PROMETHEUS UNMARKED SPOILER THREAD!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Alternate prologue.

H5UoG.jpg

He died for us.
 
ehhh I just saw the movie and it was a ton of fun, plot holes and all, though I really don't like reading too much into these films partly because it was so goddamn heavy handed as is. like, what more is there to read into it? jesus was a fucking alien? oh and its damon lindelof so you know there's never going to be any answers cause he makes that shit up on the fly, and frankly, I don't want answers since they're almost always shit. just like how I didn't want answers for lost!

having said that, did idris elba and charlize theron have sex? that was really unclear and it's been bugging me for a while since i've gotten out of the cinema :lol. and the ending was fucking ridiculous. just let shaw die, ffs.
 
Why would anyone have been comparing the avengers and prometheus at all at any point? They're not at all the same kind of thing.
I'm guessing it's just that they're two of the biggest movies to have come out recently, and probably the two most likely to be watched by people who'd come to forums like this.

Although, I don't think the fan reactions to the two are wholly unpredictable. It seems to have been widely agreed upon that Ridley Scott has been slipping, whereas Joss Whedon still commands a fiercely loyal following. Throw him on a comic book movie, and it was sure that at worst his most serious fans would love it and it'd perform well on property alone.
 
But why? Why do this? For what purpose?

There's a much easier way to interpret things..

For a movie named Prometheus, there's not a lot of literal Prometheus stuff.. sure David steals the goo and slips it to the humans, but that doesn't quite match up with the myth.

Unless you look at the Engineer from the beginning of the film. He was in a round ship (sure it could be 2000 years old to explain the difference in ships) which could suggest a split in the Engineers.

Said Engineer steals from the gods and gives it to "humankind" and has to suffer for doing so.
 
I'm trying to imagine what the reaction would be on GAF if 2001 came out today after a similar hype campaign. Not saying Prometheus is on the same level of quality, but that would be an interesting sight to see.
 
I enjoyed the movie even though much of it made no sense. The 2 biggest WTF?'s for me:

* the implausibility of taking guys like the mad Scotsman with the red Mohawk on a trillion dollar mission

* the non-reaction of the characters after the C section scene
 
It's a 'yes, man' problem.

FOX badly wants him to make an Alien prequel, hence all the buzz. They will not say no to an idea he has because they want him to make it.

Lindeloff says yes to everything Scott wanted. He literally said he just transcribed what Scott wanted, without questioning much if any of it. Read the interviews, he admits this.

Certainly none of the actors on set would question the great Ridley Scott. He is the director at that point, playing God.

So it's all from him. His ideas. No one telling him no for fear he'll either a) fire them or b) decide it's not worth his trouble and stop making the film.

This film falls on Scott's shoulders. Lindeloff is a hack, that's confirmed after watching this film. But Scott could have done anything he wanted...and he chose this.

He was "the engineer."

Is such a thing even possible?

Why yes it George Lucas.

I don't really like the whole Jesus-was-a-space-jockey idea so I'm not going to think about it. Most of the theories that go down that line of thinking make me cringe but I wouldn't put it past them.

I really think the crab-man hulkout was just 1% off from being super awesome. It seems like a lot of people here (and me) thought that it was Holloway after being burned up. It's way cooler to know that it was the other dude who crab walked all the way back to the ship and then freaked out but the film didn't really make that obvious. That scene would have been so awesome if they had played it up just a little bit more. Instead it was like 'what's that oh it's a guy oh he's fighting people'.

That scene should have happened before Holloway got sick, not after.

edit: Looking at the concept art, with the xenomorph literally walking outside. Let me guess... the thing will get in a space ship and chase Shaw.
 
I'm trying to imagine what the reaction would be on GAF if 2001 came out today after a similar hype campaign. Not saying Prometheus is on the same level of quality, but that would be an interesting sight to see.

There would probably be a "2001 Blinded Me" thread.

ACID TRIP STARGATE SCENE IN 3D MY EYES
 
Haven't been through the entire thread yet, so not sure if this has been raised already, but why is the Engineer ship at the start of the movie (saucer) different from the one at the end (U shape)?

Maybe there are different races of Engineers, one wanted to create human life, the other wants to destroy it? Not sure how that fits in with the star map leading to a military outpost.

The ship at the start was E.T's. The captain of the ship marooned the Engineer on LV226 because he was unruly and a danger to those on board.
 
There's a much easier way to interpret things..

For a movie named Prometheus, there's not a lot of literal Prometheus stuff.. sure David steals the goo and slips it to the humans, but that doesn't quite match up with the myth.

Unless you look at the Engineer from the beginning of the film. He was in a round ship (sure it could be 2000 years old to explain the difference in ships) which could suggest a split in the Engineers.

Said Engineer steals from the gods and gives it to "humankind" and has to suffer for doing so.

Yes who is Prometheus in this movie? Only the Engineer in the beginning of the movie fits the bill, IMO. Weyland could be I guess. I thought (based on the Weyland TED talk) that the movie was going to be about how mankind created AI (played God) and was punished for doing so.
 
I'm trying to imagine what the reaction would be on GAF if 2001 came out today after a similar hype campaign. Not saying Prometheus is on the same level of quality, but that would be an interesting sight to see.

especially given kubrick was notorious for his continuity errors. I can't even imagine the outrage over something like the shining, which betrayed the book and had all kinds of little errors strewn throughout the movie, but since it's kubrick (who, I should preface, is fucking awesome) we can look back thirty years later and see that it really doesn't matter all that much.

that's the shitty thing about the hyper reactions to media these days - prometheus wasn't a classic or anything, but it's hard to analyze a film when every little piece of the film is going under the microscope. missing the forest for the trees, and all that.
 
Yeah tbh that scene came out of nowhere, and somehow he had all the facts about this place having not really done anything up to that point

Eh, he was the only person on the ship to have seen the video feeds from the other two guys finding the bodies piled up at the door. He saw everything that was going on, including entering on his own later. The film has gaps but they clearly showed him putting the pieces together before that scene (though it was clearly there for the benefit of those who hadn't stitched it together).
 
Eh, he was the only person on the ship to have seen the video feeds from the other two guys finding the bodies piled up at the door. He saw everything that was going on, including entering on his own later. The film has gaps but they clearly showed him putting the pieces together before that scene (though it was clearly there for the benefit of those who hadn't stitched it together).

I think the problem is that there was no real trial and error to gain information. It was the equivalent of 90s sitcom keyboard-tapping.
 
The ship at the start was E.T's. The captain of the ship marooned the Engineer on LV226 because he was unruly and a danger to those on board.

Not sure if you are being sarcastic (never know with you anymore) but I think general consensus is the Engineer in the beginning was on Earth and seeded the planet, creating life.
 
I found it hysterical when Elizabeth had her cesarian, walked out of the room and forgot to mention the GROTESQUE ALIEN she had just BIRTHED.

How convenient that her glaring oversight saved her life in the end. Ugh.
 
Not sure if you are being sarcastic (never know with you anymore) but I think general consensus is the Engineer in the beginning was on Earth and seeded the planet, creating life.

You didn't know if I was being sarcastic when I described the opening prologue as Spielberg's kid-friendly alien species marooning a god-like species on a planet for some Star Trek 09 conflict?
 
I'm trying to imagine what the reaction would be on GAF if 2001 came out today after a similar hype campaign. Not saying Prometheus is on the same level of quality, but that would be an interesting sight to see.

This is completely impossible to say because 2001 came out in a completely different time period, a completely different film culture, and a completely different film industry. We're living in a movie and science fiction culture that has been profoundly influenced by 2001 for decades. I assume you're half-suggesting that Prometheus could be initially misunderstood like 2001 or Scott's own Blade Runner. It's possible. But then, Scott has also made plenty of films that people have never given a shit about, then or now. It's just guessing for no reason.
 
that's the shitty thing about the hyper reactions to media these days - prometheus wasn't a classic or anything, but it's hard to analyze a film when every little piece of the film is going under the microscope. missing the forest for the trees, and all that.
The forest is highly problematic too.

I'm trying to imagine what the reaction would be on GAF if 2001 came out today after a similar hype campaign. Not saying Prometheus is on the same level of quality, but that would be an interesting sight to see.

2001 is fairly straightforward. There's no bullshit mythology. There aren't a dozen half-assed themes and metaphors floating around. There aren't characters acting like idiots.

It would be polarizing, but for basically the same reasons it's polarizing now.
 
I found it hysterical when Elizabeth had her cesarian, walked out of the room and forgot to mention the GROTESQUE ALIEN she had just BIRTHED.

How convenient that her glaring oversight saved her life in the end. Ugh.

Based on the contamination protocol she enacted on the chamber after getting out, she probably thought it had been killed or frozen or neutralized in some way.
 
The forest is highly problematic too.

haha, not saying it isn't. that wasn't pointed specifically towards prometheus, more just in general. like the avengers... lots of great "banter" (not really though) but the movie was just... nothing.
 
I haven't read the whole thread, but here's what I got out of the movie.

The engineers' weapons are xenomorphs. The black chemical infects beings with similar DNA to the engineers and causes them to birth xenomorphs. They created humans to breed xenomorphs, but their own weapon infected them and they never got to enact the plan.

This obviously begs the question: if this was just a military outpost, then where are the other engineers? Did they not notice one of their bases was compromised? Did they just scrap the project? Someone trip over a cord and delete all the files about Earth?

My audience cheered at the xenomorph ending.
 
Just saw it. I'm a big Alien fan, and I knew that this wasn't going to be an "alien" movie strictly speaking, but I was disappointed. Huge portions made no sense when taken by itself, and it looks like the internet is on fire with differing opinions that are equally worthless (no offense).
 
At the theater right now to see the movie, I'll give my impressions when it's over.

Movie starts in 5 minutes and there's less than 25 people. Love empty theaters
 
The engineers' weapons are xenomorphs. The black chemical infects beings with similar DNA to the engineers and causes them to birth xenomorphs. They created humans to breed xenomorphs, but their own weapon infected them and they never got to enact the plan.
.
Evolution from single cell organisms took, what, several million years? I guess that's what pisses me off the most with the whole film.

The super intelligent, incredibly strong, interstellar traveling species (that somehow has the same DNA as us yet isn't a homosapien) plans out creating a lesser form of themselves banking on natural selection (which, ya know, wouldn't be a good plan at all) on a several light years a way planet only to plan to murder them all by infecting them with a virus thing to turn them into monsters.... or something like that?

The movie didn't answer a single question that it began with, created more, and wasn't consistent. Terrible plot. Pretty movie but poorly planned.
 
They created humans to breed Xenomorphs?

Lol, so their master plan was to wait millions of years after they 'seeded' earth just so they could breed Xenomorphs?
 
Actually all this speculation reminds me of what went on online with the Matrix Reloaded. We all hoped the third movie would illuminate it and it was even worse :(
 
especially given kubrick was notorious for his continuity errors. I can't even imagine the outrage over something like the shining, which betrayed the book and had all kinds of little errors strewn throughout the movie, but since it's kubrick (who, I should preface, is fucking awesome) we can look back thirty years later and see that it really doesn't matter all that much.

that's the shitty thing about the hyper reactions to media these days - prometheus wasn't a classic or anything, but it's hard to analyze a film when every little piece of the film is going under the microscope. missing the forest for the trees, and all that.

The difference being that, while Kubrick had a lot of continuity and logical errors in his films, he still had that ability to set up an incredible atmosphere. This movie is lifeless. Events happen without any impact. People are infected, die, sacrifice themselves, and I didn't feel a damn thing.
 
"To create you must destroy first" Perhaps they just we're using us as breeding pods for the Xeno's. David's quotes seem to lend themselves to a lot of the different theories. I suppose it was a two birds with one stone deal, kill the humans off and breed a superior organism.
 
The creationism (at least in terms of adam and eve) debate is over, the christian/monotheist debate is over, it shouldn't appear as a legit alternative theory and having a scientist protagonist as a full blown christian is unacceptable in 2012 imo (or 2090 something whenever the movie took place).

U mad? :)

Just fyi, the guy in charge of the project to map the human genome is a "full blown Christian".

Anyway, the point is that evolution does not answer nor does it even attempt to answer the question of how life began.

Evolution *presupposes* a self replicating cell with all the complexity of a computer. The movie raises interesting questions about how this all started, hence Shaw's rhetorical question "Who made them?", "them" being the Engineers.

The movie had so many problems but it does succeed in bringing big philosophical questions to the masses, which I like.
 
http://www.slashfilm.com/interview-...-paradise-prometheus-plans-prometheus-sequel/

Ridley Scott: Try writing a book, dude. That’s difficult. Writing a screenplay is like writing a book, it’s that simple. You’ve got a blank page and that’s it, a blank page and then you go from there and everyone has their own method. I know some start here and end here and I’m good with writers. I think I would never try to write… I’ve written two or three screenplays before, but I wouldn’t do it. It takes too long and I would rather… Te time it would take me to write a screenplay it would take me the time to make two films. I would rather make the movies and I’m a better moviemaker than I a would be writer.

Ridley Scott: Totally. Very good. Yeah, we go too far, but then you can’t simply go too far, because by going too far “Are we living better today, despite all of the problems that exist, than the fifties?” Yes, of course we are. Then the eighteen fifties? No comparison. The nineteen hundred? No comparison in every shape and form, but are we heading towards a much larger problem? Definitely.

Ridley Scott: It’s a bit of each. You do a bit of each and I’ve opened the doors. I know where it’s going. I know that to keep him alive is essential and to keep her alive is essential and to go where they came from, not where I came from, is essential. That’s a pretty open door and then rather than going to that, I don’t see landing in a place that looks like paradise, that’s not how it’s going to be. There is a plan, yeah.

edit: Pretty clear the aliens did not plan to use humans to breed xenomorphs. They decided to change mankind's course after they didn't go in the direction they had hoped.
 
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Prometheus compared to Kubrick films. I watched someone say Prometheus was better than Alien. All those moments will be lost in cyberspace... like tears in syntax... time to hit F5.
 
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Prometheus compared to Kubrick films. I watched someone say Prometheus was better than Alien. All those moments will be lost in cyberspace... like tears in syntax... time to hit F5.

It's too bad it won't get a Director's Cut. But then, what does?
 
Also about the engineers (I explained this in detail before but whatever):

http://www.movies.com/movie-news/ridley-scott-prometheus-interview/8232

“I don’t want to go back to where I came from. I want to go where they came from.”

Movies.com: So that was always going to be the natural ending for this film?

RS: Totally. And because they’re such aggressive f**kers … and who wouldn’t describe them that way, considering their brilliance in making dreadful devices and weapons that would make our chemical warfare look ridiculous? So I always had it in there that the God-like creature that you will see actually is not so nice, and is certainly not God. As she says, “This is not what I thought it was going to be, and I think we should get the Hell out of here or there won’t be any place to go back to.”

That’s not necessarily planted in the ground at the tail end of the third act, but I knew that’s kind of where we should go, because if we’ve opened up this door -- which I hope we have because I certainly would like to do another one – I’d love to explore where the hell [Dr. Shaw] goes next and what does she do when she gets there, because if it is paradise, paradise can not be what you think it is. Paradise has a connotation of being extremely sinister and ominous.

Movies.com: We’re not going to get a slow build in this second film, then. These guys are volatile from the start?

RS: In a funny kind of way, if you look at the Engineers, they’re tall and elegant … they are dark angels. If you look at [John Milton’s] Paradise Lost, the guys who have the best time in the story are the dark angels, not God. He goes to all the best nightclubs, he’s better looking, and he gets all of the birds. [Laughs]

I started off with a title called Paradise. Either rightly or wrongly, we thought that was telling the audience too much. But then with Prometheus – which I thought was bloody well intellectual – that wasn’t my idea. It was Fox’s notion, It came from Tom Rothman, who’s a smart fellow. The more I thought about it, the more I thought it was a good idea. This is about someone who dares and is horribly punished. And besides, do you know something? A little bit of an education at the cinema isn’t such a bad thing.

Can someone explain me the ship st the beginning? Who what where?

It's in that interview. It's basically just showing how their DNA can be used to create life. Symbolic self-sacrifice to create life, etc. It's not on Earth.
 
They created humans to breed Xenomorphs?

Lol, so their master plan was to wait millions of years after they 'seeded' earth just so they could breed Xenomorphs?

It does make sense. I mean we don't know anything about these engineers yet. For all we know their society is full of war and they want to exploit biological weapons like we did in our past. Also, as seen in the original movies, humans really thought the Alien creatures to be "beautiful" and really wanted to study everything about it. They brought Ripley back to life in order to help breed one. Since these engineers have the same genetic makeup as humans, we can assume they probably think similarly as humans as well and wanted to really study the alien creatures. And just like in the original movies, their curiosity ended up killing a lot of them.
 
They are not growing humans to turn them into Xenomorphs. That much is clear. They created humans, THEN CHANGED THEIR MINDS. Even the movie says it clearly, and Scott confirms that yes this is the premise: they changed their minds. Shaw wants to know why, is going to find out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom