Nintendo Removes Controversial Fire Emblem Fates Conversation

Thanks for your thorough response.

Firstly, you've addressed what had me confused as someone looking in on Nintendo from the outside - why do highly violent & sexualised games like Bayonetta 2 and Devil's Third get a free ticket on their console, and yet Fire Emblem and Fatal Frame do not - it creates an uneasy feeling for an adult games enthusiasts like myself - but now I understand that it pretty much depends on how close that brand is to Nintendo.

I disagree with your opinion on what is and is not censorship, however.
There are two versions of the original Ghost in the Shell manga in English - one has nudity, the other has her clothes painted on (after the fact, by another artist).

I would describe the latter as being a censored translation, I'm not expecting you to agree with me, but it does meet dictionary definitions of what censorship is.

I'd also like to point out that something that is censored is not the same as something that is banned. They are different concepts, different words, and with different meanings and implications.

As for your final paragraph, perhaps it is a double-edged sword for Nintendo. They must choose between being seen as censor-nannies, or dealing with accusations of sexual orientation bigotry. Why is it though, that Sony and Xbox seem to avoid being in this situation ? - they sure publish their share of sordid games and objectionable content.
Both of those have actually had some pretty notable instances of self-censorship in the past. MS has the Conker remake which, in even its "uncensored" mode, has far more curse words bleeped out than the N64 original, while Sony took great offense to how the death of Jason played out originally in Heavy Rain, which resulted in the largely unintelligible mess we got.
 
Firstly, you've addressed what had me confused as someone looking in on Nintendo from the outside - why do highly violent & sexualised games like Bayonetta 2 and Devil's Third get a free ticket on their console, and yet Fire Emblem and Fatal Frame do not - it creates an uneasy feeling for an adult games enthusiasts like myself - but now I understand that it pretty much depends on how close that brand is to Nintendo.

I think you completely fail to understand what the issue with the Soleil scene and why its completely not comparable at all to anything in Bayonetta or (I presume) Devil's Third
 
But she did end up falling in love with the MC because of the potions effects, right? She doesn't have any romantic interest in you until you spike her drink and she sees the MC in a different way while in hallucinogenic state.
It's not that simple. She says that Corrin's female form is not her type and although she saw a bunch of other men turned women none of them made her ''hearth race'' like Corrin did. In the 3rd support conversation she also pretty happy to be around you, although you're in your male form. This indicates that it's not only a matter of gender/physical attraction. However, she does say that she fell in love with your female form. Though, she still likes you even if you're male and your male form still makes her hearth race.

How can I compare a drug that alters perception and can induce visual hallucinations to a 'magic powder' that causes the user to have their perception altered so that they visually hallucinate a gender swap? I'm not sure, let me think.

You don't see him spiking her drink as an issue, I do.
You described the effects of taking LSD as ''you're going to trip balls''
Yeah, doesn't seem at all comparable to a drug whose only effect is a temporary gender-swap perception.

People take issues with ''spiking'' and ''drugging'' because it's commonly associated with date rape. Had they used a spell or magic glasses or whatever it never would have blown up as much as it did.

Just to clarify: Soleil is not straight, let alone bi. She constantly flirts with women (Ex: In the ending of the chapter where she's introduced, she's seen flirting with a villager. When Kamui mentions the magic drug, Soleil reminds him that she is into girls and not guys and, if I recall, there's a support conversation in the original where she and another character swap bodies that results in her wanting to check out said character's body). She has a unique ability called "Girl Lover". Short version: She likes women. Her not being able to have a same-sex relationship in the game is baffling, let alone the other support conversations that take a very drastic turn from their A to S support levels.

That said, removing the magical drug and giving her a same-sex option would be one of the better solutions.



1. He didn't ask if she wanted his help with what he perceived as a problem that needed to be fixed. She was was drugged without her consent. That's not okay, especially since it was the drug that would eventually lead to Soleil falling for MaCorrin. It doesn't matter what his intent was: Drugging someone without their consent is not okay under any circumstances.
2. Corrin may have known the effects of the drug, but he didn't know if they could have had any other side-effects on her, be it physical or mental. For all he knows, this drug could have killed her due to a severe allergic reaction, like sneaking in peanut butter into the sandwich of someone who is allergic to consuming peanuts in any form.
Soleil doesn't remind Corrin that she's into girls and not guys. She says that Corrin's female form is not her type of cute girl.

1.) The drug is not the (sole) reason she fell in love. See my reply to Saucycarpdog in this post. Actually, there are plenty of circumstances where drugging someone against their will is perfectly acceptable. For example, mandatory vaccination; doesn't matter if the baby/child/parents consent or not.
2.) If you're going to throw out crazy theories, at least provide some shred of evidence. Even if that magic drug had deadly/lasting side effects (lol), it is entirely possible Corrin educated himself and determined that there would be no risk if Soleil took the drug.
 
Aside from giving her a potion without telling her first, there is NOTHING wrong with these conversations.

There is no gay conversion or drugging in the sense of date rape. If people actually check out the conversations (that video that's been posted in here is perfect), then I don't understand how you can take them so out of context.

IF ANYTHING, they could have Soleil scold you for not telling her about your idea sooner and/or you beat yourself up for not telling her sooner. There isn't anything logical about not telling her about the potion.

Nevertheless, this game is T for Teen. Anyone playing it should already understand that something like that (despite how harmless and minor it is) isn't a very smart way of thinking; if not, then it ISN'T the game's fault.

Like I said a while back, after looking into this controversy objectively and watching some of the game's comedic and romantic themes, I developed an interest in Fire Emblem that was never going to spark otherwise; unfortunately, localization wants to slam its censor hammer once again, so I'm keeping my wallet closed.
 
I think you completely fail to understand what the issue with the Soleil scene and why its completely not comparable at all to anything in Bayonetta or (I presume) Devil's Third

Uh huh smells like another derail 'Let's talk about generic violence and sexualisation in videogames and not the specific issue in the topic of the thread"

Aside from giving her a potion without telling her first, there is NOTHING wrong with these conversations.

There is no gay conversion or drugging in the sense of date rape. If people actually check out the conversations (that video that's been posted in here is perfect), then I don't understand how you can take them so out of context.

IF ANYTHING, they could have Soleil scold you for not telling her about your idea sooner and/or you beat yourself up for not telling her sooner. There isn't anything logical about not telling her about the potion.

I watched the video and the text as he translates it makes it pretty clear that she is sexually interested in women and features no instances of her discussing men. She is drugged without her knowledge (which having her at least react to being told this would be an improvement) and then develops an attraction to a male MC that she never previously hinted at (telling her about the drugging doesn't fix this). She has the 'Girl Love' perk for flips sake that the game fails to complete the circle and allow her to have gay relationships is a broader failing.

Now I don't think there was any intent to have the scene play out in a 'date rapey gay conversion' rather that this was meant to be a 'cute' scene in a broad comedy kind of a way. That it doesn't come across like that outside of Japan is why they are talking about changing it and I don't have a problem with that. Your solution would fix the part where the MC drugs Soleil without her consent but it wouldn't affect the outcome where she changes her whole sexual orientation.
 
Both of those have actually had some pretty notable instances of self-censorship in the past. MS has the Conker remake which, in even its "uncensored" mode, has far more curse words bleeped out than the N64 original, while Sony took great offense to how the death of Jason played out originally in Heavy Rain, which resulted in the largely unintelligible mess we got.

The non-Nintendo platforms libraries are typically more adult-oriented with games like Grand Theft Auto V pushing many more potentially objectionable boundaries than Fire Emblem. And yet its (arguably) Nintendo who seem to be making the headlines more.

What are Nintendo doing wrong to have a tamer library than their competitors, and yet to keep ending up in this situation ?
 
The non-Nintendo platforms libraries are typically more adult-oriented with games like Grand Theft Auto V pushing many more potentially objectionable boundaries than Fire Emblem. And yet its Nintendo who seem to be making the headlines more.

What are Nintendo doing wrong to have a tamer library than their competitors, and yet to end up in the headlines for it more ?

Sony and Microsoft rarely if ever have to publish and localize Japanese games with problematic elements like underboob bikinis on 13 year olds or this crap on Fire Emblem.
 
Thanks for your thorough response.

Firstly, you've addressed what had me confused as someone looking in on Nintendo from the outside - why do highly violent & sexualised games like Bayonetta 2 and Devil's Third get a free ticket on their console, and yet Fire Emblem and Fatal Frame do not - it creates an uneasy feeling for an adult games enthusiasts like myself - but now I understand that it pretty much depends on how close that brand is to Nintendo.

I disagree with your opinion on what is and is not censorship, however.
There are two versions of the original Ghost in the Shell manga in English - one has nudity, the other has her clothes painted on (after the fact, by another artist).

I would describe the latter as being a censored translation, I'm not expecting you to agree with me, but it does meet dictionary definitions of what censorship is.

I'd also like to point out that something that is censored is not the same as something that is banned. They are different concepts, different words, and with different meanings and implications.

As for your final paragraph, perhaps it is a double-edged sword for Nintendo. They must choose between being seen as censor-nannies, or dealing with accusations of sexual orientation bigotry. Why is it though, that Sony and Xbox seem to avoid being in this situation ? - they sure publish their share of sordid games and objectionable content.

Words have different meaning and context depending on the person you speak to, never use a dictionary to prove your case. Here's an interesting thought though. The treehouse team at NoA, are they not professional writers themselves? What is Derivative Work, and doesn't it apply to them just as any other artist who works their own creative ideas on someone else's work? Is it truly censorship if the original content is still uncensored, but untranslated in a different region, that you can still buy it from said region? I just do not see this as censorship, and this is coming from someone who's been an independent animator for 6 years. I see a different version of a game, it's own entity separate yet similar to its original counterpart.
 
The non-Nintendo platforms libraries are typically more adult-oriented with games like Grand Theft Auto V pushing many more potentially objectionable boundaries than Fire Emblem. And yet its (arguably) Nintendo who seem to be making the headlines more.

What are Nintendo doing wrong to have a tamer library than their competitors, and yet to keep ending up in this situation ?
They are the easy target. It fits the general narrative. "Duh, of course Nintendo and their family friendy approach, ruining games for everyone [me]."
 
They are the easy target. It fits the general narrative.

Lol,

A) Sony and MS do not publish GTA, thus they also don't localise it (duh).

B) Implying there aren't controversies around GTA is.... where have you guys been? GTA has been at the center of shitstorms that acutally had political consequences. Every single release of that franchis spikes massive controversy. FE controversy doesn't even make it to IGN.
 
Now I don't think there was any intent to have the scene play out in a 'date rapey gay conversion' rather that this was meant to be a 'cute' scene in a broad comedy kind of a way. That it doesn't come across like that outside of Japan is why they are talking about changing it and I don't have a problem with that. Your solution would fix the part where the MC drugs Soleil without her consent but it wouldn't affect the outcome where she changes her whole sexual orientation.
Yeah, they're taking the scene out of context and censoring it - which isn't fair at all.

Unless the video I watched mistranslated things, Soleil still loves women. She develops a love for MC after she gets to know him. That has a strong message to it - showing off a great way at looking at people (don't judge a book by its cover).

I'm sure that she would lose interest in some women after knowing them on a personal level. Love vs. Infatuation. To change all of this to giving her a same-sex hookup, even for the sake of just supporting same-sex relationships, would be rather boring to me.
 
Yeah, they're taking the scene out of context and censoring it - which isn't fair at all.

Unless the video I watched mistranslated things, Soleil still loves women. She develops a love for MC after she gets to know him. That has a strong message to it - showing off a great way at looking at people (don't judge a book by its cover).

I'm sure that she would lose interest in some women after knowing them on a personal level. Love vs. Infatuation. To change all of this to giving her a same-sex hookup, even for the sake of just supporting same sex relationships, is rather boring to me.

WHAT THE FUCK

Are you seriously saying that her being a lesbian is just a phase, unlike falling in love with a man!?
 
WHAT THE FUCK

Are you seriously saying that her being a lesbian is just a phase, unlike falling in love with a man!?
No.

That's why I said some women, not all. It's not realistic to say that every person you crush over, male or female, is someone that you would marry.
 
nsquote's semantic power hour - "censorship edition" said:
Indeed, this is another typical example of the old motte-and-bailey fallacy. Editing for mass appeal can be construed as "censorship" under the widest possible interpretation of the denotation, yet as soon as that toothless denotation is justified suddenly people are trying to smuggle in connotations by sliding back to the prototypic connotation of what the average person thinks when they hear of "censorship".

Also, it continues to amuse me how people say "let the free market [voting with your wallet] decide"... until market forces turn against the former accepted norm in the name of more profits from a wider audience, and then suddenly "letting the free market decide" is "censorship".

do we have to have this semantics lectute every single thread? i'm going to have to start citing myself or distributing awareness pamphlets about the motte-and-bailey fallacy, i swear
 
WHAT THE FUCK

Are you seriously saying that her being a lesbian is just a phase, unlike falling in love with a man!?

Yeah that's not what he said at all. It's like when you find someone insanely attractive physically, but then get to know them and lose that attraction because your personalities don't mesh. You don't stop finding them physically attractive, you just aren't going to be in love with them.

It's really not that hard to understand what he meant....
 
The word censorship has two meanings (as somebody on the most recent TvW thread pointed out):

- government/authoritative censorship, which is a legal decision made by a government to supress ideas or language (in the vast majority of cases this is problematic as it removesdiscussion from the situation)
- cultural/public censorship, which is a call, request or discussion made among a public group in communication with each other to limit or remove something they find problematic or offensive from a context (whenever it actually comes to something it's almost always positive)

Censorship isn't one catch-all word for removing something, anything.

Both of those have actually had some pretty notable instances of self-censorship in the past. MS has the Conker remake which, in even its "uncensored" mode, has far more curse words bleeped out than the N64 original, while Sony took great offense to how the death of Jason played out originally in Heavy Rain, which resulted in the largely unintelligible mess we got.

Shit, I did not know that. The opening scene really suffered because of that. It's so obvious in hindsight.
 
I disagree with your opinion on what is and is not censorship, however. There are two versions of the original Ghost in the Shell manga in English - one has nudity, the other has her clothes painted on (after the fact, by another artist).

I would describe the latter as being a censored translation, I'm not expecting you to agree with me, but it does meet dictionary definitions of what censorship is.

I'd also like to point out that something that is censored is not the same as something that is banned. They are different concepts, different words, and with different meanings and implications.

Hmmm. I agree.

However, I won't say that i have a militant position towards censorship, so I suppose that doesn't bother me as much.

As for your final paragraph, perhaps it is a double-edged sword for Nintendo. They must choose between being seen as censor-nannies, or dealing with accusations of sexual orientation bigotry. Why is it though, that Sony and Xbox seem to avoid being in this situation ? - they sure publish their share of sordid games and objectionable content.

I think likely because of the demographics they target. Nintendo wants and intends to maintain their reputation as largely family friendly with the occasional outlier (usually third-party published games). Both XBox and Sony target a more teen - young adult demographic generally speaking.
 
Then why would you say she shouldn't have any same sex romances? And why the fuck would that not apply to male-female relationships?

Holy shit that was a terrible post

Sorry, I think that particular phrase you're taking issue with was pretty unambiguous. They said it would make sense that the character "would lose interest in some women after knowing them on a personal level", because the same thing happens with hetero interests/relationships.

The whole situation as a whole though seemed really badly handled though, the shame-obsession in the character's arc is just... Ugh.
 
Yeah that's not what he said at all. It's like when you find someone insanely attractive physically, but then get to know them and lose that attraction because your personalities don't mesh. You don't stop finding them physically attractive, you just aren't going to be in love with them.

It's really not that hard to understand what he meant....

Explain how this excuses him saying they shouldn't have added any same sex romance because that's boring

What the fuck does that even mean
 
Sony and Microsoft rarely if ever have to publish and localize Japanese games with problematic elements like underboob bikinis on 13 year olds or this crap on Fire Emblem.

Incidentally, Sony did pass on publishing Rule of Rose, a game that does feature some level of sexual element in relation to minors, outside of Japan, with the buck ultimately being passed to Atlus in the US and 505 Games in Europe. I think that's been the only Sony title that handles content like that at all that I can think of, but it is an intriguing footnote all the same in terms of having to handle content like that.
 
Yeah, they're taking the scene out of context and censoring it - which isn't fair at all.

It's in context and it is that bad, your awareness of how crap a lot of media (specifically Japanese RPGs) is at dealing with gay characters gives you a context where you can mentally wrestle the scene into not being as awful as it is. Raw this scene is exactly that, he drugs her without her consent, she hallucinates, falls in love w/MC, later has a relationship with him. The game didn't code her as bisexual at any point prior to her being drugged so I don't think it's unreasonable to say she underwent an involuntary gay conversion.

If Nintendo can rewrite this scene to eliminate those awful elements, more power to them as I said I don't think they knew what they were actually wrote here. How they do that is likely to be a debate in and of itself because if they just fix the spiking element we'll still be left with a character who is coded as gay having a straight relationship.
 
Explain how this excuses him saying they shouldn't have added any same sex romance because that's boring

What the fuck does that even mean

I never said anything about that part, nor did you. You excuses him of saying it was a phase she was going through. I don't know why he said he'd find it boring, maybe you should address him (nicely) about that part of the post if you want to know why he think it's boring?
 
Then why would you say she shouldn't have any same sex romances? And why the fuck would that not apply to male-female relationships?

Holy shit that was a terrible post
Let me put it this way.

The game should have same-sex hookups regardless, but to replace this particular convo with one is boring to me.

It would be cool to have an option for it to play out one way or the other so everyone can be happy, no they want to just change the whole thing.
 
I never said anything about that part, nor did you. You excuses him of saying it was a phase she was going through. I don't know why he said he'd find it boring, maybe you should address him (nicely) about that part of the post if you want to know why he think it's boring?

I don't particularly feel like being polite to people who don't feel that non straight identities deserve respect. Which is a large number of people in this thread
 
It's just that hooking up with MC isn't enough for me to believe that she doesn't love women anymore.

I wouldn't be surprised if she wanted more of that potion to check out MC's female form while they're married.
 
It's just that hooking up with MC isn't enough for me to believe that she doesn't love women anymore.

I wouldn't be surprised if she wanted more of that potion to check out MC's female form while they're married.

Just Fyi, she can hook up with all male NPC's, not just your player character.
 
I don't particularly feel like being polite to people who don't feel that non straight identities deserve respect. Which is a large number of people in this thread

Okay, let me explain something to you: What we are discussing is fiction. Fiction. I'm positive the vast majority of people okay with the scene in the game, are in no way okay with "gay conversion" in real life, or drugging people against their will. We are talking about a small sequence of events that sits tucked away inside a largely expansive game. No one is saying that drugging and gay conversion are okay in real life.

In fact, the person you're taking issue with now, isn't even saying non-straight identities don't deserve respect, that's something you're telling him he's said. You need to chill. This guy, nor me, nor anyone else who holds an opposite viewpoint on this issue is an "enemy" or a "bigot" or whatever. They are people with an opposing opinion that do not feel as strongly about a fictional series of events, as they do about real life incidents involving actual non-straight individuals and drugging.

You don't need to make someone you don't agree with an enemy, and for me, someone who prefers reading these discussions more so than outright participating, it gets really dumb when it turns into thinly veiled accusations of homophobia, sexism or what have you.
 
Yeah, her lesbianisms weren't real. There are no lesbians in FE.
Are there?
Rhajat
20151126034203


Niles is a gay male you can hook up with.

latest
 
Whoever she hooks up with is up to the player. This is a game after all.

Still doesn't mean she straight up stops loving women.

This is head canon not what is in the game, in the game we only see her comment on and react to other women.

If there are other scenes where she expressed any interest in men that would be one thing but even in GaijinHunters 30 minute video there is not even a hint of that. Instead we have a character who expresses interest in women not men, is drugged and then has a relationship with a man out of the blue.

We can think of all sorts of ways this isn't what it's shown to be but on a clear reading of the material we have a character who has had their sexual identity changed by a 'magic powder'.
 
A magic powder makes someone bisexual when they were previously just seemingly gay. I mean, it's obvious why it ought to be changed right?
 
Sorry if this has been brought up already/answered but do we know the extent of how it was changed? Couldn't j
It be as simple as the protagonist asking her if shed like to roleplay with him by taking the potion?
 
Sorry if this has been brought up already/answered but do we know the extent of how it was changed? Couldn't j
It be as simple as the protagonist asking her if shed like to roleplay with him by taking the potion?

No idea yet, all we know is they are changing it within some capacity. Hence why I've been reading the discussion, rather than participating, up to this point. I don't know how I feel until I know in what way and to what extent it's been changed.
 
Top Bottom