• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

2012-13 Dec NBA Season lOT2l It Wasn't Me, It Was Uncle Drew

Wow I didn't see that Collison end of regulation shot until now. I would've stabbed Mayo right afterwards for wasting that miraculous shot (and incredible game).
 
KD is better than Melo. It's not an argument. The gap isn't some crazy gap, but it's there.

But Melo is an MVP candidate this year, and that's not an argument either.

Top players in the league this year are:

LBJ
KD
CP3
Melo
Kobe

Harden just misses that top 5 thusfar. Kobe can't be in front of Melo because his team isn't winning yet.

RE: the Bulls, that DEFENSE means that gutting the bench wasn't that much of a problem anyway. If Rose comes back even 75% of himself, they might go off in the second half.
 

Cloudy

Banned
LBJ
KD
CP3
Melo
Kobe

CP3 does not belong on this list. Ugh, PGs are so overrated..

BTW here's a new stat for the Kobe haters:

http://www.nba.com/mvp-ladder/2012-13/index.html

LAST WEEK: 36.0 ppg | 6.3 rpg | 4.0 apg

If the Lakers were as consistent with their play as Bryant has been with his scoring (10 straight games with 30 points or more), Bryant would take his rightful place among the top three candidates on this list. He is having a remarkable season, even by his lofty standards, when you consider his overall production. The strangest part for Bryant and the Lakers has to be the fact that the more Bryant scores, the better the chance the Lakers will lose (0-7 this season in games where Bryant scores 35 points or more).
 
CP3 does not belong on this list. Ugh, PGs are so overrated..

How could someone who has watched Chris Duhon and Darius Morris take turns fucking themselves on a court for the past few weeks not appreciate great PG play?

Your fellow fans are praying for Steve Blake's speedy recovery STEVE BLAKE! Nash has had a huge influence on The Lakers since his return and he's old as fuck.

Konex.....stahp
 

Cloudy

Banned
How could someone who has watched Chris Duhon and Darius Morris take turns fucking themselves on a court for the past few weeks not appreciate great PG play?

Your fellow fans are praying for Steve Blake's speedy recovery STEVE BLAKE! Nash has had a huge influence on The Lakers since his return and he's old as fuck.

Konex.....stahp

I appreciate good PG play but I'm not going to give one guy credit for another guy making his fucking shots! Just because our PGs suck doesn't mean CP3 is a legitimate MVP candidate.
 
Harden vs. CP3 in terms of who has been more valuable would be interesting in that CP3 is probably better per minute and per possession, but Harden has to play way more and use more possessions which would naturally make him more important to the Rockets winning than CP3 is to the Clippers winning.

Then again, you can say that about most great players on great teams versus great players on average teams which is why MVP is kind of a weird award in the NBA. The more good players there are on a team, the less value each individual player has because there's only one ball.
 
How could CP3 not count?

His ability to facilitate the offense is otherworldly. PGs aren't overrated when they play like he does. This isn't like some empty stats thing, like the legend of prime Marbury's 20 and 8.
 
I appreciate good PG play but I'm not going to give one guy credit for another guy making his fucking shots! Just because our PGs suck doesn't mean CP3 is a legitimate MVP candidate.

MVP discussions not involving KD or Bron aren't worth anyone's breath anyway. I think Lebron is the clear leader at this point in the season.
 
man Harden has been playing fucking fanatastic lately.
73JNI.png

He's becoming more and more consistent.
 

Cloudy

Banned
Also, what "huge influence" is Nash having exactly?. He is another legit scorer/shooter that we desperately needed and his PnR with Dwight is nice but I'm not seeing this "huge influence" yet.

Everyone is giving him kudos for his intangibles but are we scoring more with him? Nope. Less turnovers? Nope. Better FG% I doubt it.

Someone please show me how Nash has "completely changed" this team? Don't get me wrong, he is a great addition..but that's mostly because his backups are fucking terrible!
 

Cloudy

Banned
How legit is that chart because when I see this:
7v8fE.png

I can't help but think that it's broken.

Obviously folks who barely play should be discounted cos their stats are skewed. Those numbers show that LeBron (by far), Bosh and Wade have the most impact for Miami. On the other hand, the Clippers are KILLING teams with CP3 off the court. That is just a fact..
 

rando14

Member
Hmm maybe I could make an Angelfire website and make a few green boxes with players names in them and put some big numbers by the players I like. It'd be as legit as that website.
 

reilo

learning some important life lessons from magical Negroes
ESPN said:
Another day, another rout for the Clippers. But is that a good thing for Lob City? Adande: Daily Dime

:|

If the Lakers were winning 15 in a row, does JA Adande ask "is that a good thing?"
 
Also, what "huge influence" is Nash having exactly?. He is another legit scorer/shooter that we desperately needed and his PnR with Dwight is nice but I'm not seeing this "huge influence" yet.

Everyone is giving him kudos for his intangibles but are we scoring more with him? Nope. Less turnovers? Nope. Better FG% I doubt it.

Someone please show me how Nash has "completely changed" this team? Don't get me wrong, he is a great addition..but that's mostly because his backups are fucking terrible!

You got to be kidding.

Even from an individual stats perspective guess who is who, 2 are Duhon and Morris during Nash's injury and 1 is the games Nash has played since injury.


5pts 4 asts 41% from 3, 44% overall
5pts 2 asts 40% from 3, 37% overall
14pts 9 asts 66% from 3, 64% overall


Yea Nash's is a small sample size but...he's Steve fucking Nash.
 

Omega

Banned
CP3 does not belong on this list. Ugh, PGs are so overrated..

gtfo.

CP3 has always been disrespected. why is this? because he flops?

Whether it's people saying DWill was better couple years ago or people ignoring how he took shitty Hornets teams to the playoffs and having shitty overrated PGs like Rondo and Westbrook being considered better

you can't sit there and tell me this team would even be a winning team without CP3. but Kobe gets an MVP nod for leading his team to a sub .500?
 

Sharp

Member
The Clippers are KILLING teams with CP3 off the court. That is just a fact..
Konex, even ignoring for the moment the fact that the stat is largely useless over a single season for a single player (it will tell you who sucks and who doesn't suck, but that's about it), who do you think is usually on court when CP3 is off it? The rest of the starters, or the bench? The other team's starters, or the other team's bench? The Clippers have a well-above average bench that blows out other teams' benches, but that doesn't actually make them better players than the starters.
 

reilo

learning some important life lessons from magical Negroes
An ORtg of 126 is just stupid. Especially over a span of 30 games while playing 33mpg. Good grief.

Kobe's career-high ORtg is 117 --- THIS season. Magic had a ORtg of 126 in 89-90.
 
Konex is right about one hing, Steve Nas isn't going to lift LA out of the throes of mediocrity any time soon.

Literally no one expects that. Even the least engaged Lakers-age members knew if our starters weren't 100% then they'd struggle.

Dwight isn't Dwight, Nash has played 4 games only 2 under the new offense and Pau is falling apart.

Only Kobe and Metta have shown up 100% this year.
 

Cloudy

Banned
You got to be kidding.

Even from an individual stats perspective guess who is who, 2 are Duhon and Morris during Nash's injury and 1 is the games Nash has played since injury.


5pts 4 asts 41% from 3, 44% overall
5pts 2 asts 40% from 3, 37% overall
14pts 9 asts 66% from 3, 64% overall


Yea Nash's is a small sample size but...he's Steve fucking Nash.

Yes, individually Nash is much better than his backups. We all know that. I've been told he's "turned the team around in 3 games!" I don't see it. He is a good role player..period.
 

Cloudy

Banned
The Clippers have a well-above average bench that blows out other teams' benches, but that doesn't actually make them better players than the starters.

I would say Crawford is easily the 3rd best player on that team and Barnes and Bledsoe have a case for top 5.
 

Cloudy

Banned
An ORtg of 126 is just stupid. Especially over a span of 30 games while playing 33mpg. Good grief.

Kobe's career-high ORtg is 117 --- THIS season. Magic had a ORtg of 126 in 89-90.

CP3 is not even in the same league as Kobe as an offensive player and will never be. That stat is obviously skewed for high assist guys. BOGUS
 

reilo

learning some important life lessons from magical Negroes
I would say Crawford is easily the 3rd best player on that team and Barnes and Bledsoe have a case for top 5.

That's called optimizing your line-ups. The same way that Manu is a starting caliber 2G but for strategic purposes, he plays off the bench.

CP3 is not even in the same league as Kobe as an offensive player and will never be. That stat is obviously skewed for high assist guys. BOGUS

ROLL FUCKING EYES. Stop (triple) posting.
 
Yes, individually Nash is much better than his backups. We all know that. I've been told he's "turned the team around in 3 games!" I don't see it. He is a good role player..period.

Being twice as good as all the other PG options COMBINED isn't enough for you?

And who the fuck said he turned the team around? He gives them much more offensively while being slightly worse than Darrius on D and about as bad as Duhon.

Dwight returning to defensive anchor is the only thing that can save this team. People forget that he wasn't expected to even be on the court til January. I'm still not certain that Defensive Dwight will return in time for The Lakers to make a deep playoff run, but we'll see.
 
Konex, even ignoring for the moment the fact that the stat is largely useless over a single season for a single player (it will tell you who sucks and who doesn't suck, but that's about it), who do you think is usually on court when CP3 is off it? The rest of the starters, or the bench? The other team's starters, or the other team's bench? The Clippers have a well-above average bench that blows out other teams' benches, but that doesn't actually make them better players than the starters.

Exactly. Our bench is better than the starters of some teams, but they really shine when going up against other benches. If you've watched CP3 and Bledsoe play for any considerable amount of time and still think that Bledsoe is better, then I really don't know what to tell you. I guess your main beef with PGs is that they might prevent Kobe from taking more shots.
 

linsivvi

Member
CP3 is not even in the same league as Kobe as an offensive player and will never be. That stat is obviously skewed for high assist guys. BOGUS

Just like defensive rating is skewed against guards, just like your 82games chart doesn't care about bench quality.

All sport stats are bogus if you just use them out of context to suit your narrative.
 

Sharp

Member
I would say Crawford is easily the 3rd best player on that team and Barnes and Bledsoe have a case for top 5.
Supposing for the moment that this was true, which I am not saying it is, wouldn't the fact that they are coming in off the bench and facing relatively weak opposition in the form of the other team's bench inflate their stats absurdly? It's like comparing a prospect's numbers in the minor leagues in baseball to those of actual major leaguers playing against major league competition, and using that as proof that the prospect was better. Do you really not see the problem with that comparison?

That's the biggest reason individual simple +/- requires such a huge sample... it's way too easily affected by the quality of the team around you, your role on the team, and the opposition you face. To use another analogy from baseball, it's like looking at RBIs: if you have a lot of RBIs you're probably good, and if you have a terrible +/- you probably suck, but trying to compare players on that basis is pointless.
 
Top Bottom