There's no reason to believe Civil War will review as poorly as Batman v Superman, though.I'm afraid Civil War reviews will compare that movie to BvS.
Some of my friends will be unbearable on those days :/
There's no reason to believe Civil War will review as poorly as Batman v Superman, though.I'm afraid Civil War reviews will compare that movie to BvS.
Some of my friends will be unbearable on those days :/
Guaridans managed to introduce five brand new characters nobody knew before in a single movie. And Batman needs even less introduction than Spiderman.
Cameos from small players on their own also aren't anything bad. They were just shoddily done. But honestly, if the core of the movie was good, nobody would give a damn. People would just think "this movie was awesome and they teased future awesomeness down the line.
People are overthinking the whole thing. BvS is having troubles because it's simply weak movie. Even today, in the era of constant world building and shared universe, in the end all that matters if it's a fun movie or not.
The shoehorned Justice League stuff is a part of the reason why BvS is a mess though.
There's no reason to believe Civil War will review as poorly as Batman v Superman, though.
True, but it's that they executed it poorly, not that they dared to put those characters in the movie at all.
Oh I doubt it will, but my hardcore DC friends will see a conspiration against BvS.
Those shady Marvel-bought critics
Why are you assuming Warner execs care to or even know how to do their jobs?! This studio rewards failure! Speed Racer craters? Here's another 150 million for Jupiter Ascending thankyouverymuch!
Because I enjoy this comparison - BvS' 2nd Monday is ~33% lower than Zootopia's, at $4.6m.
It's also lower than Zootopia's 3rd and 4th Mondays (though that last one was the day after Easter). Zootopia opened to $75m.
I'm not sure. Look at Civil War. Was there any introduction to Spider Man? Nope. Black Panter? Nope either.
I don't think it'sabout world building. The Batman v Superman set up worked well on it's own as jumping point for the whole franchise. None of those superhero characters is complex enough to require full movie of their own before team up. The quality of the movie is the only problem. If they would make a good BvS nobody would care about very fast pace of world building.
Jesus, looking at BOM, BvS's $3.1M Monday is lower than nearly every single day earning of Zootopia during its run so far (only Zootopia's 4th Wednesday is lower). Do we know how much Zootopia made yesterday?
Sounds like BvS will struggle to beat Guardians. At this point, Suicide Squad beating it in the DOM BO wouldn't be too far fetched.Taking a look at the dailies for Man of steel, I think it is fairly probable that BvS fails to outgross the remainder of Man of steel's run going forward. BvS might have an edge on the next weekend or two but that wont be enough to overcome the weekday deficit.
Man of Steel made another $81M after its second weekend.
Sounds like BvS will struggle to beat Guardians. At this point, Suicide Squad beating it in the DOM BO wouldn't be too far fetched.
Batman vs Superman should have taken place after multiple Justice League movies and them working together. Give the characters and actors time to develop chemistry so the writer and director can twist and fuck with it.
My problem with this idea is that by the time they're working together for three or four movies, there's no fucking way they actually fight each other. You almost have to have them fighting each other early.
Miller only got that scenario to work because a) it was an elseworlds story and b) he turned Superman into a fucking stooge for Reagan.
Followup Batman vs Superman fights in comics almost always rely on mind controlled Superman or some dystopia reality where Lois is killed.
I still hate the idea behind Injustice.
They were FRIENDS Bronson :'(
Followup Batman vs Superman fights in comics almost always rely on mind controlled Superman or some dystopia reality where Lois is killed.
I still hate the idea behind Injustice.
I doubt they can claim that. When Civil War out likely grosses it will the audience be paid off as well?Oh I doubt it will, but my hardcore DC friends will see a conspiration against BvS.
Those shady Marvel-bought critics
I doubt they can claim that. When Civil War out likely grosses it will the audience be paid off as well?
Me too but the comic adaptation was surprisingly great.
I hate the tired "Lois' death makes Superman evil" trope though. It's been done way too many times and actually speaks poorly of Superman's character.
Yeah, I think the second most cited example of Batman fighting Superman is Hush, right?
(which isn't that good, really. You could take out all the word balloons and as a collection of wordless Jim Lee pinups it ends up maintaining more or less the same quality)
I like Grant Morrison's Justice League run, but the absolute most bullshit plot point in the entire run was when Superman killed himself in the alternate Rock of Ages future because Lois died, basically condemning earth.
My point for Civil War is we've had multiple movies through the years seeing tension build between Captain America and Iron Man. There's a history there, between the characters and actors. This movie will be a huge payoff for that.
Batman vs Superman should have taken place after multiple Justice League movies and them working together. Give the characters and actors time to develop chemistry so the writer and director can twist and fuck with it. In the comic world, Batman vs. Superman fighting should be a huge, climatic, third act event. Marketing wise it really can't be topped by DC, IMO. Wonder Woman and Justice League aren't going to have NEAR the hype of something like this.
Say what you want about Age of Ultron, but one thing it did was adequately point the finger of blame at Stark which may have been part of the rift buildup to lead into this. I'm not a comic book guy so I have no idea if it's built in the same way it was in the comics.
Say what you want about Age of Ultron, but one thing it did was adequately point the finger of blame at Stark which may have been part of the rift buildup to lead into this. I'm not a comic book guy so I have no idea if it's built in the same way it was in the comics.
They were FRIENDS Bronson :'(
Say what you want about Age of Ultron, but one thing it did was adequately point the finger of blame at Stark which may have been part of the rift buildup to lead into this. I'm not a comic book guy so I have no idea if it's built in the same way it was in the comics.
Say what you want about Age of Ultron, but one thing it did was adequately point the finger of blame at Stark which may have been part of the rift buildup to lead into this. I'm not a comic book guy so I have no idea if it's built in the same way it was in the comics.
And yet the MCU films have done a horrible job showing that Cap/.Tony are actually friends. We're told it, but we're never shown it. So the 'you chose Bucky over me' stuff is just weird as fuck... unless the point is Tony's delusional; as fuck.
And yet the MCU films have done a horrible job showing that Cap/.Tony are actually friends. We're told it, but we're never shown it. So the 'you chose Bucky over me' stuff is just weird as fuck... unless the point is Tony's delusional; as fuck.
Internationally Dinosaurs are as big as Star Wars lol.It's crazy to think that Dinosaurs (Jurassic World) atm is bigger than DC super heroes.
Also, looking at some theater scheduling for the coming weekend, and so far as I can tell, a couple chains here in town (nationals, not indie/locals) have definitely scheduled less screens for Batman v Superman this weekend. In some cases by about 3 shows per day.
Internationally Dinosaurs are as big as Star Wars lol.
The drop off for BvS must be hurting cinemas, for them Jungle Book probably can't get here soon enough.
Oh I doubt it will, but my hardcore DC friends will see a conspiration against BvS.
Those shady Marvel-bought critics
Civil War in the comics was a massive character assassination of Tony Stark. It was intended to be an Ultimate storyline which could have worked because that version of the Avengers had characters who were still relatively new to one another. When Marvel decided it should be a flagship 616 Event instead is when it became fundamentally incompatible with the characters it was pitting against one another.
In the MCU they have naturally built up to Civil War in a way that is making it very satisfying to behold. The rift between Steve and Tony has been building from the beginning despite them growing closer as friends, they still clearly disagree on the politics of Avenging.
"I don't know why my father ever looked up to that guy."
"Everything special about you came out of a bottle."
"Every time someone tries to win a war before it starts, innocent people die. Every time."
They're handling this far better than the comics ever could have.
Still better than him becoming a despot. And it did give us the badass Green Arrow/Atom team up to kill Darkseid.
I hope they make Stark the Director of SHIELD again.Tonys Arc After civil war is fantastic though and was great throughout the end of fractions run on it.