They did a bit. The interface got an update, all of the packaging got re-done, and we got a redesign of the console in the run-up to it.GregLombardi said:What's to upgrade though? Unfortunately for them I think they blew their load. Microsoft should have rebranded 360 when Kinect launched. All they did was Brand Kinect.
mt1200 said:
Ugly
Shiggie said:Dragon Quest X for cafe would make me tingle.
ReyVGM said:What the hell at people thinking you'll be able to play actual Cafe games on the Controller's screen.
That screen will be relegated to minigames, maps, stat screens and character conversations such as Metal Gear Solid's CODEC scenes.
That's what I was thinking. If they released Move/Kinect already, then what are they gonna do for ps4/720? They can't package it in with it since some people already have them. Unless they do multiple SKUs?GregLombardi said:What's to upgrade though? Unfortunately for them I think they blew their load. Microsoft should have rebranded 360 when Kinect launched. All they did was Brand Kinect.
A messy strategy.
This is assuming that those 360/PS3-to-Cafe ports were actually selling in the first place, and that developers would care about leaving it out of the equation.Vinci said:I could easily see the following happen:
360, PS3, Cafe: Developers stick with 360 as the lead primarily, and simply port to the PS3 and Cafe. Maybe a couple of developers want to stick their neck out and develop on the stronger Cafe system, to 'up the ante,' but that's about it.
Cafe, PS4, 720: PS4 and 720 launch. Given that software has sold on Cafe, and it's not massively - MASSIVELY - weaker than the PS4 and 720, why on earth would I (a developer) increase my costs on the new systems and make porting to Cafe impossible? Why, in essence, would I cut from selling on 3 platforms down to 2 as I increase costs? And if I do that, doesn't it sort of show that I learned nothing from the Wii, 360, PS3 generation?
Fuzzy said:I'm looking forward to taking the day off from work for Nintendo's E3 conference again this year.
WHAT?! That's pretty much the first thing I thought of. Don't you hate pausing every 20 seconds to check your map? Okay, it might not be a good idea while driving in heavy traffic, but that's the risk you takeInterfectum said:Really? That sounds horrible to me.
Well, I guess what I'm saying is that it should have been perceived as a new console to the consumer. They took the middle road, which is a reasonable choice given the market environment but a messy strategy that could be upended by 2 companies IMHO if they wanted to: Nintendo / Apple.Michan said:They did a bit. The interface got an update, all of the packaging got re-done, and we got a redesign of the console in the run-up to it.
Not to mention... Rare ;_;
What? Naaaaaah. I wouldn't even be as big as the GTA IV tattoo, Final Fantasy used to be on a single console when it happened. GTA is already on both[Nintex] said:I'd say it would be on par with the time that Final Fantasy XIII showed up at MS's conference.
even for a fake.mt1200 said:Ugly
Thats a painted windows 7 case.....its not even plugged in...mt1200 said:
Ugly
Eh, one of Nintendo's simultaneous strengths and faults is how they take lessons from the past, and I don't think they remember the RE4 fiasco favorably.Akai said:That's how I read it, too. (It actually being shown for the first time there, I mean.) There's no way in hell that Ninty would get GTAV exclusive, but if they really wanted I think it's possible a timed-exclusive could be money-hatted...
Great contribution, junior.mt1200 said:http://fastcache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/9/2011/04/1303719948949.jpg
Ugly
Shiggie said:Dragon Quest X for cafe would make me tingle.
Fuzzy said:I'm looking forward to taking the day off from work for Nintendo's E3 conference again this year.
RPGCrazied said:I really wish every console would get every 3rd party game, and then all you have to do is decide on what first party games you like the most to get that console.
Then everyone wins, right?
Teetris said:What? Naaaaaah. I wouldn't even be as big as the GTA IV tattoo, Final Fantasy used to be on a single console when it happened. GTA is already on both
FoneBone said:This is assuming that those 360/PS3-to-Cafe ports were actually selling in the first place, and that developers would care about leaving it out of the equation.
fixedRPGCrazied said:I really wish every console would get every 3rd party game, and then all you have to do is decide on what first party games you like the most to get that console.
Then everyone ceaselessly pixel counts, right?
EmCeeGramr said:I'd say "GTAV announced at the Nintendo conference for their next-gen system" would be pretty huge on the "hnnnnnnnnnnnng" meter.
Shiggie said:Dragon Quest X for 3DS would make me tingle.
It's "" worthy but doesn't actually mean anything substantive.EmCeeGramr said:I'd say "GTAV announced at the Nintendo conference for their next-gen system" would be pretty huge on the "hnnnnnnnnnnnng" meter.
Wireless power. It's the big surprise!ShockingAlberto said:Also fake
Also somehow on despite no wires?!
mt1200 said:G]http://fastcache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/9/2011/04/1303719948949.jpg[/IMG]
Ugly
FoneBone said:It's "" worthy but doesn't actually mean anything substantive.
It obtains its power from the flesh sacks that dare approach it.Michan said:Wireless power. It's the big surprise!
The_Technomancer said:Eh, one of Nintendo's simultaneous strengths and faults is how they take lessons from the past, and I don't think they remember the RE4 fiasco favorably.
Yeah would be pretty funny if the secret was a time machine and Square Enix went back in time to cancel DQIX for DS and started building it for a system that didn't exist yet at that time.EVH said:Btw, wouldn't be funny if DQIX was a launch title for this?
The secret feature is wireless transmission of electricity.ShockingAlberto said:Also fake
Also somehow on despite no wires?!
I dunno. Even just a port would signify a few important things about the new console and Nintendo's direction for it.Interfectum said:if it was announced exclusive (timed or otherwise) I'd say it would be huge. If it's just a day 1 port then yeah, non-news really.
The_Technomancer said:Chinatown Wars was a ridiculously quality product. I would say R* definitely has no problem developing for Nintendo platforms, the Wii just wasn't their technical cup of tea.
RPGCrazied said:I really wish every console would get every 3rd party game, and then all you have to do is decide on what first party games you like the most to get that console.
Then everyone wins, right?
It'd be more about symbolic significance than anything else, if it actually happens.Interfectum said:if it was announced exclusive (timed or otherwise) I'd say it would be huge. If it's just a day 1 port then yeah, non-news really.
Looks like a cover for the Wii.mt1200 said:
Ugly
You say that now but you also know that the GAF E3 thread would blow up if GTAV showed up at Nintendo's conference before anywhere else.ShockingAlberto said:I dunno. Even just a port would signify a few important things about the new console and Nintendo's direction for it.
It's more of a symbolic thing than actual "lose your shit" craziness.
Cosmonaut X said:Heh - I'd be doing that too, but there's a damn good chance I'll be in a labour ward at the time and I doubt my better half would be impressed if I was checking E3 feeds on my phone...
EVH said:And posted several times here.
Also fake.
Btw, wouldn't be funny if DQIX was a launch title for this?
ShockingAlberto said:Also fake
Also somehow on despite no wires?!
birdchili said:"playable" at e3 is key, and it's got to be more than just a kitchen sink controller. i can't imagine something like that on it's own being particularly compelling, particularly at the zoo that will be the e3 floor. they need to get people talking about how fun it was, and i'm not sure anything we're hearing so far is going to give any kind of gameplay buzz to anyone.
we're still missing something. surely.
Amir0x said:If there was some exclusivity combined with it - real exclusivity, timed at least - then it would be something.
It's more of an image makeover for Nintendo than a really big ANNOUNCEMENT.
evangd007 said:That's Nintendo's plan, riding the assumption that they have the most appealing first party games.