AlphaSnake
...and that, kids, was the first time I sucked a dick for crack
RIP Rodney =(
Mr_Furious said:Because it has long been established that the average successful console lifespan is at least 5 years in this industry. 3 years may seem like a long time to the hardcore early adopters but the average consumer usually waits a while for a multitude of reasons. The Xbox has had it's most successful year EVER yet MS is going to quickly abort their current platform, prematurely bringing to the market it's successor. Basically the Xbox's lifespan has been cut short by 1 and a half years just so MS can start making a profit on their hardware. What's stupid about this whole scenario is that it was a viable option to redesign the current Xbox to be profitable without cutting features. BTW, people buy systems they feel confident will be around for a while and have adequate support so it's not just the existing library but also the console's future library as well. You may be fine with a next-gen console releasing annually but I sure as hell do not. I hope MS shoots themselves in the foot with the Xbox2. Here's something to think about: what if Xbox2 doesn't end up successful in MS's eyes and they want to end production in 3 years for yet another next-gen system? The market will not sustain on people spending 300+ dollars every 3-4 years for home hardware "upgrades" just because companies aren't smart enough to be profitable with their proposed hardware.
Damn good argument here.Mr_Furious said:Because it has long been established that the average successful console lifespan is at least 5 years in this industry. 3 years may seem like a long time to the hardcore early adopters but the average consumer usually waits a while for a multitude of reasons. The Xbox has had it's most successful year EVER yet MS is going to quickly abort their current platform, prematurely bringing to the market it's successor. Basically the Xbox's lifespan has been cut short by 1 and a half years just so MS can start making a profit on their hardware. What's stupid about this whole scenario is that it was a viable option to redesign the current Xbox to be profitable without cutting features. BTW, people buy systems they feel confident will be around for a while and have adequate support so it's not just the existing library but also the console's future library as well. You may be fine with a next-gen console releasing annually but I sure as hell do not. I hope MS shoots themselves in the foot with the Xbox2. Here's something to think about: what if Xbox2 doesn't end up successful in MS's eyes and they want to end production in 3 years for yet another next-gen system? The market will not sustain on people spending 300+ dollars every 3-4 years for home hardware "upgrades" just because companies aren't smart enough to be profitable with their proposed hardware.
The end of the cycle? Since when is 3 years the end of a successful platform's "cycle"? You're making it sound like this is the norm when I just argued otherwise. Just because you want the Xbox2 now doesn't mean that the market does. Once again, the market has dictated that the lifespan is an average of 5 years per generation. BTW, I never stated that the Xbox's existing library wasn't important but consumers do care about future support for their just purchased $150 (or more) system. By your rationale, no new hardware would sell worth a shit because there's not a lot of games already available on the market. Obviously people buy consoles based on it's future as well.jedimike said:Once again... if you are buying an Xbox now, you are buying for games that are already out for it, not for games coming in the future. Consumers are buying the item and games at the bargain end of the cycle. No one is getting screwed.
Mr_Furious said:The end of the cycle? Since when is 3 years the end of a successful platform's "cycle"? You're making it sound like this is the norm when I just argued otherwise. Just because you want the Xbox2 now doesn't mean that the market does. Once again, the market has dictated that the lifespan is an average of 5 years per generation. BTW, I never stated that the Xbox's existing library wasn't important but consumers do care about future support for their just purchased $150 (or more) system. By your rationale, no new hardware would sell worth a shit because there's not a lot of games already available on the market. Obviously people buy consoles based on it's future as well.
Mr_Furious said:The end of the cycle? Since when is 3 years the end of a successful platform's "cycle"? You're making it sound like this is the norm when I just argued otherwise. Just because you want the Xbox2 now doesn't mean that the market does. Once again, the market has dictated that the lifespan is an average of 5 years per generation. BTW, I never stated that the Xbox's existing library wasn't important but consumers do care about future support for their just purchased $150 (or more) system. By your rationale, no new hardware would sell worth a shit because there's not a lot of games already available on the market. Obviously people buy consoles based on it's future as well.
jedimike said:The "historic" console life cycle is irrelevant. People buy shit all the time and within months something bigger and better comes out. PC's, PDA's, Cars, Microwaves, Washer's, fruitcakes... it doesn't matter. People buy things on their current value or potential value. Those people that buy an Xbox in the first year are buying based on potential value. Those buying now are buying on current value. Nobody buys a console based on how many years it has left.
sonycowboy said:meh. My local stores have stacks and stack of them wherever I go...
:lol :lol :lol
Sound familiar?
adam20 said:this coming from a sony fanboy. Statistics show sony fanboys more likely to lie than non sony pony's.
sonycowboy said:I think it's certainly not useless and there are MANY positives, but I'd bet that most buyers are unaware that Xenon is coming out next year and that their new purchase will not be getting "heavily developed" games 12 months from now. I've seen quite a few people buy systems that they were unaware how close to the end of it's life they were and they were quite upset that they had made the purchase.
adam20 said:this coming from a sony fanboy. Statistics show sony fanboys more likely to lie than non sony pony's.
Like the wildly popular Nintendo DS handheld game system...
adam20 said:this coming from a sony fanboy. Statistics show sony fanboys more likely to lie than non sony pony's.
shinokou said:Halo 2 shortages? Good lord, the store I work at has literally about 50-60 copies of overstock. They're all the special edition, too... why can't people just shell out the extra five bucks so I don't have to look at those damned things anymore?
Dead?Azih said::lol every mainstream article on videogaming has to include some sort of backhanded Gamecube insult this holiday season.
Gamecube: The Rodney Dangerfield console of this generation
OH SNAP OH SNAPscola said:Dead?
Mr_Furious said:Because it has long been established that the average successful console lifespan is at least 5 years in this industry. 3 years may seem like a long time to the hardcore early adopters but the average consumer usually waits a while for a multitude of reasons. The Xbox has had it's most successful year EVER yet MS is going to quickly abort their current platform, prematurely bringing to the market it's successor. Basically the Xbox's lifespan has been cut short by 1 and a half years just so MS can start making a profit on their hardware. What's stupid about this whole scenario is that it was a viable option to redesign the current Xbox to be profitable without cutting features. BTW, people buy systems they feel confident will be around for a while and have adequate support so it's not just the existing library but also the console's future library as well. You may be fine with a next-gen console releasing annually but I sure as hell do not. I hope MS shoots themselves in the foot with the Xbox2. Here's something to think about: what if Xbox2 doesn't end up successful in MS's eyes and they want to end production in 3 years for yet another next-gen system? The market will not sustain on people spending 300+ dollars every 3-4 years for home hardware "upgrades" just because companies aren't smart enough to be profitable with their proposed hardware.
I dunno about "widely known". I don't think anything we talk about here could truly be considered widely known among the millions of people who are purchasing consoles this month.Kanbee-san said:Thats all well and good, but the thing has been out for three years and has rougly another year to go. If you buy an xbox now, you would be a retard to expect games until 2006 because its widely known there arent many exclusive titles left to come past mid 2005.
JoshuaJSlone said:I dunno about "widely known". I don't think anything we talk about here could truly be considered widely known among the millions of people who are purchasing consoles this month.
Kanbee-san said:Yeah thats certainly true, but i thought that because $300 is "so much money to spend" that people would research before they laid down there dosh ?
Try six months from now. What's "retarded" about your argument is that the reason why "exclusives" won't last into 2006 is because MS is aborting their own system prematurely, in favor of it's successor and millions of the late (ridiculous saying this only 3 years into a system's lifecycle) adopters are not aware of this. If the Xbox would've had the full 5 year lifecycle, the support would still be there (even into 2006). Considering that this was the Xbox's most successful year, ever, it' silly to think companies (MS included) wouldn't still be supporting the Xbox in the coming years if the Xbox2 wasn't right around the corner.Kanbee-san said:Thats all well and good, but the thing has been out for three years and has rougly another year to go. If you buy an xbox now, you would be a retard to expect games until 2006 because its widely known there arent many exclusive titles left to come past mid 2005.
Shooting themselves in the foot does not equate to failing so please don't put words in my mouth. I want MS to have a tough time with the Xbox2 coming into market mainly because I don't believe the market is ready but I sure as hell don't want MS to fail. God knows they'd answer that failure with an even shorter lifespan of their Xbox2 in favor of the Xbox3.Kanbee-san said:As for hoping MS fail, geez thats a lame comment. Even the holiest of M$ haters know that the industry needs the competition that MS bring. Otherwise its gonna turn into the EA way of gaming (rehash the same game every year).
Your last statement is so filled with assumptions that you have no right calling anyone else a "retard".Kanbee-san said:The way i see it, the xbox will have had 4 years of solid support when it ends. Just dont be a retard and hop on in the last half of the consoles journey and complain that it didnt give you your 5 years worth. $300 is nothing especially compared to the turnover of PC gaming costs.
Mr_Furious said:Your last statement is so filled with assumptions that you have no right calling anyone else a "retard".
Not if you work in the industry. MS has every intention on releasing the Xenon in 2005 and that's not an assumption.GhaleonEB said:Until the Xenon timeline is announced by MS, this entire goddamn coversation is full of assumptions.
GhaleonEB said:Until the Xenon timeline is announced by MS, this entire goddamn coversation is full of assumptions.
Mr_Furious said:Try six months from now. What's "retarded" about your argument is that the reason why "exclusives" won't last into 2006 is because MS is aborting their own system prematurely, in favor of it's successor and millions of the late (ridiculous saying this only 3 years into a system's lifecycle) adopters are not aware of this. If the Xbox would've had the full 5 year lifecycle, the support would still be there (even into 2006). Considering that this was the Xbox's most successful year, ever, it' silly to think companies (MS included) wouldn't still be supporting the Xbox in the coming years if the Xbox2 wasn't right around the corner.
Mr_Furious said:Shooting themselves in the foot does not equate to failing so please don't put words in my mouth. I want MS to have a tough time with the Xbox2 coming into market mainly because I don't believe the market is ready but I sure as hell don't want MS to fail. God knows they'd answer that failure with an even shorter lifespan of their Xbox2 in favor of the Xbox3.
Mr_Furious said:Your last statement is so filled with assumptions that you have no right calling anyone else a "retard".
Kanbee-san said:Care to back that up with some facts ? Less bullshit more facts please.
Kanbee-san said:Nice save, not.
All you have is assumption, yet you spout on about what right I have to speak ? I would have expected more from a ron jeremy fan.
krypt0nian said:You don't need to go outside to know its raining.
2005 is a lock.
Mr_Furious said:You only need to look at either EB's or GS's release lists for further proof that after June not much is planned for the Xbox.
I hear ya but I'm not using those as the basis of my argument. The lists fall in line with what I've been hearing from multiple reliable sources within the industry. There's bound to be multiple announcements from various 3rd parties (hell, I'm working on one of them) on or around E3 but what triggered this debate were "exclusives". I have it on good authority that this E3, MS will have no exclusive games announced for their Xbox nor are they paying any developer/publisher for exclusive rights/window to current games in development for the Xbox. Their show is going to be mainly focused on the Xbox's successor.Chi-Town said:Games that come out in the 2nd half of the year usually don't get announced until E3. It's definately possible that there will be less Xbox support but pointing at these release lists now proves nothing substantial.
Mr_Furious said:Their show is going to be mainly focused on the Xbox's successor.
Mr_Furious said:I hear ya but I'm not using those as the basis of my argument. The lists fall in line with what I've been hearing from multiple reliable sources within the industry. There's bound to be multiple announcements from various 3rd parties (hell, I'm working on one of them) on or around E3 but what triggered this debate were "exclusives". I have it on good authority that this E3, MS will have no exclusive games announced for their Xbox nor are they paying any developer/publisher for exclusive rights/window to current games in development for the Xbox. Their show is going to be mainly focused on the Xbox's successor.
Mr_Furious said:I guess I'm alone in not liking the thought of companies shortening the lifespan of their hardware just to make a profit. As I've stated before, I do not like what MS is doing but I hope this is a one time thing and not some kind of "new trend" where they feel they can bring a new console to the market whenever they feel like it. The repercussions of such a move can be pretty damaging to the industry and the market as a whole.
Mr_Furious said:If you don't want to listen to somone that's been working in the industry for over 10 years and has made many friends that are "in the know" then that's your loss. I don't have to prove shit to you any more than I'm insisting you back up the bullshit you spout (accompanied by immature namcalling) with facts. If you do just a little bit of investigative work on this very forum will will find that other industry insiders have all but confirmed what I've already mentioned. Many Xbox developers have already shifted development over to Xenon with just a few stragglers left to wrap up current devs. You only need to look at either EB's or GS's release lists for further proof that after June not much is planned for the Xbox. I'm sure some announcements have yet to be made but nothing significant from what I've been hearing.
I don't even now how to respond to this but I do question your level of maturity (or lack there of) based off both this post and your previous one where you felt inclined to insult people because they chose to purchase an Xbox 3 years into it's life cycle. And for the record (because too many people keep thinking I'm one of these people), I purchased my Xbox just six months after it was released. It's the principle of my argument that people need to focus on more.
As I stated before junior, I don't have to prove shit. Either believe me or don't. It's that simple. And you can fuck right off with your "be quiet" bullshit. This is a message forum and I have the feedom to post any rumor or conjecture I see fit. At least I don't resort to insults with my initial posts. I don't know what the fuck crawled up your ass and why I was targeted by your asshole remarks but maybe you should take your own advice and "be quiet". It's not hard to do.Kanbee-san said:I call your bluff. Give me some facts that have been stated by microsoft themselves or stay quiet. Its not hard to do. I dont care if you worked in the industry for 20 years, without factual evidence (not conjecture) all you have to say is rumour.
I might be immature, but i dont go around passing off my opinions as fact.
Mr_Furious said:As I stated before junior, I don't have to prove shit. Either believe me or don't. It's that simple. And you can fuck right off with your "be quiet" bullshit. This is a message forum and I have the feedom to post any rumor or conjecture I see fit. At least I don't resort to insults with my initial posts. I don't know what the fuck crawled up your ass and why I was targeted by your asshole remarks but maybe you should take your own advice and "be quiet". It's not hard to do.