The guide by AndyBNV on geforce.com suggests the following settings for a 770 to keep above 40fps:
Assassin's Creed Unity - PC Performance thread
- Thread starter MayMay
- Start date
4GB 770's?
Gormenghast
Member
This is the comparison on the 770 for those who played Black Flag:
Same 770, same resolution:
Black Flag: Environment - Very High. Textures - High. Ambient Occlusion - HBAO+. Shadows - Soft Shadows
Unity: Environment - High. Textures - Low. Ambient Occlusion - Off. Shadows - Soft Shadows disabled
Same 770, same resolution:
Black Flag: Environment - Very High. Textures - High. Ambient Occlusion - HBAO+. Shadows - Soft Shadows
Unity: Environment - High. Textures - Low. Ambient Occlusion - Off. Shadows - Soft Shadows disabled
Could still be a vram issue if you're running 2 x 2gb 770s
Not lookign good for my sli 780tis at 1440p
thequickandthedead
Member
this games runs like crap on a r9 270x
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5gqsztV3gE
i'm so disappointing. note its not me playing
I wonder if the PS4/XBO versions run better.
SliChillax
Member
Holy... Is this with a 2gb 680/770? I hope my 4gb 680 will stand a chance running all maxed at 1440p with FXAA and 30fps.The guide by AndyBNV on geforce.com suggests the following settings for a 770 to keep above 40fps:
Denton
Member
I wonder if you are just trolling here or if you really are that ignorant / uninformed.
You can set textures to max, otherwise medium/high at 30fps.
Note that the recommendations were made using pre release code.
EDIT : Oh wait...1440p ? Nope.
1080p yes.
It runs *differently*. Seems to be using some higher quality settings, but its also only 900p and sub 30fps at the moment.
I think pretty much everybody with the game or planning on getting it is crossing their fingers for some miracle Day 1 patches.
High. I don't try ultra with 3gb of vram. Plus, I can't see too much of a difference when in motion. hitches like a mofo though. Tried playing at 4K...not going to happen
dude 1440p max on a single 680 ?
krameriffic
Member
So I finished the download, started the game up to play, and it immediately crashes every time on the splash screen.
Wonderful.
Wonderful.
dampflokfreund
Banned
With every single post coming through, I am feeling awful about my 280X. I'm gonna hold off on purchasing the game, until comprehensive benchmarks hit the web, but as for now I'm all:
You dont need to feel awful. Its not your cards fault this game is not optimized.
Have you downloaded the two PC patches ? They fix crashes, among other things.
b0uncyfr0
Member
If they think im buying a new card to run Unity they're bat-shite crazy. This game needs a few more months in the oven. Those requirements are utterly insane.
A 770 cant get 40+ fps without low texture quality (which looks horrible btw) and basically crippling it to look like a multiplat game released 3 years ago ; f&ck off!!! Ill take my 770 that runs almost all new games at 1080p/60 with most bells and whistles and play something else.
EDIT: I swear to some God, i will lose it if they flap up Far Cry 4.
A 770 cant get 40+ fps without low texture quality (which looks horrible btw) and basically crippling it to look like a multiplat game released 3 years ago ; f&ck off!!! Ill take my 770 that runs almost all new games at 1080p/60 with most bells and whistles and play something else.
EDIT: I swear to some God, i will lose it if they flap up Far Cry 4.
Oh wow, thanks for the headsup
That's my window! I'm using 7970.With every single post coming through, I am feeling awful about my 280X. I'm gonna hold off on purchasing the game, until comprehensive benchmarks hit the web, but as for now I'm all:
krameriffic
Member
Well I am redownloading it now. I don't know if it installed patches as I downloaded it overnight while asleep. I assume it did because I tried several times including a reboot to launch the game after it completed and nothing. The verify game cache also failed completely to do anything.
Check if your drivers are up to date, Nvidia recently released the 344.65 WHQL.
The guide by AndyBNV on geforce.com suggests the following settings for a 770 to keep above 40fps:
http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/guides/assassins-creed-unity-graphics-and-performance-guide
The guide by AndyBNV on geforce.com suggests the following settings for a 770 to keep above 40fps:
http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/guides/assassins-creed-unity-graphics-and-performance-guide
No TXAA with a 780ti? .... for 40fps?!?!
Eat shit whoever is responsible.
It's probably Nvidia for being tight on VRAM and UBIshit for not optimizing PC verison.
Bullshit, always has been.
The guide by AndyBNV on geforce.com suggests the following settings for a 770 to keep above 40fps:
http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/guides/assassins-creed-unity-graphics-and-performance-guide
Hmm.. my 780 gets 40-50fps while it's maxed out (Ultra High with FXAA) most of the time. Definitely had some huge dips in some sequences though. Nothing that'd ruin it for me though - game plays great with a controller.
dampflokfreund
Banned
Why do you keep defending this port so hard? Do you really think a new 970/980 will do much better than your 780(770)? I really don't think so. If we only defend this piss port, nothing will change.
LabouredSubterfuge
Member
How's SLI performance kids?
UnrealEck
Member
According to Smokey, around 70% GPU utilisation on a 3-way Titan Black setup.
That may be the reason.
There's nothing to defend. Given what we know about the console performance ("Atrocious" framerate at 900p with lower graphical settings) the PC version's performance is entirely in line with the other platforms.
If you want to complain, don't complain about the port, complain about the game's basic technology.
UnrealEck
Member
That's what annoys me. When PC performance is bad people talk about going console for the game and they don't have any perspective on a comparison whatsoever.
Yep, that's the point. If we're picking on the 'port' we need to look at it relative to what it was ported from. A discussion about the technical choices of the game is a different one.
Pretty much.
I'm "defending it" because the performance data we have is not conclusive enough to call this unoptimized.
To your second point : a 970 is noticeably faster than a 780, 15%. You can add another 15-20% for the 980.
Frankly, I have a hard time being surprised by those results, the game seems legitimately demanding and I'm 100% fine with that.
Lockjaw333
Member
"Sub 30fps" is generously. It feels like it sits in the low 20s most of the time on PS4.
Should have gotten the PC version...
Crossing Eden
Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
It's about as true as the rumor that Microsoft is paying developers for parity, even the ones that have a marketing deal with Sony.
As in completely unfounded bullshit.
publicpwnerer
Member
What sites? The review embargo is lifted in 4 hours and 10 minutes.
SliChillax
Member
dampflokfreund
Banned
I... I can't understand that at all. Why buy a new GPU which costs 350$ for only 15-40% faster framerates? 15% isn't noticeably faster, its just a bit faster (7,5 FPS).
Yeah the game is demanding but not because of the graphics or the crowds but because its unoptimized. The game looks like a blurry mess, there are many low res textures and pop-ins, every NPCs acts and looks the same, what's so special about the games graphics? The lighting is good indoors but that's really it.
@Durante well, if you show me a 7770 with a intel i3 CPU (Sandy Bridge no hyper threading) which is similar to a Xbox One, if that archieves the same FPS I will believe you
Yeah, I think people are missing that part. They see mediocre performance numbers and assume bad port when, in reality, the problem goes deeper. If anything it seems to be running better on the PC with hardware similar to the consoles.
Assassins creed unity 45-50 fps gtx 780
Dragon age inquisition gets 45 average with a 780ti
Hmm . . .I wonder whats going on here
Dragon age inquisition gets 45 average with a 780ti
Hmm . . .I wonder whats going on here
UnrealEck
Member
it's THAT bad?
Edit: How much Vram does it eat up? Is a 4GB card enough?
It uses over 6GB of VRAM.
Please for the love of science bear in mind though that this isn't a necessity. Some games these days make use of what you have to offer them. 4GB is enough. 2GB is enough. It all depends on the settings you want.
Similar threads
- Poll