halls of the Red Keep.

The rest of the Kings were either sickly or ranged from competent to good rulers.

It is pretty interesting just how many fucked Targs there were. Since these are the Targs that keep getting elaborated on in the books and histories, I assume it's telling us something about Dany too. I hope she goes full nutter. Well, nuttier.
 
There's also other Targs that weren't outright mad, but didn't really help the realm either. For instance, Viserys I's weak-willed rule led to the Dance of the Dragons, after all, since he had been manipulated a LOT by Otto Hightower.

I need to watch that. I know zip about British history except for the parts we're involved with or that were in major novels. If Charles Dickens, Susanna Clarke, Mel Gibson, or Naomi Novik didn't talk about it, I have no clue. :p

It's a great little summary of the War of the Roses. Obviously a lot of details are left out, but nothing where I'd say it's outright bad representation.
 
It is pretty interesting just how many fucked Targs there were. Since these are the Targs that keep getting elaborated on in the books and histories, I assume it's telling us something about Dany too. I hope she goes full nutter. Well, nuttier.

What if we write profiles for Robert and Stannis Baratheon? Wouldn't look much better...

That Targ blood the Baratheons have to blame?
 

Patriots7

Member
I don't think anyone here believes she was kidnapped against her will. I think most of us believe that she and Rhaegar went off together in secret and got married on the Isle of Faces, afterwards he probably sent her Dorne to keep her safe.
Eh.
She makes a big deal to Ned about how Robert would never be faithful because he's a manwhore, then goes and runs off with a married man?

I've never been able to understand that. If she willingly ran off with a married Prince, then her characterization of Robert falls hollow.

She also doomed her father and brother to death and that would imply she didn't even give a fuck as long as she was getting that Rhaegar D.
 

foxtrot3d

Banned
Eh.
She makes a big deal to Ned about how Robert would never be faithful because he's a manwhore, then goes and runs off with a married man?

I've never been able to understand that. If she willingly ran off with a married Prince, then her characterization of Robert falls hollow.

She also doomed her father and brother to death and that would imply she didn't even give a fuck as long as she was getting that Rhaegar D.

1. Robert was a drunken sot with a reputation of womanizing even at that early point. A bit different than one guy taking another wife for love instead of duty.

2. Rhaegar is pretty much considered the perfect guy.

3. It doesn't seem to look like Rhaegar was trying to make her "some other girl" he seems to have actually married her and unlike Elia this was a marriage for what we think was love. Although it could have been for prophecy.

4. We don't know Rahegar's intentions, he could have told her he intended to put Elia aside and have her as his only wife.

5. Lyanna is described as a fighter and wild, it's hard to imagine her being easily kidnapped and locked away. In essence, it'd be like capturing and trying to wed Arya against her will, somehow I think Needle would have something to say about that.

6. Why was she "dooming her father and brother?" How could Rhaegar or Lyanna possibly predict how events would ultimately unfold? That Brandon would be stupid enough to ride up to the Red Keep and threaten him with his life and that Aerys would be mad enough to have him and his father burned alive. That's like saying to a lesser extent that Robb should have known Walder Frey would betray the ancient custom of guest right and murder him and his entire company of men, including his mother, for breaking a marriage cotract.
 

Amir0x

Banned
What if we write profiles for Robert and Stannis Baratheon? Wouldn't look much better...

That Targ blood the Baratheons have to blame?

We have their history laid bare for us on the page, so I guess that makes a crucial difference. When you can actually read the full history, you get the nuance. Maybe that's the problem with just profiling the Targs, you're getting this snapshot. If you could say Robert was a drunk womanizer who just wasn't made to be King but instead a Warrior (and certainly not crazy), you wouldn't say there was a slant toward that behavior since Stannis is like the exact opposite... stoic, stern, a man who is intent on doing his duty so firmly that he can sometimes be interpreted as cruel. And Renly Baratheon was different still from them, outgoing, social, beloved by the people but sometimes viewed as an candidate who isn't particularly serious.

I think it's hard to know though since Robert, Stannis and Renly are a pretty small sample for a line, and only one of them has legitimately been king.

It certainly would appear that the books are trying to say that the Targaryens tainted incestual bloodline does lead to more fucked up offspring though. Constantly talking about obsessions, wild rants, visions, cruelty, nuttery.
 

foxtrot3d

Banned
We have their history laid bare for us on the page, so I guess that makes a crucial difference. When you can actually read the full history, you get the nuance. Maybe that's the problem with just profiling the Targs, you're getting this snapshot. If you could say Robert was a drunk womanizer who just wasn't made to be King but instead a Warrior (and certainly not crazy), you wouldn't say there was a slant toward that behavior since Stannis is like the exact opposite... stoic, stern, a man who is intent on doing his duty so firmly that he can sometimes be interpreted as cruel. And Renly Baratheon was different still from them, outgoing, social, beloved by the people but sometimes viewed as an candidate who isn't particularly serious.

I think it's hard to know though since Robert, Stannis and Renly are a pretty small sample for a line, and only one of them has legitimately been king.

It certainly would appear that the books are trying to say that the Targaryens tainted incestual bloodline does lead to more fucked up offspring though. Constantly talking about obsessions, wild rants, visions, cruelty, nuttery.

Yup, I always find Aemon's talk with Sam as he is dying pretty sad especially when he talks about hoping to see brother Dareon "whole" and "happy." When you read "The Hedge Knight" he comes off as a good enough guy just constantly plagued by visions/dreams, dreams that always came true.
Samwell said:
“I remember, Sam. I still remember.”
He was not making sense. “Remember what?”
“Dragons,” Aemon whispered. “The grief and glory of my House, they were.”
“The last dragon died before you were born,” said Sam. “How could you remember them?”
“I see them in my dreams, Sam. I see a red star bleeding in the sky. I still remember red. I see their shadows on the snow, hear the crack of leathern wings, feel their hot breath. My brothers dreamed of dragons too, and the dreams killed them, every one. Sam, we tremble on the cusp of half-remembered prophecies, of wonders and terrors that no man now living could hope to comprehend . . . or . . .”

It also makes me wonder what would have happened if Dareon had sobered up and actually wrote down his visions to tried to make sense of them. It seems to me he was one of the most powerful "dreamers" that House Targaryen ever had probably right up there with Daenys the Dreamer. It also makes me wonder if Bloodraven ever caught on to this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom