Angry Grimace
Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
The only saving grace for Bray's match is that his character consistently doesn't care if he loses and not in that John Cena way.
I can potentially see Seth cashing in successfully at mania, because I have a feeling roman will get absolutely trashed the next night on raw if he takes the belt. The only that works is if Roman turns heel. That might be the way to salvage him, and use his heat to their advantage until he brings up his abilities...if he ever does.
They did it with The Rock when he was Rocky Maivia. People legit despised him as a happy-go-lucky face before they turned him heel, aligning with The Nation of Domination. We can only hope and pray they apply it to this situation as well.I can potentially see Seth cashing in successfully at mania, because I have a feeling Roman will get absolutely trashed by the crowd the next night on raw if he takes the belt. The only that works is if Roman turns heel. That might be the way to salvage him, and use his heat to their advantage until he brings up his abilities...if he ever does.
I don't think this happens. Vince is all in on Roman. That's his guy, whether we like it or not. If anything, I could see Vince turning him heel because he thinks the fans will "boo him for a reason then!"
Shame that once again WWE drops the ball on how to properly build a guy. He was red hot leading into 2014, but sub-par feuds, no proper buildup, poor booking to make him look strong (the ending at this years Rumble was a fucking joke), not to mention him powering out of everything Bryan at Fastlane (despite it not being a horrible match).
Whats bothering the shit of me even more is the fact that Cena is going to bury Rusev.
I don't think this happens. Vince is all in on Roman. That's his guy, whether we like it or not. If anything, I could see Vince turning him heel because he thinks the fans will "boo him for a reason then!"
Shame that once again WWE drops the ball on how to properly build a guy. He was red hot leading into 2014, but sub-par feuds, no proper buildup, poor booking to make him look strong (the ending at this years Rumble was a fucking joke), not to mention him powering out of everything Bryan at Fastlane (despite it not being a horrible match).
Whats bothering the shit of me even more is the fact that Cena is going to bury Rusev.
If we're working from the assumption that Roman wins, doesn't it make far more sense for Russev to win so that Reigns has a credible opponent to defend his title against?
Nah. Fuck it. Big Show and Kane aren't busy.
I think Rusev will be fine. They've built him into a monster. This is one case where Cena winning makes total sense. Even if it's about as predictable as it gets.Whats bothering the shit of me even more is the fact that Cena is going to bury Rusev.
Also they aren't going to do to Reigns what they did to Bryan by forcing him into a feud with Kane/Big Show after winning the title. They know how to make a guy and they know how to make you not care about a guy.
Yeah, I can unfortunately see the hardheadedness possibly continue with Roman.I don't think this happens. Vince is all in on Roman. That's his guy, whether we like it or not. If anything, I could see Vince turning him heel because he thinks the fans will "boo him for a reason then!"
Shame that once again WWE drops the ball on how to properly build a guy. He was red hot leading into 2014, but sub-par feuds, no proper buildup, poor booking to make him look strong (the ending at this years Rumble was a fucking joke), not to mention him powering out of everything Bryan at Fastlane (despite it not being a horrible match).
Whats bothering the shit of me even more is the fact that Cena is going to bury Rusev.
I would be OK with Reigns winning and Rollins coming down to cash in, only to have Triple H screw Rollins and have Reigns win again, making him the new poster boy of the Authority.
The biggest downside is that Rollins is so, so good as a shitbag heel, and I wouldn't want to give that up...but then we would have Ambrose having to deal with not one, but both of his Shield brothers being backstabbers.
Do they? Do they really? Do you have any evidence from this side of 2004 to back up that hypothesis?
Not sure I'm ready for Seth as a babyface either.
Can someone explain why I shouldn't like Roman Reigns?
I'm going to a WM watch party on Sunday, don't watch wrestling anymore, and I have no idea why people like or don't like Roman.
Did you watch WWF and/or WCW back in the day? Remember when you first saw Lex Luger and you were like "fuck Hulkamania, Savage and Warrior, this guy will be bigger than all!" and you saw him walking to the ring, and he just looked like a Greek god, he made Stallone look like Sonic the Hedgehog by comparison.
And then you saw him talk, and wrestle, and just his mannerisms and the whole image that you had just shattered into millions of pieces. That is kinda what Roman sadly is, there is just something about him that is really unconvincing especially when he talks. He seems like the most chill guy out there, but as far as some babyface who wants to win? Nah.
Luger was miles ahead of Reigns at least.
Sadly yes
He is a poor mans version of Kevin Nash in terms of promo, a better wrestler tough, but considering Nash's ability that is faint praise. At least Nash had a spark in his eye, a certain charisma about him, he was a douche in real life and that helped his character. Reigns seems like a much nicer and grounded dude
Did you watch WWF and/or WCW back in the day? Remember when you first saw Lex Luger and you were like "fuck Hulkamania, Savage and Warrior, this guy will be bigger than all!" and you saw him walking to the ring, and he just looked like a Greek god, he made Stallone look like Sonic the Hedgehog by comparison.
And then you saw him talk, and wrestle, and just his mannerisms and the whole image that you had just shattered into millions of pieces. That is kinda what Roman sadly is, there is just something about him that is really unconvincing especially when he talks. He seems like the most chill guy out there, but as far as some babyface who wants to win? Nah.
If there was some kind of reverse parlay where I could bet that either Cena, Sting or The Undertaker loses, I'd take that bet. Way too many "obvious" matches for there not to be a swerve.
The only swerve is that there is no swerve.
Lugar was never bigger or cooler than Warrior.
John Cena has also been in WWE for 15 years.Cena is one of the all times greats, roman isn't.
Can someone explain why I shouldn't like Roman Reigns?
I'm going to a WM watch party on Sunday, don't watch wrestling anymore, and I have no idea why people like or don't like Roman.
Never said he was, read the post again, i said when you saw Luger, you got the impression that he was going to be gigantic, a icon. But once you saw him speak and wrestle, the whole image fell down
Why would i compare Reigns to Luger if i said Luger was bigger than Warrior? The point of using Luger is that he looked the part, but lacked everything else. At least Warrior also had good charisma and presence to go with godlike physique. Reigns does not have that
If we're working from the assumption that Roman wins, doesn't it make far more sense for Russev to win so that Reigns has a credible opponent to defend his title against?
Nah. Fuck it. Big Show and Kane aren't busy.
Never said he was, read the post again, i said when you saw Luger, you got the impression that he was going to be gigantic, a icon. But once you saw him speak and wrestle, the whole image fell down
Why would i compare Reigns to Luger if i said Luger was bigger than Warrior? The point of using Luger is that he looked the part, but lacked everything else. At least Warrior also had good charisma and presence to go with godlike physique. Reigns does not have that
Believe that?The only possible way Roman could get more annoying is if they had him end every sentence with a question mark.
Really looking forward to reading this thread when Roman wins.
Really looking forward to reading this thread when Roman wins.
You guys really think Roman Reigns will win at Wrestlemania?
After all the time and effort they put into building Brock Lesnar as a beast that isn't on any other Superstar's level?
I'm glad we didn't get Bryan vs Brock yet, Brock Lesnar is the immovable object that the unstoppable force can't move.
Considering Lesnar hasn't signed a new deal yet. Reigns is pretty much winning.
If Lesnar does sign a new deal, then that opens up some more possibilities.
How do you know he hasn't signed?
No I was in the thread, there was definitely incensed reactions.Why? It'll probably be like the Rumble; a lot of yawns and no real reaction.
But there are people who think Brock has resigned and will win.No one being particularly surprised?
The way Raw ended yesterday just screams that he hasn't signed a deal yet. They didn't want to make anyone look too strong over the other in case plans change so it ended with both of them looking silly.
Maybe they keep Rollins a heel, but under the thumb of the Authority, since he's kayfabe scared of going against them or doing anything else. He plays second fiddle to Roman and gets treated like dirt by him and the rest of the Authority until a few months later when he can't take it anymore and finally turns face. Maybe he gets stopped by Triple H before the bell actually rings and is still holding onto the briefcase come MITB, where he has to take a risk of cashing in and earning the ire of the Authority.
Do bookies actually take bets on Wwe? How the hell does that work? Of course that system can be beaten!
Do bookies actually take bets on Wwe? How the hell does that work? Of course that system can be beaten!