Amir0x said:
Three, creating a slate of NEW hardcore IPs INTERNALLY DEVELOPED with the budget and marketing of a Zelda or Mario game. I'm so tired of their franchise abuse.
Four, Pikmin 3.
Five, ZERUDA.
Six, MARIO.
Can I read this as "not so tired"?
I must say that I'm not sure I understand... I mean, I also welcome any new IP from them (I'm a Pikmin fan), even if I'm not fully convinced by the last ones. They still tried many things under the Wii **** brand.
On the other side, they have a lot of IPs, and everybody has its picks. One will want a Wario, a Kirby, a DK, a F-Zero, a Starfox, an Animal Crossing, a Smash Bros, a Mario Kart, a Metroid, a Fire Emblem, etc. They usually stay at 1, max 2 game per generation and per IP, and they try to outsource many of them. But it's difficult to make everyone happy.
I can't say I disagree with you, still. I miss some good surprise IPs (again, Pikmin is in my top3 of the previous generation). They tried some new things, though, they were just not completely my taste this generation, and I welcomed some 3rd-party efforts. But I don't think there's really an abuse per se, they just can't let IPs unused or some will voice their dissatisfaction.
(we're the first to claim we wanted Pikmin 3, a F-Zero or a true Starfox, among others, no?)