Send nudes so we can judge if your peewee is niche or not.my dick is multiple inches long but that doesnt mean its an impressive number.
good result for a niche device tho and way better than that steam machine mess.
Send nudes so we can judge if your peewee is niche or not.my dick is multiple inches long but that doesnt mean its an impressive number.
good result for a niche device tho and way better than that steam machine mess.
Yeah 13.5M. Valve wouldn't be anywhere near that.Nintendo sold 'multiple millions' of its Wii U.
The case makes very easy to carry around.It’s way too big to be an actual carry around portable
.... how? The switch is literally an android tablet with 2 detachable controllers and a dock for hdmi out. It isnt that much harder to make a hybrid than it would be to make a handheld. You could even say the deck fits the description as it can connect other controllers and output to tv... You're just grasping at straws now.The Switch isn't analogous to the Steam Deck. It would be much more difficult for Sony and Microsoft to create a hybrid system and replicate the Switch than it would be for them to create a side project that was a pure handheld.
I actually use the Steam Deck like I use my Switch. Dock + PS5 controller on my 4KTV has been about 70% of my Diablo 4 time..... how? The switch is literally an android tablet with 2 detachable controllers and a dock for hdmi out. It isnt that much harder to make a hybrid than it would be to make a handheld. You could even say the deck fits the description as it can connect other controllers and output to tv... You're just grasping at straws now.
You have posted more than anyone in this thread, clearly you think this is news worth talking about. And you are trying to speak from some sort of tech authority which you don't have. I don't even know what you are trying to accomplish here.
Based on this, I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding of what Valve is doing with the Steam Deck.I would also add that if Steam Deck had more actually competition and not just high-margin competitors going for the niche of the niche, they would probably put out annual or bi-annual models to keep their margins and sales up.
.... how? The switch is literally an android tablet with 2 detachable controllers and a dock for hdmi out. It isnt that much harder to make a hybrid than it would be to make a handheld. You could even say the deck fits the description as it can connect other controllers and output to tv... You're just grasping at straws now.
Basically, the Steam Deck hasn't sold well
an impressive number.
And made more money than PS3 and Xbox 360 and their almost 90 millions.Nintendo sold 'multiple millions' of its Wii U.
I know full well what they're doing.Based on this, I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding of what Valve is doing with the Steam Deck.
Steam Deck owners are a new consumer type for the platform so you can't really compare to the 120 million who most likely get on for GaaS. Let's say it's 3 million deck owners. That's 3 million people looking at the Steam store in a new light, purchasing games they may or may not have purchased on a PC. That's also 3 million people beta testing their OS and proton... their major get out of jail gambit should something happen to Windows in the next 5-10 years.I know full well what they're doing.
They're trying to release hardware at a modest margin in order to push additional adoption of Steam. Increase loyalty among steam consumers to further lock them into the steam ecosystem, but there are 120 million steam users, 60 million daily active... and as few as 2 million steam decks sold? Even if it were 5 million that wouldn't be impressive.
The steam deck is profitable, since it is sold at a profit and they've almost certainly recouped R&D and manufacturing back, but that doesn't mean it'll have a great ROI.
Define "sold well/impressive number" in a world that DS and PS2 sold 150+ millions.
So a price difference of $529 vs $549, a price increase of 4% but in return you get the following upgrades:As someone who does hardware purchasing, I can tell you that the components in the steam deck are significantly cheaper now than when the system launched in February of 2022. RPIs get significant processing and memory upgrades, while generally maintaining a similar price (until recently).
Steam Deck owners are a new consumer type for the platform so you can't really compare to the 120 million who most likely get on for GaaS. Let's say it's 3 million deck owners. That's 3 million people looking at the Steam store in a new light, purchasing games they may or may not have purchased on a PC. That's also 3 million people beta testing their OS and proton... their major get out of jail gambit should something happen to Windows in the next 5-10 years.
Either new consumers or even existing Steam users are most likely using Steam Deck differently than their PC. There are games that lend themselves very well to portable play and those games will be uplifted on Steam thanks to Steam Deck. Think Vampire Survivors or Dave the Diver. All users, new or old will be viewing the Steam Deck store in a different light. That's good diversifying sales, encouraging even more developers to put their games on the Steam platform.Everyone I know who owns a Steam deck already had a steam library and still plays on their PC. Anecdotal for sure, but I don't see any evidence that they created a new consumer type.
The switch being the all in one Nintendo platform wouldn't have dissuaded Sony or Microsoft from simply making a scaled down hybrid system as a companion to their larger systems. MS is already ahead on this aspect since they have the Xbox series s. they don't have to go full nuclear and turn their entire ecosystem into a hybrid.The difficulty for Sony and Microsoft to make a handheld version of their current platform is immense, but the difficulty to make a version that is both handheld and has the full capabilities of the current console is even more difficult.
The only reason Nintendo is able to accomplish this is because their platform is significantly behind the consoles.
Sony and Microsoft can't replicate that without concessions to their home console platform. They could however put out a a stand-alone handheld that played their games at low resolution and frame rate.
So a price difference of $529 vs $549, a price increase of 4% but in return you get the following upgrades:
Improved 6nm SoC
Larger OLED HDR screen with 90hz refresh rate and double polling rate
Double SSD capacity
Faster LPDDR memory
Better Wi-fi module, upgrading to 6E standard
Better Bluetooth module, upgrade to 5.3
Additional antenna for better connectivity
25% larger battery, faster charging
Improved cooling
Better audio processor (dedicated DSP)
Some other internal and assembly improvements
Better thumbsticks and touch pads
Most of the cost saving would come from cheaper LPDDR5 and the 6nm SoC. The display would certainly be more expensive, while the larger battery and SSD offset any cost decreases there. The other improvements will also offset some potential savings from cheaper components.
The new OLED model seems to not offer a massive difference in profit for Valve.
Yeah I bet they did with their recent scam sales without telling anyone there was about to be an upgrade.
Valve says it has sold “multiple millions” of Steam Decks
The handheld gaming PC has proven to be a big hit for Valve.www.theverge.com
Valve is a private company, free from investors who owns the most popular digital gaming storefront in the world. They should have turned into monsters years ago.Let's wait and see how will they turn into monsters when they reach critical mass.
To you? You are a Valve owner/employee?To me the Steam Deck to really get sufficient ROI would need to sell 5 million units a year and should be close to 10 million units after 2 years.
To you? You are a Valve owner/employee?
On top of all this how do you even know how much the deck cost to make? 2 million 400 dollar sales would be 800 million bucks, and we both know people bought more expensive models than just the 400 dollar model. If the deck was so overpriced as you claim it is valve would have broke even by now, if not soonTo me the Steam Deck to really get sufficient ROI would need to sell 5 million units a year and should be close to 10 million units after 2 years.
The switch being the all in one Nintendo platform wouldn't have dissuaded Sony or Microsoft from simply making a scaled down hybrid system as a companion to their larger systems. MS is already ahead on this aspect since they have the Xbox series s. they don't have to go full nuclear and turn their entire ecosystem into a hybrid.
If the switch with their 120 million sales didn't make MS or Playstation budge a steam deck is not going to so it. Again, competitional response does not automatically mean success.
I'm pointing out that it doesn't look like Valve is intending to significantly increase margins on the Steam Deck. The original model gets a significant price cut while the newer model justifies why it got the 4% price increase. I fully agree that the devices are sold above margin just like any other PC or gaming console out there.The purchase of the older components at this point might have cost them more than they're worth. We'll see how long they continue to support the LCD models.
The long overdue price cut for the LCD models should tell you exactly that they were largely overpriced at this point in their life.
The price point for the OLED model would not have come at a cost of margins and the LCD models even with their cut price are still above margin...
Somehow you're focused on the previous price while ignoring that the original components were already cheaper.
On top of all this how do you even know how much the deck cost to make? 2 million 400 dollar sales would be 800 million bucks, and we both know people bought more expensive models than just the 400 dollar model. If the deck was so overpriced as you claim it is valve would have made their ROI by now, if not soon
Do you know what is the Valve profit target?Do you know what ROI and opportunity costs are?
To me or to anyone.
I'm pointing out that it doesn't look like Valve is intending to significantly increase margins on the Steam Deck. The original model gets a significant price cut while the newer model justifies why it got the 4% price increase. I fully agree that the devices are sold above margin just like any other PC or gaming console out there.
The Steam Deck goals are quite clear, try and expand the nascent PC handheld market, make Steam a more appealing platform, and offer a way for Valve to expand Linux gaming so as to break the shackles of Microsoft. It has clearly succeeded at all of that.
Everything Valve has done or talked about the Steam Deck clearly indicates that making a ton of money from direct sales of the device was not a primary concern.
Valve is vague about everything, I wouldn't read too much into that.They might have been able to make more money with a better steam controller without the need for R&D and support... At the end of the day we don't know how many units sold, because they refuse to tell us. But when a company is vague about their sales, they're generally not good.
Do you know what is the Valve profit target?
And... Valve knows exactly what metrics Steam Deck is selling at and what it's bringing to the Steam platform. So they see this as a good opportunity as they are continuing to invest in Steam Deck, Steam OS, etc. So what is your argument here?It's a private company, so we'll probably never know. But everything comes at a cost and that is opportunity cost.
The money and resources put into this aren't being put into game development or expansion into more Mac support on Steam.
When you look at companies and their missed opportunities, it always comes down to opportunity costs.
Most people actually bought the higher tier 500 and 600 versions over the lossy 400gb model, valve probably saw more profit than they did losses.That's a pretty good margin, but what's the breakdown of sales across 64gb, 256gb, and 512gb?
I think Valve wants to be careful how popular Steam Deck actually gets, tbh. I don't think they want Sony or MS to see Steam or Steam Deck as a true competitor or threat as that could change their relationship and what is put on their store.Most people actually bought the higher tier 500 and 600 versions over the lossy 400gb model, valve probably saw more profit than they did losses.
I'm done here. Typing paragraphs on a phone is annoying and unfun.
A more interesting conversation would be asking if putting the thing in more retail stores would increase sales since all the major consoles including even vr do so.
Yeah I bet they did with their recent scam sales without telling anyone there was about to be an upgrade.
Most people actually bought the higher tier 500 and 600 versions over the lossy 400gb model, valve probably saw more profit than they did losses.
I'm done here. Typing paragraphs on a phone is annoying and unfun.
A more interesting conversation would be asking if putting the thing in more retail stores would increase sales since all the major consoles including even vr do so.
And... Valve knows exactly what metrics Steam Deck is selling at and what it's bringing to the Steam platform. So they see this as a good opportunity as they are continuing to invest in Steam Deck, Steam OS, etc. So what is your argument here?
If the deck sells more people get on steam which means a larger audience of people are exposed to sony and ms pc ports. More money for all parties involved. If anything it would be in their best interest to keep Deck sales high so more pc ports get sold.I think Valve wants to be careful how popular Steam Deck actually gets, tbh. I don't think they want Sony or MS to see Steam or Steam Deck as a true competitor or threat as that could change their relationship and what is put on their store.
My argument is action speak louder than words. They said Steam Deck sold millions and they are continuing to invest it in. Clearly they are happy with the result so far and/or they see a reason to continue.So your argument is they haven't discontinued it so it has to be meeting their expectations (that they won't discuss publicly)
So fortunate to be a privately held company...