So is Ryse for PS4. QTE + long distance combat this time.
NextGen games: Beautiful and boring.
how did you figure all that?
So is Ryse for PS4. QTE + long distance combat this time.
NextGen games: Beautiful and boring.
To be fair, at this point having a shooter that doesn't let you use environmental cover would be ass-backwards.
So why not "smh" at the people gushing over the game as well? Everyone, yourself included, is reacting to the same footage.
seriously!? that qualifies as "all the bad news" in this world???
crazy talk...not to mention we've known all that for awhile, but am i nuts for having expected it all from the moment the game was announced?...
This looks like any of the other dozens of third person cover shooters from the previous gen, only with better graphics. I know, it's a 5 second gif and none of the others show much more gameplay wise besides QTEs and cinematics. But, if I were making videos/gifs to showcase a new game, I would not show a generic run to cover + pop and shoot.
Because you can look at the footage and say it is beautiful. You cannot look at the footage and know if the game will be total crap or not.
This looks like any of the other dozens of third person cover shooters from the previous gen, only with better graphics. I know, it's a 5 second gif and none of the others show much more gameplay wise besides QTEs and cinematics. But, if I were making videos/gifs to showcase a new game, I would not show a generic run to cover + pop and shoot.
This has already been said by multiple people because multiple people keep saying the same thing.This looks like any of the other dozens of third person cover shooters from the previous gen, only with better graphics. I know, it's a 5 second gif and none of the others show much more gameplay wise besides QTEs and cinematics. But, if I were making videos/gifs to showcase a new game, I would not show a generic run to cover + pop and shoot.
They just need to say that this is 1080p and we'll call it a day.
So why not "smh" at the people gushing over the game as well? Everyone, yourself included, is reacting to the same footage.
It's 1920x800. So it will be as sharp as a 1080p game but with black barsThey just need to say that this is 1080p and we'll call it a day.
And yet games like Max Payne 1 & 2 are amazing!
I guess having good design is ass-backwards then.
Because the people gushing are doing so over the visuals, which isn't exactly the same thing as coming to the conclusion that the game's going to be boring/rubbish based off of the very little actual gameplay in the same gifs.So why not "smh" at the people gushing over the game as well? Everyone, yourself included, is reacting to the same footage.
The screens are gorgeous
Amazing RAD went from psp to this
If Sony is releasing the supposedly U2 moment vid now
Can't wait to see what ammo they are saving for E3
This looks like any of the other dozens of third person cover shooters from the previous gen, only with better graphics. I know, it's a 5 second gif and none of the others show much more gameplay wise besides QTEs and cinematics. But, if I were making videos/gifs to showcase a new game, I would not show a generic run to cover + pop and shoot.
This looks like any of the other dozens of third person cover shooters from the previous gen, only with better graphics. I know, it's a 5 second gif and none of the others show much more gameplay wise besides QTEs and cinematics. But, if I were making videos/gifs to showcase a new game, I would not show a generic run to cover + pop and shoot.
To be fair, at this point having a shooter that doesn't let you use environmental cover would be ass-backwards.
I don't think too many people are saying it's going to be the most amazing, deep gameplay experience ever based on these gifs. People ARE saying that it's going to be a shallow, generic TPS based on these gifs though. The positives are about the graphics, which look quite close in quality to the reveal trailer that many of us thought was unattainable in real time.
Because you can look at the footage and say it is beautiful. You cannot look at the footage and know if the game will be total crap or not.
It's 1920x800. So it will be as sharp as a 1080p game but with black bars
You can also go the bubble route, a la Stranglehold or The Specialists.Max Payne 3 used quantum physics and magic to overcome this issue. You can use those Max Payne jump dive slow-mo moves and they'll effect any other players who see it - causing them to move slow mo as well. Players who can't see other affected players move as normal.
Its a trip, but it worked. Not saying that exact solution would apply here, just that nature, and devious devs, find a way.
So why not "smh" at the people gushing over the game as well? Everyone, yourself included, is reacting to the same footage.
I agree it should not be a full price game, after all did they have to make 280p less contentBut what about my 280 vertical p's? I want p's, p's all over me.
Well some people seem to do a bit more. "Greatest game of fall 2014" certainly implies great gameplayBecause the people gushing are doing so over the visuals, which isn't exactly the same thing as coming to the conclusion that the game's going to be boring/rubbish based off of the very little actual gameplay in the same gifs.
Edit: Beaten by Crimson!
That's a man.
BTW: 17 pages for this! What are guys going to do tomorrow?
This is a bit of an obtuse position to take. You and I have the same information - we both know what it looks like. Either we can both draw opposite conclusions from two seconds of footage or we can both draw no conclusions at all. We cannot force the stance that only a positive outlook is the acceptable one. It's stifling potential discussion (of which there isn't much available, considering how little we have to actually discuss).
You do know those games came out over 10 years ago and he was talking about current time .
Let's break this down to make it very simple:This is a bit of an obtuse position to take. You and I have the same information - we both know what it looks like. Either we can both draw opposite conclusions from two seconds of footage or we can both draw no conclusions at all. We cannot force the stance that only a positive outlook is the acceptable one. It's stifling potential discussion (of which there isn't much available, considering how little we have to actually discuss).
If someone says that the image quality of the game is beautiful, there is the information to do so. To say that the game is generic, just like gears, or anything of that sort is an assumption that is not truly supported at all. You see about 4 seconds of game footage that showcase a part of one particular scenario. You can say that this particular part looks like things that you have seen before or even generic, but you cannot say that this is the entirety of the game or declare the entire game to be generic because of 4 seconds of leaked footage.
I was just saying you could make a great shooter that people would like without having to resort to implementing cover.
But that would take a bunch of time and thought into creating the levels so you are right that those aren't priorities for developers in this day & age.
It will be a mess for sure, but there will certainly be more to talk about.
I'm really excited to see if they show off some of the creatures from the initial reveal trailer, and maybe some more environments.
Pretty sure Sony Santa Monica are helping them, so it isn't too surprising.
BTW: 17 pages for this! What are guys going to do tomorrow?
Crash GAF
This is a bit of an obtuse position to take. You and I have the same information - we both know what it looks like. Either we can both draw opposite conclusions from two seconds of footage or we can both draw no conclusions at all. We cannot force the stance that only a positive outlook is the acceptable one. It's stifling potential discussion (of which there isn't much available, considering how little we have to actually discuss).
I'll never understand comments like this from about 2 seconds of clip.