The Chosen One
Member
If John Wall is going to get ejected at least punch someone more important.
pilonv1 said:SIX POINTS FOR LIN
Grizz commentators are perplexed at how Radmanovic is scoring
dIEHARD said:Knicks suck ass on defense, why is anyone surprised or laughing.
dream said:Remember when the Knicks won a game and ESPN wrote an article about how the Knicks have jelled and New York Basketball is Relevant Again?
derp derp derp. TS is a horrible stat.ItWasMeantToBe19 said:Wright TS%: 55%
Beasley: 50%
Clearly higher percentage shooter there. Wright is a worse rebounder though which is pitiful. I'm not arguing for Wright, I'm arguing against the SF position. When guys who play 50 games a year and put up average stats will having a below average impact on offense execution and aren't even average defender can be considered top ten SFs, a position sucks. Whatever, let's continue debating which player sucks less like you always do instead of what I was saying.
TS is a perfect stat for today's 3pt chucking, foul baiting league. A guy that shoots 33 percent from 3 and 80+ from the line and gets there a lot is more valuable than a guy that shoots 50 percent, but hardly hits 3's or gets to the line.giri said:derp derp derp. TS is a horrible stat.
Dorrell shoots higher from the FT line, and 3. Which means he's just a set shot shooter (which correlates to what i see in games), you can get guys like Pietrus for that, and pietrus isn't top 10 anything (well, maybe fruit like sounding names). Beasley shoots an overall better FG%, which mean he's a much better finisher, and scorer off the dribble (pull up jumpers). AND beasley gets much more attention from defenses than Wright ever does.
The Frankman said:Someone GIF Biz Markie.
EDIT: OH MY GOD REFS LOL.
giri said:derp derp derp. TS is a horrible stat.
Dorrell shoots higher from the FT line, and 3. Which means he's just a set shot shooter (which correlates to what i see in games), you can get guys like Pietrus for that, and pietrus isn't top 10 anything (well, maybe fruit like sounding names). Beasley shoots an overall better FG%, which mean he's a much better finisher, and scorer off the dribble (pull up jumpers). AND beasley gets much more attention from defenses than Wright ever does.
I can see it in an argument for overall offeciency (though even there it's flawed). But in determing who is a better shooter, it's completely useless.charsace said:TS is a perfect stat for today's 3pt chucking, foul baiting league. A guy that shoots 33 percent from 3 and 80+ from the line and gets there a lot is more valuable than a guy that shoots 50 percent, but hardly hits 3's or gets to the line.
Thats not what it measures, and you saying it does, shows why you're using it wrong, and it's flawed.ItWasMeantToBe19 said:So you're saying that a stat that actually judges how many points you score per shot is bad? Really? Really? Beasley's effect on the offense is negative as he is a ball stopper who sucks, Wright's is positive as he is a floor spacer, neither are good players.
It doesn't determine who the better shooter is. Just who is the more efficient scorer. For all we know Ben wallace could be unbeatable in horse.giri said:I can see it in an argument for overall offeciency (though even there it's flawed). But in determing who is a better shooter, it's completely useless.
Why, just the other day some nong tried to tell me CP3 is a better shooter than Nash because his TS% is higher. I lol'd.
and to put on top of this point James, House and Jones did nothing to back up Z. The Heat are not what they used to be, Howard doing it old school.charsace said:JWall has gained more respect from me. Show dudes that you will retaliate.
Thats not what it measures, and you saying it does, shows why you're using it wrong, and it's flawed.
dream said:Deron made up for it though.
giri said:I can see it in an argument for overall offeciency (though even there it's flawed). But in determing who is a better shooter, it's completely useless.
Why, just the other day some nong tried to tell me CP3 is a better shooter than Nash because his TS% is higher. I lol'd.
Thats not what it measures, and you saying it does, shows why you're using it wrong, and it's flawed.
SamuraiX- said:MARCUS THORNTON HAVE MAH BAYBEHS!