working conditions in third world countries are routinely justified
huh?
working conditions in third world countries are routinely justified
Left leaning my ass. The only "liberal" values dominant on gaf are gay rights and atheism . And racial tolerance perhaps due to the board's strict racism rules.
As for the rest, gaf is a troglodyte heaven, where Murica is always the hero, Assange is a raping terrorist, Islam is the enemy of civilization, taxes are robbery, unions are a threat to America, fortified concept is public enemy #1, working conditions in third world countries are routinely justified, etc. etc.
Left leaning my ass. The only "liberal" values dominant on gaf are gay rights and atheism . And racial tolerance perhaps due to the board's strict racism rules.
As for the rest, gaf is a troglodyte heaven, where Murica is always the hero, Assange is a raping terrorist, Islam is the enemy of civilization, taxes are robbery, unions are a threat to America, fortified concept is public enemy #1, working conditions in third world countries are routinely justified, etc. etc.
I am not sure this is reducible to any single factor. I suspect simple demographics (generally skewing younger and more international) is probably the biggest factor, though. I do not think moderation policy has as significant an effect as some posters have suggested. There are many posters who are regular participants in those threads and who have lasted for years while posting with conservative positions on all manner of issue.
I remembe Al Gore being against explicit music, and Hilary Clinton being against violent videogames.
AbsolutelyJust because they call themselves Democrats doesn't mean their values are all liberal.
Democrats and liberals are not always the same thing even though they try to advertise themselves as such.
huh?
Probably because a person on the right can't speak up here without having to fend off half a dozen (or more) rabid left leaning members. It's overwhelming and most people with any common sense don't have time for it.
I don't lean left or right, but I generally refrain from discussing social or political issues on this site.
I was 16 when George W. Bush won his first term in 2000, but had I been two years older, I would have voted for him.
I went to a very liberal university where everyone hated Bush and Iraq War protests happened almost daily, but I secretly still supported Bush in 2004. When I finished college in 2006, the Democrats took control of Congress, and I was actually kind of sad about that.
What happened? It may have started in 2007 when I took a trip to London. I hung out in a lot of pubs, and of course when people found out I was American, they wanted to vicariously take the piss out of George W. Bush by talking politics incessantly when all I wanted to do was drink pints and learn more about the Premier League.
By that point I was pretty anti-war. But another thing constantly came up: "So in America, you can't just visit a doctor for free?" And I would answer, "You can always go to the hospital, but if you don't have insurance you'll have to pay a large bill." I don't think a lot of younger Brits really understood the U.S. healthcare system, and they were completely dumbfounded by it. The conversation would always lead to, "Why wouldn't you just give everyone healthcare coverage?"
And I had no answer for that. It got me thinking independently about politics for maybe the first time. So the next year, when the Obama vs. McCain election came around, and Obama's platform was based around setting up a universal healthcare system, while right-wing commentary was vehemently opposed to the entire idea, citing the spectacular "failures" of such systems in Canada and the U.K., I began to lean hard left. Republicans were calling nationalized healthcare systems "failures" and "socialist systems." But I had been to the U.K., and not only were they most definitely not socialists, but their healthcare system wasn't a failure at all.
From there, I gradually became what's called a liberal in America as I realized that 21st century-era Republican arguments didn't stand up to the slightest bit of scrutiny.
It's not specific to here, Neogaf's demographic online is typically left leaning.
I love how Alphanoid abandons threads whenever his made up story about his father's taxes gets brought up.
What happened?
What happened?
Educated people often tend to lean left in politics for the obvious reasons (common sense), and most people on gaf are educated.
Others have already pointed out that both parties identified as "liberal" and "conservative" are actually right wing in a global context.
True left wing liberalism has no political representation here.
That being said, you're being a bit harsh. PoliGAF (where most of the political discussion tends to concentrate) is not at all Anti-Islam, Anti-Taxation, or anti-Union. Assange doesn't really show up on my radar, personally- so I cant comment on the guy.
Meh, I'd rather say young people usually lean towards more pogressive, while older folks towards more conservative values.
Edit: Damn.
Pretty much.
Young people think they know everything, news @ 11.
Pretty much.
Young people think they know everything, news @ 11.
I love how Alphanoid abandons threads whenever his made up story about his father's taxes gets brought up.
Empty Vessel says hi.
Empty Vessel says hi.
This
There's no such thing as left in American politics.
There's no left in American politics.
Utter bullshit.
Now if you, say, go on a tirade against gay rights? You'll probably get banned.
You don't get banned for being a conservative on GAF. You get banned for being one of the hate filled "bad" ones. Funny enough? You can be a liberal on GAF and get banned for the same thing!
Aw, now we'll never know what your weird post meant.
3) Gaffers don't understand economics. Any thread about capitalism gets filled with myopic shit about fiat money being limitless, rose tinted glasses about state capitalism, elitism regarding where resources ought to be allocated, peak oil and all sorts of other fringe beliefs with minimal scholarly backing.
Yep. I think Kryptonian is an example of this.
Some time ago he said how the tax system in the US worked in such a way that his father had to purposefully cut his own paycheck, because if he made any more money he would be so heavily taxed that he would make far less than the lowered paycheck.
1) Filling out your tax return and seeing the money melt away is probably the biggest impetus for fiscal conservatism. Seeing 20k evaporate isn't fun regardless of what the average rate, median income blah blah blah shit is. I don't think most Gaffers have had that experience yet.
Fuck your assumptions. According to my tax software, I make more than 91% of Americans and yet pay taxes in the top 1%. And I'm not getting much of anything in services now and expect to not receive Medicare or Social Security when I retire in 40 or 50 years. The fact that people who make far more money than me cheat on their taxes every year doesn't relieve me of the responsibility to contribute to improving my country. How quaint and old-fashioned, right?
The idea that the free market is the silver-bullet solution to every problem the world faces is every bit as insane as the idea that government intervention is the silver-bullet solution. There is no silver bullet, there is no way to "fix the world."
There is a delicate balance that needs to be maintained or else society collapses. I don't think people appreciate how rare and fragile civil society is, and how hard it is to fix once it breaks.
Yea this is a load of crap. Most of us have filed taxes especially the regulars when it comes to poligaf and other threads.1) Filling out your tax return and seeing the money melt away is probably the biggest impetus for fiscal conservatism. Seeing 20k evaporate isn't fun regardless of what the average rate, median income blah blah blah shit is. I don't think most Gaffers have had that experience yet.
3) Gaffers don't understand economics. Any thread about capitalism gets filled with myopic shit about fiat money being limitless, rose tinted glasses about state capitalism, elitism regarding where resources ought to be allocated, peak oil and all sorts of other fringe beliefs with minimal scholarly backing.
I'm really not one to stick up for alphanoid's views but beating him up over that is kind of old, hasn't it run its course?
While the scenario he described was clearly wrong (reducing salary in order to step down to a lower tax bracket and ultimately end up with a higher net income) as described, it's pretty common for high earners to get creative in terms of reducing their taxes. Maybe it was the AMT he was trying to avoid somehow, or maybe he took less income in favor of some other compensation that was taxed at a lower rate, there wasn't really enough detail.
Yea this is a load of crap. Most of us have filed taxes especially the regulars when it comes to poligaf and other threads.
Yea this is pretty much the exact opposite of what your thinking. Its a rarity when a conservative gaffer can come up with solid arguments that are backed up by anything at all. Thats the problem in most threads when people just start making up stuff on the spot. They get called out and then they retreat to their corners spouting of stuff like you just posted.