Well modders will have over 900 planets to choose from at least.I didn't even think about it till you said it the mods will be insane. Any empty planets could be used for new modded areas.
Well modders will have over 900 planets to choose from at least.I didn't even think about it till you said it the mods will be insane. Any empty planets could be used for new modded areas.
Some of you are odd as fuck.Looks fine enough but where is the gore
I see what you didWell modders will have over 900 planets to choose from at least.
These dudes have been hyping themselves so much that they can't find faults with the shit we've just seen.Salt?
How's giving constructive criticism means one is salty. It's not always wars. I bought a Series X last year to play FP games and Starfield was a big reason. The reveal was disappointing, and it's okay if people point out the flaws in it.
yeah it didnt looks great but these types of games are about adventure and exploration first, combat is only there to break up the gameplay loop and make it more challenging to adventure and exploreThe gunplay looked atrocious.
Well you must be just dead inside then if you feel like that after THAT deep dive.Salt?
How's giving constructive criticism means one is salty. It's not always wars. I bought a Series X last year to play FP games and Starfield was a big reason. The reveal was disappointing, and it's okay if people point out the flaws in it.
FACTS![]()
In a nutshell
The game is way too over-ambitious. Focusing on barren 1000 planets when they could've hand-crafted one single solar system with select few planets would've been a far better and tighter experience. They badly need a new engine, can't believe the dead-eyes or character models which are early XB1/PS4 gen. This is their flagship title, no reason why there is still so much jank
I'm talking about the game overall dumbass.
![]()
The shhoting didnt look a amzing, but it was never going to be COD or something. A bit surprised they did't show any VATS style mechanic too.yeah it didnt looks great but these types of games are about adventure and exploration first, combat is only there to break up the gameplay loop and make it more challenging to adventure and explore
hopefully it feels good. fallout 4 felt great so if its close to that ill be happy
Starfield has been your most wanted game for years when all you had to go on was 5 seconds of video trailer and a screenshot? And you don't see a problem with that?Well you must be just dead inside then if you feel like that after THAT deep dive.
Starfield has been my most wanted game for years, and that deep dive went so far beyond what i was expecting (i was basically expecting Skyrim/Fallout in space).
i see you are a bethesda games developer. tell us more about the game since your the expert here1000 planets that will be lifeless , you just land and gather resources then you go to the next planet
ffs i hate it when developers use size as a way to measure the quality of their game , who gives a shit if you have 1000 planets if they are filled with generic crap
The same way Cyberpunk was a monster but didn't stop it from being a massive disappointment?Keep the salt flowing dude, keep it flowing.
This game is going to be a monster, and played through the whole of this gen.
And shove this finger up your bottom.![]()
It looks like No Man's Sky with a higher budget and chopy framerate. Could still be good but a bit underwhelming.
1K planet is very very low. NMS, Elite have billions... It's all procedural of course.
Well you must be just dead inside then if you feel like that after THAT deep dive.
Starfield has been my most wanted game for years, and that deep dive went so far beyond what i was expecting (i was basically expecting Skyrim/Fallout in space).
Loved Morrowind, loved Oblivion, loved Fallout 3 and New Vegas, and Skyrim is arguably my fave game of all time. And that kind of game is spcae, something i adore, well you get the picture.Starfield has been your most wanted game for years when all you had to go on was 5 seconds of video trailer and a screenshot? And you don't see a problem with that?
So fuck Todd Howard because you "dont" have to build outposts?
Mate have a cup of coffee with a bunch of sugar, cuz that salt is clearly killing you.
So you dont think your bias is blinding you to what you've actually seen now? Try to look at it objectively, as if bethesda didn't make this game, and it was some other dev you dont know.Loved Morrowind, loved Oblivion, loved Fallout 3 and New Vegas, and Skyrim is arguably my fave game of all time. And that kind of game is spcae, something i adore, well you get the picture.
Bethesda open world rpg's are also my fave game type, so er yes sorry, it was my most wanted game.
Concern trolling.Honestly, I don't even know if Outposts are essential in FO4, because I never went far in that game.
And I don't know if building outposts are important in Starfield. But it's something I do not want to play in a game.
And f**** Todd Howard, for all the crashes with FO4. And the bugs. And the outposts.
There is a good chance it will be the same crap all over again.
Without a shadow of a doubt. Thank god I have a good PC.Seems like another Bethesda game that's going to be a much better experience on powerful PC than consoles.