D
Deleted member 17706
Unconfirmed Member
DeadRockstar said:That's exactly the point Lustig was making in the part of the video Zefah referenced.
The truth is though, all of his argument can only be backed up with the use of studies that use ridiculous dosages that are irrelevant to a regular human diet, or by selectively interpreting the data. I'm not going to debate every single one of his points. I've done that plenty offline.
The point is, none of his research is relevant to the average dieter because they will never meet the conditions that he's suggesting will have a negative impact on them and having them worry about things like that will do nothing for their progress or mindset, which is surely the aim of this thread. I don't know why Lustig decided to single out fructose and demonise it, but he's completely missed the forest for the trees.
What about his conclusion that fructose is processed like a poison and can have major adverse effects on a person's body?
You said this:
DeadRockstar said:You're saying to avoid sugar, but all carbs you consume are converted to blood glucose anyway. Metabolically it's all the same. I don't see how you can be better off when there will literally be no difference.
Lustig's premise was that, metabolically, fructose and glucose couldn't be more different. He goes as far as to call fructose a poison and glucose "the energy of life". He illustrated that 120 calories worth of carbs (white bread) and 120 calories worth of fructose (fruit juice) are processed in completely different ways. Do you disagree with this?
DeadRockstar said:This fruit hate needs to stop. People thinking fructose make you fat is scaring people away from perfectly legitimate, healthy diet foods that taste great. Fruit is one of the best ways to get great taste without artificial sweeteners.
What you said here is kind of started this whole debate. I completely disagree that fructose doesn't make you fat, and that anything containing lots of fructose can be considered a healthy diet food. Sure, any responsible dieter will be able to consume fructose in moderation and still lose weight. However, they will have to offset that consumption by doing something else. I don't see how that is any defense for fructose. Fructose, by itself, provides no inherit benefit to the body. It, in fact, can harm the body, and I see no reason why it shouldn't be avoided whenever possible. The vitamins and what not you can get from fruit are great and all, but it's not like they can't be got elsewhere.