Grimm Fandango
Member
Bulls philosophy: go up by 7 points then stick your thumb up your ass and let the opponents come back.
TheAtomicPile said:Oh my God, you will not let this go will you?
No, the exact definition of the word from Webster includes none of the additional stipulations you're adding about intent. If the meaning required intent, it would be written in the definition. The point of a definition is to explain the essential elements of a word's meaning. If it's not there, its not essential.
You're just bsing because you made a smart-ass comment and then realized, by way of my posting the definition, that you were wrong the whole time.
I understand the definition, as it is written, perfectly. Nobody needs your English lessons. Don't like it? Take up your beef with Webster.
Grimm Fandango said:Bulls philosophy: go up by 7 points then stick your thumb up your ass and let the opponents come back.
SephCast said:Korver's terrible 4 point play hurt a lot. Rose has to get aggressive. Hinrich has his number.
The #1 Option Beas era has recommenced.pilonv1 said:I see the Magic Randolph era is over.
SephCast said:Bulls playing like shit. Hawks seem to be a bad matchup against them.
Gigglepoo said:Boston's going to lose the #1 seed
punkypine said:LOL@ C's playing pavlovic in crunch time
Gigglepoo said:Rondo, Pierce, Garnet, and Rondo don't have any help!
Black Mamba said:Webster is correct. You are not. The problem is that Webster and other normal dictionaries often stop short of giving the entire context.
Let's refer to Oxford's English Dictionary, which is the authoritative source for the English Language.
"A condition of affairs or events of a character opposite to what was, or might naturally be, expected; a contradictory outcome of events as if in mockery of the promise and fitness of things."
Hence, Kobe going for a dunk, ball bouncing off the rim and into Miami's basket. That could be looked at as ironic because it's as if fate itself is mocking his intentions.
Kobe being less clutch than Miami is a mere coincidence. Truthfully, it's not even that, it's simply a significant probability playing itself out.
For the situation to be "other than expected," you'd have to assume the odds of it happening converge to zero. Does anyone actually believe that last night's ending with Kobe being less clutch is something ZOMG HOW COULD THAT HAPPEN type of thing.
Like I said, according to your interpretation, every upset in sports would be ironic. Does that make sense to you?