I would add better load times to almost every game on that list as well.
I doubt it, the rules for supporting older revisions on new hardware tend to be quite stringent for compatibility reasons. I expect them to underclock the CPU to OG PS4 speeds when running a game without NEO support, same way the New 3DS handles it.
I don't think you get it, FFXV is months away from release with tons of optimization ahead of it, how does it belong on a list (at the top no less) of games that "must" get Neo upgrades. The retail version is so far out that it's ridiculous to say that FFXV needs a Neo upgrade more than any other game.People are allowed to judge what they're given and what they're shown. And in FFXV has been looking rough at every instance on multiple fronts.
Uncharted 4 is only gonna be 30fps? that's disappointing. I thought the Uncharted games released at 60fps or was that just an upgrade in the Nathan Drake collection?
Such a fascinating time to live in. The thing hasn't even been announced yet and outlets are already making wishlists.
I have no idea why people are shocked that a 2.3x gpu performance bump could allow a game to go from 30+ -> 60. Haven't they, for example, upgraded an old PC before?
Not all framerate problems are CPU bound, in fact I'd venture to say that the majority aren't outside of RTS/Open World/VR.
Additionally, lol @ people calling Digital Foundry out on performance speculation. Give them a little credit and watch the darn video.
EDIT: Added clarity as obv games won't go from sub-30 to 60, but games which are currently framelimited to 30 and can actually run higher can def. get to 60.
Metal Gear Solid V looked perfectly fine on PS4. Also, with all the post-release microtransaction fuckery, i don't think anyone should be playing a remaster of the game.![]()
Its digital foundry, what do u expect. The same guys that do performance analysis to games in Alpha state and from conference footage. Gotta milk them for the clicks.
Haha this some grade A bullshit. Dont believe any of this for a second guys
GTA V is basically the only one that makes sense to me.
Why is this included?
Obviously a patch would not be needed to hit its current setup.
Could have at least added 4K or 1440p to make a need for a patch.
Such a fascinating time to live in. The thing hasn't even been announced yet and outlets are already making wishlists.
FF15 isn't even out yet...
I would add better load times to almost every game on that list as well.
IMO, I think most of the devs will stick to the same framerate as PS4, only making it more stable and adding better GPU-driven visual effects. Ofc also resolution rise to full 1080p for those few games that feature dynamic res or 900p rendering.
Also, MGSV/GTA5 are more than fine on PS4. Sure, having better effects/LOD would be nice, but those games do not need to be on this list. They should have listed Fallout 4.
Those pig slow 5400 RPM drives on SATA 2 really show their age. SSD is out of the question but at least Sony could throw us a bone and include faster drives.
I do wonder, games that fall short of hitting their targeted framerate, do they really need a patch to be improved? I mean, the increase in performance should theoretically keep it more stable since it's always struggling to hit the target, be it 30 or 60 fps.
Someone more technically competent may correct me if wrong.
I definitely see Sony first party games like Uncharted 4 or Bloodborne getting Neo updates, and for third party games, definitely see that coming to Witcher 3 because Cd Projekt Red is awesome at supporting their games.
Do we have any reason to believe publishers are going to pay for the development and QA necessary for updating "old" titles? I could see a first party title or two being upgraded by Sony as a PR move, but third party games?
When is neo rumored to come out?