Support NeoGAF

[Kralamoonard]

lol.....

‘Uncharted 4: A Thief’s End’ review: This four-part series should have ended after Part One

Attention! It spoils the whole story.

Well, yes, NOW I AM annoyed. Seriously, this sounds like some dude who's into the "console wars" and hates Uncharted. Well..... yeah..... I'm not commenting here any forther regarding this here. This review here is a joke.

I actually thought that this here is the review.

What the hell is this? The review is not profession at all -- it just sounds like some metacritic user wrote their own troll review. Talk about professionalism, smh...

 

[LegendofDragoonLives]

Wow what a tool. How do you give this game a fucking 4? I don't really care about reviews overall with the whole .1 differences etc but something like this pisses me off. It sounds like some idiot from gamefaqs was given the legitimacy to review the game. Maybe this guy will make another topic saying that it was pulled back opinions are wrong for more clicks like the other one. :\

 

[DriftingSpirit]

lol.....

‘Uncharted 4: A Thief’s End’ review: This four-part series should have ended after Part One

Attention! It spoils the whole story.

Well, yes, NOW I AM annoyed. Seriously, this sounds like some dude who's into the "console wars" and hates Uncharted. Well..... yeah..... I'm not commenting here any forther regarding this here. This review here is a joke.

I actually thought that this here is the review.

lol

 

[silva1991]

What the hell?

 

[dragonflys545]

lol.....

‘Uncharted 4: A Thief’s End’ review: This four-part series should have ended after Part One

Attention! It spoils the whole story.

Well, yes, NOW I AM annoyed. Seriously, this sounds like some dude who's into the "console wars" and hates Uncharted. Well..... yeah..... I'm not commenting here any forther regarding this here. This review here is a joke.

I actually thought that this here is the review.

LOL!

 

[Kralamoonard]

"Should have ended after one"

"The Uncharted games have never excelled at storytelling. Instead, they’ve used it an accompaniment to overwhelming visual technology."

Oh come on, what a load of crap.

 

[Hoo-doo]

Why does metacritic count joke reviews? This is weird.

 

[ViewtifulJC]

93 Metacritic RIP

Bring back Amy Hening

 

[Loudninja]

So what is the summary because I want click it do to spoilers.

 

[The Artisan]

shit, I thought 94 was a lock. how did it get bumped down a point?

 

[dragonflys545]

shit, I thought 94 was a lock. how did it get bumped down a point?

By that 1 negative review.

 

[LuuKyK]

shit, I thought 94 was a lock. how did it get bumped down a point?

Because someone gave it a 4/10... lol

 

[Panda Rin]

No

 

[TheStruggler]

the same site/paper gave Quantum Break a 7, however it was not the same reviewer

 

[Kenzodielocke]

Will throw the game right out of the window now.

 

[Blackleg-sanji1]

By that 1 negative review.

Hence the reason why I will continue to say metacritic is broken as all hell. Eh o well still high naughty dog should be proud

 

[Raylan]

So what is the summary because I want click it do to spoilers.

The “Uncharted” games have never excelled at storytelling. Instead, they’ve used it an accompaniment to overwhelming visual technology.

This is all you have to know.....

 

[DriftingSpirit]

93 Metacritic RIP

Bring back Amy Hening

lol

 

[The Artisan]

By that 1 negative review.

Because someone gave it a 4/10... lol

but that's washington post and someone just said above that washington gave them a 10/10...so now what they just have 2 different reviews?

 

[TheStruggler]

By that 1 negative review.

Because someone gave it a 4/10... lol

I thought Metacritic was on a point system of how relevant you are and such IGN being higher in points/percentage etc. its weird how the Washington Post can have one bad review and it dips

 

[Raylan]

but that's washington post and someone just said above that washington gave them a 10/10...so now what they just have 2 different reviews?

Dude, it's on this site here. Read it.

 

[Wabba]

The game was almost at a 95 and then this review drops it to 93. I know that people have opinions, but how can you play this game and then upright think that it is a 4/10? I would be fucking furious if i where Naughty Dog.

 

[Patapwn]

They're not seriously going to let that review stay are they?

 

[Coolbgdog12]

What the hell is going on?

This just ruined my day. I'm sad now. I'm crying. I'm going to go lay down.

 

[Catdaddy]

Googled his name to see what else he did (just like he wants us too) and found this little piece:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/michael...uls-ii-the-worst-game-ever-made/#24b6e7c72d94

Freelance troll/clickbaiter I guess... either way doesn't matter to me.

 

[Creaking]

Metacritic counted a joke 4/10 review

 

[Trojan]

Guys, this reviewer might be an ass clown but let's not start talking crazy. Dude gave it a low score and he's entitled to his opinion, no matter how poor his logic might be to arrive there. Game is at an incredible 93 and this review doesn't change anything.

 

[Ran rp]

crying over a metacritic score

 

[cameron]

It's weird that metacritic counted the review since its filed to the "comic riffs" area of the site. The real Washington Post review gave the game a 10.

I also don't see a rating in that review, where did they get the 40 from? That doesn't even fit the WPs rating scale.

lol

 

[Memento]

WTF

 

[poodpick]

crying over a metacritic score

I don't get it

 

[Coolbgdog12]

Maybe the game is truly a 4/10 and that reviewer wasn't money hatted? It happens you know.

Spoiler

sike

 

[Comrade Crunch]

crying over a metacritic score

Not really, it's more over the fact that metacritic counted a joke review, it's listed as such on the website.

 

[DriftingSpirit]

I find it more funny than anything else. Someone gets so pressed that they do something like that. Hilarious.

 

[aravuus]

Hence the reason why I will continue to say metacritic is broken as all hell. Eh o well still high naughty dog should be proud

I mean, I personally think Metacritic is more or less shit and practically worthless to me, but... This is the reason you think MC is broken?

There's, like, almost literally no difference between 93 and 94 metascore.

 

[BrianRoyale]

Got through chapters 8 and 9 last night and I'm not fully into the game. Now it feels like a full on Uncharted experience. Very pleased with the encounters, a nice balance of fights and exploration. Plus now I can actually stealth out of places, mostly no forced combat. Options are nice.
Funny that Nate chucks the dynamite but Sam's the one with the lighter.

 

[Creaking]

Guys, this reviewer might be an ass clown but let's not start talking crazy. Dude gave it a low score and he's entitled to his opinion, no matter how poor his logic might be to arrive there. Game is at an incredible 93 and this review doesn't change anything.

No, it is quite literally a joke review. The whole thing is sarcastic. Or even if not that, the Washington Post website isn't treating it seriously.

 

[Kralamoonard]

crying over a metacritic score

Err, I'm sure it's the review itself is what's the point of contention.

Guys, this reviewer might be an ass clown but let's not start talking crazy. Dude gave it a low score and he's entitled to his opinion, no matter how poor his logic might be to arrive there. Game is at an incredible 93 and this review doesn't change anything.

I agree, but we are allowed to criticize his opinion (regardless of the metacritic score) -- not specifically at you, but I tend to find "muh opinion" is just a way to deflect backlash.

I mean saying this series should have ended after one, or that ND are poor story tellers, or calling Dark Souls II the worst game ever, or saying that the Wii U was a better third party console in 2013 is just click-baiting opinions.

 

[Coolbgdog12]

The guy is a joker man.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/michael...r-console-for-third-party-games/#282038c479d5

 

[Omnistalgic]

crying over a metacritic score

It's the same as crying when your team loses...

And that review is indeed crappy and is pretty much a joke review that shouldn't be counted

 

[barit]

The dream is dead. Pack it up Naughty Dog. You guys and garls had a good run tho

 

[aravuus]

No, it is quite literally a joke review. The whole thing is sarcastic.

Which makes the reactions a whole lot funnier

 

[ArmGunar]

Why does Meta count it ?

It's a joke right ?

Personally, I don't care but please, if you add reviews, check them
It's just a piece of crap that "review" ...

 

[Blackleg-sanji1]

I mean, I personally think Metacritic is more or less shit and practically worthless to me, but... This is the reason you think MC is broken?

There's, like, almost literally no difference between 93 and 94 metascore.

Nah like there are a bunch of 10s and 9s that one lil score shouldn't take it down.

And I love how everybody only comes into this thread to go "lol crying over metacritic"

 

[mejin]

Guys, this reviewer might be an ass clown but let's not start talking crazy. Dude gave it a low score and he's entitled to his opinion, no matter how poor his logic might be to arrive there. Game is at an incredible 93 and this review doesn't change anything.

hahaha by all means, just read it.

 

[Omnistalgic]

It's a conspiracy against the NAughty Dogs!

A conspiracy I say!

 

[Acquiescence]

Y'all just got trolled by Metacritic.

 

[Comrade Crunch]

I mean, I personally think Metacritic is more or less shit and practically worthless to me, but... This is the reason you think MC is broken?

There's, like, almost literally no difference between 93 and 94 metascore.

I think it really calls the quality of the site into question when they can't even do a cursory glance at the top of a page to see that something is listed as a joke review.

As if it already weren't a poor metric to decide if something was good, now people have to keep an eye on it to see if they count more fake reviews.

 

[aravuus]

Nah like there are a bunch of 10s and 9s that one lil score shouldn't take it down.

And I love how everybody only comes into this thread to go "lol crying over metacritic"

Dude, the score could have been at 93.5000000 for all we know. One lower score would only have to drop it down to 93.49999999 for it to show as 93, I'd imagine.

 

[silva1991]

If it's a joke will MC remove it?