• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Wkd BO 09•01-03•17 - Labor Day WEAKend box office has nothing as Bodyguard 3peats

Grizzlyjin

Supersonic, idiotic, disconnecting, not respecting, who would really ever wanna go and top that
I'm trying to think who they'll replace Angelina with. Gotta be a big name since that's the entire Dark Universe game plan. I could actually see it being Charlize, international audiences like her, right?
 
The weekend is so weak that we didn't even create a separate for it. Talk about the wasteland known as August movies.

American Hustle was decent. David O Russel films get people acting nominations that are head scratching to me though.

Didn't Silver Linings Playbook and American Hustle both score nominations in all four acting categories? I could see maybe half of those as being worthy of recognition. De Niro got nominated because it was the first time in a while that anyone had seen him give half a shit during a performance. His actual performance or that role in general weren't anything special. Bradley Cooper was put to shame by both Amy Adams and Christian Bale to such an extent that I don't see how anyone thought that he came off as memorable.

American Hustle & Silver Linings Playbook were box office & critical successes, and the performances were generally praised, of course they'd get multiple acting noms, the coat-tail nomination was Weaver for SLP, who literally only had like six lines or something. Great actresses, insignificant role.

Would put it in the same ballpark as Hell or High Water and Sicario DoM.

Since it's Weinstien too, I'm expecting a solid Oscar push behind it. So Sheridan is going be moving up another notch this fall, again.

Wind River is solid, and Renner's performance is a bit Oscar worthy IMO, but I doubt it'll land any Oscar nom beyond some technical ones though. It doesn't have the acclaim that Sicario or Hell or High Water have.
 

Chamber

love on your sleeve
Farewell Dark Universe, we hardly knew ye'.

I bet Universal had Charlize Theron as a solid Plan B for the lead of Bride Of Frankenstein until Atomic Blond turned out to be a giant pile of nothing at the box office.

Commence scrambling, Universal.

Atomic Blonde did well for what it was. I don't think anyone is shedding tears for the Dark Universe though.
 
Universal should have just done another Brendan Fraser film.

Tomb of The Dragon Emperor was not a big hit for them, and I believe Frasier turned down a fourth film as well eventually. They were going to do a remake one way or another.

I'm trying to think who they'll replace Angelina with. Gotta be a big name since that's the entire Dark Universe game plan. I could actually see it being Charlize, international audiences like her, right?

Or they could just cancel the Dark Universe as a whole, since it's clear it's not going to be profitable for them.
 
I remember being surprised as the awards started coming in on Hell or High Water. It was pretty under-the-radar until award season began in full.
 

Busty

Banned
Atomic Blonde did well for what it was. I don't think anyone is shedding tears for the Dark Universe though.

Less than $100m worldwide off the back of her in the last Fast/Furious film and, to a lesser degree, Fury Road is poor. Even if this was a Focus release it's still a disappointment.
 

Chamber

love on your sleeve
Less than $100m worldwide off the back of her in the last Fast/Furious film and, to a lesser degree, Fury Road is poor. Even if this was a Focus release it's still a disappointment.

It's not a franchise movie or an ensemble movie, not sure what F&F8 or Fury Road have to do with it.
 
Yeah, I'm not seeing Atomic Blonde's receipts being much of a factor in whether or not some big budget blockbuster decides they wanna cast one of the industry's only recognized Academy Award-winning ass-kickers.

She's still Charlize Theron. Not that star power matters for much anymore, but I don't think anyone at Universal is like "Well, Atomic Blonde didn't set the world on fire."

She's still a very prominent name on a very small list of actors (regardless of gender) who can believably beat the shit out of someone while also possessing legitimate acting chops.
 
Atomic Blonde has made $90M on a $30M budget and it's not like they busted the bank marketing it.

Period-piece cold war spy movie also isn't going to be a huge sell.

I'm sure it did as expected.

EDIT: $30M budget, not $50M
 

kswiston

Member
Yeah, I'm not seeing Atomic Blonde's receipts being much of a factor in whether or not some big budget blockbuster decides they wanna cast one of the industry's only recognized Academy Award-winning ass-kickers.

She's still Charlize Theron. Not that star power matters for much anymore, but I don't think anyone at Universal is like "Well, Atomic Blonde didn't set the world on fire."

She's still a very prominent name on a very small list of actors (regardless of gender) who can believably beat the shit out of someone while also possessing legitimate acting chops.

I don't think that Atomic Blonde is going to determine much, but The Huntsman flopped for Universal with Jessica Chastain and Emily Blunt, in addition to Charlize. Stacking the cast isn't going to make a huge difference if they don't have a concept that people care to watch in the first place.
 
Stacking the cast isn't going to make a huge difference if they don't have a concept that people care to watch in the first place.

Yeah, but I'm speaking less to the viability of shitty ideas in cinematic universe-building and more to the idea that a studio is going to use something like Atomic Blonde as a serious gauge by which to measure whether or not one of the best-known options for action+acting is going to make it into a big-budget ensemble.
 

kswiston

Member
Looking at WB's schedule through the remainder of the year, I wonder if they can hit $2 billion this year. They will need about $770M from the following by Dec 31st.

It - 9/8/17
Ninjago - 9/22/17
Blade Runner 2049 - 10/6/17
Geostorm - 10/20/17
Justice League - 11/17/17
Bastards (2017) - 12/22/17

Even if Warner Bros misses $2B, they should easily pass Universal for second place this year.
 
Bastards is one of those movie that was filmed years ago and is just getting released. Another one of those releasing this year is Same Kind of Different as Me, which I assume was delayed to avoid Mr. Church and The Shack.
 

Busty

Banned
Atomic Blonde has made $90M on a $30M budget and it's not like they busted the bank marketing it.

Source please?


Yeah, I'm not seeing Atomic Blonde's receipts being much of a factor in whether or not some big budget blockbuster decides they wanna cast one of the industry's only recognized Academy Award-winning ass-kickers.

She's still Charlize Theron. Not that star power matters for much anymore, but I don't think anyone at Universal is like "Well, Atomic Blonde didn't set the world on fire."

She's still a very prominent name on a very small list of actors (regardless of gender) who can believably beat the shit out of someone while also possessing legitimate acting chops.

True. But if you're going to invest potentially hundreds of millions into an actor to headline yet another attempt at launching a franchise you have to look at past performances and if Universal spent $70-80m on production and P&A on Atomic Blonde only to come up short why would they go ahead and invest heavily on her again?

Looking at WB's schedule through the remainder of the year, I wonder if they can hit $2 billion this year. They will need about $770M from the following by Dec 31st.

It - 9/8/17
Ninjago - 9/22/17
Blade Runner 2049 - 10/6/17
Geostorm - 10/20/17
Justice League - 11/17/17
Bastards (2017) - 12/22/17

Even if Warner Bros misses $2B, they should easily pass Universal for second place this year.

I think IT, Justice League and Ninjago can get them there. Geostorm will obviously sweep the Oscars but sadly won't make much at the box office because the demand will be so great it will create a bottleneck in cinemas where the sheer numbers of people trying to get into the multiplex will mean no one will be able to do so.
 
True. But if you're going to invest potentially hundreds of millions into an actor to headline yet another attempt at launching a franchise

Any decision made in the name of furthering the stillbirth that is Dark Universe is already suspect as fuck, though, so questioning the "logic" behind those decisions seems futile to me.

If they wanted her before, they'd probably still want her now, because at least people are going to somewhat remember Atomic Blonde by the time this year ends, unlike The Mummy.
 

kswiston

Member
The Mummy is set to receive a decent amount of awards recognition in January
when the Razzie nominations drop
 

Toa TAK

Banned
The Mummy is set to receive a decent amount of awards recognition in January
when the Razzie nominations drop
They shouldn't even waste their time.
You will never forget The Mummy, though.
I had people come and say right to my face---my beautiful face-- that The Mummy wasn't as bad as """they""" made it out to be.

I can't help everyone. I've put out warnings, I've preached in town centers, I've written half-hearted forum posts but it seems people want to be delivered into the devil. I remember The Mummy because it is the burden placed upon me, but it was all for nothing.
 

Chamber

love on your sleeve
Looking at WB's schedule through the remainder of the year, I wonder if they can hit $2 billion this year. They will need about $770M from the following by Dec 31st.

It - 9/8/17
Ninjago - 9/22/17
Blade Runner 2049 - 10/6/17
Geostorm - 10/20/17
Justice League - 11/17/17
Bastards (2017) - 12/22/17

Even if Warner Bros misses $2B, they should easily pass Universal for second place this year.

JL and IT are going to do $600m+ by themselves, it's in the bag!
 

kswiston

Member
American Made seems to be getting decent reviews so far. We'll see what America's hottest young actor can do when he has material that allows him to stretch out his definitely above average length legs.
 
I can't help everyone. I've put out warnings, I've preached in town centers, I've written half-hearted forum posts but it seems people want to be delivered into the devil. I remember The Mummy because it is the burden placed upon me, but it was all for nothing.

This thread needs no more poets, for it already has a Toa
 

mreddie

Member
Apparently, some people are saying this weekend and summer were poor because of payback for "Liberal Hollywood"

And by some, I mean comments on why this summer has kinda sucked for movies.
 
Paramount Bites Into ‘Dracul’: ‘It’ Director Andy Muschietti In Mix

Paramount Pictures has acquired screen rights to Dracul, the first prequel authorized by the estate of Bram Stoker. The film will be developed as potential directing vehicle down the line for Andy Muschietti, reteamed with It producers Barbara Muschietti and Roy Lee.

Written by Dacre Stoker and J.D. Barker, the tale is set in 1868, where a 21-year old Bram Stoker meets with an ungodly evil that he traps in an ancient tower all the while scribbling the events that led him there. The monster origin tale just went to Putnam’s Mark Tavani in a five-house auction brokered by Kristin Nelson of Nelson Literary Agency. The UK rights for Dracul were bought by Simon Taylor of Transworld and by Michel Lafon for France in a pre-empt.

The film deal was brokered by Angela Cheng Caplan of Cheng Caplan Company Inc. and attorney Wayne Alexander. Paramount executive Vanessa Joyce brought in the project and will oversee the development with Miri Yoon of Vertigo Entertainment.
 

shintoki

sparkle this bitch
Jeremy Renner really needs a nom for it. He gives one of the best performances I've seen in years. I hope they push for it.

It's in the hands of the best company to do so. I'd expect a best original screenplay nom for it too.

The initial meeting with the parents of the girl, alongside the transition to show what happened was brilliant.

Wind River is solid, and Renner's performance is a bit Oscar worthy IMO, but I doubt it'll land any Oscar nom beyond some technical ones though. It doesn't have the acclaim that Sicario or Hell or High Water have.

Sicario did not really land any either outside a few technical. Though, it came out in probably the strongest year for films in a while.

Wind River has Weinstein behind it, who typically give films some of the best Oscar pushes on the market. I'm expecting it
 

vinnygambini

Why are strippers at the U.N. bad when they're great at strip clubs???
Paramount never ceases to amaze me.

They should focus their efforts on launching new franchises or reboots. They have a library of great properties at their disposal and they do nothing.

The Last Airbender did $320M over 7 years ago despite terrible wom. The IP is still loved by many and I'm sure there is a sizable audience, if done right, for a theatrical release to be successful. Hope Jim looks at that.
 
Paramount never ceases to amaze me.

They should focus their efforts on launching new franchises or reboots. They have a library of great properties at their disposal and they do nothing.

The Last Airbender did $320M over 7 years ago despite terrible wom. The IP is still loved by many and I'm sure there is a sizable audience, if done right, for a theatrical release to be successful. Hope Jim looks at that.

Supposedly, they're thinking about it? I know M. Night wants to make another go at.
 

berzeli

Banned
Atomic Blonde has made $90M on a $30M budget and it's not like they busted the bank marketing it.
Source please?
Focus snapped up Atomic Blonde‘s North America rights at Cannes two years ago for eight figures. So while Uni/Focus doesn’t have equity in the pic, it’s a licensing deal with mutual upside to both parties. Uni/Focus is also shouldering P&A (which is under $40M, most of it digital and stunts).
via Deadline.
 
Top Bottom