They actually don't.. really only Magic can say he chipped without a big in the finals.. did it in style as well..
I don't decide to take away ALL the credit.. but having a great big with a wing = championship. Always has. You are the one with a bias.. not me. I have no team. I have no rivals. Now I am just a fan of the sport and the history. History tells us that bigs are more important than wings.. the closest team to not have a true dominate big man were the Larry Brown Pistons but I would argue that Wallace decided to actually play big that year and their defense was insane..
I think it is you who are undervaluing the effect a big has for Kobe
And yeah, having the greatest big men of all time are the only reasons the Lakers chipped..
*facepalm*
In a Lakers Jersey, the three wings have more Finals MVP's and more Chips than the 3 Bigs you listed. They've played more years with LA, hold more records, more All Star Appearances while in LA, More Awards while in LA...
MORE ACCOMPLISHMENTS WHILE IN LA THAN THE BIGS
That's just not debate-able man. It's not a matter of opinion. Kareem's
LA Career isn't as accomplished as Magics, Wilt's
LA Career isn't as accomplished as West's, Shaq's
LA Career isn't as accomplished as Kobe's.
Wrong - Great Bigs don't win with just
any wing. You need a
great Wing. Kareem needed the Big O and Magic, Russell needed Havlicek and Cousy, Wilt and Jerry, Shaq and Kobe / Wade, McHale had Bird etc.
The
only Big to win without a
great wing was Hakeem, but Hakeem wasn't on the Lakers, so wtf does that have to do with Lakers history?
Oh and Mikan, but that was pre-shot clock era, and that wasn't basketball, it was
hold the ball
You act like great Bigs can win with just any wing, and that's where you're wrong. That's why I gave you the list of all the All Star's Shaq's played with his whole career. He's
never played a single season without at least 1 or 2 perimeter all stars.
Kareem is higher on the all time great list than Magic
Wilt is higher on the all time great list than West
But Magic and West's
Laker careers are better than Kareem's and Wilt's...is that so hard to understand?
Uhh he shot 44.2% .. compared to 58% for Pau, a pretty staggering difference and calls for a "definitely".
Bigs shoot at a higher % than perimeter players! News at 11, and no, he didn't. He shot 46.8% - or rounded up 47%...wtf are you reading?