Shadow_FFVI
Member
Didn't Uncharted 3 end up with a 92 metacritic score?Jesus, so this thread ended up reaching UC3 levels of stupid afterall.
Plenty developers would kill for scores like that.
Didn't Uncharted 3 end up with a 92 metacritic score?Jesus, so this thread ended up reaching UC3 levels of stupid afterall.
What, this isn't even close.Jesus, so this thread ended up reaching UC3 levels of stupid afterall.
BTW I posted what each star means for Giantbomb but nobody cares to read![]()
Game is releasing on Steam????
What twitter is this from?
Game is releasing on Steam????
The benefit of using a numerical scale when offering opinions on things is that it's universally understood. If your friend tells you a girl is an 8 you develop a pretty good idea of how they feel about her.
By assinging a unique meaning to each rating that requires further investigation to fully understand you devalue the system as a whole. If your friend tells you a girl is an 8 but his definition of an 8 isn't the same as everyone else's then they might as well just say what they mean and forget the rating as it will only confuse.
Would be funny with a version with the worst scores to.Here is a shortened version, straight to the point, from twitter:
![]()
if it was releasing on steam, I would've already preordered it.
Easy Allies already gaining traction.
EZA gave the game 5/5? Who reviewed it?
Sorry to burst your bubble Gertsmann, but by allowing your scores to be included on the Metacritic site, you by default signed a contract saying you were okay with your ratings being converted to a 100 point scale.
Nice try, sport.
1 bil is the goal for the studio, according to leaks.
Not sure if it'll get there.
![]()
Here is a shortened version, straight to the point, from twitter:
![]()
What's sad is that consumers place to much reliance on reviews and they can't think for themselves to whether or not a game would interest them based on the masses of gameplay and previews available.
Not even remotely closeJesus, so this thread ended up reaching UC3 levels of stupid afterall.
"2/5 is better than a 4/10" lol someone apparently never learned percentages...
There's something about this image I find hilarious.
Would be funny with a version with the worst scores to.
Where's the Giant Bomb review? Banner is misleading.
It seems like they put a cover system and standard features like blind fire, hip fire, grenades and firing while crouched and saw that nobody really needs the time powers to win and can play it like a standard shooter, so they took all of those out and forced players to stand up to be able to shoot and that obviously opens you to enemy fire, so now you have to move around because it's lacking basic character skills.
A good way to do this would be like Max Payne 3, it has a proper cover system and you can try to play it like a cover shooter, but using bullet time is both more effective and fun.
No because if you use cover to long you get rushed.
From what I've seen you can't shoot out of cover in QB. In MP3 you can hold on own for a while and plan your next move. If somebody is rushing towards you blind fire them, and thanks to euphoria even if they don't die they will stumble or fall for a while giving you an opening. If there's anything MP3 nailed it's the combat.
I hated Alan Wake, but I gave half the price of QB to a friend that has the xbox one.
He'll give me the PC code.
Hopefully it's at least worth it.
Nice.For what it's worth to some folks out there. I've completed the game twice, in a row, on normal, then hard. I'm still wanting to go back and play more cause the combat and visuals effects are just a blast to see and play.
7 hours with the 88 min cutscenes? Wtf??I've never let any review decide my purchase, but i have purchased the game already,so yeah. I can't deny though that it always makes me happy to see nothing but positive reviews, like you know, Rise of the Tomb Raider got, Bloodborne, Fallout 4 and so on. But the fact remains that plenty of websites do give QB a great rating, sites like Jimquisition, Destructoid, IGN, Game Informer and so on. I definitely put some stock in those site's reviews. But for some reason i definitely expected positive reviews across the board, but i guess not.
I'll see for myself next week, but i have a feeling i'll be enjoying it a lot. It's just somewhat of a shame that the game can be considered short, Gamersyde finished it in 7 hours on normal. Now i was planning on playing on hard from the start, so it will take me longer, but man...i was definitely expecting at least 10 hours on normal. That being said, i hope the game sells well enough, because i really do want to see another Remedy game on Xbox, probably Alan Wake 2.
No. From GS.
"Now, let us end our review then with a few words about the length of the game. In keeping with the genre, Jack Joyces adventure is composed of 5 acts and it took us a little over 7 hours in normal difficulty to complete it. If you add the TV series into the mix and seeing that every act is linked to a TV episode lasting about 25 minutes, you should complete the game after roughly 9 hours. "
7hrs? Rental it is.No. From GS.
"Now, let us end our review then with a few words about the length of the game. In keeping with the genre, Jack Joyces adventure is composed of 5 acts and it took us a little over 7 hours in normal difficulty to complete it. If you add the TV series into the mix and seeing that every act is linked to a TV episode lasting about 25 minutes, you should complete the game after roughly 9 hours. "
Wasn't it repeatedly stated to be 10+ hours last night?
7hrs? Rental it is.
Oh, I see.No. From GS.
"Now, let us end our review then with a few words about the length of the game. In keeping with the genre, Jack Joyces adventure is composed of 5 acts and it took us a little over 7 hours in normal difficulty to complete it. If you add the TV series into the mix and seeing that every act is linked to a TV episode lasting about 25 minutes, you should complete the game after roughly 9 hours. "
Oh, I see.
Curious to see how long SlasherJPC took to finish, especially the second time given that he's finished it one.
That's pretty good.Took me over 10 on first playthrough with lots of exploration and reading, second playthrough with no exploration, reading and no deaths is 8:45, both with every cutscene.
I read a review that said all the tv episodes are streamed ? Is that correct , will be a negative for me as my internet isn't that great .