Hulk Hogan v. Gawker jury selection was pure fuckery.

Status
Not open for further replies.
You missed the best one

Mmp5lSo.png
Lol "real"
 

Downhome

Member
As crazy as this all is, I am completely stunned that there is any chance in the world that Gawker could win this case. That would be a terrible precedent, and I hope that Hulk Hogan prevails and crushes those morons. This goes far beyond just Hulk Hogan and whatever it is you think of him as a person.
 
As crazy as this all is, I am completely stunned that there is any chance in the world that Gawker could win this case. That would be a terrible precedent, and I hope that Hulk Hogan prevails and crushes those morons. This goes far beyond just Hulk Hogan and whatever it is you think of him as a person.

Hulkamania's gonna run wild on Gawker brother

If things really go south the hulkster can break out his creative control
 

Zaph

Member
As crazy as this all is, I am completely stunned that there is any chance in the world that Gawker could win this case. That would be a terrible precedent, and I hope that Hulk Hogan prevails and crushes those morons. This goes far beyond just Hulk Hogan and whatever it is you think of him as a person.

I'm not sure on the timeline, but did Gawker decide to fight this prior to 50 Cent's ruling? Before that, I could kinda imagine why you'd want to try your luck, but since then it's pretty clear what the courts think of this type of stuff.
 
It's funny, sometimes in wrestling you find people who nobody has a bad thing to say about - your Nick Bockwinkles, your shane'o'macs, your Bobby Eatons...

Brutus seems to be the polar opposite, because I've never heard of anyone with a good thing to say about him

Interesting. Is it because of his close tie to Hogan, or some other reasons?
 
Interesting. Is it because of his close tie to Hogan, or some other reasons?

Partially. Everyone I've heard talk about him regard him as a no-talent parasite who just stuck close to hogan for paydays. But it was more his tendency to throw his weight around back when he was Hogan's "guy" in 80's wwf & in wcw that really annoyed people.
 

Acorn

Member
Partially. Everyone I've heard talk about him regard him as a no-talent parasite who just stuck close to hogan for paydays. But it was more his tendency to throw his weight around back when he was Hogan's "guy" in 80's wwf & in wcw that really annoyed people.
Just checked his Twitter, dude @wwe's everything. They don't care bro.
 
Those quotes are something. I know that daulerio pretty much has to take those positions, but I can't imagine a jury is going to look to favorably upon how cavalier gawker has been over such things.
 

Downhome

Member
Anna Phillips ‏@annamphillips 5m5 minutes ago

If someone published a video of you having sex, would you be embarrassed?
AJ: "If something went horribly wrong" #hulkvsgawk

What?

This entire thing can't be reality. Surely they are attempting to flat out hand Gawker and all of their money to Hulk Hogan, and they want to go down in a blaze of insanity...
 
What exactly is this case even about and why is hulk hogan talking about his penis size? If you told me this was a fake case for the wwe I'd believe you
 

Downhome

Member
My God...

Anna Phillips ‏@annamphillips 2m2 minutes ago
Daulerio's depo ends with the question: Can you imagine a scenario in which a celebrity sex tape is not newsworthy? #hulkvsgawk

Anna Phillips ‏@annamphillips 2m2 minutes ago
Daulerio responds: "If they were a child."
Atty: Under what age?
"Four."
Atty: No four-year-old sex tapes, okay. #hulkvsgawk
 
My God...

Anna Phillips ‏@annamphillips 2m2 minutes ago
Daulerio's depo ends with the question: Can you imagine a scenario in which a celebrity sex tape is not newsworthy? #hulkvsgawk

Anna Phillips ‏@annamphillips 2m2 minutes ago
Daulerio responds: "If they were a child."
Atty: Under what age?
"Four."
Atty: No four-year-old sex tapes, okay. #hulkvsgawk

UHHH....
 

Downhome

Member
Yup, Hulk's about to be super rich. Hulkamania running wild all over Gawker.

And much like his matches, especially later into his career, he isn't even needing to do much of anything. He is just standing there letting the opponent bump their ass off for him.
 

Zaph

Member
My God...

Anna Phillips ‏@annamphillips 2m2 minutes ago
Daulerio's depo ends with the question: Can you imagine a scenario in which a celebrity sex tape is not newsworthy? #hulkvsgawk

Anna Phillips ‏@annamphillips 2m2 minutes ago
Daulerio responds: "If they were a child."
Atty: Under what age?
"Four."
Atty: No four-year-old sex tapes, okay. #hulkvsgawk

A.J. Styles Daulerio blatantly wants his old employer to lose. Looks like there's bad blood there, he does not like Denton at all.
 
My God...

Anna Phillips ‏@annamphillips 2m2 minutes ago
Daulerio's depo ends with the question: Can you imagine a scenario in which a celebrity sex tape is not newsworthy? #hulkvsgawk

Anna Phillips ‏@annamphillips 2m2 minutes ago
Daulerio responds: "If they were a child."
Atty: Under what age?
"Four."
Atty: No four-year-old sex tapes, okay. #hulkvsgawk

Holy mother of...

They should stop the trial. This guy is only hurting them.
 
My God...

Anna Phillips ‏@annamphillips 2m2 minutes ago
Daulerio's depo ends with the question: Can you imagine a scenario in which a celebrity sex tape is not newsworthy? #hulkvsgawk

Anna Phillips ‏@annamphillips 2m2 minutes ago
Daulerio responds: "If they were a child."
Atty: Under what age?
"Four."
Atty: No four-year-old sex tapes, okay. #hulkvsgawk

Wait, what?
 

Hasney

Member
My God...

Anna Phillips ‏@annamphillips 2m2 minutes ago
Daulerio's depo ends with the question: Can you imagine a scenario in which a celebrity sex tape is not newsworthy? #hulkvsgawk

Anna Phillips ‏@annamphillips 2m2 minutes ago
Daulerio responds: "If they were a child."
Atty: Under what age?
"Four."
Atty: No four-year-old sex tapes, okay. #hulkvsgawk

He could have said any age. ANY AGE. Jesus.

A.J. Styles Daulerio blatantly wants his old employer to lose. Looks like there's bad blood there, he does not like Denton at all.

Gawker funded his new thing after he left though though. Seems weird.
 

Acorn

Member
My God...

Anna Phillips ‏@annamphillips 2m2 minutes ago
Daulerio's depo ends with the question: Can you imagine a scenario in which a celebrity sex tape is not newsworthy? #hulkvsgawk

Anna Phillips ‏@annamphillips 2m2 minutes ago
Daulerio responds: "If they were a child."
Atty: Under what age?
"Four."
Atty: No four-year-old sex tapes, okay. #hulkvsgawk
The fuck dude, even if you're throwing your ex employer under the bus or sarcasm that shit is gonna be attached to your name forever.
 

Haxan

Banned
My God...

Anna Phillips ‏@annamphillips 2m2 minutes ago
Daulerio's depo ends with the question: Can you imagine a scenario in which a celebrity sex tape is not newsworthy? #hulkvsgawk

Anna Phillips ‏@annamphillips 2m2 minutes ago
Daulerio responds: "If they were a child."
Atty: Under what age?
"Four."
Atty: No four-year-old sex tapes, okay. #hulkvsgawk

Uh, so, who do you think is in the running to buy off the various Gawker sites/brands once they're liquidated to pay Hogan?
 
Uh, so, who do you think is in the running to buy off the various Gawker sites/brands once they're liquidated to pay Hogan?

It's funny because Gawker was publicizing the stream on their website in some self-aware meta way, completely oblivious to the "not 10" inches" penis slowly approaching their rear end.
 

kewlmyc

Member
My God...

Anna Phillips ‏@annamphillips 2m2 minutes ago
Daulerio's depo ends with the question: Can you imagine a scenario in which a celebrity sex tape is not newsworthy? #hulkvsgawk

Anna Phillips ‏@annamphillips 2m2 minutes ago
Daulerio responds: "If they were a child."
Atty: Under what age?
"Four."
Atty: No four-year-old sex tapes, okay. #hulkvsgawk

I refuse to believe someone actually said this in court.
 

JBourne

maybe tomorrow it rains
My God...

Anna Phillips ‏@annamphillips 2m2 minutes ago
Daulerio's depo ends with the question: Can you imagine a scenario in which a celebrity sex tape is not newsworthy? #hulkvsgawk

Anna Phillips ‏@annamphillips 2m2 minutes ago
Daulerio responds: "If they were a child."
Atty: Under what age?
"Four."
Atty: No four-year-old sex tapes, okay. #hulkvsgawk

I won't miss Gawker.
 

Bronx-Man

Banned
All I can say is, thank God Gawker is finally about to kick the bucket. They're the Daily Mail of internet "journalism".
 

Wereroku

Member
All I can say is, thank God Gawker is finally about to kick the bucket. They're the Daily Mail of internet "journalism".

They just unionized and will now go bankrupt...... maybe that was the plan all along.

This is all on the editorial staff for having literally no journalistic integrity. A first year journalism student could have told them this would happen.

The management let them get away with stuff before so they just kept pushing the lines. I wouldn't want anything to do with their staff but they should have been reigned in earlier.
 

B-Dubs

No Scrubs
They just unionized and will now go bankrupt...... maybe that was the plan all along.

This is all on the editorial staff for having literally no journalistic integrity. A first year journalism student could have told them this would happen.
 

Makonero

Member
I just hope Kotaku (Totilo, Schreier and the rest) survive somewhere. They don't deserve to be tied to this insanity.
 

Patryn

Member
How the hell did the Gawker attorneys let that series of questions go through? How the hell did they not prep Daulerio at all?

Those questions and answers sounds like he thinks this is a giant joke and he wants Gawker to lose the case.

If I was on the Gawker staff I'd be freaking out and updating my resume at this point.
 

DMczaf

Member
Gawker should have known. Hogan has been doing this for over 3 decades!

Sell sell sell sell and then HULK UP BROTHER!

*points* YOU!!!

punch

punch

punch

shoot off the ropes

big boot.

leg drop.

BROTHER!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom