elrechazado
Banned
I'll see that and raise you the misuse of the law of thermodynamics as the reason people believe in this calories in calories out balance nonsense.teh_pwn said:Yeah, the blood pressure is pretty well understood. Fructose metabolism rapes the liver of phosphorous, decreases NO (nitrates massively reduce blood pressure, see the ED ads...), and has a by product of uric acid which increases blood pressure.
Dr Robert Lustig explains this in great detail.
And don't just take my word or Lustig's word for it. Read the scientific literature:
http://www.nature.com/ki/journal/v74/n4/abs/ki2008184a.html
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15111494
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16129731
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17158419
It makes absolutely no sense to blame salt for hypertension, when the prevalence has shot up in recent decades. Before refrigeration they packed food with salt to keep them from spoiling. If you read any of Weston Price's work in the 1800s and early 1900s, you'll see that people eating such food had far less obesity, diabetes, heart disease, and cancer than we did (and tooth decay).
Lustig also explains how fructose causes insulin resistance in the liver, which causes body wide insulin resistance, and how hyperinsulinemia causes leptin resistance.
It just amazed me that people can believe that they must count calories to correct obesity. Animals in their natural habitat with periods of abundant food eat when they're hungry, and they're lean as hell. Look at pictures of people before 1950 - fat people almost don't exist despite people eating "bad" eggs/bacon for breakfast, butter/meat/vegetables for dinner.
scroll down to - Rebuttal: Conservation of Energy
http://entropyproduction.blogspot.com/2009/02/all-medical-science-is-wrong-within-95.html
Also, see the vids I posted a few posts up. Fascinating discussion on how hibernating animals put on weight even as consumption drops.