I do still absolutely blame her for it and she deserved a ban and the damage it will forever have on her career, "but," her situation really is the least bad/malicious it could possibly be. If you don't even admit that then IDK really.
This is basically how I look at the situation, too. She's to blame for not realizing the drug had been banned, for continuing to take it after that, and for taking it in the first place. That said, she accepted her punishment and blame and stayed away from the game for the required 15 months.
With that out of the way, what more do you want? What more is there to complain about? OK, some folks--fellow players included--think she should have been banned for life. Well, guess what? That's not how this kind of situation is handled in tennis, esp. based on the findings of her case. (She was found to have not intentionally doped, for the record.) So, why not just move on and accept that she's back in the game?
BTW, I truly believe most of the "sour grapes" comments spewing from the mouths of some plays comes from jealousy and hatred. They didn't like her before the doping scandal, so now they've latched onto it because it allows them to publicly rip on her.
Which is fine, as I get the feeling she doesn't care. Also, the only thing it's going to do is fuel her desire to beat all of them to a pulp on the tennis court. It isn't going to cause her to walk away from the game, as so many of them hope...
