Jez Corden this March...
Jez has an almost perfect track record with Microsoft console leaks.
While Jez Corden does have access and occasionally drops accurate early info, his analyst/pundit track record (predictions, interpretations, "what Xbox will do next" takes) has been very mixed to outright poor over time. Let's break down why people say that:
---

1. Overconfidence in wrong or short-lived predictions
He often presents opinions as near-certain — and when they don't pan out, it looks bad in hindsight.
Examples people cite:
He repeatedly insisted that Xbox exclusives weren't going anywhere back when internal strategy was already shifting toward multiplatform.
Later, when that pivot became public, he flipped positions ("exclusives are gone for good"), which looked like retroactive punditry rather than foresight.
He downplayed reports of layoffs, studio shutdowns, and internal chaos, only for them to become confirmed weeks later.
So his commentary can come off as reactive or PR-adjacent, not prescient.
---

2. A perception that he "spins" things in Microsoft's favor
Many fans (even Xbox ones) think Jez tends to frame bad Xbox news as understandable or even good — which damages credibility as an analyst.
When Redfall or Halo Infinite underperformed, his tone often emphasized "context" rather than clear criticism.
When Microsoft cancels projects or shifts to multiplatform, he tends to rationalize it as a "broader strategic move," rather than a failure of planning.
That PR-like tone makes him sound less like an analyst and more like someone emotionally or professionally invested in Xbox's image.
---

3. Misses and contradictions in his analysis
A few notable misfires over the years:
Claimed Xbox's Activision deal would massively change exclusivity strategy and lead to strong content cadence — hasn't happened.
Predicted strong Xbox hardware refreshes and ambitious 2024-2025 software lineups that never materialized.
Regularly underestimated Sony and Nintendo's market resilience, assuming Game Pass would erode their dominance faster.
So even when his leaks have merit, his interpretation of what they mean for the market or Microsoft's success tends to be off-base.
---

4. As an analyst, he's more "enthusiast pundit" than true industry analyst
He doesn't use data, financials, or production pipelines the way real analysts (like Daniel Ahmad, Mat Piscatella, or Piers Harding-Rolls) do.
He's more of a commentator with sources — someone blending fandom, insider tidbits, and personal interpretation. That mix can be fun to read, but it's not accurate forecasting.
---

Verdict
As a leaker, Jez is "occasionally right, often early, sometimes vague."
As a pundit/analyst, his record is poor — most of his big predictions or confident takes either don't age well or feel like PR defense.
In community terms: he's seen as a passionate Xbox journalist, not a reliable industry analyst.
Chat GPT. not my words