If there's jet packs I'm done. Just can't deal with that mess anymore.
If there's one good thing I can say about AW it's the graphics, so I'm expecting SHG to hit it out of the park with the visuals.
I said this in another thread...WW2, why always WW2. Are companies that afraid to do something new? Who not try Vietnam or something else?
Do they have DICE's amazing sound design tho?
did you play AW? the folks at Sledgehammer are really good. Most of them are the devs who made Deadspace 1 and i think they had amazing sound design in that game.
Vietnam has also been done plenty. But one of the bloodiest wars in Asia, the Korean war, somehow get's little attention.
Yeah, I'm kinda surprised we haven't hit this already.The Korean War to me represents a massive opportunity for something unique in a shooter franchise. It takes place right when really impressive changes in technology were just making their first appearances (jet aircraft, assault rifles, etc.) whilst still retaining a lot of WWII technology and ascetics. Not to mention there's a lot of REALLY kick-ass battles that took place in the Korean War (Battle of Inchon, Chosin Resevoir Breakout, etc.)
Lawl. Not even true. Treyarch basically killed their trust with the fucking abysmal BO3 campaign and Infinity Ward has actually gained a lot of points for its great SP with IW and has been a lot of cool community stuff.
Treyarch is super overrated.
Treyarch make the worst COD games and I seriously disliked bo3 more than I disliked ghosts. The two worst COD games for me are bo2 and bo3.I wouldn't go as far to say overrated but they royally fucked up the universe of BO and BO2 by tying it to the mess that was BO3. Something tells me that there was a major shakeup with the extra year they were given.
This. I want something more akin to The Pacific or The Thin Red Line than Saving Private Ryan (which is good in its own right).
Technically the Korean War isn't over. So I don't think any developer would like to burn their hands on an active war.The Korean War to me represents a massive opportunity for something unique in a shooter franchise. It takes place right when really impressive changes in technology were just making their first appearances (jet aircraft, assault rifles, etc.) whilst still retaining a lot of WWII technology and ascetics. Not to mention there's a lot of REALLY kick-ass battles that took place in the Korean War (Battle of Inchon, Chosin Resevoir Breakout, etc.)
🤔Treyarch make the worst COD games
They already have.I can't imagine COD doing the subject justice. Especially considering their most recent entries.
But I'm hopeful.
About time they quit with that futuristische setting. Glad they are going for WW 2
Treyarch make the worst COD games and I seriously disliked bo3 more than I disliked ghosts. The two worst COD games for me are bo2 and bo3.
on the subject of Vietnam war, this game was great. Remember having problem running this on my computer back then.
![]()
Shinobi hasn't said anything about this COD yet ?
That's not even Brothers in Arms cover. Probably thousands of shots of a soldier like that have been used through the decades of media.
WolfensteinIt's been so damn long since we had any AAA WWII game. Said this before, but we've had none this gen and we have more modern games than WWII so this is very overdue.
There's kids that game now and got a PS4 or XB1 as their first system in the past four years and they have no WWII game experience.
Wolfenstein![]()
Valtýr;234403015 said:It feels like they think we're stupid.
on the subject of Vietnam war, this game was great. Remember having problem running this on my computer back then.
![]()
This is not the scale that Call of Duty currently deals in. At least in MP it's just 12 guys lol. Guess we gotta wait for Battlefield 1941 for the real deal.
Hmm, I didn't know bo2 was popular. Around my circles, bo2 was pretty much universally referred to as boring ops. The only campaigns I couldn't even be bothered to finish are bo2 and bo3.Oddly enough Black ops 2 is my favorite haha. BO3 is straight garbage though.
I agree, best visuals out of the 3 studios for sure. Also very good sp. Mp on the other hand was not to my liking as a lot of other people.If there's one good thing I can say about AW it's the graphics, so I'm expecting SHG to hit it out of the park with the visuals.
I think BO2 was probably the most boring entry as well something about it feels empty as hell. But I think im in the minorityHmm, I didn't know bo2 was popular. Around my circles, bo2 was pretty much universally referred to as boring ops. The only campaigns I couldn't even be bothered to finish are bo2 and bo3.
Maybe I'm alone on this but I really enjoyed Call of Duty 3.
ew i'll pass. enough of this WW crap. even after the long break it's still not enough. i won't be buying another Battlefield/Cod game until they go back to modern/futuristic settings.
He just mad they beat him to the punch in making another WW2 game.
I never expect Randy to make another BiA game, as much as I want it.
You already have that.
![]()
6 vs 6 is how they did it back then, they just don't show us
Such a hilarious x smh shame there's no 16 vs 16 minimum or at least 8 vs 8 or 10 vs 10
Cmon activision