GoldenEye98
posts news as their odd job
I've rarely seen a complainant of DF add more nuance and context than they do. It's almost always the complete opposite.....they lack any nuance and context.
Eurogamer said they weren't, DF said they wanted to but "they hadn't received" a code, and then one of them went on a rant how he hates HP and wouldn't be the one to cover it.I thought they weren't going to touch that game.
I was clearly wrong about that but everything else I said still stands.
The Bayonetta point is fair - I think outside of "This game is broken", most technical breakdowns are fairly trivial. BayoPS3 was a pretty extreme example.Considering their bread and butter was Xbox 360 vs PS3 when the war was at full tilt.
I can agree.
Your username is Pure Platimum, im assuming thats a Bayonetta reference........the PS3 version of Bayonetta was not fun.
It took Sony themsevles to step in after launch to try and fix the game.
Digital Foundry was the largest voice pointing out just how off the PS3 version of the game was.
![]()
Face-Off: Bayonetta
Hold onto your potatoes, because there's no way to sugarcoat this one - Bayonetta is one of the most dramatic Face-Offs…www.eurogamer.net
Define better?
CCuz arent graphics part of the puzzle when people say a game is good or bad.
Because if not, wouldnt it be fair to say most graphical techniques dont make a game better, yet people will hold a game with better graphics in higher regard than one without.
A good game is a good game even if it isnt textured at all......it would be better with textures.....it woould be better with good animations.......it would be even better with good lighting(Raytracing).
Wasnt Halo infinite clowned on prerelease because it didnt have "good graphics".
I just wish that we had 1/10th of the discourse online about actual design, mechanics, gameplay, as we did about graphics and pixel-counting...but of course one is very hard to talk about because "game-feel" is a very nebulous thing. It's far easier to talk about resolution and frame rate which are measurable.Do TF claim the game is not fun because of pixel count ?
Biased/Un-biased, they only do technical tests, not fun to play tests. Its gamers that choose to listen to pixel counting as fun.
Many of my fondest gaming memories stem from PS2 era - SoTC ran at I believe 15FPS most of the time, and it's one of the strongest games ever made. Technical fidelity has very little to do with having fun.Agree with this very much. DF pitch themselves as enthusiasts interested in dissecting the minutiae of what goes into making the biggest games technical masterpieces, but unfortunately, their audience historically has been console warring fanboys who would be happy to skip the analysis and jump straight to "Playstation/Xbox better" with a couple of screenshots showing one platform at its lowest framerate and another at a locked 60 that they can then post accompanied with:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
. I'm certain that some people have no idea when they're playing something that is technically good or bad, but DF tells them if they should praise it or condemn it when arguing online.
A lot of hate for DF here but I agree with you! Also they hate DF so much but post every video of them, quote them, use their analysis etc.You might not like some person there or something they said in the past, but its qualified people talking straight, and they produce in video form, and just stay consistent and on-topic.
I think old Gamespot, when Greg Kasavin was there, had the same feel.
Why does everything feel so amateruish in gaming journalism?
I just want some serious people with thought out informed opinions on games, contained in a 40 minute show without 3 hours of bullshit, lighthearted banter and people constantly trying to be funny.
The Bayonetta point is fair - I think outside of "This game is broken", most technical breakdowns are fairly trivial. BayoPS3 was a pretty extreme example.
Alex optimized settings are usually a good baseline for people to use when setting up their games.
What's funny is that that couldn't actually be farther from the truth. They've made it into some sort of bizarre bullet-hell bastardization I don't even recognize as a proper shooter, let alone a Doom game.In their defense, it's fuckin' Doom. You should already know what type of game it is.
You know those brits love Seville rowI'm sorry, I can't trust anyone who says 'bespoke'.
Hasn't been seen in over a year. Hope he's okay.Whatever happened to VG Tech? That was a great channel that at least folks had something to compare DF to and keep them honest. Not that I have a problem with DF. I think they do a good job, personally.
Liking digital foundry is like liking diarrhea, herpes, or anything else.
![]()
Why shouldn't I express my opinion about how shitty Digital Foundry is? You don't seem to have anything better to do than stalk my comments in the relevant threads. What's your secret?Yet you mention them constantly and enter so many of their threads.
Do you have a secret?
![]()