No she shouldn't.
So you want a 14 year old girl to be raped and beaten by full grown women?.
You are lower than a snakes asshole.
Do people honestly believe she should get out of this with a minor slap on the wrist? That would set an extremely bad precedent.
She should be tried as an adult.
Some girls can be quite heartless, couldn't she put the baby up for adoption?
There are some messed up people...
She was probably incredibly scared and panicked. Maybe a bit mentally not there either. People can do crazy things in times like that. Having a baby, alone in a toilet, no one knows, she'd be terrified. No excuse for what she did but there is...reasoning behind it. I can't imaging she was pleased at what she had done.
It sounds to me like this sort of legislation would only encourage baby murders.
She's 14. By 14 I knew not to get someone pregnant, but if I had by accident, I wouldn't kill it. I'd be scared as fuck, but however your quality of life would be impacted, you'd killed your own flesh and blood. That kid will never grow up, never call you by your name... it just sickens me.
I completely understand HER reasoning, but I don't understand why she reasoned that way.
and the 14 year old is lower than what?
Checking for a pulse means a fucking lot
Stories like this make me sick. My wife and I have been trying, unsuccessfully, to have a child for a year now. She is on fertility drugs, acupuncture, and I have been tested also.
Stories like this make me sick. My wife and I have been trying, unsuccessfully, to have a child for a year now. She is on fertility drugs, acupuncture, and I have been tested also.
That's pretty shocking and revolting.
I can hardly believe that a 14 year old could stealthily give birth when her mom was home
Imagine if that baby were to be another Einstein.
Imagine if that baby were to be another Einstein.
Sigh.
Are people seriously defending this girl for real? Yikes.
It's only a lot because it's written in the article for shock value.
The teen, who is 5 feet 3 inches tall and weighs about 100 pounds, told detectives she lifted the moving infant from the toilet, felt for a pulse...
Really?
If it was a 14 year old boy killing a baby, noone would defend it.
Okay, okay, I'm not really going to defend her, but there are some significant differences between a 14 year old boy killing a baby and a 14 year old girl who has just given birth killing her baby.
So it's not that bad, because it was her own baby?
It seems one of the bigger deterrents to an abortion was the requirement for parental consent. I understand why some places have this requirement in place, but I think it would be better to allow them to all ages, anonymously.
Question for legal-GAF:
In states with parental consent requirements, if the daughter wants an abortion but the parents don't allow for it, is it the parents' responsibility to care for the daughter's child until the daughter is 18?
Children don't have much in the way of rights. At least not if a parent or acting guardian (be it a person or agency) doesn't want them to.If we don't force adult women to give birth, why do we allow it to be a possibility for a child?
Like I said, I'm not going to defend her, but you have to accept that there are significant psychological and emotional processes that go on behind the scenes during a pregnancy and birthing that a 14-year-old boy just doesn't encounter.
Are people seriously defending this girl for real? Yikes.
I thought of this too. She might have done all of this to protect him, especially if he is over 18 (or he coerced/convinced her to). Pure speculation there.And I just noticed that the father of the baby isn't mentioned anywhere in the article.
See, you try to find excuses for her evil behaviour.
Because a girl wouldn't do that. A girl wouldn't do that to her own baby. There have to be reasons, which forced her to kill it. She could have just brought it to a hospital and leave the baby on the doorstep. Done. She knew that she was pregnant the whole time. It wasn't even one of the "oh, I didn't know that I was pregnant"-births.
See, if her 14 year old boyfriend killed it, noone would defend him, even if he "panicked" and "killed it" (even by accident), although it would have been his baby as well. But here, that girl killed it in cold blood. She knew what she was doing. 14-year olds are not babies anymore, they should definitely know that killing another human is murder. Still people look for reasons to defend it. Must have been her mother. Or someone else. Anything but her.
And I just noticed that the father of the baby isn't mentioned anywhere in the article.
What?Crazily, yes. There are a shit ton of wet blankets ITT who have totally glossed over the fact that this person choked the life out of another person and then concealed this act. At the age of 14 you know right from wrong. To state that she should not be tried for murder/manslaughter and subsequently incarcerated is a mind numbingly ludicrous position. She has comitted an unlawful and absolutely heinous killing. The responsibly for this act rests with her and she should be punished for it, to the fullest extent of the law.
I think he's saying we shouldn't bother with all that "extenuating circumstances" talk and just throw her in the slammer for 30-60 years. SoundsWhat?
Almost no one is saying she should walk free as if nothing happened.
Fuck this is depressing. God damn it.