Clinton: 'I was on the way to winning' until Comey, Russia intervened

Clinton still whinning about "the Russians". She had the media, the government and the financially interests behind her. She lost because of austounding arrogance and terrible past decisions. Trump had much less going for him and much stronger headwinds.

I love how the Russians is in quotes as if there isn't overwhelming evidence that points to Russian interference confirmed by multiple intelligence agencies including ones who were described as "Trumpland".
 
"I would have won if it hadn't been for those meddling kids" makes you sound like a Scooby Doo villain, tho, so maybe don't do that
 
"I would have won if it hadn't been for those meddling kids" makes you sound like a Scooby Doo villain, tho, so maybe don't do that
We really going to discredit Russia's massive disinformation campaign and influence via WikiLeaks in the election?
 
"I would have won if it hadn't been for those meddling kids" makes you sound like a Scooby Doo villain, tho, so maybe don't do that

Well she did admit she messed up too but I mean in any election there's multiple factors as to why people lose or one, it's never solely down to the candidate.
 
Seems like a fair and accurate assessment... but when you're running against a know-nothing racist reality tv star who brags about sexual assault with no policies or government experience, how the hell did the margins get so narrow that some bad news cycles tank your whole campaign?
 
Seems like a fair and accurate assessment... but when you're running against a know-nothing racist reality tv star who brags about sexual assault with no policies or government experience, how the hell did the margins get so narrow that some bad news cycles tank your whole campaign?
Idk, ask the 63 million people who voted for the piece of shit.
 
I guess the misogyny argument she makes will be put to the test if Elizabeth Warren runs in 2020. I voted for Clinton but no way was she my preferred candidate, she is still a corporate sell out.. truth is Trump sold a bigger bag of lies and used that bag of lies to run a better campaign. Why he still has supporters now though is beyond belief. I just wish the DNC wouldn't have done Bernie dirty like they did, can't imagine the utopia we would be living if he had actually won.

As for the FBI reopening the email investigation hurting her.. maybe, and with how close the election really was in those swing states it may have just been the difference. I'm not sure why any of this matters now though, and I feel Clinton should quit dwelling on it as it is just making her look as pathetic as Trump in not getting over it.
 
We really going to discredit Russia's massive disinformation campaign and influence via WikiLeaks in the election?

John Podesta's gmail being hacked was pretty much a self inflicted wound too. Their IT people meant to say 'DO NOT CLICK THIS LINK !!!' but it came out as 'This is a legitimate email'.
 
Hopefully they go after the non voters instead since appealing to Trump voters is going to backfire.

Are non-voters a bigger issue than swing voters? I mean, Obama won two terms not that long ago... did he get more people out to the polling stations rather than win on content?
 
Youth turnout would not be Obama levels with Hillary as the nominee but it would still be substantial. Obviously Bernie is the candidate who has more enthusiastic youth support. The ones that were sure to vote I'm certain would end up voting Clinton, while there would be some that would not vote or vote Stein for example. But this won't be the demographic that changes this race.

I'm more worried about 30+ year old white people making under 50K an year, that is the demographic that worries me and seems to be the ones flocking to Trump. Alot of these people usually don't vote, but have turned on due to the circus nature of Trump. These people have not seen better times in the last 8 years, and they are also unaffected by the narrative that Obama brought on change for their community. They are disenfranchised and low information. I'm worried that poor white people could swing to Trump and this is what I'm noticing across the Primaries and it's pretty substantial numbers, a lot of people who don't usually vote.

The whole narrative of youth being the biggest problem for Hillary is missing the point really, there are large number of people out there to Trump as their hope for change, it's crude, it's terrifying, but this is what I'm taking away from some of the things I've heard being said about the Trump supporters.

Here is an excerpt from Matt Taibbi - How America Made Donald Trump Unstoppable

Unions have been abused so much by both parties in the past decades that even mentioning themes union members care about instantly grabs the attention of workers. That's true even when it comes from Donald Trump, a man who kicked off the fourth GOP debate saying "wages [are] too high" and who had the guts to tell the Detroit News that Michigan autoworkers make too much money.

You will find union members scattered at almost all of Trump's speeches. And there have been rumors of unions nationally considering endorsing Trump. SEIU president Mary Kay Henry even admitted in January that Trump appeals to members because of the "terrible anxiety" they feel about jobs.

"I know guys, union guys, who talk about Trump," says Rand Wilson, an activist from the Labor for Bernie organization. "I try to tell them about Sanders, and they don't know who he is. Or they've just heard he's a socialist. Trump they've heard of."


A post from the beginning of last year is I think what really encapsulates Clinton's loss.
In the end I think if she had focused more on winning over union members and campaigning on a populist economic message - she might have been able to beat Trump. Her campaign focusing on the negatives of Trump to me remains the biggest flaw - she basically learned nothing from 2008 primary. Republicans will vote Republican, it's a dem's job just to focus on high voter turnout and you don't get that by having your major platform being "Trump bad"
 
I guess the misogyny argument she makes will be put to the test if Elizabeth Warren runs in 2020. I voted for Clinton but no way was she my preferred candidate, she is still a corporate sell out.. truth is Trump sold a bigger bag of lies and used that bag of lies to run a better campaign. Why he still has supporters now though is beyond belief. I just wish the DNC wouldn't have done Bernie dirty like they did, can't imagine the utopia we would be living if he had actually won.
Not really, but I it makes you feel better about being sexist. "I love women, but that ones voice is just to shrill for me to vote for her" Really the fact that we've elected so many men with such shittier qualifications than her over the last 200 years doesn't leave much room for imagination here.
 
Seems like a fair and accurate assessment... but when you're running against a know-nothing racist reality tv star who brags about sexual assault with no policies or government experience, how the hell did the margins get so narrow that some bad news cycles tank your whole campaign?

The Republican Party endorsed him.
 
So folks saying why Hillary lost Rust Belt, Senate Intel Co-Chair Mark Warner:
I've said this before and I'll say it again. As the cyberwarfare ramps up between countries the US electoral college is going to become an increasingly easy electoral mechanism to manipulate. Trying to influence the popular vote would be far harder since the voting base is spread out, but targeting specific mid to large swing states (and the smaller rural/suburban counties) to tip the scales of the electoral college will likely become more and more common in the future (especially if we keep this current winner take all system in place). The USA is like a massive boat that won't be able to turn even when we see the icebergs right ahead of us.

We're so screwed because there is no way we'll be able implement the comprehensive electoral and media reform necessary to tackle these issues head on.
 
She was on track to win by a narrow margin but against a clown like Trump it should have never been close.

Also, while Comey letter was a nothing burger, WikiLeaks were largely true things, even if one sided

Trump, a coward exploitative, lying billionaire outflanked Hillary on populism. Shows how sucky of a candidate she was. She couldn't go further left because her donors wouldn't like it.
Tells more about the country than the candidates to be honest.
 
Anytime I see someone say the media was behind Clinton I wonder if I'm in an alternate dimension

you must be. she had massive media support. she had the SNL/Daily Show flunkies repeating her talking points. she outspend Trump on media spots 2:1. she had historic support among the nation's 100 largest newspapers, many of which had never supported a Democrat or even any candidate, before:

Among the United States' 100 largest newspapers by paid circulation, 57 endorsed Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton,[6] while only two, the Las Vegas Review-Journal and the Florida Times-Union, endorsed Trump.

Clinton won support from not only traditionally Democratic-leaning newspapers, but also traditionally non-political and conservative newspapers, including those which had "either never before supported a Democrat or had not in many decades ... or had never endorsed any presidential candidate, like USA Today.

they banked on the media so much they flew back to NY every day to watch the coverage.
 
There is still the question of how much did Russia intervene, influence a lot of course. But aside from hacking the DNC emails, and strategically leaking them. Outside of DC how damaging was that shit? It was just embarrassing office gossip, and some fascinating insight for political junkies, but other than that, there wasn't really anything there. The allegations she's corrupt because of it, well they were saying that previously.

It seemed like it did hurt the morale of her team, and maybe those leaks just drove team Clinton insane. That community episode that I think is taking on the notion of wikileaks and the Sony hacks, has one where everyones emails are leaked slowly, and it drives them crazy.

Obama always picked his battles. Frankly, he was so militarily bullish when he felt the need, but completely backed down every single time against Russia, and seeing and listening to his rationalization for not doing certain stuff is so disappointing. People, including Clinton, begged Obama to confront Russia. To me, Obama was too obsessed with his legacy.

Comparing Syria to Iraq is ridiculous because there wasn't an ongoing genocide in Iraq. And Iraq could've been a success story with Obama in charge, true story. Afghanistan is a different story, but there was a window of opportunity to actually nation build, but they went in to destroy the place from day one.
 
Translation: "I was on my way to winning until my FBI criminal investigation was brought up, and until people saw how we were shady as fuck as campaign via emails."
 
Translation: "I was on my way to winning until my FBI criminal investigation was brought up, and until people saw how we were shady as fuck as campaign via emails."

The FBI invieatigation that cleared her? Or are you gonna go back to your right-wing conspiracies about Hillary Clinton to justify that one?
 
Seems like a fair and accurate assessment... but when you're running against a know-nothing racist reality tv star who brags about sexual assault with no policies or government experience, how the hell did the margins get so narrow that some bad news cycles tank your whole campaign?

We live in a world where bragging about sexual assault apparently doesn't seem all that abnormal for some people, apparently. Or who are at least more than willing to subscribe to the idea that that's just "how men talk." Consider Trump's election to be the appearance of existing issues bubbling up to the surface in all their rotten glory. Being unapologetically racist is just being "real" or "telling it like it is." In other words, Trump says things that many people already believe or are more than willing to believe.

Sanders supporters who jump at the opportunity to point out that he did better than Hillary in states that she lost probably don't realize that Sanders message wouldn't have been as appealing as Trump's without the racism to go with it.
 
There is still the question of how much did Russia intervene, influence a lot of course. But aside from hacking the DNC emails, and strategically leaking them. Outside of DC how damaging was that shit? It was just embarrassing office gossip, and some fascinating insight for political junkies, but other than that, there wasn't really anything there. The allegations she's corrupt because of it, well they were saying that previously.

It seemed like it did hurt the morale of her team, and maybe those leaks just drove team Clinton insane. That community episode that I think is taking on the notion of wikileaks and the Sony hacks, has one where everyones emails are leaked slowly, and it drives them crazy.

Obama always picked his battles. Frankly, he was so militarily bullish when he felt the need, but completely backed down every single time against Russia, and seeing and listening to his rationalization for not doing certain stuff is so disappointing. People, including Clinton, begged Obama to confront Russia. To me, Obama was too obsessed with his legacy.

Comparing Syria to Iraq is ridiculous because there wasn't an ongoing genocide in Iraq. And Iraq could've been a success story with Obama in charge, true story. Afghanistan is a different story, but there was a window of opportunity to actually nation build, but they went in to destroy the place from day one.
The leaked e-mails had select parts picked out of them by wikileaks to feed into conspiracy theories from the far left about rigged primaries, etc. Those didn't hurt Clinton in the middle, but on the far left. Disappointed Sander's supporters looking for whatever evidence they could that their guy hadn't lost a fair election.

To be clear, I know wikileaks hosted every e-mail they got, but the highlights they posted were clearly designed to stop Sanders supporters switching over to Clinton, and judging from what I saw on my Facebook wall, that was at least partly successful.
 
In other words she winning until the public was reminded again that Hillary Clinton is a duplicitous sneak. Her political striving is why we have an unqualified monster in the Oval Office. Please go away Hillary.
 
It was one of the many things. The DNC really threw her campaign under the bus with their bias. And Im not talking about media bias and such Im talking about the basics such as the very small amounts of debates that were held. Anyone could see that they already decided they want Hillary and they found Sanders to be an annoyance for dragging it out. It wasn't illegal at all but in an election where people were frantically throwing votes at Trump because of their hate towards the establishment (lol at the idea of an anti-establishment Trump) it was seen as a pretty tone-deaf move imho.

The really big thing that really cost her the election is just how backwards the US election system is and what a massive problem gerrymandering is. I just cant comprehend how the system evolved to the point where parties picking their voters instead of the other way around is seen as the norm.

Hopefully the democratic party and their voters now realize that the democratic process shouldn't be taken for granted.
 
In other words she winning until the public was reminded again that Hillary Clinton is a duplicitous sneak. Her political striving is why we have an unqualified monster in the Oval Office. Please go away Hillary.

Ahh, yes. The sure sign of a person unfit to run a presidential campaign - ambition.
 
This is not an untrue statement. If neither of those things happened she would have won but her campaign still had a number of failings which should have been addressed.
 
Just keep pouring salt on that wound, Hillary. It's not like the Dems are divided enough.
Her political career needs to be put down like a dog, maybe then she'll learn how to lose.

I still think her joke-worthy candidacy was ultimately responsible for Trump winning, not because all the racists found their candidate.
 
I really wish the GOP had nominated someone sane and only semi garbage so I could enjoy the Clinton and delusional yaaas queen tears much more despite voting for her.
 
I really wish the GOP had nominated someone sane and only semi garbage so I could enjoy the Clinton and delusional yaaas queen tears much more despite voting for her.
Her cult, you know the one that would shit on Bernie and call anyone who supported him a misogynist, have funnily all disappeared.

I wonder what happened, since you know GAF was one of her biggest shills for her website.
 
Well it certainly didn't help but I'm not sure she was on her way to winning. She ran a pretty uninspiring campaign. Many people voted for her simply because Trump and the Republicans are so damn terrible not because they were all that excited about her. Hard to win an election like that.
 
The FBI invieatigation that cleared her? Or are you gonna go back to your right-wing conspiracies about Hillary Clinton to justify that one?

They could not prove intent because her lackeys destroyed thousands of "personal" emails, effectively crippling the FBI. Leave it to Clinton supporters to come up with every excuse they can for their corrupt Prima Donna. Thanks to her shady shit, we now have Trump. Thanks to her campaign telling their media lapdogs to prop up Trump as her "Pied Piper" candidate, we now have Trump.

The Clintons need to go back into the self-dealing hole they just came out of.
 
Isn't there more evidence that Bill Clinton is a rapist than Donald Trump is a racist bigot?
 
Isn't there more evidence that Bill Clinton is a rapist than Donald Trump is a racist bigot?

Not just a rapist. A potential pedophile rapist who was a regular on Epstein's Lolita Express. But hey, according to GAF he would have been a mighty fine First Ladyman.
 
She lost because she was a shit candidate. Period.

This Comey, Russia, and by extension, 3rd party, and stupid, racists Americans (ok, so maybe the last one is true) denial is just dumb.

She needs to get over it and accept the reality that she's not a very good candidate. Only SHE could lose to Trump.
 
I love how the Russians is in quotes as if there isn't overwhelming evidence that points to Russian interference confirmed by multiple intelligence agencies including ones who were described as "Trumpland".
I'm ok with using the term "Russian interference" as long as either "Russian" or "interference" is put in quotes.

It's important to point out in one way or another that what the Russians pulled was a propaganda effort against Hillary. It wasn't Russia literally rigging the vote tally like the media and many Dems have led a considerable portion of their base to believe by using that term or the now iconic "Hacking of our election" line.

The damage is done now, I think. So it really doesn't matter so much anymore. If I remember correctly, they got over 50% of Dems to believe that the vote tally was rigged according to this one poll.
 
"Love Trumps Hate" and "I'm With Her" really tell you all you need to know about Clintons campaign.

And don't forget how Abuela didn't even have the backbone to address her supporters at her campaign HQ the night of the election. She had someone else come out and tell them all to go home. 😂
 
Top Bottom