Farewell Dark Universe, we hardly knew ye'.
I bet Universal had Charlize Theron as a solid Plan B for the lead of Bride Of Frankenstein until Atomic Blond turned out to be a giant pile of nothing at the box office.
Commence scrambling, Universal.
American Hustle was decent. David O Russel films get people acting nominations that are head scratching to me though.
Didn't Silver Linings Playbook and American Hustle both score nominations in all four acting categories? I could see maybe half of those as being worthy of recognition. De Niro got nominated because it was the first time in a while that anyone had seen him give half a shit during a performance. His actual performance or that role in general weren't anything special. Bradley Cooper was put to shame by both Amy Adams and Christian Bale to such an extent that I don't see how anyone thought that he came off as memorable.
Would put it in the same ballpark as Hell or High Water and Sicario DoM.
Since it's Weinstien too, I'm expecting a solid Oscar push behind it. So Sheridan is going be moving up another notch this fall, again.
Farewell Dark Universe, we hardly knew ye'.
I bet Universal had Charlize Theron as a solid Plan B for the lead of Bride Of Frankenstein until Atomic Blond turned out to be a giant pile of nothing at the box office.
Commence scrambling, Universal.
Universal should have just done another Brendan Fraser film.
I'm trying to think who they'll replace Angelina with. Gotta be a big name since that's the entire Dark Universe game plan. I could actually see it being Charlize, international audiences like her, right?
Marvel hasn't seen a dud like this since Secret Wars 2.Inhumans has a big fat 0 on RT.
Atomic Blonde did well for what it was. I don't think anyone is shedding tears for the Dark Universe though.
Less than $100m worldwide off the back of her in the last Fast/Furious film and, to a lesser degree, Fury Road is poor. Even if this was a Focus release it's still a disappointment.
Yeah, I'm not seeing Atomic Blonde's receipts being much of a factor in whether or not some big budget blockbuster decides they wanna cast one of the industry's only recognized Academy Award-winning ass-kickers.
She's still Charlize Theron. Not that star power matters for much anymore, but I don't think anyone at Universal is like "Well, Atomic Blonde didn't set the world on fire."
She's still a very prominent name on a very small list of actors (regardless of gender) who can believably beat the shit out of someone while also possessing legitimate acting chops.
Stacking the cast isn't going to make a huge difference if they don't have a concept that people care to watch in the first place.
Atomic Blonde has made $90M on a $30M budget and it's not like they busted the bank marketing it.
Yeah, I'm not seeing Atomic Blonde's receipts being much of a factor in whether or not some big budget blockbuster decides they wanna cast one of the industry's only recognized Academy Award-winning ass-kickers.
She's still Charlize Theron. Not that star power matters for much anymore, but I don't think anyone at Universal is like "Well, Atomic Blonde didn't set the world on fire."
She's still a very prominent name on a very small list of actors (regardless of gender) who can believably beat the shit out of someone while also possessing legitimate acting chops.
Looking at WB's schedule through the remainder of the year, I wonder if they can hit $2 billion this year. They will need about $770M from the following by Dec 31st.
It - 9/8/17
Ninjago - 9/22/17
Blade Runner 2049 - 10/6/17
Geostorm - 10/20/17
Justice League - 11/17/17
Bastards (2017) - 12/22/17
Even if Warner Bros misses $2B, they should easily pass Universal for second place this year.
True. But if you're going to invest potentially hundreds of millions into an actor to headline yet another attempt at launching a franchise
You will never forget The Mummy, though.Bobby, you should be a poet.
They shouldn't even waste their time.The Mummy is set to receive a decent amount of awards recognition in Januarywhen the Razzie nominations drop
I had people come and say right to my face---my beautiful face-- that The Mummy wasn't as bad as """they""" made it out to be.You will never forget The Mummy, though.
I remember being surprised as the awards started coming in on Hell or High Water. It was pretty under-the-radar until award season began in full.
Looking at WB's schedule through the remainder of the year, I wonder if they can hit $2 billion this year. They will need about $770M from the following by Dec 31st.
It - 9/8/17
Ninjago - 9/22/17
Blade Runner 2049 - 10/6/17
Geostorm - 10/20/17
Justice League - 11/17/17
Bastards (2017) - 12/22/17
Even if Warner Bros misses $2B, they should easily pass Universal for second place this year.
I can't help everyone. I've put out warnings, I've preached in town centers, I've written half-hearted forum posts but it seems people want to be delivered into the devil. I remember The Mummy because it is the burden placed upon me, but it was all for nothing.
Apparently, some people are saying this weekend and summer were poor because of payback for "Liberal Hollywood"
what elderly person's facebook page did those comments come from and did you wind up there on accident?
I actually tried to find info on Twitter, that was a mistake.
Well if you ask Ann Coulter...Is Harvey the fault of "Liberal Houston"?
Talk about a giant digital dumpster fire. It's so easy to run into utter shit (and hatred) on there.
One of the reasons I left Facebook.
Also, what is a not liberal Hollywood film? Pure Flix? A Eastwood film?
Paramount Pictures has acquired screen rights to Dracul, the first prequel authorized by the estate of Bram Stoker. The film will be developed as potential directing vehicle down the line for Andy Muschietti, reteamed with It producers Barbara Muschietti and Roy Lee.
Written by Dacre Stoker and J.D. Barker, the tale is set in 1868, where a 21-year old Bram Stoker meets with an ungodly evil that he traps in an ancient tower all the while scribbling the events that led him there. The monster origin tale just went to Putnams Mark Tavani in a five-house auction brokered by Kristin Nelson of Nelson Literary Agency. The UK rights for Dracul were bought by Simon Taylor of Transworld and by Michel Lafon for France in a pre-empt.
The film deal was brokered by Angela Cheng Caplan of Cheng Caplan Company Inc. and attorney Wayne Alexander. Paramount executive Vanessa Joyce brought in the project and will oversee the development with Miri Yoon of Vertigo Entertainment.
So it will be a version Dracula that was previously Untold?
I imagine those Gods Not Dead movies... and what was it Hilary's America?
Jeremy Renner really needs a nom for it. He gives one of the best performances I've seen in years. I hope they push for it.
Wind River is solid, and Renner's performance is a bit Oscar worthy IMO, but I doubt it'll land any Oscar nom beyond some technical ones though. It doesn't have the acclaim that Sicario or Hell or High Water have.
Source please?
Atomic Blonde marketing was extremely expensive.
Toa's price is high.
Paramount never ceases to amaze me.
They should focus their efforts on launching new franchises or reboots. They have a library of great properties at their disposal and they do nothing.
The Last Airbender did $320M over 7 years ago despite terrible wom. The IP is still loved by many and I'm sure there is a sizable audience, if done right, for a theatrical release to be successful. Hope Jim looks at that.
Atomic Blonde has made $90M on a $30M budget and it's not like they busted the bank marketing it.
Source please?
via Deadline.Focus snapped up Atomic Blondes North America rights at Cannes two years ago for eight figures. So while Uni/Focus doesnt have equity in the pic, its a licensing deal with mutual upside to both parties. Uni/Focus is also shouldering P&A (which is under $40M, most of it digital and stunts).