VGLeaks: First look as Durango XDK (always connected, kinect required, must install)

There's a difference between "will" and "must". "Will" means it's capable and "must" means it has to. My computer "will" keep a constant connection to the internet but it might not. "Must" it keep that connection to function though?

I'm willing to bet every rumor about always online is based on the quote "Always on, Always connected" except they ran with it out of context. The Wii's Wiiconnect24 was supposed to be always on, "always connected". Did it function without the internet?

I personally don't think any of the big 3 are so dumb enough to cut off that big of a market.

If it wasn't for the always part, I think you could make that argument. Always is pretty clear though. I do agree that the wording is different but the intention behind the wording is the same.
 
Yes. Microsoft is likening the Kinect 2 requirement to the Wii requiring the sensor bar. For them it's an "integral part" of the Xbox experience, so expect all of their 1st-party games to incorporate it in some way.
Thanks. I have no problem with Kinect game integration (if it doesn't work well, I simply won't buy the game) - but the idea of a Kinect enabled, always-online, always-on box in my living room just ain't happening for me.

I've got a $million dollar bet that MS is going to end up "accidentally" spying on all the people with this machine in their house.

Privacy = Gone
I don't think Microsoft themselves will 'spy' on individuals, but security is a huge risk. If hackers know the new Xbox has a camera that's always online, on and in millions of living rooms, it'll be a huge target.

but that's just it. You are missing the point. This is a living room machine. It is the evolution of the home telephone and the home version of our cell phones. It will be how in the future most people communicate with others when at home. Video tv/phone. Skype. Voice and gesture controlled media activity and eventually home control, lights DVR recording, heat, AC controlled remotely.

Its the future , an evolution of media and technology.

At least it's the start. I am amazed at the resistance to technologies and change all because of "fear"
Not sure if this is a serious post, but there's no way in hell I trust Microsoft to handle all of that responsibly.

And I definitely won't go along with it if it means Microsoft 'collecting' information about your living room/family/habits etc.
 
but that's just it. You are missing the point. This is a living room machine. It is the evolution of the home telephone and the home version of our cell phones. It will be how in the future most people communicate with others when at home. Video tv/phone. Skype. Voice and gesture controlled media activity and eventually home control, lights DVR recording, heat, AC controlled remotely.

Its the future , an evolution of media and technology.

At least it's the start. I am amazed at the resistance to technologies and change all because of "fear"

But some of the 'fear' is warranted. Or at least major concern.
What about the info saying MS wants to use the new always connected Kinect to analyze what's in the room to serve up better ads, etc.? You xbox sees a Patriots logo and starts serving you up related ads. MS will make boatloats with targeted ads like that. I consider that a huge invasion of privacy and I don't want ads like that. Even if subsidized I wouldn't want ads like that.
 
If it wasn't for the always part, I think you could make that argument. Always is pretty clear though. I do agree that the wording is different but the intention behind the wording is the same.

Not really but ok. Again i have to ask, if "mandatory online" is the intention then why doesn't the doc outright state it? You know, like it did for Kinect and disk instals?


Does this news confirm that the next Xbox will not support used-games?

Nope. Doesn't confirm whether they will or not.
 
Does this news confirm that the next Xbox will not support used-games?

Depends if they tie installations to accounts or consoles.

Not really but ok. Again i have to ask, if "mandatory online" is the intention then why doesn't the doc outright state it? You know, like it did for Kinect and disk instals?

There might be other elements that make it more complicated like if Internet drops the game doesn't kick you out.
 
Welcome to a Google world. BTW you are spied on every day by many, many corporations and goverments.

My gf's father's coworker was being interviewed for a government position a few months back and apparently this person came out of the interview shaking because of how much they knew about who he was/is, how he lived/lives, what sites he visited/visits, his relatives and ancestors, etc. Quite scary.
 
Why are people here being so blindly ignorant? The idea of "always on, always online" is the same exact intention of the PS4. How can anyone read that statement regarding the next Xbox and assume that FOR THEM it must mean being "always online" is "online required"? Some people are just purposely choosing that mindset because they want to make their console choice an easier decision.

Lets make one thing clear, BOTH Sony and MS want you to have their consoles consistently connected to the internet. Why wouldn't they? I would think as a consumer you would as well. That way, you assure that your console and games will be as up to date as possible even while you're away. Its not that when you're offline, you won't be able to play games, its that your OS or games won't be up to date. That's no different from playing a game offline now, and not being able to get the patch updates because you lack a connection to the network. People need to wise up.
 
Depends if they tie installations to accounts or consoles.

Obviously they will never tie games to physical consoles.

My gf's father's coworker was being interviewed for a government position a few months back and apparently this person came out of the interview shaking because of how much they knew about who he was/is, how he lived/lives, what sites he visited/visits, his relatives and ancestors, etc. Quite scary.

Plenty of people I know have hard shocks in interviews last few years. Always be careful what you post or do online :). Most of your "different" acounts can now be easily linked with all the information they track. You future employer *will* look you up online... be 100% sure of that, even if you flip burgers.
 
I've got a $million dollar bet that MS is going to end up "accidentally" spying on all the people with this machine in their house.

Privacy = Gone

How is this any different to the cameras and microphones in your smartphone or tablet? Or the cameras and mics in all Samsung's top-end TVs?
 
Hey look more ultra passionate debate about a product that isn't even announced yet... I'm afraid to see where this all goes once it's fully announced. Even moreso if Sony confirms much of the same rumored features as Durango. But then I suspect all dat passion will trickle to a whimper if that happens.
 
It does a little bit.

Install and take back the game!

I mean I get you could have to have the disc in the tray to play but that doesn't make much sense to me.

How does that not make sense. You never played PC games before Steam became big?

You haven't installed a 360 disc to the HDD?

After an install it just checks for the disc....ANY copy of that exact games disc...doesn't have to be the same exact disc, just the same game.
 
Does this news confirm that the next Xbox will not support used-games?

No, but a person who post here and works for MS is celebrating that they can now install games and swap between them and never swap discs. So what does that say about used games? Clearly MS isn't going to allow people to pass one disc around, so the game is probably "used up" via being tied to an account (think Vita games free with PS3 discs like Sly). The next question is can you buy a "used" disc and reactivate it for a price? The problem with this is who will control the activation price, it will never be really market based. So while a traditional used game price would nose dive for certain titles, the re-activation price will be fixed (say always $20), hence it is an arbitrary price fixing of used games. Good for some, bad for others.
 
I think they are doing all this so that they can subsidize the price of the console by forcing a Gold subscription as well. It's the only thing that makes sense.
 
You're talking about a company that:
  • Came 6 years late to HD.
  • Just last year got rid of "friend codes."
  • Accounts that are locked to systems.
  • Haven't found a way to tie Wii purchases to your 3DS/Wii U account.
That's largely irrelevant. My point is the context of "always" doesn't have to mean "mandatory".
 
What do you want to bet that they'll allow Publishers to decide whether to tie an installation to a console?

Buying a SP only game? Fuck you, locked to console.
MP biased games like CoD? Of course you can resell them, but you'll need a $20 online pass when you buy it used.

#2013+ #gaming
 
Something I wonder about always online and Kinect, isn't it possible that some creepy hackers hack your 720 and look around in your living room all day?
 
No, but a person who post here and works for MS is celebrating that they can now install games and swap between them and never swap discs. So what does that say about used games? Clearly MS isn't going to allow people to pass one disc around, so the game is probably "used up" via being tied to an account (think Vita games free with PS3 discs like Sly). The next question is can you buy a "used" disc and reactivate it for a price? The problem with this is who will control the activation price, it will never be really market based. So while a traditional used game price would nose dive for certain titles, the re-activation price will be fixed (say always $20), hence it is an arbitrary price fixing of used games. Good for some, bad for others.

This makes sense to me, but I would be surprised if the re-activation price was that low, why wouldn't they just charge $60($70?) for that too? None of the rumors so far have really been in the interest of benefitting gamers... milk us for every last dime!
 
Well considering how easy it was to "no-CD" patch a game back in the day so you didn't have to swap discs perhaps I'm naive.

That can be a problem (usually used in illegal mods on consoles where they don't pay for the game).

I use to crack my store copies too on PC, lol. Before (and during the early years of) Steam it was great not needing a CD by dropping a no-CD crack on a game.
 
I'm definitely expecting them to tie it to accounts though.

Maybe... it will require some nifty technology to actually do this TBH for a physical disk. That means the disks will need some sort of unique ID. MS has not filed a patent for that as far as I know, Sony has.

Then again they might go the PC route and include a key in the manual... not very consumer friendly IMHO. You can get away with it for PC, but the console crowd is more casual.

Like I said before... the API to do this will be there for both Sony and MS, and it will be up to the publishers to use this or not.
 
So many people intentionally misleading themselves in this thread it's making my head spin. Always online =/= requires Internet. My god. The always connected stuff sounds great anyways.
 
Why are people here being so blindly ignorant? The idea of "always on, always online" is the same exact intention of the PS4. How can anyone read that statement regarding the next Xbox and assume that FOR THEM it must mean being "always online" is "online required"? Some people are just purposely choosing that mindset because they want to make their console choice an easier decision.

Lets make one thing clear, BOTH Sony and MS want you to have their consoles consistently connected to the internet. Why wouldn't they? I would think as a consumer you would as well. That way, you assure that your console and games will be as up to date as possible even while you're away. Its not that when you're offline, you won't be able to play games, its that your OS or games won't be up to date. That's no different from playing a game offline now, and not being able to get the patch updates because you lack a connection to the network. People need to wise up.

Exactly. People just hear what they want to hear.
 
Maybe... it will require some nifty technology to actually do this TBH for physical disk. That means the disks will need some sort of unique ID. MS has not filed a patent for that as far as I know, Sony has.

Then again they might go the PC route and include a key in the manual... not very consomer friendly IMHO. You can get away with it for PC, but the console crowd is more casual.

Like I said before... the API to do this will be there for both Sony and MS, and it will be up to the publishers to use this or not.

Yes - I thought a little bit about it - what if they include a little RFID chip in the box for verfication? So if the box is stored within a certain range the game will start without a disc. If you store your boxes outside this range you have to insert the disc.
 
It does a little bit.

Install and take back the game!

I mean I get you could have to have the disc in the tray to play but that doesn't make much sense to me.

No not at all.

How can that not make sense? It's the same way it currently works for disk installs on the Xbox, PC and PS3. Is having the install automatic the thing that is hanging you up? The PS3 does that already. The only difference is now you won't have to go and make a sandwich.
 
Yes - I thought a little bit about it - what if they include a little RFID chip in the box for verfication? So if the box is stored within a certain range the game will start without a disc. If you store your boxes outside this range you have to insert the disc.

They would have to include an RFID reader... probably not going to happen :) but that sollution would actually support used games.

There is one flaw... RFID chips can be easily copied or tampered with :)
 
Depends if they tie installations to accounts or consoles.

I think the ultimate consumer friendly solution would be to tie that disc to your account when you install it, but when someone else installs that disc to their account, it gets untied from your account.

That way they completely eliminate disc swapping, but they still allow used games.
 
In my dream world they'd offer both options:

1) Don't tie the game to my account: Disc has to be in the drive when I play it. Disables quick switching, allows to resell. Offline only with disc in system.

2) Tie the game to my account: No disc required, enables quick switching, eliminates resell but allows you to install anywhere as long as your account is logged in. Offline only with disc in system.

I've long bought into the Steam ecosystem so I'd be fine with option #2.
 
Man, I still don't believe MS will go with the "Always Connected" route. There are lots of Xbox 360 users that are not online. MS really thinks they can force this people to connect?
 
Required installs are great, as is kinect with every console and an improved controller. Always connected...do not want.

You like waiting for updates to install or....?

This isn't some kind of DRM, this is the same thing the Wii did and the PS4 showed off. When the console is "off" it is still online and able to download updates, games, dlc, etc. This just means you never have to wait for stuff to download. Imagine pre-ordering Halo 5 or whatever and it is preloaded over the weeks before release without you ever knowing. Come release day at 12:01 AM you can boot it up and play without ever seeing a progress bar.

I feel like either GAF has gone insane or no one actually understands what the Always On actually does...
 
Man, I still don't believe MS will go with the "Always Connected" route. There are lots of Xbox 360 users that are not online. MS really thinks they can force this people to connect?

They aren't forcing anyone. The Xbox will function fine offline. For those that are online you never see a progress bar to download an update, or a dlc, or a new game. It is all done seamlessly when the console is "off". How is this bad?
 
You like waiting for updates to install or....?

This isn't some kind of DRM, this is the same thing the Wii did and the PS4 showed off. When the console is "off" it is still online and able to download updates, games, dlc, etc. This just means you never have to wait for stuff to download. Imagine pre-ordering Halo 5 or whatever and it is preloaded over the weeks before release without you ever knowing. Come release day at 12:01 AM you can boot it up and play without ever seeing a progress bar.

I feel like either GAF has gone insane or no one actually understands what the Always On actually does...

Or if you are a Battlefield premium member, like myself, instead of manually and waiting for the hefty map pack to download, you come back home and it is already downloaded and ready to play. This is going to be a very useful feature that a lot of people are going to appreciate.
 
But some of the 'fear' is warranted. Or at least major concern.
What about the info saying MS wants to use the new always connected Kinect to analyze what's in the room to serve up better ads, etc.? You xbox sees a Patriots logo and starts serving you up related ads. MS will make boatloats with targeted ads like that. I consider that a huge invasion of privacy and I don't want ads like that. Even if subsidized I wouldn't want ads like that.

I guess I am just not as sensitive to it as some are.

I don't believe MS is EVIL. so I doubt seriously that there will be inappropriate or illegal use of the technology. Also, I avoid ads as much or more than anyone... (no radio stations, DVR 95% of my tv watching with Commercial skipping, ad blockers on internet, etc) ... and I have never felt Xbox live had an "AD" problem and I doubt I will notice nor by bothered by the things that people here are fearing.

I believe for some people that concern is genuine to them, (which I think is unwarranted as really, they are not going to do anything illegal) and as long as they are not using my personal information why the hell would I care how they sell ads? For others this is just another illusionary ALARM to ring in some pathetic attempt to scare people away from the Xbox
MS


I guarantee the PS4 will have an "always on connection" as well to do the same background downloads etc. I can't wait to see how many pages that will go.
it will be as if this thread never happened
 
Top Bottom