After you have played?Sure, I'll give some impressions tomorrow.
After you have played?Sure, I'll give some impressions tomorrow.
Eggman, grace us with your review of the game based off of pre-release material. I just think its pretty hard to judge a reviews accuracy when you have not played the game.
what if zombi 2 suddenly takes place in japan and the main character is Scott-san and instead of a cricket bat you draw your hanzou steel and BOOM it's the real Red Steel 2
I agree it's also hard to judge a review accurately until you yourself have played a game or more than 3 reviews have dropped.To be fair, I think it's pretty hard to judge the game based on reviews accurately when we have a 92, a 7, and a 4.5 currently.
the Wii-U controller?
Sit and take what? How is this score an affront to you?
This review did not make mention of the rounded edges on the disk. INVALIDATED.The ZombiU banner was sort of interesting, but why does it have a British guard zombie guy? The guy in the same shined a flashlight on some doors and then opened them. There was some zombies and you could shake the gamepad. The disc is shiny and reflective on the back.
An excellent title. 9/10
Why does it have to be arbitrary "3?" The fact there's already a review almost 30 (or 3 using a 10 scale) points more should lead to some questioning.I agree it's also hard to judge a review accurately until you yourself have played a game or more than 3 reviews have dropped.
After you have played?
I'm still excited for the game. One low review won't diminish my excitement, though I'm a little more prepared to be disappointed just in case.
oh my god yessssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
I'm still excited for the game. One low review won't diminish my excitement, though I'm a little more prepared to be disappointed just in case.
How about two low reviews? IGN's staff doesn't seem to hot on it either.
How about two low reviews? IGN's staff doesn't seem to hot on it either.
I hope this game is actually good and a lot better than what Gamespot thinks.
But it's a Ubisoft game so being bad isn't out of the question.
How about two low reviews? IGN's staff doesn't seem to hot on it either.
On ZombieU the two back buttons are to hit. When do you 'swing' the controller? :S
Did you know that you can kick enemies when they're down in Silent Hill 2 to kill them instantly? It makes the combat way faster, and combat sucked before I figured that out.
Really? They were gushing on their preview.
I think he's talking about a tweet that people were just reading too much into.Link?
This is what's bugging me. I've seen mutiple vids showing players using different types of weapons(flares, guns, crossbows, explosives, etc), but the gamespot review shows mostly just clubbing zombies to death one by one and they seem to suggest its the only good way to play the game, hence the low score.You don't. The bat is mainly for when you run out of ammo and for a short period after you die when you need to retrieve your backpack. Other than that, it's okay for one-on-one but is entirely useless for any other situation. Seemingly, the pistol alone is a one-shot-kill to the head. Why would anyone prefer the bat? It's just dumb.
Theoretically, you could use the bat for most of the game if all you ever did was lure one zombie at a time, but in some situations you would die a lot before all of the zombies were dead. And even then, every time you die, the character becomes a zombie so for each death another zombie appears, effectively.
There are quite a few weapons in-game, but you need to find them through looting. A video I watched earlier had the player find a crossbow at what appears to be very early in the game:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDZQ_ofA3-w&t=1m18s
Personally, i'm looking forward to trying the game out myself when it hits UK shelves. It looks good.
Why does it have to be arbitrary "3?" The fact there's already a review almost 30 (or 3 using a 10 scale) points more should lead to some questioning.
Of course.
what if zombi 2 suddenly takes place in japan and the main character is Scott-san and instead of a cricket bat you draw your hanzou steel and BOOM it's the real Red Steel 2
I'm doing the review for the site I work for and I must say that the GameSpot review scares me... a lot.
I'm doing the review for the site I work for and I must say that the GameSpot review scares me... a lot.
whatever gang. if it's crap, we'll know tomorrow. lets not shit on a reviewer for having an opinion.
This is what's bugging me. I've seen mutiple vids showing players using different types of weapons(flares, guns, crossbows, explosives, etc), but the gamespot review shows mostly just clubbing zombies to death one by one and they seem to suggest its the only good way to play the game, hence the low score.
Activist reviewers huhWow, panic over a Maxwell McGee review?
Let's look at the past games he has reviewed,
http://www.gamespot.com/users/Maxwell/contributions
He is the "fighting games guy".... why the heck did he get the job of reviewing a slow paced survival game when he is mostly a connoisseur of the complete opposite style of game play; fast, fast and fast? He also doesn't look like he gets assigned the "big name games" either...which is something to consider when looking at the source of this, "I tried to finish the game as fast as I could because I hate slow paced games", review.
In my view, it seems that the powers that be at GS, when handing down review assignments, looked at the pending ZombiU review in the wake of other "bigger" games out now, and said "ehh, more Wii U 'current gen' crap to review...give it to Maxwell."
I am only saying this to calm the down the panic that ZombiU is "crap". I think there is more to the fact that the review was done in a rush by someone who does not prefer to play slow paced action games than there is to the game actually being a bad game.
Other reviews, by reviewers who actually LIKE this kind of game, will balance this out.
I agree. This is one of the big reasons I really love quick looks from giant bomb. It's good to watch someone play a game for an extended period of time.I will say, all this crap is a good argument for why review scores are bad.
Regardless of how the game actually is, if all we had to go by was watching the guy play the game in the video the way he did, along with his commentary, I'm willing to bet there wouldn't be nearly so much freaking out.
Let me put it this way.
When chatting with someone in real life about movies, and one guy says "dude I hated that movie it SUCKED everything about it was the WORST MOVIE EVER"... I think most people generally don't get angered and proceed to argue about it for five hours. If you thought the film was fine personally, you just roll your eyes and move on. Or make like a short quip about your friend's taste.
But if the same guy said that, attached a "3 out of 10" number to it, and his opinion was printed in a newspaper somewhere, there's much more psychological manipulation at play. And a greater chance you're going to freak out, and even start to worry that you don't really like the movie, you're now insecure, it's really horrible after all, etc.
I think even a thumbs up or thumbs down system would not cause so much drama like these damn numbers with their fractions do.
Wow, panic over a Maxwell McGee review?
Let's look at the past games he has reviewed,
http://www.gamespot.com/users/Maxwell/contributions
He is the "fighting games guy".... why the heck did he get the job of reviewing a slow paced survival game when he is mostly a connoisseur of the complete opposite style of game play; fast, fast and fast? He also doesn't look like he gets assigned the "big name games" either...which is something to consider when looking at the source of this, "I tried to finish the game as fast as I could because I hate slow paced games", review.
In my view, it seems that the powers that be at GS, when handing down review assignments, looked at the pending ZombiU review in the wake of other "bigger" games out now, and said "ehh, more Wii U 'current gen' crap to review...give it to Maxwell."
I am only saying this to calm the down the panic that ZombiU is "crap". I think there is more to the fact that the review was done in a rush by someone who does not prefer to play slow paced action games than there is to the game actually being a bad game.
Other reviews, by reviewers who actually LIKE this kind of game, will balance this out.
I will say, all this crap is a good argument for why review scores are bad.
Regardless of how the game actually is, if all we had to go by was watching the guy play the game in the video the way he did, along with his commentary, I'm willing to bet there wouldn't be nearly so much freaking out.
Let me put it this way.
When chatting with someone in real life about movies, and one guy says "dude I hated that movie it SUCKED everything about it was the WORST MOVIE EVER"... I think most people generally don't get angered and proceed to argue about it for five hours. If you thought the film was fine personally, you just roll your eyes and move on. Or make like a short quip about your friend's taste.
But if the same guy said that, attached a "3 out of 10" number to it, and his opinion was printed in a newspaper somewhere, there's much more psychological manipulation at play. And a greater chance you're going to freak out, and even start to worry that you don't really like the movie, you're now insecure, it's really horrible after all, etc.
I think even a thumbs up or thumbs down system would not cause so much drama like these damn numbers with their fractions do.
I don't think anyone in this thread is claiming the game is crap. I think in general people need to calm down . Reviews are subjective and trying to compare a number across a set of reviews by different reviewers is not going to work.
This is what's bugging me. I've seen mutiple vids showing players using different types of weapons(flares, guns, crossbows, explosives, etc), but the gamespot review shows mostly just clubbing zombies to death one by one and they seem to suggest its the only good way to play the game, hence the low score.
I think even a thumbs up or thumbs down system would not cause so much drama like these damn numbers with their fractions do.
Wow, panic over a Maxwell McGee review?
Let's look at the past games he has reviewed,
http://www.gamespot.com/users/Maxwell/contributions
He is the "fighting games guy".... why the heck did he get the job of reviewing a slow paced survival game when he is mostly a connoisseur of the complete opposite style of game play; fast, fast and fast? He also doesn't look like he gets assigned the "big name games" either...which is something to consider when looking at the source of this, "I tried to finish the game as fast as I could because I hate slow paced games", review.
In my view, it seems that the powers that be at GS, when handing down review assignments, looked at the pending ZombiU review in the wake of other "bigger" games out now, and said "ehh, more Wii U 'current gen' crap to review...give it to Maxwell."
I am only saying this to calm the down the panic that ZombiU is "crap". I think there is more to the fact that the review was done in a rush by someone who does not prefer to play slow paced action games than there is to the game actually being a bad game.
Other reviews, by reviewers who actually LIKE this kind of game, will balance this out.