What's sad is that consumers place to much reliance on reviews and they can't think for themselves to whether or not a game would interest them based on the masses of gameplay and previews available.
Do they though?
Destiny got a lot of low scores yet sold well. I've generally found reviews scores don't have much of a say and people go off did they like the look it when it came to their attention via whatever means. So many games with high scores sell poorly or don't tally with the scores even if they have decent marketing. Looking through the history, it just seems random.
Funny thing about the scores. If Jeff gives this a 3/5 and gamespot a 7 a lot less people would give shit and would move on. You show yourself to wanting games to get a certain score regardless of what the reviewer thinks.
People scream for choice and fairness for everyone but then want games to be brought up to a certain score they're happy with. You've got plenty of resources out there, majority think it's a good game, second majority think it's average and the last think the bad points out weighs the good, and that's Jeff's take on it as well as the others.
The second majority is actually quite a large collection of 6s and 7s with a lot of bad stuff to say about the game. Jeff is only slightly under that considerable consensus. Not surprising to see Jeff's take on it and that second majority is bringing the meta score down.
Jeff gets fired at gamespot for not giving a game a good review and starts Giant Bomb, get praise for not towing the corporate line, gives game a bad score and gamers flip their wigs and want it higher.