Peacefully? Probably not.thats not true at all, that is saying dany could just walk to the iron throne and sit down and be done with it
How could they announce Sansa openly though? I don't think the show can just gloss over the Sansa being wanted for regicide thing. It maybe won't seem so incongruous from a show only perspective, but I'm sure Sansa has made several references to being frightened of the queen finding her.
Ah, forgot about that. It still seems like the kind of gamble Littlefinger wouldn't take. He would watch and wait imo.
Plan makes no sense.
Marrying Ramsay does not legitimize Sansa by any means. She is the current (to most) heir to Winterfell already.
This just helps the Boltons. It's so illogical.
Peacefully? Probably not.
But I feel like there are more people willing to restore a Stark as Lord/Queen of the North than defend the Bolton's arguable claim.
Marrying Sansa strengthens their claim. It does not strengthen hers.
How could they announce Sansa openly though? I don't think the show can just gloss over the Sansa being wanted for regicide thing. It maybe won't seem so incongruous from a show only perspective, but I'm sure Sansa has made several references to being frightened of the queen finding her.
That scene bothers me so much. It made no sense. Cersei would have had him killed on the spot.To be frank... this is the same Littlefinger that openly threatened Cersei to her face in Season 2. Not as smart as he should be/thinks he is.
The Freys control Riverrun and Harrenhal is an abandoned ruin, as is Winterfell for that matter. Littlefinger and Sansa definitely do not control the Vale or it's power either. At the end of the day, Sansa can't remarry as Sansa as long as Tyrion is alive unless the King allows it. That is not happening.The Lannisters aren't at the height of their power and aren't exactly in a position to attack the North at this point.
With the North, Sansa/Littlefinger would probably control:
- The North (sans the Boltons)
- Riverrun
- The Vale (which can raise a fresh army)
- Harrenhal
Sansa can't remarry as Sansa as long as Tyrion is alive unless the King allows it. That is not happening.
Plus what does Littlefinger get out of it for giving up the most powerful piece he has to play?
The alliegence of the Boltons, who by that point will have betrayed their last two patrons within the space of about a year.
Plus Stannis is going to come down on Winterfell like a hammer soon anyway.
Plus he's giving Cat's daughter to the most evil fucker in
Westeros.
If they really do go for this it makes so little sense.
She could if it was the Martells and Tyrells in power in Kings Landing.
Ah, forgot about that. It still seems like the kind of gamble Littlefinger wouldn't take. He would watch and wait imo.
The Freys control Riverrun and Harrenhal is an abandoned ruin, as is Winterfell for that matter. Littlefinger and Sansa definitely do not control the Vale or it's power either. At the end of the day, Sansa can't remarry as Sansa as long as Tyrion is alive unless the King allows it. That is not happening.
I believe it is official. In the books, Tywin urges Tyrion to consumate the marriage.Isn't the rule that if it's never consummated, the marriage isn't official?
Hmm, you're right. Though I think such a thing would need to be confirmed by both parties and even then it would have to be annulled by a septon.Isn't the rule that if it's never consummated, the marriage isn't official?
Yeah, the show is pretty vague. I assumed Littlefinger acted as guardian for Robin but he would hardly be in control of the Lords and armies.This seems like book logic to me. The show at least suggests they do control the Vale. And we don't know the rules for annulling marriage in the HBOverse. Or what the hell happened to Riverrun.
Well, just enough to see how the Battle of Winterfell plays out.He can't watch and wait forever, everything will be wrapped up in 2 years.
isn't the plan obvious?
if he will really marry sansa to ramsey, he wants stannis to kill him after the wedding and sansa would become the ruler of the north.
then littlefinger would marry her himself and would be one of the, if not the the most powerful man of westeros and a huge step closer to being king.
Oh lol, I seeNo, your hyperbole suggestion makes complete sense, which means that it's the opposite that's happening in the show...
Yeah, the show is pretty vague. I assumed Littlefinger acted as guardian for Robin but he would hardly be in control of the Lords and armies.
If Stannis kills Ramsay I can't see him forgiving Littlefinger for delievering Sansa to the Boltons in the first place. Stannis would legitimate Sansa but Littlefinger wouldn't get away if he is still a man of "justice".
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-e...ser-davos-actor-liam-cunningham-10194273.html
Stannis is dead. Sansa kills him. I can feel it now.
Speculation from Reddit:
Judging by D&D's response to someone who brought up the problem with that scene at the Q&A session they did recently, it's clear that they are completely misunderstanding the criticism of that scene. They think that they are being taken to task for daring to have Jaime rape Cersei right in the middle of a 'redemption arc', and that they thought that they knew the scene would be contraversal but they thought it was 'important to do' the way it was done.
They either completely misread the scene in the book or just wanted it to be rape in the show regardless of what it was in the book. Either way, it wasn't a fuck up as far as they're concerned no matter how much it seemed like one.
- I just don't see why would Brienne kill Stannis. She doesn't know that it was him the one that killed Renly, only we, as spectators, know it. And why would he confess such a thing? This is the weakest link of that theory, me thinks
- I just don't see why would Brienne kill Stannis. She doesn't know that it was him the one that killed Renly, only we, as spectators, know it. And why would he confess such a thing? This is the weakest link of that theory, me thinks
She's apparently going to willingly marry him. And even if that weren't the case, the writers do not have to have the marriage immediately -- Margaery and Joffrey's engagement lasted over a season. If they rush the wedding, again, it's because they want to.Actually it kinda is, barring some unforeseen circumstance Ramsay has to consummate the marriage and she's not going to go into that willingly I would imagine.
But the regicide is not a small issue.I think it does strengthen her claim, yes.
because right now, the boltons are the legitimate rulers of the north. the king legitimated them. of course many people in the north disagree, the north remembers, it is known. however the king has the boltons backs. the north cant just make sansa the warden of the north.
but if she married ramsey and he and his father get killed, she is legitimate by any means AND has the norths backing. she would be legitimately accepted by everyone.
well apart from the small issue of regicide, but there is no way around that if she is ever to be used by littlefinger in any way.
But the regicide is not a small issue.
There is no way that the Lannisters would not see that as a betrayal, thus the Bolton's would lack the backing of King's Landing. Not only that, it would expose Littlefinger as being apart of the plan to kill Joffrey, threatening his control of the Vale and Harrenhal.
Not only that, why not go straight to Stannis and have him recognize her as the Warden of the North, her rightful title?
It's so ludicrous.
One thing I hope the show changes is that Aemon meets Dany before he dies. Even if he dies as soon as he gets to her I feel like it would be a really good moment and a fantastic ending to an amazing character.
Nah, it was so sad how he died before he could meet her it would be a shame to lose that.One thing I hope the show changes is that Aemon meets Dany before he dies. Even if he dies as soon as he gets to her I feel like it would be a really good moment and a fantastic ending to an amazing character.
Do show-watchers even remember he's a targ? I don't see it happening.
And are people seriously entertaining the thought of Sansa marrying Ramsay?
It's heavily implied with what we've seen in trailers and dialog in the second episode. We know Sansa and Littlefinger areWhat we don't know are any of the specifics or the exact context of any of this stuff.going to end up at Winterfell as there are shots of them there. We know Littlefinger tells her, "There's no justice in this world, not unless we make it. Avenge them." Putting that and Winterfell together logically follows as a plot to get revenge against the Boltons. We know Littlefinger talks about a marriage proposal being accepted in the last episode. We know a book plot is Ramsay marrying a fake Stark. We also know Littlefinger in the books has a long plan to reinstall Sansa at Winterfell. It's not a giant leap to think that the show is just accelerating this plot and condensing it with the fake Arya wedding. We know there is supposed to be a "traumatic" Sansa scene, and Ramsay's actor had a hard time with some of his material this season.
Do show-watchers even remember he's a targ? I don't see it happening.
And are people seriously entertaining the thought of Sansa marrying Ramsay?
I always wanted to see if the North still has any loyalty to the Stark name.
One thing I hope the show changes is that Aemon meets Dany before he dies. Even if he dies as soon as he gets to her I feel like it would be a really good moment and a fantastic ending to an amazing character.
Do you want me to begin preparing you a big feast of crow now, or would you rather do it yourself once the truth is out?
But the regicide is not a small issue.
There is no way that the Lannisters would not see that as a betrayal, thus the Bolton's would lack the backing of King's Landing. Not only that, it would expose Littlefinger as being apart of the plan to kill Joffrey, threatening his control of the Vale and Harrenhal.
Not only that, why not go straight to Stannis and have him recognize her as the Warden of the North, her rightful title?
It's so ludicrous.
I feel that on the showBrienne vs Stannis is going to happen but it won't go as planned. Melisandre killing her sounds about right if it does happen but she won't kill Stannis. She already won one big fight with the Hound and we never see repetitions like that, even if it isn't GRRM writing the scenario in this case.
Is S2 considered the worst season?
Is S2 considered the worst season? I watched episode 1 and it was pretty weak. I know it happens in the books but actually watching the guards running around murdering children felt like it entered 2edgy4me territory. Did Robert actually keep all of his bastards in King's Landing? I'm guessing so but it has been a year since I finished the books.
Yeah 2 is the worst. But it has the best episode (Blackwater)
I could buy an argument for either season 2 or 3 being the weakest.
The changes the show has already made make the Vale plot from TWOW impossible. In any event, there's nothing to indicate Sansa will be going to Winterfell anytime soon; her plot is intrigue in the Vale and her interactions with Littlefinger. Moreover, the single-biggest problem with Sansa going to Winterfell is if it involves being brutally raped by him, as the interviews seem to suggest.I don't understand what's wrong with the idea of Sansa going to Winterfell, isn't that where she's headed in the books anyway? Who cares who marries Ramsay, he probably won't survive the Battle of Winterfell on the show (or the books) and Sansa will be able to marry some heir to the Vale, just as Littlefinger planned in AFFC.
Not only that, why not go straight to Stannis and have him recognize her as the Warden of the North, her rightful title?