Well it looks like it is a good budget tv, looking at http://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/vizio/e-series-2015 the review looks good mostly, and this random video on Youtube makes it sound like it wont be a bad monitor.
Figured I would ask here if anyone has any Opinions of it.
By Japanese you mean Sony, right? Who else is there right now?
50" TV for your bedroom? Damn.
Also, a 50" TV that comes with just one HDMI port? Double damn.
Might you happen to have a link?Saw a flat OLED from LG being teased on AVSForums. A signature series or something. Please have improved input lag. I so want to buy one of those in 2016.
Might you happen to have a link?
I lucked out. Costco had the set on sale for $1,000 during Black Friday. I was very, very nervous about the input lag after reading up on OLED, but to my surprise, 0 issues with this set.
Managed to buy a refurbished Sony RGB OLED broadcast monitor.
Will post pictures and take requests.
did you get the 25" or 17". I use the 17" E170A at work everyday.
Lots of discussion about LG OLED's and input lag. Fwiw, I ended up nabbing a new 55EG9100 (2016 model) and have not encountered any noticeable input lag. The 2015 models have a recorded ms of ~43ms. No idea if that's lower in the 2016 model, but as someone who predominately plays twitch shooters, I've noticed no lag at all. Blops 3 results below while using this set.
I also have a Sony X930C and I still favor the OLED. I've always been an XBR man, but after my experience with the LG I'm OLED for life - I refuse to by a non-OLED set moving forward.
I lucked out. Costco had the set on sale for $1,000 during Black Friday. I was very, very nervous about the input lag after reading up on OLED, but to my surprise, 0 issues with this set.
http://www.avsforum.com/forum/40-oled-technology-flat-panels-general/2258098-lg-ces.html
The video is offline but there's some screenshots.
http://a3.images.reviewed.com/image/fetch/s--EJ7A-eaD--/c_fill,cs_srgb,f_auto,fl_progressive.strip_profile,g_center,q_jpegmini,w_747/https://reviewed-production.s3.amazonaws.com/1450975205000/LG-signature-Hero.jpg[img]
[img]http://a3.images.reviewed.com/image/fetch/s--5NgIahz8--/c_limit,cs_srgb,f_auto,fl_progressive.strip_profile,g_center,q_jpegmini,w_579/https://reviewed-production.s3.amazonaws.com/attachment/a18f5e8c57ad48e4/LG%20signature.jpg[img]
[img]http://i.imgur.com/OAxAzxJ.png
http://i.imgur.com/dIOh7ok.png[img][/QUOTE]
I really wish there wasn't such an effort to make TVs as thin as possible. Shit has killed off or made a bunch of better quality related things over expensive.
I really wish there wasn't such an effort to make TVs as thin as possible. Shit has killed off or made a bunch of better quality related things over expensive.
You gonna be waiting a long time. 1080p TVs are dead.
That LG Signature line looks like the Art Wall model that didn't release. I believe it was going to be the EF9800. With the integrated sound bar.
Will be interesting to see what exactly it is and what features it has. Most importantly if they fixed the vignetting, tint, and lowered the input lag.
Pricing converted to USD
55" - $2,300
65" - $3,850
800 nits brightness
Dolby Vision support
Ships with 4 pairs of 3D glasses so new panels still support 3D
Won't hold my breath on OLED pricing being that low in the US though. LG CES press briefing is next Tuesday along with most everyone else.
Yeah, but how long until they're available, and how long until we find out what the input lag is?
I'm guessing at least 8 more months.
The current LG 4K curved sets were unveiled at the last CES, and were out in March.
Not sure if it's been mentioned in this thread yet, but the 2015 Vizio M series has incredibly low input lag, and great picture once you calibrate it properly. I picked up the 60 inch model a couple months ago, and it's fantastic.
If you're buying a large TV for games, this is the list you should be choosing from. http://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/by-test-results/input-lag
Since Stealthcobra was asking for something around 42in and 4k, here's a link to the 2015 M series on Amazon. http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00T63YMGK/?tag=neogaf0e-20
I'm not saying you're wrong, but then why did reviews for them only come out a couple months ago?
Obviously we don't know the answer to any of these questions unless 1. LG make it a point that they are focusing on input lag for gamers 2. The conference has even started so a release date will probably come then. Don't be such a pessimist, 8 months time? Think about what you just said especially since LG has a huge OLED ad for the Superbowl. 8 months? C'mon dudeYeah, but how long until they're available, and how long until we find out what the input lag is?
I'm guessing at least 8 more months.
Do any of these new sets have a function to de-smart them? Sometimes I just need a "screen" (when playing games or watching movies).
My experience so far was with a LG I bought my parents. It features webos or whatever it's called and I don't like it a bit since it takes like 30s for the tv to boot up,multiple load screens to get to the settings menus etc.
Pricing converted to USD
55" - $2,300
65" - $3,850
800 nits brightness
Dolby Vision support
Ships with 4 pairs of 3D glasses so new panels still support 3D
Won't hold my breath on OLED pricing being that low in the US though. LG CES press briefing is next Tuesday along with most everyone else.
I'm going to jump on the OLED bandwagon when Panasonic releases something reasonably priced.As far as I'm concerned LCD is dead tech. OLED all the way.
More pics
Pricing converted to USD
55" - $2,300
65" - $3,850
800 nits brightness
Dolby Vision support
Ships with 4 pairs of 3D glasses so new panels still support 3D
Just want to offer my two cents/impressions regarding the LG OLED EG9100.
I own a Pioneer Kuro LX5090, which I bought brand new in 2011, I think. Over time it developed a red tint to the blacks, and they're not quite as deep anymore, so when my parents offered me a decent price for it about 6 months ago, I started looking for a replacement.
I've waited for OLED TVs for quite some time now, but I thought the price was a bit too high, so I decided to buy a Sony W805, which I'd keep for a couple of years before buying an OLED. I returned it, and kept the Kuro for a while longer.
In the meantime, some new LG OLED models came out, and I decided to buy the 9100 on Black Friday. Yesterday I called the store, and told them I'll return it.
Why?
Because, even though the blacks are awesome, it has several problems, some more irritating than others, and I can't justify paying that much money for a product that is pretty much non-future proof (non-4k, non-HDR) as well. The problems I have with it include poor near blacks, vertical banding, vignetting, colour tinting (pink on the left, green in the middle) and the input lag.
I don't know about the 960, but for those of you who consider the EG9100 right now, feel free to buy one, but don't expect a perfect TV. In my opinion, it's sadly far from it. Hopefully we'll have OLED models with no issues in a couple of years, but right now, there are too many issues for me to justify buying it at that price. I can't wait for Sony and Samsung to jump on the train.
I'll buy a Samsung JS9000 as soon as I've returned the LG, and see how it compares. Dat input lag.
Just want to offer my two cents/impressions regarding the LG OLED EG9100.
I own a Pioneer Kuro LX5090, which I bought brand new in 2011, I think. Over time it developed a red tint to the blacks, and they're not quite as deep anymore, so when my parents offered me a decent price for it about 6 months ago, I started looking for a replacement.
I've waited for OLED TVs for quite some time now, but I thought the price was a bit too high, so I decided to buy a Sony W805, which I'd keep for a couple of years before buying an OLED. I returned it, and kept the Kuro for a while longer.
In the meantime, some new LG OLED models came out, and I decided to buy the 9100 on Black Friday. Yesterday I called the store, and told them I'll return it.
Why?
Because, even though the blacks are awesome, it has several problems, some more irritating than others, and I can't justify paying that much money for a product that is pretty much non-future proof (non-4k, non-HDR) as well. The problems I have with it include poor near blacks, vertical banding, vignetting, colour tinting (pink on the left, green in the middle) and the input lag.
I don't know about the 960, but for those of you who consider the EG9100 right now, feel free to buy one, but don't expect a perfect TV. In my opinion, it's sadly far from it. Hopefully we'll have OLED models with no issues in a couple of years, but right now, there are too many issues for me to justify buying it at that price. I can't wait for Sony and Samsung to jump on the train.
I'll buy a Samsung JS9000 as soon as I've returned the LG, and see how it compares. Dat input lag.
BenQ RL2755HM if you could find one. or the 24" model but I think that's pretty small
So I ended up getting this monitor for my nephews. Was pretty easy to set up, just need to calibrate it. The only issue is that it didn't come with a remote control. Is it possible to get a remote control for one of these? Does anyone that has the recently released 'official' remote control for PS4 know if you can control volume with it? I think messing around with volume levels is the main issue, really.Thanks for this, I found it on Amazon:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00SJANIWA/
Prime delivery, too.
The reviews say that the speakers aren't great - to be expected. My nephews aren't audio experts, but any recommendations for a small set of perhaps 2 speakers that don't need their own power supply?
Thanks.