#PS4NoDRM #XboxOneNoDRM || Now do you "Believe?"

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm sure it doesn't that's why you quoted it out of context.

What fucking context can make laughing at people's suffering ok?

None.


Accepting reality. You can all fight for your "rights", but unless you're taking sony to court ain't no way they listen. This is about making money...This is about earning a piece of the pie gamestop earn from ripping as all off. If they rot away in the end i'd be very happy actually. I hate gamestop.

OK well you "accept reality" while we voice our concerns as customers and refuse to just take an ass fucking like good little sheep.

Well, i'll enjoy reading the tears on gaf at E3 then

Cut and dry.
 
They're not getting shafted, they've sold their game. The new owner is doing with it what they please. It's no different than selling a house or a car. Selling an old collectable, or toy.

What you're suggesting is that we don't own the game, we merely rent/lease them. And fuck that.

Exactly. I've said it time and time again but what other industry thinks they deserve part of the used sales of their items? If this were any other industry everyone would be up in arms but because it's gaming people actually jump through some insane mental gymnastics to try and make it ok. It's not. It's really that simple.

IT'S NOT OK TO:

TAKE AWAY MY RIGHTS!
FOR YOU TO TELL ME IF I CAN SELL MY LEGALLY PURCHASED ITEM!
WHO I CAN AND CAN'T SELL IT TO!
TAKE PART OF THAT PROFIT FOR YOURSELF!
TREAT ME LIKE A CRIMINAL BECAUSE I LEGALLY BOUGHT YOUR PRODUCT!

It's just that simple.
 
This is one of the biggest problems in gaming right now. Currently it's unviable financially for the develper, soon it'll be unviable for the consumer as well. No one will pay that much for a game like that if they can't sell it on, or if the new price isn't driven down.

This also ties in heavily with the inflation of games budgets.

A B tier game(although still awesome) shouldn't have a large enough budget that it requires a price tag of 59.99. It should work like movies where the budget is 10 percent of a blockbuster therefore requires 1/10th the sales to be successful.

Although Publishers believe they have to pay the famous voice actors, the famous composers and make some cg for any game to be succesfull.

This line of thinking is doomed to fail.
 
yqWaq51.png
Lol
Best thing that comes out of this campagne.
 
Whatever happens, thanks to gaf and all the journalists/outlets (and other forums) who supported the effort.
 
I also like how some people on twitter have come out and said "This doesn't affect me" or "I always buy games new" but follow it up with "However I support #PS4NoDRM #PS4USEDGAMES"

It's a nice change from people not caring because it doesn't effect them.
 
To be perfectly honest when i made this thread my hope was for 2, maybe 3 pages of responses and like 50-75 tweets from members and lurkers.


What's happened is just amazing. This isn't about me (though I do want a tag!!!), I just mentioned an opening and everyone has jumped through. It's really cool. I also think (and hope) it's pretty goddamn hard to ignore.
 
No the point is to make it clear how we feel. We can't do anything more than that.

We can hope that it changes minds. We can hope it has a sea change effect on everything and even the xbone changes. But the point is for us, en masse, to let sony know how we feel so they can't feign ignorance. And it's on pretty good information that they are leaning this way already so several thousand tweets is a nice little push to help them over the wall.

Yes, for sure. If they were leaning that way already. the outpour of tweets against DRM can only help push them.

Hopefully your contacts have some idea how much of an impact it's making in a few days or whatever :p
 
What fucking context can make laughing at people's suffering ok?

None.

The one where i said if microsoft does it sony will follow and you wouldn't listen. And then we start a 100 threads pilling on sony when they actually said they would leave DRMs up to the publishers.
 
Exactly. I've said it time and time again but what other industry thinks they deserve part of the used sales of their items. If this were any other industry everyone would be up in arms but because it's gaming people actually jump through some insane mental gymnastics to try and make it ok. It's not. It's really that simple.

IT'S NOT OK TO:

TAKE AWAY MY RIGHTS!
FOR YOU TO TELL ME IF I CAN SELL MY LEGALLY PURCHASED ITEM.
WHO I CAN AND CAN'T SELL IT TO
TAKE PART OF THAT PROFIT FOR YOURSELF

It's just that simple.

Just like how Nintendo thinks they should get a cut of the profit generated by youtubers and streamers for playing their games. "Hey that's our game, getting played, and the money - it's all because of us!"

If they perceive it as a missing revenue stream, then it's a real thing for them.

They need to price their games differently Army of Two 3=/=Skyrim=/=Barbie's Horse Adventure=/=Super Mario Bros WiiU

Though, I'm sure some companies would just say "OUR GAME IS WORTH A HUNDRED DOLLARS!"
 
Can we include the head honchos of the big publishers like EA, Activision, Zenimax, ect?

Sony and MS are getting pressure from these people to implement such drm. Goto the source.

I support this cause. I'm all for developers getting a piece of the used game sales but that is IF I sell it. If I lend it to a friend he should not have to pay to play.
 
The one where i said if microsoft does it sony will follow and you wouldn't listen. And then we start a 100 threads pilling on sony when they actually said they would leave DRMs up to the publishers.

So when does that make it ok to be a self-centered asshole?


Accepting reality. You can all fight for your "rights", but unless you're taking sony to court ain't no way they listen. This is about making money...This is about earning a piece of the pie gamestop earn from ripping as all off. If they rot away in the end i'd be very happy actually. I hate gamestop.

OK well you "accept reality" while we voice our concerns as customers and refuse to just take an ass fucking like good little sheep.

Well, i'll enjoy reading the tears on gaf at E3 then
 
This thread and the whole movement has been pretty amazing. Been following this since morning and I'm amazed how big this got.

Had to make a Twitter account and make some tweets myself :)
 
I'm sure it doesn't that's why you quoted it out of context.
Accepting reality. You can all fight for your "rights", but unless you're taking sony to court ain't no way they listen. This is about making money...This is about earning a piece of the pie gamestop earn from ripping as all off. If they rot away in the end i'd be very happy actually. I hate gamestop.
Well, i'll enjoy reading the tears on gaf at E3 then
Quoted out of context? You think taking Sony to court is the only way of achieving something meaningful and anything else will result in you drinking gaf tears at e3. Is that your context?

Get lost.
 
So when does that make it ok to be a self-centered asshole?

Self centered? It might have been, i admit i might have used a strong choice of words but i'll still make a mention of how we should tame our expectations. This whole issue started with online passes....and no matter how much we complained it still never went away. Maybe gaf/consumers can make a difference, but i strongly doubt it.
 
It's funny to see how many tweets have a twitter egg icon (aka it's likely they've never tweeted before this). That's pretty awesome.
 
Quoted out of context? You think taking Sony to court is the only way of achieving something meaningful and anything else will result in you drinking gaf tears at e3. Is that your context?

Get lost.

#EXPOSED


Self centered? It might have been, i admit i might have used a strong choice of words but i'll still make a mention of how we should tame our expectations.

Don't worry about "our" expectations.
 
I also like how some people on twitter have come out and said "This doesn't affect me" or "I always buy games new" but follow it up with "However I support #PS4NoDRM #PS4USEDGAMES"

It's a nice change from people not caring because it doesn't effect them.

It shows that there is respect between gamers and that we don't like being fucked by a publisher.
 
No one is debating the reasoning for why games get sold back or the inadequate all titles are created equal therefore all new games must cost the same, the publishers just want a cut of that massive revenue stream because money.

It's not so much about making project 10 dollar universal so much as it is pressuring resellers to give a cut of resells to the publishers/developers.

Why should they get a cut of used games/resells? Do you give a cut of the money back to the manufacturers of every commondity you're done with, and have sold at a garage sale, flea market, ebay, newspaper ad etc?
Do the people you sold it to, do the same when they resell it? I can't think of any way this makes sense. A $70 commodity was purchased, enjoyed, perhaps shelved a while.. perhaps not. Owner then sells an unwanted item of his to whomever, as is the owners right to do in a free market economy, no?
 
Quoted out of context? You think taking Sony to court is the only way of achieving something meaningful and anything else will result in you drinking gaf tears at e3. Is that your context?

Get lost.

I used a strong choice of words....i'm not a sadistic asshole, apologies to gaf then. I only meant to tame our expectations for e3. Nothing more nothing less, i even started a thread on gaf debating this same point.
 
To be perfectly honest when i made this thread my hope was for 2, maybe 3 pages of responses and like 50-75 tweets from members and lurkers.


What's happened is just amazing. This isn't about me (though I do want a tag!!!), I just mentioned an opening and everyone has jumped through. It's really cool. I also think (and hope) it's pretty goddamn hard to ignore.

The internet is quite amazing, and so are you. Good one.
 
Why should they get a cut of used games/resells? Do you give a cut of the money back to the manufacturers of everything you're done with, and have sold at a garage sale, flea market, ebay, newspaper ad etc?

It's not a matter of whether or not they should at this point, I think how the publishers/developers feel is that there is a substantial % of customers that do not purchase their games on day 1 at full price. They wait several months and purchase reduced price copies.

Should they get a cut? Probably not.

But they, for the most part anyways, perceive the resell market to be a missing revenue stream (if only because the revenue generated by preowned games is rather large). And therefore want a piece of it.

Which is why I think this authentication fee is a kind of game they are playing with resellers is to pressure them into an agreement where they give a % of the revenue generated back to the people that made the game.
 
Resellers like Gamestop are getting all of the revenue generated from the re-sale of games, sometimes they sell the same game multiple times.

The people that make the game are getting shafted because their game is being purchased many times over, but none of the money is going to them.
You're a fool. That's all there is to it. Where do you think these used games came from? The way you talk, you act as if they were all stolen and the poor developers and publishers never saw a single cent.

They were purchased new at some point. The developers and publishers already got their cut and don't deserve any more.

I'm saying the publishers have been waiting so long to implement this. This isn't just about used games, it's about hacking and piracy too.
This kind of behavior only encourages those things. How else are people going to get around these draconian restrictions? They're going to find a way to hack the system which will enable piracy. Then the publishers, rather than learn from their mistakes, will just force even more restrictive DRM.
 
Uploaded an image of the NoDRM-website to a finnish website, which mainly posts funny pictures and videos, but has over 500,000 unique views per week if my memory serves. Hopefully they approve of it and post it :)
 
I don't have a twitter account, but rest assured, if I did I'd be right there rallying with you all. It's crazy how much this has blown up; hopefully Sony will see the light.
 
You're a fool. That's all there is to it. Where do you think these used games came from? The way you talk, you act as if they were all stolen and the poor developers and publishers never saw a single cent.

They were purchased new at some point. The developers and publishers already got their cut and don't deserve any more.

Apologies, I forgot to write "they feel" as though they are getting shafted.

The post above yours clarifies what I meant to say.
 
It's not a matter of whether or not they should at this point, I think how the publishers/developers feel is that there is a substantial % of customers that do not purchase their games on day 1 at full price. They wait several months and purchase reduced price copies.

Should they get a cut? Probably not.

But they, for the most part anyways, perceive the resell market to be a missing revenue stream. And therefore want a piece of it.

Which is why I think this authentication fee is a kind of game they are playing with resellers is to pressure them into an agreement where they give a % of the revenue generated back to the people that made the game.

I know where you're going man, but there's a percentage of consumers in the world who do not buy furtinture, cars, music, golf clubs, hell *anything* day 1 full price. A lot of people buy stuff used, and not from the original maker. I know it's not apples to apples 100%, but it's a slipperly slope. They way it works for most things is you buy something, you own it. From there, you can sell it. I'm sure developers would love to get double and triple dipping on the used sales, but it doesn't mean they should.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom