Exactly. There are no absolute truths at this point, it's just whatever truth you've set yourself up to align to. The only truth that should be addressed is that this should cease as it is - it's too fucked.
I feel you, all the stuff to do with kids I've seen has hurt my soul. My boy is 5 and it hurts.
It helps that they like using human shields.
I can't wait for hamas to be on the View and discuss extreme MAGA Republicans, that'll be peak Western commentary.Hilarious seeing people claiming that Israel is doing holocaust. Hamas couldn't have asked for better western support
www.linkedin.com
Exactly.
They've (Israel) been doing this from the beginning and still are. Think an Islamic nation would have bothered with all the paperwork, public warnings, warning taps or even the evacuation flyers. IDFs not firing rogue missiles into Gaza either. Attacks are planned carefully as I said previously to minimize civilian casualties.
Thats the thing isreal by and large is trying to do things right, yes they are some that are vindictive and vile, but they're the exception , isreals will occasionally hit the wrong target (or more likely one hamas was loading with human sacrifices) , but it isn't the policyNot saying a LinkedIn news editor is the best source but she kept this short and sweet. Right in the header (LinkedIn approved this newsletter too) Israeli's had confirmed Palestinians hit the hospital. Seems IDF whatever your view is of them is/has been to minimize collateral damage from the beginning. Gaza/Palestine/Islamic terrorists have done the contrary. Anyway, read carefully as the truth is there but typically with cited sources and short-handed. Appreciate all the updates I get from the thread too. I'm still at work for another hour and do some marketing in LinkedIn; so...I get GAF or LI to read for any given updates.
Israel-Hamas war: Latest updates | LinkedIn
Israel's military said it has started a wave of attacks in Lebanon, following an earlier rocket attack from Lebanon on a northern Israeli city.
Or they'll say say "those flames were AI generated." Just wait...
If that is a contravention of journalistic standards and something other than reporting on what others are saying it is, there are steps like journalistic reviews, hiring/firing, and such that could be considered before knee jerking to defunding and inadvetently push a monoply of private/corporate controlled news.
Now screwing with that would warrant arrest though, right? I mean, that's next level anti-Semitism to mess with a Holocaust monument.
It's adorable you think this is "knee jerk". You aren't familiar with the CBC narrative, are you?
It's cute that you think the everyone isn't familiar with the bs narrative fabricated against the CBC to push defunding by political activists.
The fuck. I know people at Kurecik and Incirlik, would appreciate it if you didn't treat them as sacrificial pawns to satisfy your war boner.
It's held to journalistic standards. It can be challenging to parse for those that think the the news is meant to tell them what to think and not inform them about what others are saying/doing then figure things out from there. CBC saying that someone(probably unreliable, but officially recognized) said it was an airstrike isn't them confirming anything more than someone is saying that. It's up to the reader to figure out if the source is reliable.
Whose standards, yours?
The truth doesn't require belief to be true. If people want to willfully believe something false because it satisfies their preconceptions then they have no integrity and their opinions aren't worth consideration.
