London 2012 Summer Olympics |OT3|

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well my wife is Japanese so it's easy to know who to cheer for in the Final.

If it was Canada vs. Japan in the final it'd be pretty rough in the house for a while:)
 
The handball was questionable, but what I saw is that it bounced off one player, whose arm was in an unnatural position upwards, and then glanced off the elbow of a player whose arm was at the side.

The second player received the yellow for some reason.

I might have seen wrong. Sunhi, redeem us.

Nah, that's how it went down, I just checked the stream again on NBC(1:32ish on the stream bar). The yellow/foul was called on the second player, who I don't think deserved it.
 
crying-eagle.jpg
 
That's not entirely true in practice. Handballs are frequently called even when it's seemingly unintentional if the referee deems that the player didn't make a strong enough effort to avoid it or even if they just determine it's worthy of calling a handball. It's why they don't always get a yellow even when the handball is called.

The ball was blasted at them. Their hands/arms were close to their bodies.

I know it's not always an easy decision to decide what was intentional or not, but for me this was pretty easy, there wasn't much they could do to get their hands out of the way in time.

I've read a few times in this thread that it happens all the time in men's football. I don't remember seeing many at all as bad as this. I wouldn't mind seeing some examples.
Handballs are hardly ever given inside the area, and when they are it's usually when the arm is raised well away from the body.

I mean I don't really care, I'm not Canadian, I'm just surprised so many people are defending the decision. If it was in the Champions League final there would be outrage.
 
Probably , anyway I still do not get why U.S. has great women football team and they suck in the mens one...I am pretty sure mens gets more money and support.

The competition is on a whole other level tbh... but from what i recall of the last WC, USA's team seems to have improved.
 
Probably , anyway I still do not get why U.S. has great women football team and they suck in the mens one...I am pretty sure mens gets more money and support.
Because very few countries in the world take women's football seriously. Which is a critique on the rest of the world, not USA.
 
Probably , anyway I still do not get why U.S. has great women football team and they suck in the mens one...I am pretty sure mens gets more money and support.

No clue either. The women have just always been a lot better than the men in comparison to the competition. PEACE.
 
This USA/Argentina game is going to go down as a flop battle. Argentina flying around left and right now.

Hilarious though that Chris Paul is being victimized on flops.
 
Probably , anyway I still do not get why U.S. has great women football team and they suck in the mens one...I am pretty sure mens gets more money and support.

Because there are a lot of ignorant fucking assholes in this country that believe that soccer is a girl's game, no joke.
 
Probably because many young athletic US men end up playing other sports.

This.

Football/soccer is huge at the youth levels in the US. But once you get into secondary school, most guys drop soccer and move into one of the more mainstream sports, while women remain playing soccer or basketball.
 
I'm so sad that Canada lost, not as a Canadian, but for Christine Sinclair. She played her heart. I hope she at least gets to bring home a Bronze. Imagine if she actually had a world class team backing her up. Team Canada may be pretty good, but they'd be crippled without her. The US could live without one of their stars such as Wambach, Rapinoe, Morgan, Solo, etc. Team Canada could not.

Best case scenario: gold for USA, silver for Japan, bronze for Canada.
 
Probably , anyway I still do not get why U.S. has great women football team and they suck in the mens one...I am pretty sure mens gets more money and support.

Actually, one of the consequences of Title IX (equal funding and opportunity for men and women athletes) is that many schools and colleges do not have men's soccer or volleyball programs, or if they do, intramural (i.e. doesn't really count). Basically with the 80+ men playing on football teams, schools have to use sports like soccer to give the women a sport the men don't have. As the big football program is what brings in the money for all the other sports, it's an arrangement most schools are fine with.

Edit: And the natural moving of men into baseball, basketball, and football as they age.
 
Yeah but it hasn't reached the levels of the "Big 4" yet.

I think MLS is much bigger than the NHL now...hockey is far more of a fringe sport really (in part due to the large number of Latinos who immigrate here from other countries). Both are a ways behind NCAAF and NCAABB though and the obvious Big 3.
 
Just saw the last of the football match between US and Canada. Very good game, and while I'm happy with US winning it.. I'll be rooting for Nadeshiko Japan on Thursday. :lol
 
No clue either. The women have just always been a lot better than the men in comparison to the competition. PEACE.

entirely different level of competition in the men's game. The European leagues and first divisions have been around a lot longer. The game is getting better for the men but it will take a long time to catch up. MLS is only in its 16th season.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom