Marvel's Phase 3 Announced: includes Black Panther, Captain Marvel

Status
Not open for further replies.
BlastProcessing said:
Other than the fact that they could have just negotiated an extra film for him, they could easily solve this with story.

For instance, Civil War could end with Cap quitting and going off the grid. Infinity Wars: Part 1 could have Bucky holding the shield. At the end of part one the team is shattered with Thor falling. So Tony has to go and find Cap and make peace because he is the only person Tony can think of that can wield the hammer.
Click to expand...

I'm like 99% sure Cap "dies" (these are comic books) in Civil War. Evans has said he wants to direct and is done doing movies; and I believe Cap 3 was his last contracted movie. I suspect if Evans is up for Avengers 3, shenanigans with Strange & Thanos lead to him being resurrected. But pretty sure Cap will bite the bullet.

Assuming typical Whedon level killing of characters; I am guessing Jane Foster, Pepper Potts, and Rhodes don't survive Avengers 2, and he may kill some combination of Hawkeye / Black Widow / Fury as well. Thor will leave Earth (with Jane dead) and Iron Man will be super done with all the things. Hulk goes into full blown hiding (terrified of his destructive potential), and Cap is done with everyone.
 
I think that Marvel has renegotiated Downey's deal twice now, for several tens of millions of dollars, just to keep him around longer kind of renders contract concerns null and void now imo. They're not going to shell out 40 million to get Downey into Cap 3 and then let Evans or Hemsworth walk just before the grand finale.
 
Cybit said:
I'm like 99% sure Cap "dies" (these are comic books) in Civil War. Evans has said he wants to direct and is done doing movies; and I believe Cap 3 was his last contracted movie. I suspect if Evans is up for Avengers 3, shenanigans with Strange & Thanos lead to him being resurrected. But pretty sure Cap will bite the bullet.

Assuming typical Whedon level killing of characters; I am guessing Jane Foster, Pepper Potts, and Rhodes don't survive Avengers 2, and he may kill some combination of Hawkeye / Black Widow / Fury as well. Thor will leave Earth (with Jane dead) and Iron Man will be super done with all the things. Hulk goes into full blown hiding (terrified of his destructive potential), and Cap is done with everyone.
Click to expand...

Evan's said he isn't interested in acting in Non-Marvel movies that he's not directing himself. It's been clarified by him twice and mentioned in this thread quite a few times.

Blader said:
I think that Marvel has renegotiated Downey's deal twice now, for several tens of millions of dollars, just to keep him around longer kind of renders contract concerns null and void now imo. They're not going to shell out 40 million to get Downey into Cap 3 and then let Evans or Hemsworth walk just before the grand finale.
Click to expand...

RDJ is on a movie to movie basis, as is SJ. Eventually the profit roof will be reached though and Marvel won't be able to match the desired pay of all of these actors on a movie to movie basis. At that point, either they have less crossovers or they tap new actors or new characters in some cases to take on the roles/mantles.
 
Jest Chillin said:
Evan's said he isn't interested in acting in Non-Marvel movies that he's not directing himself. It's been clarified by him twice and mentioned in this thread quite a few times.
Click to expand...

Just like how people refused to believe Spiderman returning to the MCU was anything more than speculation, people will just assume it's news and run with it.
 
Cybit said:
I'm like 99% sure Cap "dies" (these are comic books) in Civil War. Evans has said he wants to direct and is done doing movies; and I believe Cap 3 was his last contracted movie. I suspect if Evans is up for Avengers 3, shenanigans with Strange & Thanos lead to him being resurrected. But pretty sure Cap will bite the bullet.

Assuming typical Whedon level killing of characters; I am guessing Jane Foster, Pepper Potts, and Rhodes don't survive Avengers 2, and he may kill some combination of Hawkeye / Black Widow / Fury as well. Thor will leave Earth (with Jane dead) and Iron Man will be super done with all the things. Hulk goes into full blown hiding (terrified of his destructive potential), and Cap is done with everyone.
Click to expand...

I take your bet. Oh wait:

Dai101 said:
Since apparently this has to be posted in every thread:



Just to bury this once and for all:

"I said I directed last year and I really responded to it; I really enjoyed it and I'd love to focus a little more on that... By no means am I planning on retiring. It's kind of a silly statement."

http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/04/02/chris-evans-isnt-retiring-from-acting-after-all

"By no means am I planning on retiring," he said, calling his previous comments "kind of a silly statement". By way of caveat, he added: "I certainly am going to try and focus a bit more on directing at this point."

"If I'm acting at all, it's going to be under Marvel contract, or I'm going to be directing. I can't see myself pursuing acting strictly outside of what I'm contractually obligated to do."

http://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/apr/01/captain-america-chris-evans-not-quitting-acting
Click to expand...

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=136387825&postcount=1549

It was posted just a few pages back.
 
Blader said:
No, they have contracted numbers of appearances just as everyone else. Jackson's is nine, Downey's was four, then expanded to six and now seven.
Click to expand...

Not exactly. At least not from what I've read: http://www.mandatory.com/2014/08/29/how-many-more-movies-does-your-favorite-superhero-have-breaking/

RDJ, SJ, Mackie, and Renner are Movie to Movie and everyone else has a set number. He's commited to a certain amount but that's not the same as people like Evans, Jackson, and Hemsworth who are being paid a set amount per movie for X amount of movies.
 
Peru said:
Push the button and do the right thing, Marvel

emily-blunt-edge-of-tomorrow-1.jpg
Click to expand...

100% perfect casting choice, I agree!
 
I need to ask a question but I dont know if its considered spoiler or not (its relation to the infinite wars) lol

But seeing as how people have dropped tid bits from the Civil war storyline I'm hoping I'm fine.

Inifinte Wars.... Is this Thanos looking for the gems or the storyline where he's looking for his son and Ebony Maw takes over Doctor Strange and tricks the avengers into telling him he's on earth?
 
Jest Chillin said:
Not exactly. At least not from what I've read: http://www.mandatory.com/2014/08/29/how-many-more-movies-does-your-favorite-superhero-have-breaking/

RDJ, SJ, Mackie, and Renner are Movie to Movie and everyone else has a set number. He's commited to a certain amount but that's not the same as people like Evans, Jackson, and Hemsworth who are being paid a set amount per movie for X amount of movies.
Click to expand...

I don't know where they're getting their info, but Deadline has said that Scarlett is signed for 8 films, Renner himself said he's on for 4 (three Avengers and 1 solo film which will probably be swapped for another option), and Jackson's deal has always been for nine -- it even says right there in the link :lol

Downey's was also originally for 4 films (3 Iron Man, 1 Avengers) but was renegotiated last year for Avengers 2 and 3. So I guess he's technically on a movie-to-movie basis now, but he's definitely obligated for Infinity War -- or at least one of them.
 
Cybit said:
I'm like 99% sure Cap "dies" (these are comic books) in Civil War. Evans has said he wants to direct and is done doing movies; and I believe Cap 3 was his last contracted movie. I suspect if Evans is up for Avengers 3, shenanigans with Strange & Thanos lead to him being resurrected. But pretty sure Cap will bite the bullet.

Assuming typical Whedon level killing of characters; I am guessing Jane Foster, Pepper Potts, and Rhodes don't survive Avengers 2, and he may kill some combination of Hawkeye / Black Widow / Fury as well. Thor will leave Earth (with Jane dead) and Iron Man will be super done with all the things. Hulk goes into full blown hiding (terrified of his destructive potential), and Cap is done with everyone.
Click to expand...

Two of those characters aren't even in Avengers 2 (Foster and Potts).
 
I haven't seen much discussion on how Ragnarok was presented. The quote from the presentation is:


What we will do between now and the release of this movie is to educate the rest of the world as to what [Ragnarok] means, and it's a very important word which means, essentially, "the end of all things." This is a very important movie for us in our Phase 3 timeline. As the Russos did so well reinventing Captain America in the Winter Soldier and changing everything that would come after it, that is the plan for Thor: Ragnarok; to take Thor to another level in his own franchise, and, in fact, picks up right after we leave him in Avengers 2, and will impact everything that comes afterwards.
Click to expand...

So, yeah, it seems that this won't be a "just Asgard" adventure, but something that implements a massive change in the MCU landscape. Perhaps results of this is the cause of Inhumans appearing?


Also, on Captain Marvel:
One of the key things was figuring out how to....introduce one of, if not THE most powerful hero in the entire MCU.
Click to expand...

That makes me happy. Captain Marvel is Marvel's Superman, she's just rarely been treated as such. Going to be nice seeing what they do with her, understanding that her power level is so far above the others.




I do like that the idea of Dr Strange is to open up the world of parallel dimensions.
 
Blader said:
I don't know where they're getting their info, but Deadline has said that Scarlett is signed for 8 films, Renner himself said he's on for 4 (three Avengers and 1 solo film which will probably be swapped for another option), and Jackson's deal has always been for nine -- it even says right there in the link :lol

Downey's was also originally for 4 films (3 Iron Man, 1 Avengers) but was renegotiated last year for Avengers 2 and 3. So I guess he's technically on a movie-to-movie basis now, but he's definitely obligated for Infinity War -- or at least one of them.
Click to expand...

The distinction is that the people who are listed as Movie to Movie can negotiate more aggressively while the ones who are not, can't. That's why there were rumors that some of the actors (like Hemsworth) were becoming unhappy because they had lengthy contracts for relatively low amounts of money given the success and popularity the movies have garnered. Pretty much any of the Avengers could demand much higher pay rates for other movies but they're stuck in lengthy contracts.

I'm pretty sure that's also why actors portraying characters Marvel has big plans for are now being offered more lengthy contracts (Stan getting 9). So that Marvel doesn't get Downey'd again when they want an actor for a future film that extends past the numbered contract.

Edit: I guess the most straight forward way to say it is that Movie to Movie basically suggests that each additional movie after the original contracted amount can or has been negotiated while the numbered deals are set in stone.
 
AMUSIX said:
I haven't seen much discussion on how Ragnarok was presented. The quote from the presentation is:




So, yeah, it seems that this won't be a "just Asgard" adventure, but something that implements a massive change in the MCU landscape. Perhaps results of this is the cause of Inhumans appearing?


Also, on Captain Marvel:


That makes me happy. Captain Marvel is Marvel's Superman, she's just rarely been treated as such. Going to be nice seeing what they do with her, understanding that her power level is so far above the others.




I do like that the idea of Dr Strange is to open up the world of parallel dimensions.
Click to expand...

Oh... so this is how they plan to fit in Spider Man/X-Men!

It would make perfect sense to push for them to show up first in a Dr Strange movie.
 
Jest Chillin said:
Evan's said he isn't interested in acting in Non-Marvel movies that he's not directing himself. It's been clarified by him twice and mentioned in this thread quite a few times.

RDJ is on a movie to movie basis, as is SJ. Eventually the profit roof will be reached though and Marvel won't be able to match the desired pay of all of these actors on a movie to movie basis. At that point, either they have less crossovers or they tap new actors or new characters in some cases to take on the roles/mantles.
Click to expand...

Dai101 said:
I take your bet. Oh wait:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=136387825&postcount=1549

It was posted just a few pages back.
Click to expand...

Oh, Blah. Well, glad he is sticking around. Still think he's gonna get offed in Civil War though. They will want to drop a mic somewhere; and taking out Cap (even temporarily) would do it.

Ithil said:
Two of those characters aren't even in Avengers 2 (Foster and Potts).
Click to expand...

I think they'll die off screen; both for story and logistical purposes.
 
AMUSIX said:
I haven't seen much discussion on how Ragnarok was presented. The quote from the presentation is:


So, yeah, it seems that this won't be a "just Asgard" adventure, but something that implements a massive change in the MCU landscape. Perhaps results of this is the cause of Inhumans appearing?
Click to expand...

Not only that, but isn't the Tesseract + Infinity Gauntlet on Asgard? If so, that kind of implies how this will change everything in Phase 3.
 
Cybit said:
Oh, Blah. Well, glad he is sticking around. Still think he's gonna get offed in Civil War though. They will want to drop a mic somewhere; and taking out Cap (even temporarily) would do it.



I think they'll die off screen; both for story and logistical purposes.
Click to expand...

You are expecting them to kill off Natalie Portman and Gwyneth Paltrow, off screen?
 
AMUSIX said:
So, yeah, it seems that this won't be a "just Asgard" adventure, but something that implements a massive change in the MCU landscape. Perhaps results of this is the cause of Inhumans appearing?
Click to expand...

Well the name obviously means big things will happen. I always assumed Thor 3 would be the last movie before Thanos finally makes his move, and it's probably going to involve him in some manner. Maybe Loki has to maintain his facade as Odin or risk the 9 Realms falling into chaos, which erupts when Thanos invades Asgard to recover the Tesseract, and murders Loki for his previous failure.


Also, on Captain Marvel:

That makes me happy. Captain Marvel is Marvel's Superman, she's just rarely been treated as such. Going to be nice seeing what they do with her, understanding that her power level is so far above the others.
Click to expand...

For sure, Marvel would get some pretty significant brownie points if the most powerful Avenger ends up being a woman. Thor is pretty wimpy compared to his comics counterpart, so if Carol maintains her normal power level, she'll be the clear winner.

She was very powerful in Avengers: EMH and I hope that's the kind of firepower she's gonna bring to the table in the MCU.
 
If I remember correctly, Marvel originally approached Emily Blunt for Black Widow, but she turned them down to make that awful Gulliver's Travels movie (among other reasons). I don't know how gracefully Marvel takes rejection, but at least there's a connection there between the actress and studio that makes the possibility of her being a different Marvel character a bit higher? Or maybe not.

Either way, I like her and would've preferred her as Black Widow over Scarlet.
 
Stark said:
Not only that, but isn't the Tesseract + Infinity Gauntlet on Asgard? If so, that kind of implies how this will change everything in Phase 3.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure if just transferring a few powerful artifacts from heros to villains would cut it. TWS literally changed the MCU world by bringing down SHIELD. For Ragnarok to do something similar, I'd think that the Asgardian control of the 9 realms is gone, and the magics that were introduced in Dr. Strange are now running rampant...which is where I could see Inhumans coming from.
 
WonkersTHEWatilla said:
If I remember correctly, Marvel originally approached Emily Blunt for Black Widow, but she turned them down to make that awful Gulliver's Travels movie (among other reasons). I don't know how gracefully Marvel takes rejection, but at least there's a connection there between the actress and studio that makes the possibility of her being a different Marvel character a bit higher? Or maybe not.

Either way, I like her and would've preferred her as Black Widow over Scarlet.
Click to expand...

She didn't turn Widow down as much as she had already signed for Gulliver's and the filming schedules conflicted. She did end up turning down a different role though. Maybe Jane in Thor? I can't recall atm.
 
AMUSIX said:
I'm not sure if just transferring a few powerful artifacts from heros to villains would cut it. TWS literally changed the MCU world by bringing down SHIELD. For Ragnarok to do something similar, I'd think that the Asgardian control of the 9 realms is gone, and the magics that were introduced in Dr. Strange are now running rampant...which is where I could see Inhumans coming from.
Click to expand...

Inhumans aren't magical, let me get my thread making on.
 
Jest Chillin said:
She didn't turn Widow down as much as she had already signed for Gulliver's and the filming schedules conflicted. She did end up turning down a different role though. Maybe Jane in Thor? I can't recall atm.
Click to expand...

She turned down Peggy Carter. I'm pretty sure she was going to be Widow, but Gulliver's ran long so she had to bail.
 
Ether_Snake said:
100% perfect casting choice, I agree!
Click to expand...

It's the only sensible choice. Unless Marvel stumps everyone and casts someone really left field like Brit Marling.

The pluses for Blunt are that she actually makes Hollywood films,has proved she can eclipse even Tom Cruise in an action heavy movie and more importantly be believable. Can do 'badass' without it becoming unbearable and she'll be the 'rightish' age when this launches.

Also Marvel apparently really love her.
 
AMUSIX said:
I'm not sure if just transferring a few powerful artifacts from heros to villains would cut it. TWS literally changed the MCU world by bringing down SHIELD. For Ragnarok to do something similar, I'd think that the Asgardian control of the 9 realms is gone, and the magics that were introduced in Dr. Strange are now running rampant...which is where I could see Inhumans coming from.
Click to expand...

Oh I know. I'm just saying as an additional thing that the one/two things Thanos wants is on Asgard. I bet he'll have a part to play with Ragnarok.
 
BronsonLee said:
She turned down Peggy Carter. I'm pretty sure she was going to be Widow, but Gulliver's ran long so she had to bail.
Click to expand...

That sounds about right. And she's stated in interviews that she's still interested in working with Marvel. It has to be the right character and the right time though.
 
squidhands said:
I have a sneaking suspicion that you're wrong.
Click to expand...

Weapxn said:
Er...no. He was a front runner for a while, wasn't he?

And Blunt was offered Peggy? I'm glad she turned it down. I doubt she would have wanted to do the TV show.
Click to expand...

BronsonLee said:
Surprisingly? He's actually right. Krasinski was frontrunner for a while before it came down to I think Garrett Hedlund and Chris Evans.

...Oh god, imagine Tron: Legacy man as Captain America
Click to expand...

Yup. Ole Jim Halpert was nearly Cap.
 
Jim as Captain America would have probably killed the MCU

That would have been an awful casting. I'm so glad I don't have to see the esurance guy take out Thanos
 
AMUSIX said:
I'm not sure if just transferring a few powerful artifacts from heros to villains would cut it. TWS literally changed the MCU world by bringing down SHIELD. For Ragnarok to do something similar, I'd think that the Asgardian control of the 9 realms is gone, and the magics that were introduced in Dr. Strange are now running rampant...which is where I could see Inhumans coming from.
Click to expand...

I... what?
 
CreeperBlocks said:
I'm calling it now Spider-Man WILL be in phase four. He has to
Click to expand...

Sinister Six, ASM3 and probably ASM4 would have to tank. Then Sony wouldn't give up right away, they'd want to at least try everything they possibly could. And when that failed, they might still let the contract run it's course just to be dicks.

The only way I can see it happening in the next decade is a split Marvel/Sony ownership, with Sony handling the solo deals and Spidey making occasional cameos. But who knows if Marvel would even want that? Though you just KNOW somewhere in a Disney/Marvel vault is a "Sony fucking sucks" plan for Spidey in the MCU, how they'd build him up etc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Marvel Considers Recasting Black Panther
2 3 4 5 6
259
6K
calico replied
Marvel Zombies
21
459
Stitch replied
Marvel Cinematic Universe Ranked
20
934
DKPOWPOW replied
Marvel's What If? Season 3
21
1K
ManaByte replied
  • Locked
Marvel erases Israeli Mutant from Captain America: Brave New World
4
1K
Haint replied
Top Bottom