Why does GAF lean so much to the left in politics?

Status
Not open for further replies.
And this, gone are the days of having an opinion. These days if your opinion differs or offends someone.. its labeled discrimination and people are banned. Some people are completely and utterly blind to this and simply cannot understand that some opinions are absolutely not discrimination ... but, like I said .. hive mind, safety in numbers etc.. Its horribly lop-sided and unrealistic. The real world doesn't work that way, and trying to pretend that GAF is magic rainbowland where nobody gets their feelings hurt is basically the root of why this forum is left leaning.

What kind of opinion are we talking about.

I don't see how racist opinions can be called non discriminatory, for example.
 
Why aren't you offended by all the people generalizing the right as "stupid" or "mysoginist"?

Generalizations are small minded and myopic, but are so REGARDLESS of who says them.

I agree that generalizations on both sides are bad. You know, i do respect the old republican movement. I honestly can say that i can´t stand the Tea party movement, or neo conservatives.
 
It all depends on what is important to the individual. Some people are indifferent to social issues and support the GOP based solely on non social issues. I am sure there are many atheist republicans.

I'm sorry, I don't buy that you can pick and choose responsibility for the policies you vote for. If you defer to theocrats on social issues you are by default supporting theocratic policies, there is no wiggling out of that.
 
Will we ever have a real 3rd party ? I can't see this country surviving without one at this point.

Not with first past the post. Any third party that gains enough traction in the USA will either have a good portion of it's platform co-oped by one of the main two parties or will displace one of the main two parties, relegating the former party to a status shared by current third parties.
 
Is the European right as reviled here as the American right? Because I feel they provide a sane and constructive counterview towards debates.

EDIT: And I would consider myself centre-right on the European balance.

I'm a dual citizen, French and American. I tend to vote on the right in France, and on the left in the US. Left in one country does not mean left in another.

I don't like extremes, which is why I don't like the Republican party in the US (would be considered a far far far right party in France), and don't like the NPA and FN in France (far left and far right crazies). If you're a sane conservative, I don't have a problem with that. Unfortunately, sane conservatives don't exist in the US anymore (talking about political parties here, not individuals), and they're needed for debate. The Democrat party still has good candidates, but what happens when we get the equivalent of Tea Party crazies taking over that party as well? We need an alternative, and right now there isn't one.
 
I think people also tend to forget that you can be fiscally conservative and socially liberal or socially moderate. People that are fiscally conservative will often fall under the rep's and get the same ridicule as those who are socially conservative which isn't a fair game to play. We get too black and white with our politics in America. Its always a us or them battle instead of the many shades of gray it really is.

What does fiscally conservative mean? Have you read or heard anyone call themselves fiscally liberal? It's a meaningless label and it tells me nothing about you. You might as well add to that and say you believe in freedom and liberty.
 
One thing I've always loved about message boards is they're darwinism for opinions. Opinions not fit for survival get torn to shreds quickly. Users are always eager to own noobs or idiots.

One of the reasons I came to be liberal was because I came of age reading message boards and I rarely if ever saw conservative opinions win out in a contest of ideas. Republicans in America get away with what they do because real life isn't a message board. Rick Santorum can stand up on a debate stage and not get challenged much at all. But put his exact statements in the form of a Neogaf member and he'd get torn to bits, and quickly.

If conservatism in practice had more positive results you'd see message boards be more conservative. But few people are going to stick their neck out here and espouse conservative principles when it's so obviously a position that will get them owned, and they know it and don't want that.

this is an interesting idea.

i may disagree with people's opinion, but i won't hate them if there's solid rationale behind it.
 
I'm a dual citizen, French and American. I tend to vote on the right in France, and on the left in the US. Left in one country does not mean right in another.

I don't like extremes, which is why I don't like the Republican party in the US (would be considered a far far far right party in France), and don't like the NPA and FN in France (far left and far right crazies). If you're a sane conservative, I don't have a problem with that. Unfortunately, sane conservatives don't exist in the US anymore (talking about political parties here, not individuals).


This is exactly my position as well. Which makes it kinda difficult to identify on the left-right scale when it can be interpreted differently by different people.
 
I'm a dual citizen, French and American. I tend to vote on the right in France, and on the left in the US. Left in one country does not mean left in another.

I don't like extremes, which is why I don't like the Republican party in the US (would be considered a far far far right party in France), and don't like the NPA and FN in France (far left and far right crazies). If you're a sane conservative, I don't have a problem with that. Unfortunately, sane conservatives don't exist in the US anymore (talking about political parties here, not individuals).

Is there any party in France or Europe as bad as the Republican Party?
 
Did they before? Most republicans support medicare. They opposed it though when it was being formulated though. I think why conservatives are farther right is because they're still "conserving" the current system that is "behind" others. We fought the cold war and everything was commies v. freedom.

Europe and Canada was under the US's umbrella and could develop more socialistic alternatives that worked and now are supported across the political spectrum. The same thing happens in the US.

Wat?

How did the actions of the US cause the development of health care in Europe?

As to Republicans supporting health care... What's Mitt Romeny's platform? Because Stephen Harper supports health care,and the policy setting conservatives are the ones that set policy.

Sure, there may have been conservative opposition to health care in Canada initially, but it's been supported for decades. It's like asking what the conservative viewpoint is on women's sufferage.

Conservatives were opposed to healthcare during this election cycle. The conservatives arguing against it in the US... Are still sitting out their term. Well not really, because your election system is weird and they have elections staggered and I'm not sure when it's a congressman or a senator doing this or that, but the point is that "Obamacare" isn't even four years old. Is it even two? Is it even enacted yet?

The point is, US is far far far right of the rest of the world. Abortion, sex education, creationism, climate change, health care, unions, the death penalty, gun control etc. etc. are actually points of discussion in American news. In Canada and I imagine in Europe, these issues are solved problems. It'd be like talking about slavery or the 40 hour workweek.
 
Punditry is pretty stupid no matter which side they're on. I avoid reading them and try just reading the news from places like BBC international and such. News sites have their own problems, but at least they're not all trying to be the cleverest little hippie or the biggest strongest conservative.

I actually read through right leaning sites like theblaze, breitbart and drudge just to get an idea of the other side's view on things. I feel like if I know the extreme views on a topic I can understand it better.

I must admit though, I've never read anything like theblaze.com before. It seems to me that the site is driven by hate and fuels it with fear. At least once a week there's a story about the black panthers, Louis Farrakhan or some controversial figure that is twisted to scare people that liberals want to harm them physically. Obviously anything Obama is greatly twisted there. I just looked now and there's a photo comparison of Paul Ryan and Joe Biden asking who's manlier. I'd be curious if anyone knows of a left leaning site that does this in the same vein of theblaze.com.
 
I think the lack of U.S. conservative support on gaf may result from many of us not being american. As a canadian I would just like to point out that the american right-wing is kinda terrifying to me.
 
I'm a dual citizen, French and American. I tend to vote on the right in France, and on the left in the US. Left in one country does not mean left in another.

I don't like extremes, which is why I don't like the Republican party in the US (would be considered a far far far right party in France), and don't like the NPA and FN in France (far left and far right crazies). If you're a sane conservative, I don't have a problem with that. Unfortunately, sane conservatives don't exist in the US anymore (talking about political parties here, not individuals).

Neither party in the US is sane anymore. It almost seems like they're trying to out crazy eachother. Any incumbent in congress will not receive my vote at all after the BS I've seen the past couple of years.
 
I am not sure this is reducible to any single factor. I suspect simple demographics (generally skewing younger and more international) is probably the biggest factor, though. I do not think moderation policy has as significant an effect as some posters have suggested. There are many posters who are regular participants in those threads and who have lasted for years while posting with conservative positions on all manner of issue.
 
And yet it is somehow okay to stereotype like this. lol

I don't pre-judge, or assume that someone is a bigot just because they identify as a conservative or support some conservative position. Of course individuals can be conservative without being bigoted, but when I hear bigotry being presented or defended by some political figure, it is much more often coming from the right than the left. I don't think anyone on either side can deny that.
 
I probably wouldn't post here very much if it leaned as much to the right as it does to the left. So I dunno, to me it's sorta just one of the things that defines the community.
 
Independent as well. I stay far away from these threads usually. Don't worry though as I'd rather not have looneys in The White House just to get my giant wall built. Obama!!
 
What does fiscally conservative mean? Have you read or heard anyone call themselves fiscally liberal? It's a meaningless label and it tells me nothing about you. You might as well add to that and say you believe in freedom and liberty.

I'd wager it means that you believe in conservative style economic ideas (lower taxes, less regulation in markets, fewer government services) but with liberal viewpoints on certain issues like gay marriage, abortion, etc. There's no reason why those opinions have to be in opposite parties but it just happens to be that way.

People have mentioned some reasons, like age, location, and even the average tendencies of a heavy internet user but I'd also like to mention the dichotomy of the parties. People vote for opinions on different issues, maybe something as simple as being religious or not religious. If I was gay, I'd have a hard time voting Republican because it seems like the party line is one of "family values".

I personally vote as far left as I can because of my economic beliefs...and I don't know if those will ever change. I could see myself voting for a center party or maybe even a right one if I ever do that move to Europe I've been mulling over for years, but in the US? Maybe never.
 
Idk what party I belong to, whichever one rewards hard work and not being a terrible human being. I absolutely hate the idea of political parties to be honest.
 
I'm a dual citizen, French and American. I tend to vote on the right in France, and on the left in the US. Left in one country does not mean left in another.

I don't like extremes, which is why I don't like the Republican party in the US (would be considered a far far far right party in France), and don't like the NPA and FN in France (far left and far right crazies). If you're a sane conservative, I don't have a problem with that. Unfortunately, sane conservatives don't exist in the US anymore (talking about political parties here, not individuals), and they're needed for debate. The Democrat party still has good candidates, but what happens when we get the equivalent of Tea Party crazies taking over that party as well? We need an alternative, and right now there isn't one.

Don't get my hopes up.
 
So wait. What do you think of Sarah Palin?

I dunno if you're joking or not but it's confrontational rubbish like this that really strains the relations between people of different political affiliations on a board like GAF. "Gotcha!" posts and silly sweeping political punditry ("Reality has a liberal bias!" "If we're conservative we're gonna get banned - don't ban me!" "OH SO YOU HATE GAYS!?") just drives the wedge between everyone further.

I seriously do not care what someone's politics are outside of political debates. When politics are brought up, all sides need to have a modicum of respect for each other and also an understanding of how conversation and debate works, instead of trying to be the first to say whatever clever-clogs catchphrase or supposed trump card they have against the other side. A lot of politics threads on GAF turn into soundbite wars, and I wouldn't hesitate to say that a lot of more liberal posters are more guilty of it than others.

Some of my favorite posters on GAF are like... probably 100% opposite from me politically. DennisK4 and Manos, for example, are intelligent dudes who I have a good amount of respect for, regardless of whether I agree with them. If Computer is a conservative, what is asking him about Sarah Palin going to prove? You're either going to get "I don't like her" because guess what, a lot of tories don't, or at the very least, a well-worded response from Computer, because Computer isn't an idiot.

Man, I dunno. I'm down to rumble over politics any day of the week but dogpiling on people for their political views is just silly.
 
Is it really unfair to generalize the right as "anti-gay rights"?

Sure, you could argue that not everyone in the right wing feels that way, but that's in the basic platform.

The political platform is not anti-gay; it is definitely not PRO-gay marriage rights though and this is typically tied to the religious argument that a traditional marriage is between a man and a woman.

But a) I didn't mention that when I said you shouldn't generalize people as "stupid" or "misogynists" and b) you can lean republican and not agree with every single item on the platform.

I have no problem with the LGBT community and personally could not care less if 2 consenting adults regardless of sex want to marry. More power to them.
 
I get the feeling that a lot of the "left" in America is pragmatic when it comes to outcomes and aren't necessarily axiomatic in their ideology.

Like, if an outcome is medical care for everyone, do we really care if the private sector provides it as opposed to the government? Whatever gets the job done proper and well, you know?

I find the American right to be, at least in words, more aligned with "The state shouldn't do things" while I feel the left is more "if the state can do something better, why shouldn't it?" as opposed to "The private sector shouldn't do things".
 
Because conservatives who feel "persecuted" go into the Chick-Fil-A thread and troll gay people or post stupid shit in PoliGAF and wonder why they get banned.

FLEABttn said:
I find the American right to be, at least in words, more aligned with "The state shouldn't do things" while I feel the left is more "if the state can do something better, why shouldn't it?" as opposed to "The private sector shouldn't do things".
Yeah I would say liberals in general are more flexible in their positions than conservatives, though obviously that's not exclusive to GAF.
 
Are you honestly not catching my drift? It does not mean it is morally right.

You can stereotype conservatives as racists and misogynists, and that's okay in this forum. That's kind of the point of this thread.
"Most conservatives are racists and misogynists" is not the same statement as "Most racists and misogynists are conservatives."
 
Is there any party in France or Europe as bad as the Republican Party?
There are plenty of horrible political parties in major EU countries but none of them hold as much power as the republican party.

I usually lean a little right in my home country's politics but in USA that would be considered extreme left wing.
 
Because there is no "Left" in US politics.

In all seriousness I lean left on social issues because that's just being a decent human being in all honesty and for economic ones I stay out of as I've no idea how they work (must take Economics class soon).
 
Moderation policies and reactionary banning. There was a poster who leaned right that I disagreed with. He got banned for expressing his opinion in a thread. Even though I disagreed with him, I posted about how he was banned for just expressing his opinion, and then I got banned for backseat moderating.
 
Doesn't help that conservatives who do post on PoliGAF refuse to use logical arguments and do crazy things like meltdown or post links showing the opposite of what they're arguing.
 
What does fiscally conservative mean? Have you read or heard anyone call themselves fiscally liberal? It's a meaningless label and it tells me nothing about you. You might as well add to that and say you believe in freedom and liberty.

Fiscally liberal has generally fallen out of favor in our (assuming we're younger than 40) lifetimes, because as Milton Friedman put it -- attributing to Nixon -- "We're all Keynesians now, [yet] nobody is a Keynesian."

There isn't much of a need to define fiscal liberalism because even most Republicans are fiscally liberal. Defining yourself as fiscally conservative, generally, still betrays some underlying agreement that we can't completely eliminate debt spending.

Educated people often tend to lean left in politics for the obvious reasons (common sense), and most people on gaf are educated.

If you read this thread from any objective point of view, you'd get the sense that most of Gaf is entirely uneducated when it comes to politics. Seriously, the statements that nobody reacts negatively to are astounding. "I lean left because that's just being a decent human," is equivocable to a conservative christian saying "I am conservatively Christian because that's what God wants," and actually thinking that's a legitimate point of view to hold. That nobody reacts to those sort of ridiculous things is enough to suggest that we're not very bright, we're just so insular and isolated in our beliefs that we reinforce the idea that we're all so smart.

Edit -- and the post below this, "all hateful people seem to be conservatives." You can only believe that's true if you totally isolate yourself from people with other beliefs.

For what it's worth, I'm a registered Republican, but I have a lot of liberal ideas, perhaps more liberal ideas than conservative these days (and frankly, I'd ask what the terms even mean; when it's a "liberal" idea to be against drug decriminalization and a "conservative" idea to have an interventionist foreign policy, we've turned the phases on their heads), but I believe in changing a party from the inside out, not abandoning it and then scolding from the outside.
 
Are you honestly not catching my drift? It does not mean it is morally right.

You can stereotype conservatives as racists and misogynists, and that's okay in this forum. That's kind of the point of this thread.

No. People are stereotyping racists and misogynists as conservatives. A slight difference, but an important one. No one is saying all conservatives are hateful, but all hateful people seem to be conservatives. See the difference?

Further, what party is aligned with anti women and anti gay policies? Again, not every person who votes that way is in agreement with all their policies, but the party is what it is, and conservatism in the US is what it is.

"Most conservatives are racists and misogynists" is not the same statement as "Most racists and misogynists are conservatives."

Beat me to it :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom