b&jy77VjiKn$#F
Member
I enjoyed the new Radiohead songs more than Civil War.
At the very least, Civil War is actually a movie. BvS is just "scenes" put together after eachother in some sort of editing program.
You are aware this is not actually a response, right?
Of all the BvS threads you've been in I'm surprised you seem to think talking like that leads to anything. How many people on either side of the argument about BvS have insulted the other? How many of those people received some sort of penalty/punishment?
lmao fucking hyperbole around here god damn. pathetic post
You are aware that posting a picture of a cartoon rabbit reading a love letter to his cartoon human wife written crudely on Marvin Acme's will, itself written in ACME Disappearing-Reappearing ink and deeming the ownership of Toon Town return to the Toons that inhabit it in the case of his death which in this case happened at the hands of Judge Doom who is actually an evil Toon and killed Eddie Valiant's brother with a piano and a cartoon shoe with a barrel of Dip may possibly indicate that my post was not intended as an in-depth response and more of a jape?
Despite the supergeeks arguing either against working for the restrictive capitalist government or for their own sense of doing right and correcting injustice, the fact is, nothing here has gravitas. Civil War is politics as adolescents misperceive social/global crisis. This has been going on for so long (ever since Hollywood realized the bounty to be had in cajoling comic-book cultures ready audience; since, say, the 1978 Superman film, then 1989s Batman) that, by now, the brainwashing is complete. The trivializing has grabbed such hold that when a genuine pop artist like Zack Snyder deepens comics lore into visionary, moral art (the profound Man of Steel and Batman v Superman), many fanboys, and critics, react with anger, resentment and ignorance.
To praise Civil War as entertainment is to accept its puerile conflicts. This is the moral reduction that has happened to American youth culture in the wake of the generational dissents of the Vietnam War. Movies as violent as the Marvel flicks are not pacifist but are proof of anti-military sentiment such as became evident in the confused Ferguson protestations about militarized police, a foolish, redundant term exploited by manipulative media outlets and politicians. Civil War furbishes aggression simply to excite viewers who are as programmed as poor Bucky.
This was an elaborate way to say, "I know." Which was pointless. Much like the post I quoted.
lmao fucking hyperbole around here god damn. pathetic post
lmao fucking hyperbole around here god damn. pathetic post
It is hyperbole, but it is painfully obvious that BvS was chopped to bits in the editing room.
lmao fucking hyperbole around here god damn. pathetic post
Sa da tay#PootieTangIsBetterThanYourFav
I don't know
what does Armond have to say
http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...rheroes-dumbed-down?target=author&tid=1152026
welp, there you have it
The trivializing has grabbed such hold that when a genuine pop artist like Zack Snyder deepens comics lore into visionary, moral art (the profound Man of Steel and Batman v Superman), many fanboys, and critics, react with anger, resentment and ignorance.
I don't know
what does Armond have to say
http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...rheroes-dumbed-down?target=author&tid=1152026
welp, there you have it
I don't know
what does Armond have to say
http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...rheroes-dumbed-down?target=author&tid=1152026
welp, there you have it
Paying any amount is crayWell I didn't say how much
Someone please link his BVS write up about cumming.I don't know
what does Armond have to say
http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...rheroes-dumbed-down?target=author&tid=1152026
welp, there you have it
why must you take part in the moral decay of our societyi am so glad he hates CW
Yeah, BvS is a mess in terms of pacing and editing
Editing may very well be, but that's stuff I don't even think about while watching a movie, it doesn't affect my opinion. Pacing I don't know, I liked it, there is an event at the beginning that you would expect near the end, that instantly grabbed me and afterwards it felt like this calm before the real storm while not being boring at all.
why must you take part in the moral decay of our society
In the end all that really matters about any tv show/movie whatever:
How does it make you feel?
I haven't seen civil war but I loved BvS. It doesn't really matter it's ok to enjoy two movies
From two different companies, it's not a contest.
BruhIn the end all that really matters about any tv show/movie whatever:
How does it make you feel?
In the end all that really matters about any tv show/movie whatever:
How does it make you feel?
I'd pay money to browse GAF in a reality where BvS got decent reviews, I wonder how many people think for themselves.
i will gladly take the opposite side of everyone in the National Review
that he loves BvS & MoS and hates Civil War is just icing on the cake
seems reductionist
some people strive to understand films/shows/books/etc to a deeper level than that
if poor pacing doesn't bother you, that's great but it is a valid aspect of film that people should be encouraged to comment on
Bruh
You just said you'd pay to travel to an alternate reality where BvS reviewed well
You're right. Here is how BvS made me feel:
![]()
Also didn't you just claim
I don't know
what does Armond have to say
http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...rheroes-dumbed-down?target=author&tid=1152026
welp, there you have it
You're right. Here is how BvS made me feel:
![]()
Also didn't you just claim
Bruh
You just said you'd pay to travel to an alternate reality where BvS reviewed well
Well I respect that opinion, I'm saying that reviews don't matter, but that I would want to see how much they affect the concensus.
I haven't seen civil war but I loved BvS. It doesn't really matter it's ok to enjoy two movies
From two different companies, it's not a contest.
what a reductionist viewpoint
there are a great many more aspects to film/shows/albums/books than just that
Damn, he went in hard. He makes some interesting, salient points though.I don't know
what does Armond have to say
http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...rheroes-dumbed-down?target=author&tid=1152026
welp, there you have it
There are so many literary allusions and symbolism in the film we haven't even discovered yet.
Heres a list of Bullshit that was in the BvS movie:
..
Some of the point as I have made could be explained. But most of them are borderline stupid. However, I liked Batmans realisation of both monsters sharing the name Martha.
Overall, I understand why some people like the movie. But calling it the best comic book movie ever made or comparing it to Marvels strongest offerings is foolish.
WTF: "in the confused Ferguson protestations about militarized police,..." "Offensevely named black panther" What is this?
Wow that write up is something else.I don't know
what does Armond have to say
http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...rheroes-dumbed-down?target=author&tid=1152026
welp, there you have it
I think half your points are tenuous at best. I see a refusal to even contemplate on the film's merits. But let's have a conversation, because I think the film is more nuanced than what's expected from the genre. There's a lot of good stuff.
-The scene in Africa is stupid beyond belief. Why is Lois alive as a witness? Why does Superman get blamed for the deaths considering he doesn't need to use bullets?
I thought this scene was the first piece of evidence that the film is unafraid to take us to a very real, very contemporary, place. Journalists interview these labelled "terrorists" all the time. This Lois Lane has balls of steel. And Superman wasn't blamed for the gunfight; considering the main piece of dialogue that happened immediately after was a description of the local militia gunning down a village, due to Superman's intervention. I particularly liked how in this cinematic world, there's a lot of pain and consequences... Which hasn't really been addressed in the MCU until Avengers 2.
-Lois and Clark bathtub scene. Did the conversation have to take place their?
LOL. What's wrong with this scene? Lois is taking a bath, probably the first one since being in the middle of bullets and desert. It shows how comfortable they are in front of each other, and it was quite poignant when Lois tries to spell it out for Clark that there's things to consider when saving the day. Do you have a girlfriend, a wife? It's one of the most authentic scenes in the movie.
-When Lex puts a toffee in the Senators mouth. Is this really Lex's attitude?
See, I loved that character moment. It's a power play. A government man (to his gloom) is literally eating out of the hands of this enigmatic sociopath.
-Lex starts killing his assistants now? (Mercy)
Lex, in every piece of media, has been established to kill his cohorts. This isn't the first time Mercy has been killed. As for the film, it would make sense to lessen the suspicion on him if his dear assistant was caught in the blast.
-Why would Batman leave his Batarang after stealing the Kryptonite
It's his middle finger to Lex. I thought that was a definitive statement, and inspired by his animated version who does the same.
-Lex's plan to persuade Superman to battle Batman was coincidently just when he kidnapped Martha?
The plan wouldn't exactly work if Superman thought something was amiss any sooner.
-Superman cant use his X-ray vision to locate Martha?
Why is this even an issue? Superman is surrounded, in all 360 degrees, by a loud, dense city. People have a hard time finding each other in large Minecraft map, even if they make a bright-ass structure, screaming to be found.
-Lex gets his design team to associate logos to the justice league members. WUT. Also, unveiling the justice league members through email...in a movie? Really?
Those logos are already part of the character's appearance... I'll give you the email scene, though it bothered me less than the large majority.
-Lois throwing the spear and then retrieving it (WHAT?). and some how deducing that the spear kills Doomsday. How does she even know this considering she didn't even see Doomsday?
Lois explicitly watches the events unfold from the alien ship twice. Remember how she urges Perry to evacuate the Daily Planet building? It's not rocket science to deduce that the weapon that carved a scar in Superman's face (when nothing is able to), could be used to fight an entity that's emerged from a Kryptonian ship..
-Why the hell didn't Batman retrieve the spear (maybe using the Bat plane?) instead of luring Doomsday back to the original location?
He did. I think you're confusing the order of events. Batman first sees Doomsday when it had crashed landed. He goes for the spear, while simultaneously leading it back to the original location.
-Also, as HISHE explained. Superman and Doomsday were in space. Why didn't he just throw that monstrosity into space?
I really don't understand the question. This was Superman's first major point of attack; to "throw him in space." Even taking himself out if the need had arisen, which it did.
-Lois being the Damsel in distress and Superman saving her.
Lois had already proved to be a formidable ally, without the need of wearing tight leather. She's shown as a balbuster. She's also the first person to head into danger half the time. In fact, she rescues Superman twice in the film. But I guess the damsel in distress trope is really stuck in your frontal lobe for none of that to matter.
-Lex being so obsessed with Superman's death he will forgo his own security by unleashing Doomsday in front of himself and Superman.
It was a shock, even to Luthor, that his own blood child would try to kill him. Classic villainy usurped by their folly and blind want. How this bothered anyone is beyond me.
-Why the hell was the death of Superman even needed considering he is revived? Maybe this alleviates Batmans sadism by applying a no kill rule? Who the hell knows.
Without saying a word, and without spelling it out, the film killed "Clark Kent." I don't recall any comic book film where we see a pained mother of a dead hero. And the dialogue exchanged between Bruce and Diana was wicked, c'mon.
-Lastly...DING DING DING DING DING!
The best performance of his career. Tied with the music? And the painting in his daddy's office being flipped so the Devil is coming from the sky? That scene, and its allusion, was really fucking cool.
This would be quite interesting actually.
Upon release of reviews all I saw on twitter was:
'LOL Knew Ben Affleck would be an awful batman' and stuff of this sort. Interesting that people on social media rarely read the content of reviews they cite.
Few reviews like MovieBob i felt were over the top hyperbolic, the movie was not that bad. The GAF post about how the movie didn't 'earn the right' to have the cool shot of Batman, Superman and Wonder woman was also quite lame.
What intervention, he punched one guy and saves Lois. I took it as because superman took out these guys it led to a power vacuum allowing another group to attack a village. How was any of this Superman's fault and why would they blame him when these guys were killed with guns.I think half your points are tenuous at best. I see a refusal to even contemplate on the film's merits. But let's have a conversation, because I think the film is more nuanced than what's expected from the genre. There's a lot of good stuff.
-The scene in Africa is stupid beyond belief. Why is Lois alive as a witness? Why does Superman get blamed for the deaths considering he doesn't need to use bullets?
I thought this scene was the first piece of evidence that the film is unafraid to take us to a very real, very contemporary, place. Journalists interview these labelled "terrorists" all the time. This Lois Lane has balls of steel. And Superman wasn't blamed for the gunfight; considering the main piece of dialogue that happened immediately after was a description of the local militia gunning down a village, due to Superman's intervention. I particularly liked how in this cinematic world, there's a lot of pain and consequences... Which hasn't really been addressed in the MCU until Avengers 2.