Hero said:
The thing is that hybrids are supposed to be able to adjust to the situation to fill in other roles if necessary but in no way shape or form should they be able to do it better than the main class. There would be no point in taking a rogue if enhancement shamans could provide better dps than them because that is ALL that rogues do. No group buffs, no totems, a mediocre raid debuff, etc.
Heh. See, again, if your guild isn't filled with a bunch of dipshits/assholes, nobody's going to say: "Oh hey, that rogue signed up on time, he's good, reliable, etc. but this shaman showed up, let's take him instead". Unless there's an absolute
need for the role, then it's bullshit that you would get swapped. The paladin I was with in Kara last week outhealed by ass by a long shot. Did I care? No! I mean, you could say, why not bring 2 paladins? Because I was there and I'm a competent healer.
Now, I do agree that the rogue purpose in the raid should be enhanced, but in a 10-man situation, sapping might be viable CC. In a 25-man, you're just going to be filling up DPS spots anyway, so what the **** does it matter? People are just way too protective over the class that they play when it's compared to others.
And it's not just hybrids either, I've heard bitching from rogues about hunters, hunters about rogues, mages about hunters, etc. etc. etc. If the group is succeeding and you are filling your role. Who. ****ing. Cares.
But the hybrid thing applies for other classes too. Warriors bitched when TBC came out and druid tanks were performing their job better than them. On my server it's hard to find good warrior tanks since most of them quit or rerolled.
Now that's just stupid. Warrior tanks were still very viable (
especially when they started to gear up) and I ran with a lot of great warrior tanks. The fact that druids were doing well was just an added bonus ... less time looking for group. If you're someone who would reroll over that, then I don't want you tanking for me.